{"id":374314,"date":"2026-01-31T13:00:57","date_gmt":"2026-01-31T07:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=374314"},"modified":"2026-02-06T10:43:50","modified_gmt":"2026-02-06T05:13:50","slug":"delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing ‘Happi Planet’ trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> An application was filed by Happi Planet Eco Products Pvt. Ltd.<\/span> (plaintiff) seeking exemption from instituting Pre-Institution Mediation under Section 12A<\/a> of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/a> (“CC Act”), along with seeking an ex parte ad-interim injunction against rampant trademark infringement, counterfeiting, and misuse of the plaintiff’s trade dress on e-commerce platforms. Tushar Rao Gedela, J., restrained defendants 1 to 7 from using in any manner plaintiff’s well-known brand trademarks “Happi Planet” and the distinctive packaging\/proprietary trade dress, including inter alia HAPPY PLANET, HIPIPA PLANET et al, and\/or plaintiff’s copyright in the artistic work, packaging and trade dress.<\/p>\n

The Court, placing reliance upon the Supreme Court decision in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Keerthi<\/span>, (2024) 5 SCC 815<\/a>, granted exemption, observing that where urgent interim relief is sought, the requirement of pre-institution mediation cannot operate as a bar.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff, Happi Planet Eco Products Private Limited, claims to have conceived and commenced its business in the personal and home care segment under the distinct branding and identity “Happi Planet”. It asserts that it established its market presence through the sale and promotion of products under the said brand, including through its domain name www.happi-planet.com<\/a>. The plaintiff claims to have launched the first commercial use of the trademark “Happi Planet” on 01.11.2021, followed by incorporation in January 2022. On 11.03.2022, the plaintiff filed an application for registration of the word mark “Happi Planet” in Class 3, claiming use since 01.11.2021. On the strength of the popularity and success of the brand, the plaintiff claims to have received significant venture capital funding from reputed investors.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff further claims to have established a distinct market presence by offering eco-friendly home care solutions that are free from harmful toxins and certified “Readily Biodegradable” as per OECD 301 standards. It placed on record its commercial growth, stating that annual revenue figures rose from Rs. 0.46 crores in FY 2022—23 to Rs. 36.37 crores by FY 2025—26. Apart from its own e-commerce website, the plaintiff’s products were stated to be sold through major platforms such as Amazon, Flipkart and Zepto, with offline expansion through retail stores in Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore. The plaintiff also claimed extensive brand-building through influencer engagement, digital marketing and advertising campaigns, with marketing expenditure reaching approximately Rs. 14.01 crores by FY 2025—26.<\/p>\n

A key facet of the plaintiff’s claim was its adoption of a distinctive packaging style with unique colour schemes, visual motifs and an overall distinctive presentation. The plaintiff asserted that this distinctive trademark and trade dress constituted a valuable intellectual property, developed through “considerable effort, creativity and commercial insight.” According to the plaintiff, the packaging and overall get-up of its products had acquired substantial goodwill and consumer association, making it an identifiable brand in the competitive home-care market.<\/p>\n

So far as the defendants are concerned, the plaintiff contended that Defendant 1 to 7 were counterfeiters who were not only selling sub-standard products resulting in dilution of the plaintiff’s goodwill and reputation, but were also violating the trademark “Happi Planet” and infringing copyrights in the original artistic work of its packaging and trade dress. The plaint attempted to demonstrate misuse and infringement by Defendant 1 to 7 through the sale of inferior products in “near identical\/deceptively similar or identical trade dress and packaging.”<\/p>\n

