{"id":375018,"date":"2026-02-07T11:30:22","date_gmt":"2026-02-07T06:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=375018"},"modified":"2026-02-09T17:07:10","modified_gmt":"2026-02-09T11:37:10","slug":"bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In a writ petition unveiling “a sordid tale of targeted departmental vendetta, full of mala fide actions and protracted persecution”<\/span>, compelling a senior civil servant and former Armed Forces officer to repeatedly knock at the doors of constitutional courts. While noting that the petitioner, despite having an unblemished service record and been ranked first by a duly constituted Search-cum-Selection Committee for appointment as Member (Accountant), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, was persistently denied appointment through a series of obstructive administrative actions and bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee, a Division Bench of Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, JJ., held that the petitioner had been subjected to grave injustice, rank high-handedness, and deliberate obstruction bordering on vendetta by the respondents.<\/p>\n

Setting aside the minutes of the impugned selection meeting, the Court directed the convening of a fresh Search-cum-Selection Committee, expressly excluding the concerned officer, and imposed ₹5,00,000\/- costs on the respondents for their continued procrastination and mala fide conduct.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioner is a former Permanent Commissioned Officer of the Indian Army who was released from service on account of physical disability suffered during active military operations. After demobilisation, he qualified the Civil Services Examination and was appointed to the Indian Revenue Service (IRS) in the 1990 batch under the general category. Throughout his career in the Income Tax Department, he maintained an unblemished service record and was promoted to the post of Commissioner of Income Tax on 12-01-2012.<\/p>\n

In 2014, the petitioner applied for appointment to the post of Member (Accountant), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). He was interviewed by a Search-cum-Selection Committee (SCSC) chaired by a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court, which evaluated all candidates and placed the petitioner at All India Rank One. Despite this recommendation, no appointment order was issued, purportedly on the basis of adverse Intelligence Bureau (IB) inputs arising out of matrimonial litigation with his estranged spouse.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved, the petitioner initiated proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the respondents to place the IB material before the SCSC. Allahabad High Court affirmed this direction, and the Supreme Court dismissed the respondents’ SLP on 15-11-2017, requiring compliance.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, a series of adverse administrative actions followed. The petitioner’s vigilance clearance was withheld, he was issued a show-cause notice, his name was placed in the “Agreed List” of officers of doubtful integrity, and disciplinary proceedings were initiated. Each of these actions was successfully challenged by the petitioner before the Tribunal and the High Court. In the midst of contempt proceedings for non-compliance with judicial orders, the petitioner was served with a charge memorandum and placed under suspension. Ultimately, he was compulsorily retired under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules on 27-09-2019, barely three months before superannuation.<\/p>\n

The order of compulsory retirement was set aside by the Supreme Court by judgment dated 03-03-2023, holding the action to be punitive, arbitrary, and not in public interest. The Court recorded strong findings of high-handedness and observed that the respondents had “turned turtle” after having consistently graded the petitioner as “Outstanding” with integrity “beyond doubt”.<\/p>\n

Despite dropping the charge memorandum in August 2024 and directions issued in contempt proceedings, the petitioner was again made to appear before a fourth reconstituted SCSC. One of its members was an officer who had earlier faced contempt proceedings at the petitioner’s instance. The SCSC rejected the petitioner’s candidature in September 2024.<\/p>\n

Invoking Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Article 32<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>, the petitioner challenged the SCSC’s decision to reject his candidature.<\/p>\n

Moot Points<\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the inclusion of an officer, who had earlier faced contempt proceedings at the petitioner’s instance, in the Search-cum-Selection Committee vitiated the selection process on account of reasonable apprehension of bias?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the repeated denial of appointment to the petitioner amounted to mala fide exercise of power, arbitrariness, and violation of principles of natural justice?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Whether the minutes of the SCSC meeting dated 1 September 2024 were liable to be set aside?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Parties’ Contentions<\/h3>\n

    The petitioner contended that he had been subjected to a “targeted departmental vendetta, full of mala fide actions and protracted persecution” despite repeated judicial findings in his favour. It was urged that the presence of an officer, who was personally involved in contempt proceedings relating to the petitioner’s service dispute, created a genuine and reasonable apprehension of bias, rendering the decision-making process fundamentally unfair.<\/p>\n

