{"id":375953,"date":"2026-02-18T09:00:01","date_gmt":"2026-02-18T03:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375953"},"modified":"2026-02-24T13:04:50","modified_gmt":"2026-02-24T07:34:50","slug":"ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/","title":{"rendered":"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a bail application revolving around the question whether the arrest is vitiated for non-communication of &#8216;grounds of arrest&#8217; as mandated by Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\">22(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804205\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (&#8216;BNSS&#8217;), especially in the context of an offence under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\">Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985<\/a> (&#8216;NDPS Act&#8217;), a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. Kauser Edappagath<\/span>, J., held that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and that informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 21-1-2025 at 12.50 p.m., Accused 1 and 2 were found in possession of 221.89 grams of MDMA inside an almirah in a hotel room, for sale. Accused 1 (&#8216;applicant&#8217;) was arrested on 20-5-2025, and judicial custody continued thereafter. He was charged with offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570294\" target=\"_blank\">22(c)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570301\" target=\"_blank\">27A<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001570304\" target=\"_blank\">29<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802179\" target=\"_blank\">NDPS Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicant&#8217;s counsel submitted that the requirement of informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest is mandatory under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\">22(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804205\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a>, and since the applicant was not furnished with the grounds of arrest, the arrest was illegal and he must be released on bail. It was contended that the notice informing the written grounds of arrest under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804205\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804072\" target=\"_blank\">35(1)(b)(ii)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a> did not contain the quantity of contraband seized, vitiating the arrest in an NDPS case. On the other hand, the Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that all legal formalities were complied with in accordance with at the time of arrest. It was further submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of intentional criminal acts and that bail was not warranted at this stage.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Chapter 5 BNSS deals with arrest, that Section 35(1) lists cases when police may arrest without warrant; and that Section 47 clearly states that every police officer arresting any person without a warrant shall forthwith communicate to him full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested or other grounds for such arrest. The Court further noted that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\">22(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> provides that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that the requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory statutory and constitutional requirement. The Court opined that the non-compliance with Article 22(1) is a violation of a fundamental right and of the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pankaj Bansal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4wdg8fRG\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0563c1;\">(2024) 7 SCC 576<\/span><\/a>, and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prabir Purkayastha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d19TH88G\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0563c1;\">(2024) 8 SCC 254<\/span><\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that informing a person of the written grounds of arrest is a mandatory requirement under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\">22(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804205\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a>, and its absence renders the arrest illegal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vihaan Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H6294P4D\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0563c1;\">(2025) 5 SCC 799<\/span><\/a>, it was reiterated that informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is mandatory, although there is no need to communicate the grounds in writing. The Court also referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oRHj9Sk2\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0563c1;\">(2026) 1 SCC 500<\/span><\/a>, wherein it was held that the grounds of arrest must be informed to the arrested person in each and every case without exception, and that the mode of communication must be in writing in the language he understands.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding NDPS cases, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yazin S<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Kerala<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KOAe9MhU\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0563c1;\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 15334<\/span><\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rayees. R.M.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Kerala<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/iTNC92N0\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #0563c1;\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 7502<\/span><\/a>, wherein it was made mandatory to specify the quantity of the contraband seized while communicating the grounds of arrest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the notice informing the written grounds of arrest in the present case did not mention the quantity. However, the Court opined that no contraband was seized from the applicant&#8217;s possession, rather it was seized from the possession of other accused persons. The Court noted that the specific allegation against the applicant was that he supplied the contraband to the co-accused from Bangalore and stayed with them in a lodge at Bangalore, and that this specific role and the detailed grounds for arrest were clearly mentioned in the notice issued under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804205\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804072\" target=\"_blank\">35(1)(b)(ii)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the requirement of communicating the quantity of the contraband seized cannot be interpreted to apply to all accused regardless of their complicity. The Court highlighted that the specification of quantity needs to be communicated only to those accused from whose possession the contraband was seized. As for other accused from whom no contraband was seized, it was sufficient if their role in the crime and the grounds for arrest were communicated to them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the Court found satisfactory compliance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804205\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">BNSS<\/a> and Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574961\" target=\"_blank\">22(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and dismissed the bail application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Imran v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jSd0P233\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Ker 1959<\/a>, decided on 10-02-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Applicant:<\/span> P. Mohamed Sabah, Libin Stanley, Saipooja, Sadik Ismayil, R. Gayathri, M. Mahin Hamza, Alwin Joseph, Benson Ambrose, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> K.A. Noushad, SR. Public Prosecutor.