{"id":374278,"date":"2026-01-31T10:30:13","date_gmt":"2026-01-31T05:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=374278"},"modified":"2026-02-02T17:58:19","modified_gmt":"2026-02-02T12:28:19","slug":"bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/","title":{"rendered":"Tenants’ right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer’s commercial interests: Bombay High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a petition under Section 9<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘Arbitration Act’), a Single Judge Bench of Sandeep V. Marne<\/span>, J., held that termination of the Development Agreement and Power of Attorney executed with the developer was justified. The Court noted that the project had remained stagnant for over 11 years, observed that the society and its members could not be made to wait endlessly, and emphasised that the rights of tenants to secure redevelopment must prevail over the developer’s commercial interests. Interim relief was therefore refused.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The land belonged to the municipal corporation and comprised 28 tenanted structures occupied by municipal tenants. A cooperative housing society was formed, which appointed a developer in 2014 through a resolution, followed by execution of a Development Agreement and Power of Attorney. The developer submitted a redevelopment proposal under Regulation 33(7) of the Development Control Regulations, 1991. However, delays occurred in tenancy verification, consent verification, and issuance of Annexure-2.<\/p>\n

The developer contended that delays were attributable to municipal authorities’ errors in tenancy records and failure to issue Annexure-2 despite repeated correspondence. It was argued that the termination was mala fide and influenced by another developer, and that the Development Agreement was capable of specific performance. The developer also claimed to have demonstrated financial capacity and obtained irrevocable consents from tenants.<\/p>\n

The society and its members argued that the developer failed to make progress for over a decade, did not register the Development Agreement, and lost the confidence of tenants. They emphasised that the municipal corporation had accepted termination, and that the rights of tenants to redevelopment outweighed the developer’s commercial interests. The municipal corporation supported this position, pointing to repeated defaults and failure to demonstrate financial capacity.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court observed that the redevelopment proposal remained stuck at the initial stages for 11 long years. It was emphasised that the developer was solely responsible for the delay in the conduct of consent verification for over two years, and thereafter did precious little for the issuance of Annexure-2. The Court noted that the society and its members cannot be made to wait endlessly for the developer to take necessary steps in the redevelopment process, and further highlighted that the developer, being a professional, was expected to possess the necessary expertise and liaise with municipal officials to ensure the expeditious issuance of Annexure-2.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that the principles laid down in the earlier Division Bench judgment Huges Real Estate Developers LLP v. Khernagar Adarsh Coop. Housing Society Ltd.<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2921<\/a> are to be applied squarely, reiterating that when the rights of residents of dilapidated buildings to reside in safe houses are pitted against the rights of the developer to earn profits through redevelopment contracts, the latter must yield to the former.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted that the developer is using the project only for the purpose of securing profits by selling the same to another developer and has grossly delayed even its commencement, therefore, no interim measures deserve to be granted in its favour. It was further observed that the society had lost faith in the developer, and that equitable relief could not be granted in such circumstances.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, the Court held that the termination of the Development Agreement was justified and that no interim measures under Section 9<\/a> of the Arbitration Act<\/a> could be granted.<\/p>\n