    The respondents, despite service of notice and opportunity, failed to file any counter affidavit. The allegations of bias, mala fides, and vindictive conduct thus remained uncontroverted.<\/p>\n

    Court’s Analysis<\/h3>\n

    The Court noted that at every stage the respondents had “deliberately created hurdles in the path of the petitioner by either putting up cooked-up charges or failing to ensure compliance with the orders passed by various fora.”<\/span> The Court held that absence of any counter-affidavit was a conscious attempt to waste time and deprive the petitioner of the limited tenure available to him.<\/p>\n

    The Court reiterated that justice must not only be done but must manifestly be seen to be done. Relying upon State of Gujarat<\/span> v. R.A. Mehta<\/span>, (2013) 3 SCC 1, the Court observed that even in the absence of proof of actual bias, a reasonable apprehension of bias is sufficient to invalidate administrative or selection proceedings. The Court held that the inclusion of an officer who had earlier faced contempt proceedings at the petitioner’s instance was “in gross violation of the principles of natural justice”.<\/span><\/p>\n

    The Court noted that, in the absence of any counter affidavit, the allegations in the writ petition remained untraversed. The Court found the conduct of the respondents, including repeated procrastination and failure to comply with binding judicial directions, to be bordering on vendetta.<\/p>\n

    Court’s Decision<\/h3>\n

    Allowing the writ petition, the Court held that the petitioner had been subjected to “grave injustice and rank high-handedness” by the respondents and that the decision-making process stood vitiated by bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee. The Court passed the following directions —<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. \n

      The minutes of the SCSC meeting dated 01-09-2024, insofar as they related to the petitioner, were set aside.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    2. \n

      The Department of Personnel and Training was directed to convene a fresh meeting of the Search-cum-Selection Committee within four weeks, ensuring exclusion of the concerned officer.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    3. \n

      The outcome of the fresh SCSC proceedings was directed to be communicated to the petitioner within two weeks thereafter.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    4. \n

      Costs of ₹5,00,000\/- were imposed on the respondents for rank procrastination and deliberate obstruction, payable to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      [Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj v. Union of India, 2026 SCC OnLine SC 127<\/a>, Decided on 30-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

      Also read: Setting aside administrative action on grounds of violation of natural justice principles doesn’t bar administrative authorities from proceeding afresh: SC<\/a><\/p>\n

      https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/29\/administrative-action-violation-natural-justice-does-not-bar-administrative-action-sc-legal-news\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

      *Judgment by Justice Sandeep Mehta<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

      Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

      For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Petitioner-in-person<\/p>\n

