{"id":375357,"date":"2026-02-11T09:00:54","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T03:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375357"},"modified":"2026-02-10T18:30:52","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T13:00:52","slug":"ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Ecological Concerns in India’s Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The absence of a universally agreed definition of degraded land across Indian agencies has led to inconsistent estimates and potential misidentification of ecologically significant areas.<\/p>\n

Introduction<\/h2>\n

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change introduced the Green Credit Programme (GCP) through the Green Credit Rules, 2023<\/a> under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986<\/a>, with the stated objective of incentivising voluntary environmental measures.<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a> However, the implementation modalities for tree plantation, initially notified on 22 February 20242<\/sup><\/a>, and subsequently revised on 29 August 20253<\/sup><\/a>, have sparked significant ecological and legal concerns that threaten to undermine the biodiversity conservation efforts and compromise the integrity of India’s environmental regulatory framework.<\/p>\n

The degraded land dilemma: Misclassification and ecological erasure<\/h2>\n

The fundamental ecological concern stems from the GCP’s approach to identifying “degraded land” suitable for plantation. The Ministry has relied on the National Forest Policy, 1988<\/a>, to justify time-bound afforestation,4<\/sup><\/a> adopting a definition that classifies any very dense or medium dense forest reduced to scrubs or open forest as degraded land.5<\/sup><\/a> According to the India State of Forest Report 2023, forest area under open and scrub category comprises 348,789 sq km, constituting 10.61 per cent of the country’s total geographical area.6<\/sup><\/a> Between 2011 and 2021, 40,709 sq km of very dense forest and medium dense forest within recorded forest area degraded to open forest category, while 5573 sq km degraded to scrub category.7<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The absence of a universally agreed definition of degraded land across Indian agencies has led to inconsistent estimates and potential misidentification of ecologically significant areas.8<\/sup><\/a> Most critically, this approach fails to recognise the importance of open natural ecosystems (ONEs), which are globally acknowledged for biodiversity conservation and pastoral livelihoods.9<\/sup><\/a> In India, nearly 70 per cent of areas with open natural ecosystems overlap with government-designated “wastelands”,10<\/sup><\/a> demonstrating the systemic misclassification that has persisted since the Indian Space Research Organisation began mapping wastelands in 2000.11<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The ecological consequences of this misclassification are severe. Grasslands, wetlands, deserts, scrub forests, and open forests constitute distinct ecological entities whose afforestation would irrevocably alter their ecology, destroying unique flora and fauna including critically endangered species such as the Great Indian Bustard12<\/sup><\/a>, Lesser Florican13<\/sup><\/a>, wolves, and blackbucks14<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> endemic to the Indian subcontinent.15<\/sup><\/a> The assumption that such ecosystems are unproductive or marginal is fundamentally flawed; grasslands alone sequester 15-20 per cent of the world’s carbon in their soil<\/span>,16<\/sup><\/a> while plantations and monocultures favoured by afforestation programs are demonstrably less effective at carbon sequestration than natural ecosystems.17<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

The scientific community has identified additional concerns regarding misclassification. Remote sensing spectral signatures of different ecosystems can be difficult to distinguish, leading to erroneous labelling, for instance, mesic savannas being classified as dry tropical forests.18<\/sup><\/a> The decline of ONEs has already resulted in documented population declines of bird species<\/span>,19<\/sup><\/a> underscoring the urgency of preserving these ecosystems rather than converting them.<\/span><\/p>\n

The unclassed forest problem: Regulatory gaps and vulnerabilities<\/h2>\n

The selection of unclassed forest as eligible land parcels presents another critical ecological concern. Rules 13(3) and (4), Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules, 2023<\/a> create a special regulatory regime permitting compensatory afforestation on revenue forest lands, deemed forests, unclassed forests, and similar categories including Zudpi jungle, “chhote-bare jhar ka jungle”, Jungle-Jhari land, Civil Soyam, and orange forest lands.20<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> These categories often lack the legal protections afforded to notified forests, making them particularly vulnerable to inappropriate interventions.<\/span><\/p>\n

