{"id":375438,"date":"2026-02-11T16:30:35","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T11:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375438"},"modified":"2026-02-17T09:31:50","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T04:01:50","slug":"bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/","title":{"rendered":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bharati Dangre<\/span>* and Manjusha Deshpande, JJ., held that an unmarried woman carrying a pregnancy of 22 weeks was entitled to medical termination. The Court observed that the authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court had already clarified that unmarried women cannot be excluded from the ambit of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551825\" target=\"_blank\">3(2)(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002817006\" target=\"_blank\">Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971<\/a> (&#8216;MTP Act&#8217;), read with Rule 3-B of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002844026\" target=\"_blank\">Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003<\/a> (&#8216;Rules&#8217;). Emphasising that reproductive autonomy, dignity, and privacy under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> extend equally to unmarried women, the Court reaffirmed that the right to seek termination of pregnancy up to 24 weeks must be interpreted purposively.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant matter arose from a writ petition filed by a 26-year-old unmarried woman whose pregnancy had advanced to 22 weeks. She contended that the pregnancy was unwanted, arising out of failure of contraceptive device, and that as an unwed mother she would face social stigma and lack of family support.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was submitted that forcing her to continue the pregnancy would violate her right to live with dignity and compromise her mental health. The petitioner challenged Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551825\" target=\"_blank\">3(2)(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002817006\" target=\"_blank\">MTP Act<\/a> and Rule 3-B of the Rules as unconstitutional, arguing that the exclusion of unmarried women was discriminatory and violative of Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners approached the Court seeking directions to permit medical termination of pregnancy and to uphold the fundamental rights of unmarried women under the Constitution.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that interpretation of subordinate legislation must be consistent with the enabling Act, and that such legislation must be reasonable, in consonance with the legislative policy, and interpreted in a meaningful manner so as to give effect to the purpose and object of the Parent Act. The Court highlighted that an approach in harmony with the statutory scheme must be adopted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Rule 3-B of the Rules was introduced to remove mischief and to cover women unable to access abortions when their lives underwent significant changes impacting their physical and mental health, and whose decision to have a child was restricted once the length of the pregnancy exceeded twenty weeks. The Court observed that the common thread running through each category of women in Rule 3-B of the Rules was that the woman is in unique and often difficult circumstances with respect to her physical, mental, social, or financial state, and all the different categories of women seek an abortion after twenty weeks either due to delay in recognizing the pregnancy or because of some other change in their environment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Suchita Srivastava<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Chandigarh Admn.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T5UbEx4a\" target=\"_blank\">(2009) 9 SCC 1<\/a>, wherein a woman&#8217;s right to make reproductive choices was considered a dimension of &#8220;personal liberty&#8221; under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The Court emphasised the woman&#8217;s right to privacy, dignity, and bodily integrity. It further relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">X2<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/87Ny98GU\" target=\"_blank\">(2023) 9 SCC 433<\/a>, where it was held that a narrow interpretation of Rule 3-B of the Rules, limited only to married women, would render the provision discriminatory towards unmarried women and violative of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, which requires the State to ensure equality before the law and equal protection of laws.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court pointed out that by virtue of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574875\" target=\"_blank\">144<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, every authority, civil and judicial, in the territory of India is duty bound to act in aid of the Supreme Court, and therefore all those involved in implementing the provisions of MTP Act and the Rules are bound by the said authoritative pronouncement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court requested the Public Health Department of the State of Maharashtra to ensure wide circulation of the Apex Court&#8217;s decision to all functionaries involved in implementing the MTP Act and the Rules. The Court held that since the issue has been put to rest and Rule 3-B of the Rules has received a purposive interpretation by the Supreme Court, the writ petition stands disposed of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">ABC v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g97AbfN2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Bom 967<\/a>, decided on 29-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Bharati Dangre<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Kranti L. C.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> M. P Thakur, AGP, Punima Awasthi, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The woman is in unique and often difficult circumstances with respect to her physical, mental, social, or financial state, and all the different categories of women seek an abortion after twenty weeks either due to delay in recognizing the pregnancy or because of some other change in their environment.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":375448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13681,2569,29902,3268,67988,71006,13201,61925,68459,98646,98647],"class_list":["post-375438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-dignity","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-justice-bharati-dangre","tag-justice-manjusha-deshpande","tag-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-act","tag-purposive-interpretation","tag-reproductive-autonomy","tag-rule-3-b","tag-unmarried-women-abortion-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court applied the Supreme Court ruling that unmarried women cannot be excluded from abortion rights up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, reaffirming reproductive autonomy and dignity as part of Article 21 of Constitution.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court applied the Supreme Court ruling that unmarried women cannot be excluded from abortion rights up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, reaffirming reproductive autonomy and dignity as part of Article 21 of Constitution.