{"id":375741,"date":"2026-02-16T11:00:03","date_gmt":"2026-02-16T05:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375741"},"modified":"2026-02-17T16:29:49","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T10:59:49","slug":"kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/","title":{"rendered":"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the petitioner, suffering from aggressive form of blood cancer, seeking to direct the grant special leave of 47 days and corresponding extension of her training period to enable the completion of her super specialty course, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bechu Kurian Thomas J.<\/span>, noted that the present case was unique in circumstances, as the petitioner&#8217;s maternity leave and her medical leave both had to be availed in the same year. The general principle of availing leave beyond one year would result in termination of the candidature, which cannot be applied to such rare instances.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that maternity leave being a right and other leaves being a discretion, the maternity leave availed by the petitioner cannot be clubbed with the other regular leaves that can be availed by such a trainee. Thus, the Court stated that the petitioner ought to be permitted to submit a fresh application in a time-bound manner, and the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, considering the peculiar circumstances.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner completed her MBBS and MD in General Medicine and later qualified the NEET Super Specialty Examination (NEET-SS) in 2022. She joined the DrNB course in Nephrology, Super Specialty course on 14-12-2022 at the respondent 4 Institution. During her training period, she availed 184 days of maternity leave, along with 23 additional leave days, with a total of 207 days in the 2023. Later, in 2025, she was diagnosed with Stage IV High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma, an aggressive form of blood cancer. She began chemotherapy on 28-08-2025, and her treatment and rest were required to be continued February 2026. She applied for medical leave of 195 days, i.e. from 18-08-2025 to 28-02-2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">According to the petitioner, she would be able to resume her training from 1-3-2026, but by then, the total leave availed by her would exceed the permitted leave by 37 days. The petitioner submitted the leave application, to which she was informed that the total leave availed by her would be 402 days and as per Clause 7(c) of the Comprehensive Leave Rules for NBEMS trainees, if the total leave availed during the training programme is more than a year, it shall lead to the cancellation of the candidature of the trainee. Thus, the petitioner was directed to re-submit the leave application within permissible limits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioner filed the present petition seeking directions to grant special leave of 47 days and corresponding extension of her training period to enable the completion of her super specialty course. The petitioner also seeks a declaration that Clause 7(c) of the Comprehensive Leave Rules will not apply to her since she was admitted to the super specialty course on 14-12-2022 when different Rules were in force.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that when the petitioner joined the course, as per the relevant rules which were in force provided that under normal circumstances leave of one year should not be carried forward to the next year, but in exceptional cases such as prolonged illness, the leave across DrNB training may be clubbed together with prior approval of the NBEMS. However, the present rules do not take into consideration exceptional cases.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that undisputedly, the petitioner is suffering from lymphoma, which she contracted while undergoing the course. The reason for seeking leave beyond the period of one year is not attributable to any willful conduct but as something beyond her control. These circumstances cannot be ignored by the respondent, as the serious illness contracted by her was not her mistake.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the  reproductive rights of a woman have been recognized as a part of fundamental rights and maternity leave must be regarded as an aspect of reproductive right. Thus, the woman&#8217;s right to avail maternity leave cannot be denied. The Court stated that maternity leave being a right and other leaves being a discretion, the maternity leave availed by the petitioner cannot be clubbed with the other regular leaves that can be availed by such a trainee.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that normally in academic matters, it would abide by the decision of academic bodies. However, extraordinary situations require an extraordinary approach, and the present case is unique in nature. The Court noted that the petitioners&#8217; maternity leave and her medical leave both had to be availed in the same year. The general principle that a person availing a leave beyond one year would result in termination of the candidature, cannot be applied to such rare instances. Therefore, the Court stated that the restriction in the Comprehensive Leave Rules for NBEMS trainees 2024 ought not be applied pedantically to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that the petitioner ought to be permitted to submit a fresh application in a time-bound manner, and the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, considering the peculiar circumstances. Therefore, the petitioner shall not be terminated from the  DrNB programme and accordingly, disposed of the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Susan K. John v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O6JCn87u\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Ker 1333<\/a>, decided on 20-1-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> George Jacob, Roshan Jacob Mundackal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> T.Sanjay , SC, National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">O.M.Shalina, Deputy Solicitor General of India , M.Gopikrishanan Nambiar, Karthik S. Acharya, K.John Mathai, Joson Manavalan , Kuryan Thomas , Paulose C. Abraham, Raja Kannan, Pranoy Harilal.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court stated that extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures. In this unique case, where the petitioner had to avail both maternity and medical leave in the same year, the general rule of termination for exceeding one year&#8217;s leave cannot be rigidly applied.