The plaintiff claimed that on conducting a detailed market investigation and online test purchases, it was revealed that several infringing products were being offered for sale on e-commerce platforms by entities whose identities were concealed or fictitiously presented. Such products, according to the plaintiff, bore striking similarity in packaging, trade dress and overall presentation to the plaintiff’s goods. The plaintiff submitted that e-commerce platforms had permitted hundreds of third parties to sell counterfeit and infringing products over their marketplaces, and despite issuance of notices, only limited takedowns were undertaken.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff asserted that such large-scale and rampant sale of counterfeit goods had caused and continued to cause irreparable harm, loss and injury to its business, goodwill and intellectual property rights. It was claimed that the defendants were engaging in illicit trade and “riding on the back of the plaintiff’s goodwill and reputation.” The plaintiff also warned that if counterfeit products were not restrained, they could pose serious health risks to consumers, while significantly damaging the plaintiff’s brand reputation, goodwill, and consumer trust painstakingly built over time. Accordingly, the plaintiff prayed that an ex parte ad-interim injunction be passed against Defendant 1 to 7 and that directions be issued for taking down listings against Defendant 8 to 11.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that having heard the counsel for the plaintiff and upon perusing the plaint and records, it was of the prima facie opinion that an ex parte ad-interim injunction was warranted. The Court noted that the counsel had handed over the Bench the products manufactured and sold by the plaintiff on one hand, and those being manufactured and offered for sale by Defendant 1 to 7 on the other.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that upon comparison, “not only do the infringing products contain the trademark ‘Happi Planet’ of the plaintiff but also are packaged in near identical or deceptively similar packaging and trade dress.<\/span>” The Court analysed the extent of similarity and remarked that “the artistic work, the trade dress and packaging is so identical that it took a while for this Court to distinguish between the two.”<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court held that the plaintiff had established a prima facie strong case. Keeping in view the fact that the plaintiff was the owner of registered copyrights in its original artistic works, packaging and trade dress, and had already applied for registration of its trademark “Happi Planet,” the balance of convenience was found to be tilted in favour of the plaintiff. The Court further held that if restraint orders were not passed, the harm to credibility, goodwill, reputation and product standards would not be compensable in monetary terms alone.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court directed:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Defendant 1 to 7 were restrained from using in any manner the plaintiff’s well-known trademarks “Happi Planet” and its distinctive packaging\/trade dress, including variants such as HAPPY PLANET and HIPIPA PLANET.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Defendant 8 to 11 (Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho and Jiomart) were directed to block and suspend infringing listings, delist counterfeiters, and blacklist third parties found infringing upon the plaintiff’s intellectual property.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Since the injunction was declared dynamic in nature, the plaintiff was permitted to directly furnish infringing listings to the platforms, which were required to take them down forthwith without further Court intervention.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    The platforms were also directed to furnish Basic Subscriber Information (BSI) details through compliance affidavits within two weeks.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    [Happi Planet Eco Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravi Malani, 2026 SCC OnLine Del 351<\/a>, decided on 28-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Subhash Bhutoria, Ms. Anuja Negi, Ms. Annanya Mehan and Mr. Tushar Gulati, Advocates for plaintiff Mr. Deepak Singh, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Manas Raghuvanshi, Advocate for D-8.<\/p>\n

    Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Vivek Ayyagari and Mr. Abhay Aren, Advocates for Meesho\/D-10.<\/p>\n

    Mr. Jayant Malik and Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Advocates for D-11.<\/p>\n

    Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC alongwith Mr. Om Ram and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocates for CCPA(UOI)\/D-12.<\/p>\n