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory statutory and constitutional requirement, and the non-compliance with Article 22(1) is a violation of a fundamental right and of the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":375956,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[78032,74832,63897,98985,2523,51407,64066,98986,78664,52894],"class_list":["post-375953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21-constitution","tag-article-221-constitution","tag-grounds-of-arrest","tag-justice-dr-kauser-edappagath","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985","tag-ndps-case","tag-section-351bii-bnss","tag-section-47-bnss","tag-seized-contraband"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC: Quantity of substance not required in NDPS arrest| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court observes that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and informing role and grounds of arrest is sufficient.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court observes that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and informing role and grounds of arrest is sufficient.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-18T03:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-24T07:34:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC: Quantity of substance not required in NDPS arrest| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-18T03:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-24T07:34:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court observes that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and informing role and grounds of arrest is sufficient.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"Quantity of substance not required in NDPS arrest\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC: Quantity of substance not required in NDPS arrest| SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court observes that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and informing role and grounds of arrest is sufficient.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC","og_description":"Kerala High Court observes that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and informing role and grounds of arrest is sufficient.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-18T03:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-24T07:34:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/","name":"Ker HC: Quantity of substance not required in NDPS arrest| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-18T03:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-24T07:34:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Kerala High Court observes that quantity need not be communicated if no contraband is seized from NDPS accused and informing role and grounds of arrest is sufficient.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"Quantity of substance not required in NDPS arrest"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/18\/ker-hc-quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-ndps-arrest\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Informing role and grounds of arrest sufficient in NDPS case with no contraband recovery; quantity need not be conveyed: Kerala HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Quantity-of-substance-not-required-in-NDPS-arrest.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355218,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/01\/kerala-hc-grants-bail-ndps-case-as-grounds-for-arrest-not-communicated\/","url_meta":{"origin":375953,"position":0},"title":"\u2018No grounds for arrest communicated in arrest intimation or memo\u2019; Kerala HC grants bail in NDPS case","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNeither in the arrest intimation nor in the arrest memo is there anything to indicate that the grounds for arrest were communicated to the accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala HC NDPS bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Kerala-HC-NDPS-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282527,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/27\/vehicle-piloting-or-accompanying-another-vehicle-transporting-narcotic-drug-and-psychotropic-substances-cannot-be-held-as-vehicle-used-as-conveyance-in-carrying-the-contraband\/","url_meta":{"origin":375953,"position":1},"title":"Vehicle piloting or accompanying another vehicle transporting Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances cannot be held as vehicle used as conveyance in carrying the contraband; Kerala High Court orders release of piloting vehicle","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court heldthat only the vehicle used in carrying any narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances can be confiscated under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":268713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/20\/gau-hc-recovery-seizure-of-contraband-not-mandatory-arrest-detention-or-conviction-under-ndps-act-can-be-based-on-other-convincing-factors\/","url_meta":{"origin":375953,"position":2},"title":"Gauhati HC | Recovery\/seizure of contraband not mandatory; arrest, detention or conviction under NDPS Act can be based on other convincing factors","author":"Editor","date":"June 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, (CrPC) was denied by Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J. to a petitioner for a case registered under Sections 21(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) and it was held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Gauhati-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Gauhati-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Gauhati-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Gauhati-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Gauhati-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/22\/procedural-compliances-qua-search-seizure-and-arrest-under-ndps-act-1985\/","url_meta":{"origin":375953,"position":3},"title":"Procedural Compliances in relation to Search, Seizure and Arrest under NDPS Act, 1985","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kapil Madan\u2020, Gurmukh Singh Arora\u2020\u2020 and Pulkit Pandey\u2020\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 70","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-39.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200917,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/bail-denied-to-the-accused-under-section-20-biic-of-ndps-act-1985-as-no-grounds-made-out\/","url_meta":{"origin":375953,"position":4},"title":"Bail denied to the accused under Section 20 (B)(II)(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 as no grounds made out","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arvind Kumar Mishra, J., addressed a bail application where appellant was alleged under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The instant application was filed by the appellant seeking bail in a Special Sessions Trial where appellant was an accused under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221679,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/02\/ker-hc-court-grants-bail-to-juvenile-for-offences-under-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-however-commission-of-similar-offence-during-bail-shall-result-in-cancellation-of-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":375953,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Court grants bail to juvenile for offences under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 however commission of similar offence during bail shall result in cancellation of bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Alexander Thomas, J. disposed of an application for bail relating to offences under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. In the present case, the petitioner was found in possession of 495 cannabis near the Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Neyyattinkara, Thiruvananthapuram for its sale among School\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375953"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375953\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":376600,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375953\/revisions\/376600"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375956"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}