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":375746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[98847,98846,59043,2523,2747,98848,46231],"class_list":["post-375741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-clubbing-of-maternity-and-regular-leaves","tag-discretionary-leave","tag-justice-bechu-kurian-thomas","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-maternity_leave","tag-maternity-leave-is-a-right","tag-reproductive-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kerala HC: Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court stated that maternity leave is a right and maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves, which are discretionary in nature.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court stated that maternity leave is a right and maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves, which are discretionary in nature.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-16T05:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-17T10:59:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/\",\"name\":\"Kerala HC: Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-16T05:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-17T10:59:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court stated that maternity leave is a right and maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves, which are discretionary in nature.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kerala HC: Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court stated that maternity leave is a right and maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves, which are discretionary in nature.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves","og_description":"Kerala High Court stated that maternity leave is a right and maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves, which are discretionary in nature.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-16T05:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-17T10:59:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/","name":"Kerala HC: Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-16T05:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-17T10:59:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Kerala High Court stated that maternity leave is a right and maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves, which are discretionary in nature.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/12\/do-employers-have-a-responsibility-to-ensure-that-delivering-and-raising-a-child-shall-not-be-detrimental-to-female-officers-career-maternity-benefit\/","url_meta":{"origin":375741,"position":0},"title":"Maternity Benefits | Do employers have a responsibility to ensure that delivering and raising a child, shall not be detrimental to female officer\u2019s career? Ker HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Addressing a matter wherein maternity benefits were not being allowed to female officers, Raja Vijayaraghavan V, JJ., expressed that the employer is to take all steps possible to ensure that they are sympathetic to the cause of the female officer so that she can achieve her potential\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Ker_Maternity.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Ker_Maternity.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Ker_Maternity.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Ker_Maternity.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Ker_Maternity.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/17\/biological-mother-who-has-obtained-the-baby-through-surrogacy-can-claim-the-post-delivery-maternity-leave-to-take-care-of-the-new-born\/","url_meta":{"origin":375741,"position":1},"title":"Biological mother who has obtained the baby through surrogacy can claim the post-delivery maternity leave to take care of the new born","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Dealing with an urgent issue as to whether a \u2018biological mother\u2019 is entitled to the maternity leave in a case where she has obtained the baby through surrogacy, a bench of D.S. Naidu J. gave a landmark judgment in favour of the genetic\/biological mother. The Court held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/13\/maternity-leave-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":375741,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Such orders undermine confidence and morale of women; HC directs Kerala to reinstate the woman terminated for unauthorised absence on availing maternity leave","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Devan Ramachandran, J., addressed the grievances of a woman whose request for maternity leave was turned down by the State and to then exacerbate her agony, she was terminated from service on the accusation of unauthorised absence. Voicing the plight of the pregnant women in general, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/bom-hc-a-mother-cannot-be-discriminated-on-ground-that-she-obtained-baby-through-surrogacy-commissioning-mother-held-entitled-for-maternity-leave\/","url_meta":{"origin":375741,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | A mother cannot be discriminated on ground that she obtained baby through surrogacy; Commissioning mother held entitled for maternity leave","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog, CJ and N.M. Jamdar, J. allowed a writ petition filed by a commissioning mother of a surrogate child and held that she was entitled to maternity leave. Unable to bear a second child, the petitioner along with her husband, chose the route\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245400,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/maternity-leave-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":375741,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Whether a contractual woman employee is entitled to avail maternity leave in case of a surrogate child? HC analyses","author":"Editor","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Sandeep Sharma JJ. allowed the petition. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner joined as a Language Teacher on a contract basis and is currently posted at Government Senior Secondary School, Showad, District Kullu. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295030,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/every-female-male-employee-fundamental-right-maternity-paternity-leave-hp-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375741,"position":5},"title":"Every Female and Male Employee whether appointed on regular basis, contractual basis, ad hoc basis, have Fundamental Right to Maternity and Paternity Leave: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that the object of maternity leave is to protect the dignity of motherhood by providing full and healthy maintenance to the woman and her child and maternity leave is intended to achieve the social justice to women.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375741"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375741\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}