The September 2025 Guidelines for using afforestation raised under GCP explicitly recognise that “degraded forest lands as identified by the respective States\/Union Territories that are recorded as forests in government records and are under the control and management of the State\/Union Territory Forest Department” shall be eligible for exchange under compensatory afforestation.21<\/sup><\/a> This broad definition encompasses unclassed forests and other vulnerable categories, extending the reach of the program into ecologically sensitive areas lacking statutory forest protection.<\/span><\/p>\n

The participation of private entities in plantation drives on such lands compound these concerns.22<\/sup><\/a> As Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy research has documented, mis-designated wastelands and ONEs are particularly prone to tree planting initiatives that disregard their ecological significance.23<\/sup><\/a> Historical evidence demonstrates that State afforestation programs have faced allegations of corruption, with incomplete efforts or misreported data falsely appearing to comply with compensatory afforestation mandates.24<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Methodological flaws: Non-scientific approaches and perverse incentives<\/h2>\n

The original 2024 modalities prescribed plantation blocks with potential for 1100 trees per hectare<\/span>,25<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> a figure without scientific assessment that drew considerable criticism from ecologists.26<\/sup><\/a> In semi-arid areas, for example, less than 100 trees per hectare produce optimal benefits for water recharge<\/span>,27<\/sup><\/a> demonstrating how blanket density requirements ignore geographic, climatic, and ecological variability.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

The revised August 2025 methodology addresses some concerns but introduces new complications. The revised rules now require a minimum canopy density of 40 per cent and that trees be at least five years old before Green Credits can be issued.28<\/sup><\/a> While this represents an improvement over the immediate issuance framework, the methodology still fails to adequately address ecological suitability. The revised modalities mandate that “afforestation activities undertaken on degraded forest lands shall use a mixture of indigenous species based on site suitability”<\/span>,29<\/sup><\/a> but provide no specific guidance on species selection, density variation based on ecosystem type, or verification mechanisms to ensure native species are actually used.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Detailed Project Report format annexed to the revised modalities requires extensive baseline data including soil characteristics, water availability, existing vegetation, and fauna.30<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> However, the format lacks provisions for assessing whether plantation is ecologically appropriate for the identified land parcel. The emphasis remains on achieving 40 per cent canopy density rather than on restoring ecosystem functionality or preserving native biodiversity.31<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Critics have noted that if the objective were ecological restoration, the methodology should measure native biota preservation; if carbon sequestration, it should measure additional carbon sequestered; if livelihood engagement, it should measure capacity and production increases.32<\/sup><\/a> The current metric of awarding one Green Credit per tree aged five years or more33<\/sup><\/a> fails to capture these nuanced ecological outcomes and potentially incentivises monoculture plantations over diverse ecosystem restoration.<\/span><\/p>\n

Double counting concerns: Intersection with India’s carbon market<\/h2>\n

A critical integrity concern emerges from the intersection between the Green<\/span> Credit Programme and India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). Rule 14(5)(i<\/span>), Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules, 2023<\/a> mandates that all entities registered for accredited compensatory afforestation must register with the Green Credit Registry, making such afforestation eligible for Green Credits. Simultaneously, the CCTS offset mechanism explicitly permits projects to maintain exclusivity except for the Green Credit Programme<\/span><\/span>,34<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> allowing dual participation.<\/span><\/p>\n

This creates substantial double counting risks. The CCTS provides for fixed (10 year) or renewable (5+5+5 year) crediting periods35<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> and can issue credits based on projected sequestration, while the revised GCP methodology requires a five-year waiting period and 40 per cent canopy density before credit issuance.36<\/sup><\/a> A project developer might calculate that their forest sequesters 1000 tonnes of CO\u2082 (earning 1000 Carbon Credit Certificates) while simultaneously having 800 surviving trees aged over five years (earning 800 Green Credits).37<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> The same tree is thus credited for its carbon sequestration value (CCC)<\/span><\/span> and again as a physical tree unit (Green Credit).<\/span><\/p>\n

