{"id":375981,"date":"2026-02-18T11:00:38","date_gmt":"2026-02-18T05:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375981"},"modified":"2026-02-18T11:04:20","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T05:34:20","slug":"cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/","title":{"rendered":"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Competition Commission of India:<\/span> In the Information filed by Matrix Info System Pvt Ltd (‘informant’), under Section 19(1)(a)<\/a> of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a> (‘the Act’) against Intel Corporation alleging contravention to Section 3<\/a> and 4<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, the bench comprising of Ravneet Kaur (Chairperson)<\/span>, Anil Agrawal (Member)<\/span>, Sweta Kakkad (Member)<\/span>, and Deepak Anurag (Member)<\/span> stated that Intel abused its dominant position by enforcing an unfair and discriminatory India-specific warranty policy for boxed microprocessors imported from authorized overseas distributors. This conduct violated Sections 4(2)(a)(i)<\/a>, 4(2)(b)(i)<\/a>, and 4(2)(c)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> caused appreciable adverse effect on competition in the Indian market and denied consumers proper warranty service on genuine Intel products between 25-4-2016 and 1-4-2024. Further, after considering mitigating factors, such as Intel operating in a dynamic technology market, its full cooperation during the investigation, and withdrawal of the India-specific warranty policy, CCI imposed a fine of Rs. 27.38 crore on Intel for violating Section 4<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In the present case, the informant is a Delhi-based IT private trading company incorporated in 2015 under the Companies Act, 2013<\/a> that imports and sells computer parts, including Intel microprocessors in India. The informant stated itself to be a parallel importer, which is legally permissible. As per the Informant, parallel imports are beneficial for the consumers as import of goods from a country with lower prices force sellers in the country of destination to reduce prices.<\/p>\n

Prior to 2016, Intel provided a worldwide warranty on its Boxed Micro-Processors. This meant customers in India could claim warranty even if the product was purchased abroad. However, from 25-04-2016, Intel introduced an India-Specific Warranty Policy, under which warranty in India would be given only if the processor was purchased from Intel’s authorized Indian distributors. If bought from outside India, customers won’t be able to claim warranty inside India.<\/p>\n

The informant claimed that this policy affected its business and other independent resellers because customers preferred products with valid Indian warranty. It also alleged that the policy reduced consumer choice and allowed Intel’s authorized distributors in India to charge higher prices though bought at very low prices from abroad. The Informant further argued that Intel is being dominant in the Indian market for boxed microprocessors and misused this dominance by imposing unfair conditions, unfair pricing and restricting market access to parallel or competitor importers.<\/p>\n

At the beginning, the CCI found a prima facie case and ordered an investigation. Intel challenged this before the Karnataka High Court, wherein the petition was dismissed. Intel filed an interlocutory application stating that its warranty service policy in India to a world-wide warranty service policy, effective from 1-4-2024 due to business reasons.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n

1. Relevant Market<\/p>\n

CCI stated that the relevant market has two dimensions: the relevant product market and the relevant geographic market. CCI noted that a micro-processor is a type of miniature electronic device that contains arithmetic, logic and control circuitry, necessary to perform the functions of a digital computer’s CPU. Intel has two types of Intel micro-processors for PCs: (a) Tray microprocessors, and (b) Boxed microprocessors.<\/p>\n

CCI stated that the investigation established boxed microprocessors are supplied only for desktop PCs in India, as neither Intel nor its competitor sell boxed microprocessors for laptops. Further, authorized distributors confirmed that they have no arrangements for laptop boxed microprocessors with the opposite party. Accordingly, CCI delineated the relevant product market as “Boxed Microprocessors for Desktop PCs in India.”<\/span><\/p>\n

CCI noted that Intel does not manufacture microprocessors in India; instead, all products are imported either directly or through authorized distributors abroad. CCI further observed that the allegations relate specifically to changes in warranty policy applicable to India, thereby affecting Indian consumers under an India-specific framework. Since competition conditions are uniform throughout the country, CCI determined the relevant geographic market to be India<\/span> and accordingly defined the relevant market as “Boxed Microprocessors for Desktop PCs in India.”<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Assessment of dominance and abuse thereof<\/p>\n

CCI noted that Intel is consistently leading the market of Boxed Microprocessors for desktop PCs with a significantly high market share. Throughout 2016 to 2021, Intel remained the top player. Thus, the Intel was in a dominant position from 2016 to 2021. Further, Intel held proprietary right over x86 architecture and is manufacturing most diversified variants of micro-processors in India. Major computer manufacturers like Acer, Apple, ASUS, Dell etc. are selling their PCs with inbuilt micro-processors manufactured by Intel. This increases the dependence of distributors as well as final consumers on Intel.<\/p>\n