    Mr. Sumit Nagpal, SPC alongwith Mr. Sarthak Rana, G.P. for D-13<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The dispute arose from the plaintiff’s allegation that Defendants 1 to 7 were engaged in the large-scale sale of counterfeit and sub-standard home care products bearing the trademark “Happi Planet” and copying the plaintiff’s distinctive packaging and trade dress.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":374317,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32271,35228,97835,97836,18071],"class_list":["post-374314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-counterfeit-products","tag-dynamic-injunction","tag-e-commerce-platform-liability","tag-trade-dress-protection","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC injuncts counterfeit 'Happi Planet' products on Amazon, Flipkart & Meesho| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ex parte injunction restraining counterfeiters from infringing the 'Happi Planet' trademark and trade dress, directing Amazon, Flipkart and Meesho to take down fake product listings and disclose seller details.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing 'Happi Planet' trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ex parte injunction restraining counterfeiters from infringing the 'Happi Planet' trademark and trade dress, directing Amazon, Flipkart and Meesho to take down fake product listings and disclose seller details.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-31T07:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-06T05:13:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing 'Happi Planet' trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC injuncts counterfeit 'Happi Planet' products on Amazon, Flipkart & Meesho| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-31T07:30:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-06T05:13:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court grants ex parte injunction restraining counterfeiters from infringing the 'Happi Planet' trademark and trade dress, directing Amazon, Flipkart and Meesho to take down fake product listings and disclose seller details.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Happi Planet trademark\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing ‘Happi Planet’ trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC injuncts counterfeit 'Happi Planet' products on Amazon, Flipkart & Meesho| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte injunction restraining counterfeiters from infringing the 'Happi Planet' trademark and trade dress, directing Amazon, Flipkart and Meesho to take down fake product listings and disclose seller details.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing 'Happi Planet' trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings","og_description":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte injunction restraining counterfeiters from infringing the 'Happi Planet' trademark and trade dress, directing Amazon, Flipkart and Meesho to take down fake product listings and disclose seller details.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-31T07:30:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-06T05:13:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing 'Happi Planet' trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/","name":"Delhi HC injuncts counterfeit 'Happi Planet' products on Amazon, Flipkart & Meesho| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-31T07:30:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-06T05:13:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte injunction restraining counterfeiters from infringing the 'Happi Planet' trademark and trade dress, directing Amazon, Flipkart and Meesho to take down fake product listings and disclose seller details.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Happi Planet trademark"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/delhi-high-court-happi-planet-counterfeit-injunction-amazon-flipkart-meesho\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court restrains counterfeiters from infringing ‘Happi Planet’ trademark; directs Amazon, Flipkart, Meesho to take down fake listings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Happi-Planet-trademark.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-sukam-systems-p-ltd-for-its-trade-mark-su-kam-against-lithium-power-energy-p-ltd-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":374314,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction to Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. for its trade mark \u2018Su-Kam\u2019 against Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. alleged infringement and passing of by Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd. of its registered trade marks \u2018Su-Kam\u2019, \u2018BIG conqueror Tubular Battery\u2019 and \u2018BIG Warrior Tubular Battery\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":272963,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-of-vistara-against-using-similar-keychains-tags-similar-marks-damages-compensation-20lakhs-intellectual-property-rights-airlines-trademark-infringementlega\/","url_meta":{"origin":374314,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains company selling keychains and baggage tags having VISTARA marks online; Raises security concerns and directs damages of Rs 20 lakh","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Tata Sia Airlines (\u2018plaintiff') seeking decree of permanent injunction against company selling keychains and baggage tags bearing the \u2018VISTARA Marks' in the aubergine and gold colour-combination, on a Chinese e-commerce platform, namely AliExpress, by the seller (\u2018defendant'), Navin Chawla J.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"VISTARA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":374314,"position":2},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":374314,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/permanent-injunction-granted-for-infringement-of-trademark-on-satisfaction-of-triple-identity-test\/","url_meta":{"origin":374314,"position":4},"title":"Permanent injunction granted for infringement of trademark on satisfaction of \u2018triple identity test\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manmohan, J. decreed a suit for grant of a permanent injunction against the defendant for infringement of plaintiff \u2019s trademarks. It was an admitted fact that the plaintiff was a registered owner of the trademarks SUMEET and SUMEET TRADITIONAL for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314956,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/22\/nova-v-novya-trademark-dispute-delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-in-favour-of-sterling-agro-industries\/","url_meta":{"origin":374314,"position":5},"title":"[NOVA v NOVYA Trademark Dispute] Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Sterling Agro Industries","author":"Arunima","date":"February 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Sterling Agro Industries emerges victorious in the trademark clash between NOVA and NOVYA, as Delhi High Court decrees in their favor, enforcing a permanent injunction against the defendants and awarding litigation costs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374314"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374314\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":374876,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374314\/revisions\/374876"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/374317"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}