When companies use CCCs to claim carbon neutrality in reporting and use Green Credits for corporate social responsibility (CSR) or compensatory afforestation compliance, they essentially claim credit twice for the same environmental action, undermining both systems’ integrity.38<\/sup><\/a> The August 2025 Notification attempts to address concerns by specifying that Green Credits “shall be non-tradable and non-transferable except for the transfer between the holding company and its subsidiary companies”<\/span>,39<\/sup><\/a> and “may be exchanged once” for specified purposes.40<\/sup><\/a> However, this distinction does not resolve the double counting problem, as both credits claim environmental benefit from the same underlying activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

The additionality principle mandated by the CCTS offset mechanism, i.e., that activities mandated by law are not eligible41<\/sup><\/a> becomes meaningless when projects can simultaneously generate mandatory compensatory afforestation credits and voluntary Green Credits from identical activities. The September 2025 Guidelines further complicate this by establishing exchange ratios for using GCP restored land for compensatory afforestation, with ratios varying from 2:1 to 4:1 depending on project type and location.42<\/sup><\/a> This creates a complex layering of credits and offsets from the same land parcel, with no clear mechanism to prevent environmental claims from being counted multiple times across different regulatory frameworks.<\/span><\/p>\n

Institutional concerns: Maintenance and long-term viability<\/h2>\n

The revised modalities introduce a 10-year maintenance requirement with the September 2025 Guidelines specifying that “the user agency shall bear the cost of maintenance and protection of afforestation raised under Green Credit Programme for a period of 10 years”.43<\/sup><\/a> If Green Credits are availed prior to completion of the 10-year period, “the maintenance cost of the remaining period shall be deposited with the administrator”.44<\/sup><\/a> While this addresses concerns about short-term plantation survival rates, it raises questions about institutional capacity and accountability.<\/span><\/p>\n

The memorandum of understanding template provided in the revised modalities places significant responsibilities on District Nodal Officers (DNOs), including facilitating access to land parcels, providing technical support, conducting joint inspections, and taking over plantation maintenance after Green Credit issuance.45<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> This assumes substantial State capacity and resources which may not be available in practice. Historical evidence of incomplete State afforestation efforts and misreported data46<\/sup><\/a> suggests that relying on the same institutional framework for GCP implementation may reproduce existing failures.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The ecological concerns surrounding the Green Credit Programme’s tree plantation modalities remain substantial despite the August 2025 revisions. While the revised methodology addresses some procedural issues by extending the waiting period and requiring higher canopy density, fundamental ecological problems persist. The misclassification of degraded land continues to threaten biodiverse ONEs, the inclusion of unclassed forests creates regulatory vulnerabilities, the methodology still lacks rigorous ecological criteria, and the potential for double counting with carbon credits undermines system integrity.<\/p>\n

The September 2025 Guidelines’ provisions for exchanging GCP restored land for compensatory afforestation, combined with the lack of clear boundaries between GCP and CCTS, create a complex web of environmental credits that may enable multiple claims for the same ecological benefits. Comprehensive reform is necessary to ensure the GCP serves genuine environmental restoration rather than becoming a mechanism for ecological degradation disguised as conservation. This reform must include scientifically rigorous definitions of degraded land that exclude ONEs; ecosystem-specific restoration criteria rather than uniform density requirements; clear separation between GCP and carbon market mechanisms to prevent double counting; and strengthened institutional capacity for monitoring and verification.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

*Lawyer, Ex-Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Ex-LAMP Fellow, BA LLB (Hons.), Dr Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow. Author can be reached at: shashank9.rmlnlu@gmail.com<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> Green Credit Rules, 2023<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculation of Green Credit, S.O. 884(E) (Notified on 22-2-2024).<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculating Green Credit in Respect of Tree Plantation Activity, G.S.R. 592(E) (Notified on 29-8-2025) Part II, S. 3(i<\/span>), no. 548.<\/p>\n

