{"id":374831,"date":"2026-02-05T18:00:08","date_gmt":"2026-02-05T12:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=374831"},"modified":"2026-02-06T16:36:00","modified_gmt":"2026-02-06T11:06:00","slug":"child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Child’s welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents’ financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In a custody dispute involving custody of two minor sons, the Division Bench of Pankaj Mithal*<\/span> and SVN Bhatti, JJ., emphasized that while the welfare of the children is undoubtedly the paramount consideration in custody matters, other child custody factors also carry weight in shaping the final order. These include the parents’ financial capacity, the standard of living, the children’s comfort, and their education. Accordingly, the High Court may not have been entirely correct in holding that such factors are of little relevance and that custody must depend solely on child’s welfare. The Court observed that the High Court had overlooked the material and crucial aspects while passing the impugned order. Thus, the Court set aside the order passed by the High Court and remanded the matter for reconsideration.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In the present case, both husband and the wife were well educated Indian citizens. The husband served as electrical engineer in Qatar since 2012 and after their marriage on 28-7-2015 as per Muslim personal law, both of them started residing at Qatar, where two sons were born to them from the wedlock.<\/p>\n

Subsequently, due to matrimonial discord, the parties filed separate divorce petitions, before the Qatar Family Court, whereby vide common judgment and order dated 29-3-2022, divorce based on mutual abuse was granted. The husband was directed to pay alimony, enjoyment compensation, monthly child support, etc. Custody of the minors was given to the wife, while guardianship to the husband. Since, the husband was the guardian, the passports were in his custody.<\/p>\n

On 18-8-2022, the wife travelled to India by either procuring fresh passports for children or based on duplicate passports; and started residing at Srinagar. Allegedly, the wife removed the minors from Qatar to India during their academic session, without the husband’s knowledge and consent. Thus, the husband filed a Habeas Corpus Petition before the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, alleging that his minor sons were in the wife’s illegal custody. This dispute was disposed of in appeal, considering the wife’s statement that she will go back to Qatar before the schools reopen or before 2-1-2023 and she will undertake all necessary steps for obtaining residency permit for her younger son. However, the wife failed to keep her undertaking.<\/p>\n

Subsequently, the husband had initiated contempt proceedings against the wife for violating her undertaking. The Contempt Court held the wife not guilty of committing contempt and sentenced ger with a token fine. Further, the husband initiated fresh proceedings before Family Court, Srinagar under Section 25<\/a> of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890<\/a>, seeking custody of the two minor children. The Family Court granted custody of minors to the husband. However, the High Court reversed the decision, which is challenged in the present case.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court emphasized that while the welfare of the children is undoubtedly the paramount consideration in custody matters, other factors also carry weight in shaping the final order. These include the parents’ financial capacity, the standard of living, the children’s comfort, and their education. Accordingly, the High Court may not have been entirely correct in holding that such factors are of little relevance and that custody must depend solely on welfare.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the High Court completely failed to consider the impact of Qatar Court’s judgment, as the revocation of the custody order was a crucial material to determine the children’s custody. There was no subsisting custody order in wife’s favour; rather, it was in the husband’s favour appointing him as the guardian of the minors. All these aspects were highly relevant.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the High Court also ignored the impact of the contempt order. The contempt order has attained finality and is conclusive, and as such, the wife cannot resile from her guilty conduct. Further, regarding the abuse and assault case filed against the husband, the Qatar Court had given a clean chit to him and there is no subsisting conviction for assault against him, which demonstrates that the misconduct against him has not been proved, so as to disentitle him from the children’s company.<\/p>\n

The Court, referring to the mediation report, noted that both children expressed a clear inclination to join their father. Although they had little or no conscious memory of life in Qatar, they conveyed a desire to explore and reside there. When asked about their care in Qatar, the elder child stated that his father’s presence would be sufficient and that someone would inevitably be available to look after them. The Court further observed that both children appeared comfortable with the idea of being without their mother. The younger child, in particular, repeatedly expressed his wish to go with the father and showed visible distress during the interaction. It was also recorded that both children speak only English and faced difficulty in conversing with local children.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the High Court had overlooked the material and crucial aspects while passing the impugned order. Although these factors may not, on their own, be decisive in determining custody, they remain necessary and relevant considerations, and their cumulative effect was certainly significant in arriving at a proper custody arrangement. Thus, the Court set aside the order passed by the High Court and remanded the matter for reconsideration most expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months.<\/p>\n