CCI observes the finding of the DG that Intel abused its dominance by way of introducing India Specific Warranty Policy, which was:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Discriminatory in nature, when compared to its warranty policy in China, Australia and rest of the world;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    compelled parallel importers to buy boxed microprocessors only from its authorized Indian distributors at higher prices, instead of sourcing them cheaper from overseas. This reduced consumer choice, kept prices high, and restricted competition in the Indian market, violating Section 4(2)(b)(i)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    affected the sales of parallel importers whose sales remained constant or declined despite growth in the industry, leading to denial of market access in Section 4(2)(c)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    3. Unfair and\/or discriminatory condition<\/p>\n

    CCI observed that Intel had a global warranty policy but applied a separate India-specific warranty with restrictive conditions, unlike the policies in Australia and China. This India-specific policy was found to be unfair and discriminatory under Section 4(2)(a)(i)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, as it deprived Indian consumers of proper warranty service on genuine Intel boxed microprocessors from 2016 until Intel withdrew the policy in 2024.<\/p>\n

    CCI stated that by introducing India Specific Warranty Policy, OP encouraged parallel importers\/ traders to buy from authorized distributers at higher prices. It also limited the choice of end consumers in India and forced them to buy from authorized distributers in India at relatively higher prices, in contravention of Section 4(2)(b)(i)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>. CCI stated that change in warranty policy resulted in an increase in sales of authorized distributors of Intel to the disadvantage of parallel importers thereby causing denial of market access in contravention of Section 4(2)(c)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    4. Appreciable adverse effect on competition<\/p>\n

    CCI noted that a warranty is one of the relevant factors in the purchase of a boxed microprocessor as it protects against manufacturing defects, minimizes costs associated with premature failure, and offers peace of mind to the consumer. Further, Intel’s own warranty claim data from 2016—2021 shows that its microprocessors can fail. Given the critical role of microprocessors in desktop PCs, denying warranty service in India for products bought from authorized overseas distributors could harm consumers and create an appreciable adverse effect on competition in the Indian market.<\/p>\n

    5. Conclusion<\/p>\n

    CCI concluded that Intel abused its dominant position by enforcing an unfair and discriminatory India-specific warranty policy for boxed microprocessors imported from authorized overseas distributors. This conduct violated Sections 4(2)(a)(i)<\/a>, 4(2)(b)(i)<\/a>, and 4(2)(c)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, caused appreciable adverse effect on competition in the Indian market, and denied consumers proper warranty service on genuine Intel products between 25-4-2016 and 1-4-2024.<\/p>\n

    After considering mitigating factors, such as Intel operating in a dynamic technology market, its full cooperation during the investigation, and withdrawal of the India-specific warranty policy, CCI imposed a fine of Rs. 27.38 crore on Intel for violating Section 4<\/a> of the Act<\/a>. CCI noted that Intel withdrew its India-specific warranty policy from 1-4-2024 and directed Intel to widely publicize this change to raise consumer awareness and submit a compliance report.<\/p>\n

    [Matrix Info System (P) Ltd v. Intel Corpn., 2026 SCC OnLine CCI 6<\/a>, decided on 12-02-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For the Petitioner:<\/span> Khyati Dhupar ,Adv; Yashwardhan Singh, Adv; Swarendu Chatterejee, Adv; Sunil Jain; Priyanka Jain ; Prachi Jain<\/p>\n

    For the Respondent:<\/span> Samar Bansal, Adv;Karan Chandhiok, Adv;Tarushi Guliani, Adv;Aileen Aditi Sundardas,Adv; Evangelina Almirantearena<\/p>\n