4.<\/a> National Forest Policy, 1988<\/a>.<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Guidelines for Using the Afforestation Raised Over Degraded Forest Lands under the Green Credit Programme to Meet the Requirement of Compensatory Afforestation, Office Memorandum No. FC-11\/104\/2025 (15-9-2025).<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, India State of Forest Report 2023<\/span>, Vols. I & II, Forest Survey of India (18th Edn. 2023) available at <https:\/\/fsi.nic.in\/uploads\/isfr2023\/isfr_book_eng-vol-1_2023.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

7.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, India State of Forest Report 2023<\/span>, Vols I & II, Forest Survey of India (18th Edn. 2023) available at <https:\/\/fsi.nic.in\/uploads\/isfr2023\/isfr_book_eng-vol-1_2023.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought in India — Vol I: Macroeconomic Assessment of the Costs of Land Degradation in India<\/span>, The Energy & Resources Institute (2018).<\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Joseph W. Veldman, et al., “Where Tree Planting and Forest Expansion are Bad for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services” (2019) 65 BioScience 1471.<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought in India — Vol I: Macroeconomic Assessment of the Costs of Land Degradation in India<\/span>, The Energy & Resources Institute (2018).<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Land Resources, Wasteland Atlas of India-2019<\/span>.<\/p>\n

12.<\/a> Great Indian Bustard (Ardeotis nigriceps), The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T22691932A134188105 (Critically Endangered).<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> Lesser Florican (Sypheotides indicus), The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T22691710A175711752 (Endangered).<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra), The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2025: e.T11201A22288195 (Least Concern).<\/p>\n

15.<\/a> Pia Sethi, “Commentary: Green Credit Rules — Death by Trees”, India Mongabay (15-7-2024).<\/p>\n

16.<\/a> Pia Sethi, “Commentary: Green Credit Rules — Death by Trees”, India Mongabay (15-7-2024).<\/p>\n

17.<\/a> Pia Sethi, “Commentary: Green Credit Rules — Death by Trees”, India Mongabay (15-7-2024).<\/p>\n

18.<\/a> Abi Tamim Vanak, Ankila Hiremath and Nitin Rai, “Wastelands of the Mind: The Identity Crisis of India’s Tropical Savannas”, Current Conservation (1-9-2013).<\/p>\n

19.<\/a> State of India’s Birds, 2023: Range, Trends, and Conservation Status<\/span>, State of India’s Birds, 2023, available at <https:\/\/stateofindiasbirds.in\/<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> Ashok Kumar Sharma<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 2379 (petition under Art. 32 challenging the Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act, 2023<\/a>).<\/p>\n

21.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Guidelines for Using the Afforestation Raised Over Degraded Forest Lands under the Green Credit Programme to Meet the Requirement of Compensatory Afforestation, Office Memorandum No. FC-11\/104\/2025 (15-9-2025), para 2(iv<\/span>).<\/p>\n

22.<\/a> See<\/span>, Mayank Aggarwal, “Private Sector Gets Go Ahead for Assisting Rehabilitation of Degraded Forests”, Mongabay, India (23-7-2019).<\/p>\n

23.<\/a> <\/span>Report of the High-Level Working Group on the<\/span> <\/span><\/span>Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill, 2023<\/span><\/span>, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy (19-5-2023) (submission to Joint Parliamentary Committee).<\/span><\/p>\n

24.<\/a> Ishan Kukreti, “India’s Ghost Plantations in Which Millions of Rupees Have Been Sunk”, Scroll.in (12-1-2022).<\/p>\n

25.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculation of Green Credit, S.O. 884(E) (Notified on 22-2-2024).<\/p>\n

26.<\/a> Himanshu Nitnaware, “Green Credit Rules will Negatively Impact Forest Ecology, Say Experts”, Down To Earth<\/span> (27-2-2024).<\/p>\n

27.<\/a> Anuja Malhotra and Abi Tamim Vanak, “How Green is the Green Credit Programme?”, Frontline<\/span> (24-2-2024).<\/p>\n

28.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculating Green Credit in Respect of Tree Plantation Activity, G.S.R. 592(E) (Notified on 29-8-2025), paras 1, 3.<\/p>\n