      For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ld. Solicitor General, Mr. N.Venkataraman, A.S.G., Mr. V.C.bharathi, Adv. , Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv., Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv., Mr. Prakash Singh Negi, Adv., Mr. Aman Mehta, Adv., Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      “The rule of law constitutes the foundation of a well-governed society, and the shadow of bias or mala fides in the exercise of power concerning public 33 functions strikes at the very root of a regulated social order.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":375023,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[7591,98387,98388,55486,34871,98389,2805,98391,29631,5941,5363,98390],"class_list":["post-375018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-article-32","tag-bias-in-selection-process","tag-itat-appointment-departmental-vendetta","tag-justice-sandeep-mehta","tag-justice-vikram-nath","tag-mala-fide-exercise-of-power","tag-natural_justice","tag-public-appointments","tag-search-cum-selection-committee","tag-service-law","tag-supreme-court","tag-vigilance-clearance-contempt-of-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSC: Bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee Vitiates ITAT Appointment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court set aside rejection of an ex-Army officer's ITAT appointment, holding that bias and departmental vendetta vitiated the Search-cum-Selection Committee process, and imposed \u20b95 lakh costs.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court set aside rejection of an ex-Army officer's ITAT appointment, holding that bias and departmental vendetta vitiated the Search-cum-Selection Committee process, and imposed \u20b95 lakh costs.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-07T06:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-09T11:37:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/\",\"name\":\"SC: Bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee Vitiates ITAT Appointment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-07T06:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-09T11:37:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court set aside rejection of an ex-Army officer's ITAT appointment, holding that bias and departmental vendetta vitiated the Search-cum-Selection Committee process, and imposed \u20b95 lakh costs.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC: Bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee Vitiates ITAT Appointment | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court set aside rejection of an ex-Army officer's ITAT appointment, holding that bias and departmental vendetta vitiated the Search-cum-Selection Committee process, and imposed \u20b95 lakh costs.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost","og_description":"Supreme Court set aside rejection of an ex-Army officer's ITAT appointment, holding that bias and departmental vendetta vitiated the Search-cum-Selection Committee process, and imposed \u20b95 lakh costs.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-07T06:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-09T11:37:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/","name":"SC: Bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee Vitiates ITAT Appointment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-07T06:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-09T11:37:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Supreme Court set aside rejection of an ex-Army officer's ITAT appointment, holding that bias and departmental vendetta vitiated the Search-cum-Selection Committee process, and imposed \u20b95 lakh costs.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Bias in Search-cum-Selection Committee"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/bias-in-search-cum-selection-committee-itat-appointment-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Targeted Vendetta & Institutional Bias vitiate Selection Process; Supreme Court grants relief to Ex-Army Officer; Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bias-in-Search-cum-Selection-Committee.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377582,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/legal-roundup-service-law-february-2026-roundup-resignation-recruitment-appointment-pension-scc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":375018,"position":0},"title":"Service Law February 2026: A Look at the Month\u2019s Biggest Cases and Key Legislative Update","author":"Sunaina","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important service law legislative updates and cases across various High Courts and Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases and links to other roundups.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Service Law February 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Service-Law-February-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Service-Law-February-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Service-Law-February-2026.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Service-Law-February-2026.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/05\/unsuccessful-candidate-challenge-selection-process-mala-fides-reject-supreme-court-set-aside-jammu-kashmir-high-court-verdict-quashing-64-drug-inspector-appointment-justice-bv-nagarathna-justice-km-jo\/","url_meta":{"origin":375018,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Candidates cannot taint Selection Process with mala fides on being unsuccessful\u2019; Supreme Court sets aside J&K HC verdict quashing appointment of 64 Drug Inspectors","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that having participated in the selection process without any demur or protest, the writ petitioners cannot challenge the same as being tainted with mala fides, merely because they were unsuccessful.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"quashing appointment of Drug Inspectors","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1008.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1008.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1008.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1008.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235996,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/19\/ap-hc-considers-former-advocate-generals-plea-of-political-vendetta-directs-no-coercive-action-to-be-taken-in-fir\/","url_meta":{"origin":375018,"position":2},"title":"AP HC considers former Advocate General’s plea of political vendetta; Directs no coercive action to be taken in FIR","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Jitendra Kumar Maheswari, CJ stayed investigation into the case filed against the former Advocate General and Senior Advocate\u00a0Dammalapati Srinivas. Present petition was filed alleging mala fides against the State authorities, specifying the reasons as setup in the petition. Petitioner held the office of Additional Advocate General and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/bombay-hc-industrial-court-indian-express-transfer-order-mala-fide-personal-bias-unfair-labour-practice\/","url_meta":{"origin":375018,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC sets aside Industrial Court\u2019s order staying transfer of Indian Express employee due to lack of mala fides","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court referred to Rajendra Roy v. Union of India, (1993) 1 SCC 148 wherein it was held that, it is possible to draw reasonable inference of mala fide action from the pleadings and antecedent facts and circumstances, however it cannot be drawn from insinuation and vague suggestions.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239941,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/30\/its-high-time-we-put-an-end-to-the-disturbing-trend-of-govt-ignoring-our-directions-read-why-supreme-court-directed-constitution-of-national-tribunals-commission\/","url_meta":{"origin":375018,"position":4},"title":"‘It’s high time we put an end to the disturbing trend of Govt ignoring our directions.’ Read why Supreme Court directed constitution of National Tribunals Commission","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Judicial independence of the Tribunals can be achieved only when the Tribunals are provided the necessary infrastructure and other facilities without having to lean on the shoulders of the executive.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/14\/supreme-court-appointment-of-vice-chancellor-being-contrary-to-section-10-of-the-state-university-act-and-ugc-regulations-is-illegal-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":375018,"position":5},"title":"Vice Chancellor’s appointment contrary to Section 10 of State University Act, 2019 and Regulation 7.3.0 of the UGC Regulations illegal: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by the Uttaranchal High Court, wherein the Court has set aside the appointment of the appellant as a Vice Chancellor (\u2018VC\u2019), the division bench of M.R. Shah* and M.M. Sundresh, JJ. has upheld the decision of the High Court,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375018\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/375023"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}