{"id":374510,"date":"2026-02-03T13:00:10","date_gmt":"2026-02-03T07:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=374510"},"modified":"2026-02-07T16:14:08","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T10:44:08","slug":"del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/","title":{"rendered":"Medical Board&#8217;s bald plea of &#8220;lifestyle disorder&#8221; insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Disclaimer: This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an appeal challenging Armed Forces Tribunal&#8217;s order which held that the respondent was entitled to disability pension even when the Release Medical Board opined that the disability was neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service but is the result of lifestyle disorder, a Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">V. Kameswar Rao*<\/span> and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ., affirmed the Tribunal&#8217;s order of granting disability pension to the respondent and held that a bald statement by the Medical Board that a disability is lifestyle related or not attributable to service, without recording individualised reasons, is insufficient to deny disability pension.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the respondent was appointed in the Indian Air Force on 28-10-1981 and was discharged from service on 31-03-2019 after rendering 37 years, 5 months and 4 days of service. It was an admitted position that he did not suffer from any disability at the time of his appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Release Medical Board was conducted on 11-03-2018, which assessed him to be suffering from primary Hypertension @ 30% for life, and CAD Silent ASMI with normal LV function @ 30% for life, with a composite assessment of 50% for life.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Medical Board recorded that the disabilities were &#8220;not attributable to or aggravated by military service&#8221; and described them as lifestyle related. The onset of both disabilities occurred on 09-02-2013, while the respondent was posted at Jammu\/Udhampur. He had earlier served in a field area from 21-12-1982 to 09-03-1986 at 403 AF Station, Kumbhigram.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">By order dated 03-08-2023, the Armed Forces Tribunal partially allowed the respondent&#8217;s application and held him entitled to disability pension for Primary Hypertension assessed at 30%, broad-banded to 50% in terms of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ram Avtar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/I4345Mdm\" target=\"_blank\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000227217\" target=\"_blank\">2014 SCC OnLine SC 1761<\/a><\/a>, with arrears and interest. Aggrieved by the Tribunal&#8217;s order, the Union of India filed the present writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court examined the legal position laid down in several binding precedents including <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ram Kumar<\/span>, W.P.(C) 475\/2026, decided on 14-01-2026; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Balbir Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002970718\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 7873<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bijender Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002639046\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 895<\/a>, and reiterated that &#8220;<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">even under 2008 Entitlement Rules, an officer who suffers from a disease at the time of his release and applies for disability pension within 15 years from release of service, is ordinarily entitled to disability pension.&#8221;<\/span> The Court emphasised that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;the burden to prove the disentitlement therefore remains on the military department even under 2008 Entitlement Rules.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On facts, the Court noted that the respondent was medically fit at the time of entry into service, onset of disability occurred during service tenure and the Release Medical Board failed to provide any specific or cogent reasons for holding that Primary Hypertension was not attributable to service.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that while ascertaining the disability of Hypertension, the Release Medical Board had not given any reasons to support its conclusion that the disability of Primary Hypertension was not relatable to military service. It did not even gave any reasons to relate the disability to lifestyle.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;lifestyle varies from individual to individual. Hence, a mere statement that the disease is a lifestyle disorder cannot be a sufficient reason to deny the grant of Disability Pension unless the Medical Board has duly examined and recorded the particulars relevant to the individual concerned.&#8221;<\/span> The Court reiterated that Medical Boards must not adopt a vague or stereotyped approach and must record clear and cogent reasons while discharging the onus placed upon them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court upheld the Tribunal&#8217;s order of granting disability pension to the respondent and dismissed the writ petition as being without merit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Union of India v. 627281 Ex MWO (HFO) Tejpal Singh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5l1XBOLL\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Del 374<\/a>, Decided on 19-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice V. Kameswar Rao<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates and Mr. Mritunjay, Mr. Padam, DAV Legal Cell, Air Force, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;A mere statement that the disease of a lifestyle disorder cannot be a sufficient reason to deny the grant of Disability Pension unless the Medical Board has duly examined and recorded the particulars relevant to the individual concerned.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":374521,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6301,2543,27374,45171,68839,95916,98053,98052,98054,5271,82924,5941,98055],"class_list":["post-374510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-armed-forces-tribunal","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-disability-pension","tag-hypertension","tag-justice-manmeet-pritam-singh-arora","tag-justice-v-kameswar-rao","tag-lifestyle-disease","tag-medical-board-opinion","tag-military-service-law","tag-pension","tag-service-jurisprudence","tag-service-law","tag-veterans-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC: Medical Board Must Give Reasons to Deny Disability Pension | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that Medical Board&#039;s bald plea of &quot;lifestyle disorder&quot; without reasons is insufficient to deny disability pension.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Medical Board&#039;s bald plea of &quot;lifestyle disorder&quot; insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that Medical Board&#039;s bald plea of &quot;lifestyle disorder&quot; without reasons is insufficient to deny disability pension.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-03T07:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-07T10:44:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Medical Board&#039;s bald plea of &quot;lifestyle disorder&quot; insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC: Medical Board Must Give Reasons to Deny Disability Pension | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-03T07:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-07T10:44:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that Medical Board's bald plea of \\\"lifestyle disorder\\\" without reasons is insufficient to deny disability pension.