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-11T11:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-17T04:01:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/\",\"name\":\"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-11T11:00:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-17T04:01:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court applied the Supreme Court ruling that unmarried women cannot be excluded from abortion rights up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, reaffirming reproductive autonomy and dignity as part of Article 21 of Constitution.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Abortion rights unmarried women\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC","description":"Bombay High Court applied the Supreme Court ruling that unmarried women cannot be excluded from abortion rights up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, reaffirming reproductive autonomy and dignity as part of Article 21 of Constitution.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities","og_description":"Bombay High Court applied the Supreme Court ruling that unmarried women cannot be excluded from abortion rights up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, reaffirming reproductive autonomy and dignity as part of Article 21 of Constitution.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-11T11:00:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-17T04:01:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/","name":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-11T11:00:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-17T04:01:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court applied the Supreme Court ruling that unmarried women cannot be excluded from abortion rights up to 24 weeks under the MTP Act, reaffirming reproductive autonomy and dignity as part of Article 21 of Constitution.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Abortion rights unmarried women"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270576,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/22\/delhi-high-courts-ruling-that-led-to-supreme-court-recognizing-unmarried-womens-right-to-a-safe-abortion\/","url_meta":{"origin":375438,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court&#8217;s ruling that led to Supreme Court recognizing unmarried women&#8217;s right to a safe abortion","author":"Editor","date":"July 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Sathish Chandra Sharma, CJ and Subramonium Prasad, J refused termination of pregnancy to an unmarried woman whose pregnancy arose out of a consensual relationship after holding that her case was clearly not covered by any of the categories mentioned under Rule 3B of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270508,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/22\/unmarried-woman-cannot-be-denied-right-to-safe-abortion-supreme-court-delhi-high-court-termination-of-pregnancy-legal-laws-news-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":375438,"position":1},"title":"Woman cannot be denied right to safe abortion only on the ground of her being unmarried: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDenying an unmarried woman the right to a safe abortion violates her personal autonomy and freedom.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-32.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-32.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-32.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-32.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-32.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/29\/unmarried-persons-women-cannot-be-denied-right-abortion-based-on-patriarchal-principles-about-permissible-sex-supreme-court-chundrachud-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375438,"position":2},"title":"Unmarried persons cannot be denied rights based on narrow patriarchal principles on \u201cpermissible sex\u201d: Key takeaways from SC&#8217;s historic verdict on right to safe abortion","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"While the interim order was passed in the case on 21.07.2022, the Supreme Court took over two months to write a far-reaching 75-pages-long verdict, touching upon various aspects like purposive interpretation of Medical Termination of Pregnancy laws, equal status of married and unmarried or single women, right to reproductive autonomy,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-83-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351592,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/26\/bom-hc-mtp-25-week-pregnancy-permission-unmarried-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":375438,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC allows unmarried woman to abort 25-week pregnancy citing reproductive freedom and mental distress","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe right to abortion is a concomitant right of dignity, autonomy and reproductive choice which is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution and the decision to terminate pregnancy is deeply personal for any person\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"25-week abortion permission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/25-week-abortion-permission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/25-week-abortion-permission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/25-week-abortion-permission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/25-week-abortion-permission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/30\/sexual-assault-rape-under-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-laws-includes-marital-rape-constituionality-of-section-375-ipc-not-gone-into-supreme-court-abortion-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375438,"position":4},"title":"&#8220;Sexual assault&#8221; or &#8220;rape&#8221; under Medical Termination of Pregnancy laws includes &#8220;marital rape&#8221;: holds Supreme Court, without changing the contours of &#8216;rape&#8217; defined under Section 375\u00a0IPC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe nature of sexual violence and the contours of consent do not undergo a transformation when one decides to marry. The institution of marriage does not influence the answer to the question of whether a woman has consented to sexual relations. If the woman is in an abusive relationship, she\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Sexual-assault-or-rape-under-Medical-Termination-of-Pregnancy-laws-includes-marital-rape-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Sexual-assault-or-rape-under-Medical-Termination-of-Pregnancy-laws-includes-marital-rape-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Sexual-assault-or-rape-under-Medical-Termination-of-Pregnancy-laws-includes-marital-rape-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Sexual-assault-or-rape-under-Medical-Termination-of-Pregnancy-laws-includes-marital-rape-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Sexual-assault-or-rape-under-Medical-Termination-of-Pregnancy-laws-includes-marital-rape-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283807,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/the-emerging-dimensions-of-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-act-1971\/","url_meta":{"origin":375438,"position":5},"title":"The Emerging Dimensions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Sanjay Vashishtha\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 10","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Emerging Dimensions of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-45.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375438"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375438\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}