29.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Guidelines for Using the Afforestation Raised Over Degraded Forest Lands under the Green Credit Programme to Meet the Requirement of Compensatory Afforestation, Office Memorandum No. FC-11\/104\/2025 (15-9-2025), para 2(ii<\/span>).<\/p>\n

30.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculation of Green Credit, S.O. 884(E) (Notified on 22-2-2024).<\/p>\n

31.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculation of Green Credit, S.O. 884(E) (Notified on 22-2-2024).<\/span>,Annex II, Part D.<\/p>\n

32.<\/a> Mayank Aggarwal, “Private Sector Gets Go Ahead for Assisting Rehabilitation of Degraded Forests”, Mongabay, India (23-7-2019).<\/p>\n

33.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculating Green Credit in Respect of Tree Plantation Activity, G.S.R. 592(E) (Notified on 29-8-2025), para 3.<\/p>\n

34.<\/a> Ministry of Power, Government of India, Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Indian Carbon Market Offset Methodology, B3.4 (2025).<\/p>\n

35.<\/a> Ministry of Power, Government of India, Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Indian Carbon Market Offset Methodology, B3.4 (2025).<\/p>\n

36.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculating Green Credit in Respect of Tree Plantation Activity, G.S.R. 592(E) (Notified on 29-8-2025), para 1.<\/p>\n

37.<\/a> See<\/span>, Ministry of Power, Government of India, Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Indian Carbon Market Offset Methodology, B3.4 (2025).<\/p>\n

38.<\/a> “India’s Carbon Credit Offset Mechanism: BEE’s New Guidelines for a Credible Carbon Market”, Environmental Integrity Global (13-5-2025).<\/p>\n

39.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculating Green Credit in Respect of Tree Plantation Activity, G.S.R. 592(E) (Notified on 29-8-2025), para 5.<\/p>\n

40.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculating Green Credit in Respect of Tree Plantation Activity, G.S.R. 592(E) (Notified on 29-8-2025), para 7.<\/p>\n

41.<\/a> Ministry of Power, Government of India, Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Indian Carbon Market Offset Methodology, B3.7 (2025).<\/p>\n

42.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Guidelines for Using the Afforestation Raised Over Degraded Forest Lands under the Green Credit Programme to Meet the Requirement of Compensatory Afforestation, Office Memorandum No. FC-11\/104\/2025 (15-9-2025), para 3.<\/p>\n

43.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Guidelines for Using the Afforestation Raised Over Degraded Forest Lands under the Green Credit Programme to Meet the Requirement of Compensatory Afforestation, Office Memorandum No. FC-11\/104\/2025 (15-9-2025), para 2(vi<\/span>).<\/p>\n

44.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Guidelines for Using the Afforestation Raised Over Degraded Forest Lands under the Green Credit Programme to Meet the Requirement of Compensatory Afforestation, Office Memorandum No. FC-11\/104\/2025 (15-9-2025).<\/p>\n

45.<\/a> Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Methodology for Calculation of Green Credit, S.O. 884(E) (Notified on 22-2-2024)., Annex III, para 3(a<\/span>).<\/p>\n