[Mohtashem Billah Malik v. Sana Aftab, 2026 SCC OnLine SC 146<\/a>, decided on 4-2-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by- Justice Pankaj Mithal<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv.; Prosenjeet Banerjee, Adv.; Nidhi Mohan Parashar, AOR; Soayib Qureshi, Adv.; Vikrant Kumar, Adv.; Aditya Krishna, Adv.; Kavya Singh, Adv.; Anushri Joshi, Adv.; Anshika Sharma, Adv.; Amar Bajpayee, Adv.<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Altaf Hussain Naik, Sr. Adv.; Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR; Atif Suhrawardy, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court noted from the mediation report that both children wished to live with their father in Qatar, despite limited memories of the place. The elder child added that their father’s presence alone would be enough, with someone available to care for them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":374849,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[13191,98263,75287,38140,44684,64231,63305,5363,26014],"class_list":["post-374831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-child-custody","tag-consideration-for-appointment-of-guardian","tag-custody-disputes","tag-financial-capacity","tag-justice-pankaj-mithal","tag-justice-s-v-n-bhatti","tag-standard-of-living","tag-supreme-court","tag-welfare-of-child"],"yoast_head":"\nChild Custody Factors Explained by Supreme Court: Welfare, Finances & Education| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court holds that while child welfare is paramount in custody disputes, courts must also consider parents' financial capacity, standard of living, education, and children's preferences. Matter remanded to High Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Child's welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents' financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court holds that while child welfare is paramount in custody disputes, courts must also consider parents' financial capacity, standard of living, education, and children's preferences. Matter remanded to High Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-05T12:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-06T11:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Child's welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents' financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"headline\":\"Child’s welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents’ financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-05T12:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-06T11:06:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":992,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/blog-20-19.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"child custody\",\"Consideration for appointment of Guardian\",\"Custody disputes\",\"Financial Capacity\",\"Justice Pankaj Mithal\",\"Justice S.V.N Bhatti\",\"standard of living\",\"Supreme Court\",\"welfare of child\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/\",\"name\":\"Child Custody Factors Explained by Supreme Court: Welfare, Finances & Education| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/blog-20-19.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-05T12:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-06T11:06:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court holds that while child welfare is paramount in custody disputes, courts must also consider parents' financial capacity, standard of living, education, and children's preferences. Matter remanded to High Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/blog-20-19.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/blog-20-19.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"child custody factors Supreme Court child's welfare in custody disputes\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/02\\\/05\\\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Child’s welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents’ financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/arushi\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Child Custody Factors Explained by Supreme Court: Welfare, Finances & Education| SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court holds that while child welfare is paramount in custody disputes, courts must also consider parents' financial capacity, standard of living, education, and children's preferences. Matter remanded to High Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Child's welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents' financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court","og_description":"Supreme Court holds that while child welfare is paramount in custody disputes, courts must also consider parents' financial capacity, standard of living, education, and children's preferences. Matter remanded to High Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-05T12:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-06T11:06:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Child's welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents' financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/"},"author":{"name":"Arushi","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"headline":"Child’s welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents’ financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court","datePublished":"2026-02-05T12:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-06T11:06:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/"},"wordCount":992,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.webp","keywords":["child custody","Consideration for appointment of Guardian","Custody disputes","Financial Capacity","Justice Pankaj Mithal","Justice S.V.N Bhatti","standard of living","Supreme Court","welfare of child"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/","name":"Child Custody Factors Explained by Supreme Court: Welfare, Finances & Education| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-05T12:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-06T11:06:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Supreme Court holds that while child welfare is paramount in custody disputes, courts must also consider parents' financial capacity, standard of living, education, and children's preferences. Matter remanded to High Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"child custody factors Supreme Court child's welfare in custody disputes"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/05\/child-custody-factors-supreme-court-india\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Child’s welfare paramount in custody disputes; but parents’ financial capacity, living standard, and education also matter: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/blog-20-19.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/family-law-february-2026-roundup\/","url_meta":{"origin":374831,"position":0},"title":"Family Law February 2026 Roundup: Key Rulings on custody, alimony, adoption, succession, and more","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"This month saw several significant rulings from the Supreme Court and High Courts on custody, maintenance, adoption, property disputes, and personal law.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Family Law February 2026 Roundup: Key Rulings on custody, alimony, adoption, succession, and more","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-51-13.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-51-13.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-51-13.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/BLOG-51-13.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/stability-child-paramount-consideration-custody-battle-supreme-court-sets-aside-orissa-hc-judgment-granting-custody-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":374831,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court sets aside Orissa HC judgment granting father custody of child living with aunt for 14 years; says \u2018child not a chattel\u2019","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the fact that when custody of the child was handed over to the aunt , she was un-married, and is now married having two children will not be a deterrent for this Court to come to the conclusion that best interest of the child still remains\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stability of child","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/stability-of-child.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/stability-of-child.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/stability-of-child.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/stability-of-child.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240033,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/02\/bom-hc-welfare-of-child-as-paramount-consideration-father-of-minor-given-custody-for-mother-not-being-able-to-take-care-of-the-child\/","url_meta":{"origin":374831,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Welfare of child as paramount consideration: Father of minor given custody for mother not being able to take care of the child","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of A.S. Chandurkar and N.B. Suryawanshi, JJ., determined the factors in regard to grant of custody of a minor child. The instant appeal arose out of the Judgment of Family Court in proceedings filed under Sections 7, 12 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223580,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/25\/uk-sc-welfare-of-child-is-the-paramount-consideration-in-a-custody-battle-israeli-nationals-daughter-allowed-to-be-retained-with-her-mother-in-england-for-the-childs-welf\/","url_meta":{"origin":374831,"position":3},"title":"UK SC | Welfare of child is paramount consideration in a custody battle \u2013 Israeli nationals\u2019 daughter allowed to be retained with her mother in England for child\u2019s welfare","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: A Full Bench of Lord Wilson, Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales upheld the appeal of the mother to retain her child in London and set aside the Court of Appeal\u2019s order. The mother and father were Israeli nationals who moved\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/sl-sc-interest-of-child-of-paramount-importance-while-deciding-questions-of-his-custody\/","url_meta":{"origin":374831,"position":4},"title":"SL SC | Interest of child stands paramount while deciding questions of his custody","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Three-Judge Bench of Sisira J de Abrew, Vijith Malalgoda PC and P. Padman Surasena, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the Judgment of Civil Appellate High Court granting custody of a minor child to her natural parents. Respondents herein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222490,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/25\/custody-of-children\/","url_meta":{"origin":374831,"position":5},"title":"Custody of Children","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tejaswi Pandit \u2020 Assisted by Manovi Mittra\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/child-custody.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374831\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/374849"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}