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"disability pension\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Medical Board&#8217;s bald plea of &#8220;lifestyle disorder&#8221; insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC: Medical Board Must Give Reasons to Deny Disability Pension | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that Medical Board's bald plea of \"lifestyle disorder\" without reasons is insufficient to deny disability pension.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Medical Board's bald plea of \"lifestyle disorder\" insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that Medical Board's bald plea of \"lifestyle disorder\" without reasons is insufficient to deny disability pension.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-02-03T07:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-07T10:44:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Medical Board's bald plea of \"lifestyle disorder\" insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/","name":"Del HC: Medical Board Must Give Reasons to Deny Disability Pension | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp","datePublished":"2026-02-03T07:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-07T10:44:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that Medical Board's bald plea of \"lifestyle disorder\" without reasons is insufficient to deny disability pension.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"disability pension"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/del-hc-medical-board-lifestyle-disability-pension-denial-unsustainable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Medical Board&#8217;s bald plea of &#8220;lifestyle disorder&#8221; insufficient to deny disability pension: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/disability-pension.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":347492,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/09\/discharge-serviceman-denial-disability-pension-unreasoned-medical-board-report-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":374510,"position":0},"title":"Discharge of serviceman or denial of disability pension based on unreasoned medical board report would be unsustainable in law: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is a difference between the \u201cconclusion\u201d or \u201copinion\u201d, and \u201creasons\u201d to support such a conclusion or opinion. The reasons have to be separately mentioned for the conclusion arrived at by the Medical Board. The bare conclusion arrived by the Medical Board cannot treated as the reasons for discharge of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Denial of disability pension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Denial-of-disability-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Denial-of-disability-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Denial-of-disability-pension.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Denial-of-disability-pension.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":181994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/17\/armed-forces-tribunal-rules-favour-applicant-aggrieved-refusal-grant-disability-pension\/","url_meta":{"origin":374510,"position":1},"title":"Armed Forces Tribunal rules in favour of applicant aggrieved by refusal to grant disability pension","author":"Saba","date":"January 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow: Hon\u2019ble Justice DP Singh and Hon\u2019ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, pronounced an order in respect to an application being filed in regard to refusal to grant disability pension under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The applicant was commissioned in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/sc-presumes-service-related-illness-disability-pension\/","url_meta":{"origin":374510,"position":2},"title":"&#8216;Illness is presumed to be service related if no disease is recorded by medical board at time of entry\u2019; Supreme Court orders 50% disability pension for ex-serviceman","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court found that the Tribunal had merely relied on the remarks of the Invaliding Medical Board and the Re-Survey Medical Boards to conclude that, since the appellant\u2019s disability was assessed at less than 20%, he was not entitled to the disability element of the disability pension.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disability pension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Disability-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Disability-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Disability-pension.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Disability-pension.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338123,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/28\/aft-grants-disability-pension-former-army-man-suffering-from-hypertension-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":374510,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Patently illegal &amp; against the thought process of Armed Forces itself\u2019; AFT grants disability pension to former army personnel suffering from primary hypertension","author":"Editor","date":"December 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe mere fact that the disease manifested itself many years after joining service is sufficient to conclude that the same was attributable to military service because it is an established fact that stress and strain in military service is unique.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Army Disability pension for hypertension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Media-_19_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Media-_19_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Media-_19_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Media-_19_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/03\/ph-hc-grants-full-disability-pension-to-a-man-enrolled-in-army\/","url_meta":{"origin":374510,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Evident miscommunication made about dis-entitlement of disability pension\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC grants complete disability pension to a man enrolled in Army","author":"Arushi","date":"October 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Despite holding an indefeasible right to become the able recipient of disability pension, there was a financial detriment to the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/25\/aft-grants-disability-pension-former-army-man-suffering-from-hypertension\/","url_meta":{"origin":374510,"position":5},"title":"Armed Forces Tribunal grants disability pension to former army personnel suffering from primary hypertension","author":"Editor","date":"December 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The applicant was enrolled in the Indian Army in 1985 in a fit state of health and mind, however, after 26 years of service he was diagnosed with primary hypertension @30% for life and was subsequently discharged.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Army disability pension for hypertension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Army-disability-pension-for-hypertension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Army-disability-pension-for-hypertension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Army-disability-pension-for-hypertension.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Army-disability-pension-for-hypertension.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374510","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374510"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374510\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/374521"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}