46.<\/a> Mayank Aggarwal, “Private Sector Gets Go Ahead for Assisting Rehabilitation of Degraded Forests”, Mongabay, India (23-7-2019). Also see<\/span>, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Union Government, Report No. 21 of 2013 — Compliance Audit on Compensatory Afforestation in India<\/span>, Comptroller and Auditor General of India (2013).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Shashank Pandey*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":375366,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[98602,98598,98599,98597,98600,98595,98601,98596],"class_list":["post-375357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-biodiversity-impact-plantation-policy","tag-carbon-credit-double-counting-india","tag-degraded-land-classification-india","tag-ecological-concerns-afforestation-india","tag-gcp-environmental-law-critique","tag-green-credit-programme-india-analysis","tag-india-carbon-market-regulation","tag-tree-plantation-policy-india"],"yoast_head":"\nEcological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme | Critical Analysis<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A critical examination of India's Green Credit Programme assessing ecological risks, afforestation policy gaps, and carbon credit double counting concerns.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A critical examination of India's Green Credit Programme assessing ecological risks, afforestation policy gaps, and carbon credit double counting concerns.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-11T03:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/\",\"name\":\"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme | Critical Analysis\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-11T03:30:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"A critical examination of India's Green Credit Programme assessing ecological risks, afforestation policy gaps, and carbon credit double counting concerns.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Green Credit Programme Ecological Concerns\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ecological Concerns in India’s Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme | Critical Analysis","description":"A critical examination of India's Green Credit Programme assessing ecological risks, afforestation policy gaps, and carbon credit double counting concerns.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities","og_description":"A critical examination of India's Green Credit Programme assessing ecological risks, afforestation policy gaps, and carbon credit double counting concerns.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-11T03:30:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/","name":"Ecological Concerns in India's Green Credit Programme | Critical Analysis","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-11T03:30:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"A critical examination of India's Green Credit Programme assessing ecological risks, afforestation policy gaps, and carbon credit double counting concerns.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Green Credit Programme Ecological Concerns"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/ecological-concerns-green-credit-programme-india-analysis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ecological Concerns in India’s Green Credit Programme: A Critical Analysis of Tree Plantation Modalities"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Green-Credit-Programme-Ecological-Concerns.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/17\/green-credit-rules-2023-notified-to-incentivise-environmental-actions-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375357,"position":0},"title":"Centre notifies Green Credit Rules, 2023 to promote Green Credit Programme","author":"Kriti","date":"October 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change notified the Green Credit Rules, 2023 to leverage a competitive market-based approach for green credit for incentivizing environmental actions of various stakeholders.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ministry of environment, forest and climate change","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ministry-of-environment-forest-and-climate-change.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ministry-of-environment-forest-and-climate-change.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ministry-of-environment-forest-and-climate-change.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ministry-of-environment-forest-and-climate-change.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":18403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/07\/green-highways-policy-2015-launched-to-conserve-environment-and-make-india-pollution-free\/","url_meta":{"origin":375357,"position":1},"title":"Green Highways Policy, 2015 launched to conserve environment and make India pollution free","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 29.09.2015, the Green Highways (Plantation, Transplantation, Beautification & Maintenance) Policy, 2015 was launched by the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways.\u00a0 According to the policy, 1% of the total project cost of all highways projects will be kept aside for the highway plantation and its maintenance. The policy will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294990,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/delhi-hc-directs-plantation-of-10000-trees-to-utilize-money-recovered-from-defaulting-litigants\/","url_meta":{"origin":375357,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court directs plantation of at least 10,000 trees to utilize Rs. 80 lakhs recovered from defaulting litigants","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Liberty is granted to Court Commissioners to approach the Court in case of difficulty or non-compliance of the orders or non-cooperation by any agency. Signboards shall be put up at prominent places to inform the public that the plantation has been carried out under the directions of the Delhi High\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":41922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/04\/rubber-plantations-in-kanyakumari-are-private-forest-held\/","url_meta":{"origin":375357,"position":3},"title":"Rubber Plantations in Kanyakumari are Private Forest","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Hearing writ petitions filed by Kanyakumari District Planters Association & other plantation owners wherein the common issue raised was the validity of the notification issued by the District Collector, Kanyakumari, declaring the lands owned by the appellants\/petitioners as \u201cPrivate Forests\u201d under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":355151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/31\/judicial-canopy-defining-forest-in-india-guide-to-the-article\/","url_meta":{"origin":375357,"position":4},"title":"Judicial Canopy: Defining \u201cForest\u201d in India: Guide to the Article","author":"Editor","date":"July 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr Sairam Bhat* and Jaibatruka Mohanta**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Defining Forest in India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Defining-Forest-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Defining-Forest-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Defining-Forest-in-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Defining-Forest-in-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/23\/green-finance-and-environmental-governance\/","url_meta":{"origin":375357,"position":5},"title":"Green Finance and Environmental Governance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kritika Krishnamurthy\u2020 and Tapasi Mohapatra\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image23-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image23-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image23-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375357"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375357\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375366"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}