    For Intel Technology India Private Limited:<\/span> Karan Chandhiok, Adv.; Avinash Amarnath, Adv; Nicky Collins, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    CCI noted that warranty is an important factor when buying a boxed microprocessor, as it protects against defects and gives consumers confidence. Intel’s data from 2016—2021 shows failures do occur, so denying warranty in India for products bought abroad harms consumers and creates adverse effects on competition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":375986,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[37057,98995,98994,2505,98996,98997],"class_list":["post-375981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-abuse-of-dominant-position","tag-anti-competitive-warranty-policy","tag-chairperson-ravneet-kaur","tag-Competition_Commission_of_India","tag-restriction-on-parallel-imports","tag-unfair-pricing"],"yoast_head":"\nCCI imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-18T05:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-18T05:34:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/\",\"name\":\"CCI imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-18T05:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-18T05:34:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Competition Commission of India imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCI imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance | SCC Times","description":"Competition Commission of India imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors","og_description":"Competition Commission of India imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-18T05:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-18T05:34:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/","name":"CCI imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-18T05:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-18T05:34:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Competition Commission of India imposes penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/cci-imposes-penalty-on-intel-corp-for-abuse-of-dominance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CCI imposes Rs 27 Crores penalty on Intel Corp. for abuse of dominance through India-specific warranty policy on boxed microprocessors"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/penalty-on-Intel-Corp.-for-abuse-of-dominance.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293089,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/25\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-petition-by-judicial-officer-challenging-appointment-of-charman-of-competition-commission-of-india-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":375981,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses petition filed by a retired judicial officer challenging selection of Chairman at Competition Commission of India","author":"Arunima","date":"May 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Additional Solicitor General submitted that Ms. Ravneet Kaur, an IAS officer was appointed as Chairman, Competition Commission of India by the Selection Panel.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/05\/cci-ravneet-kaur-iba-conference-mergers-acquisitions-usd-30-trillion-goal\/","url_meta":{"origin":375981,"position":1},"title":"\u2018For economic development, M&A is one of key ways to foster business expansion\u2019: CCI Chair Ravneet Kaur at IBA Conference on M&A in India","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Ms. Ravneet Kaur delivered a keynote speech on the topic \u2018Antitrust\/competition policy and enforcement\u2019 at the International Bar Association (IBA) Corporate and M&A Law Committee conference on \u2018Mergers and Acquisitions in India: a key engine to the USD 30 trillion goal\u2019 at Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai.","rel":"","context":"In "Events\/Webinars"","block_context":{"text":"Events\/Webinars","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/events-and-webinars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"IBA M&A conference","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IBA-MampA-conference.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IBA-MampA-conference.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IBA-MampA-conference.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IBA-MampA-conference.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362966,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/08\/cci-on-abuse-of-dominance-by-icici-securities-nse-bse\/","url_meta":{"origin":375981,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Several key players act as competitive constraint\u2019; CCI dismisses anti-competitive, abuse of dominance allegations against ICICI Securities, NSE & BSE","author":"Sanket","date":"October 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe alleged conduct of concerted practice by NSE and BSE of prescribing standard agreement flows from the regulatory architecture and therefore, does not attract the provision of Section 3(3) of the Competition Act, 2002.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350856,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/18\/cci-dismisses-abuse-of-dominant-position-duopoly-claim-against-hindalco-vedanta-scc-times-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375981,"position":3},"title":"Read why CCI dismissed claim against Hindalco and Vedanta alleging duopoly & abuse of dominant position vis-a-vis copper supply","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe condition for de-pricing and recovery of loss for the booked copper is applicable only in case the terms of the contract are not fulfilled by the purchaser resulting in loss to the seller. Such condition in the commodity market which is prone to price risks cannot be considered to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Competition Commission of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/cci-competition-law-workshop-dsnlu-visakhapatnam-2026\/","url_meta":{"origin":375981,"position":4},"title":"Competition Law as the Backbone of Market Economy: CCI Chairperson Ravneet Kaur Addresses Regional Workshop at DSNLU, Visakhapatnam","author":"Editor","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India organised a regional workshop on competition law at Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University where Chairperson Ravneet Kaur discussed the role of competition law in strengthening market economies.","rel":"","context":"In "Law School News"","block_context":{"text":"Law School News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/lawschoolnews\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CCI Competition Law Workshop DSNLU","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/CCI-Competition-Law-Workshop-DSNLU.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/CCI-Competition-Law-Workshop-DSNLU.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/CCI-Competition-Law-Workshop-DSNLU.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/CCI-Competition-Law-Workshop-DSNLU.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/cci-dismisses-abuse-of-dominance-case-against-gmr-hyderabad\/","url_meta":{"origin":375981,"position":5},"title":"CCI dismisses abuse of dominance case against GMR Hyderabad Airport Ltd; cites operational constraints for non-renewal of license","author":"Sanket","date":"September 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Non-renewal of the Informant\u2019s license for space on the airside of Rajiv Gandhi International Airport does not have the potential to limit and restrict the provision of Line Maintenance Services, so as to cause prejudice to the consumers and hence, is not in contravention of Section 4(2)(b) of the Competition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"abuse of dominance","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/abuse-of-dominance.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375981\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375986"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}