[ISON Builders LLP v. Om Sai Ram Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed), 2026 SCC OnLine Bom 319<\/a>, decided on 23-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Karl Tamboly with Rohan Savant, Chirag Sarawagi and Yash Sinha i\/by. Tushar Goradia<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Prateek Seksaria, Senior Advocate with Rohit Agarwal, Nishant Chothani and Yash S. Jain, Pooja Yadav i\/b. Komal Punjabi<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The society and its members cannot be made to wait endlessly for the developer to take necessary steps in the redevelopment process.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":374281,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3226,2569,3066,67670,3391,45514,97813,49586,97812],"class_list":["post-374278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-delay","tag-justice-sandeep-v-marne","tag-public_interest","tag-redevelopment","tag-rights-of-tenants","tag-section-9-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-termination-of-development-agreement"],"yoast_head":"\nBombay HC on Tenants' right to timely redevelopment | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court has ruled that Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court has ruled that Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-31T05:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-02T12:28:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC on Tenants' right to timely redevelopment | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-31T05:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-02T12:28:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court has ruled that Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Tenants' right to timely redevelopment\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tenants’ right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer’s commercial interests: Bombay High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC on Tenants' right to timely redevelopment | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court has ruled that Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests: Bombay High Court","og_description":"Bombay High Court has ruled that Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-31T05:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-02T12:28:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests: Bombay High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/","name":"Bombay HC on Tenants' right to timely redevelopment | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-31T05:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-02T12:28:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court has ruled that Tenants' right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer's commercial interests.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Tenants' right to timely redevelopment"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tenants’ right to timely redevelopment prevails over developer’s commercial interests: Bombay High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Tenants-right-to-timely-redevelopment.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/development-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":374278,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Can a development agreement signed between Chairman of Society and one of the Managing Committee members be binding upon non-signatory? Court discusses while ordering redevelopment of building","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: G.S. Patel, J., in its opening remarks, expressed with respect to the present matter that: This is the usual story of a solitary member of a society obstructing the redevelopment of the society building. \u00a0It does not matter to this member that the building is in a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367942,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/27\/bombay-hc-upholds-arbitral-award-to-tcs-over-cancelled-exam\/","url_meta":{"origin":374278,"position":1},"title":"Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting Rs 5.37 crore to TCS over cancelled recruitment examination","author":"Editor","date":"November 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe UPLA Secretariat terminated the agreement with TCS in 2016, citing anomalies in another examination conducted by TCS for the Railway Recruitment Board.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitral award to TCS over cancelled exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Arbitral-award-to-TCS-over-cancelled-exam.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Arbitral-award-to-TCS-over-cancelled-exam.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Arbitral-award-to-TCS-over-cancelled-exam.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Arbitral-award-to-TCS-over-cancelled-exam.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/11\/bom-hc-courts-can-decide-arbitrability-under-s-8-arbitration-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":374278,"position":2},"title":"Courts can decide arbitrability of disputes under Section 8 Arbitration Act; Bombay HC holds Redemption of Mortgage disputes non-arbitrable","author":"Editor","date":"October 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt was not disputed that the plaintiff\u2019s prayer in the suit for recovery of the amount would be arbitrable. However, the plaintiff also sought redemption of mortgages executed in its favour and this was where the plaintiff claimed that the said claim was not arbitrable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Courts can decide arbitrability","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Courts-can-decide-arbitrability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Courts-can-decide-arbitrability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Courts-can-decide-arbitrability.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Courts-can-decide-arbitrability.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311039,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/09\/decoding-legal-complexities-ncdrc-landmark-ruling-redevelopment-challenges\/","url_meta":{"origin":374278,"position":3},"title":"Decoding Legal Complexities: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s Landmark Ruling on Redevelopment Challenges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ashoo Gupta\u2020 Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 4","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Redevelopment Challenges","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/decoding-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/decoding-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/decoding-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/decoding-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307916,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/27\/tenants-rights-in-redevelopment-cannot-eclipse-landlord-ownership-rights-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":374278,"position":4},"title":"Tenant\u2019s rights in redevelopment cannot eclipse landlord\u2019s rights of ownership: Bombay High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"November 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhat the tenants really seek is not just a right to dictate the terms of that tenancy beyond anything the law contemplates, but to impermissibly expand tenancy rights to the prejudice of the property owner \u2014 without taking the slightest steps to acquire those ownership rights.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/10\/arbitration-agreement-language-final-binding-arbitral-award-intention-valid-supreme-court-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":374278,"position":5},"title":"Arbitration clause, even without the words \u201cfinal and binding\u201d, valid if the intention of the parties, to abide by arbitrator’s decision, is clear: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"When Section 7 or any other provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 do not stipulate any particular form or requirements, it would not be appropriate for a court to gratuitously add impediments and desist from upholding the validity of an arbitration agreement.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/374281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}