{"id":374034,"date":"2026-01-29T14:00:20","date_gmt":"2026-01-29T08:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=374034"},"modified":"2026-01-29T13:12:43","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T07:42:43","slug":"multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> The bench of Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra<\/span>, JJ has held that multiple complaints under S. 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a>, arising from dishonour of multiple cheques issued pursuant to the same transaction, do not per se amount to abuse of process. Each dishonoured cheque constitutes a distinct and independent cause of action, subject to fulfilment of statutory requirements including presentation, dishonour, notice, and failure to pay.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In the present case, the appellant entered into an Agreement to Sell with the respondent developer for three commercial units in a Ghaziabad project, paying a total consideration of approximately ₹1.72 crore. The respondent failed to execute and register the sale deeds in the agreed timeframe. Towards refund of the amount along with compensation, the respondent issued multiple cheques, some drawn on the firm’s account and some personally by the proprietor. All the cheques were dishonoured upon presentation.<\/p>\n

Consequently, the appellant filed multiple complaints under S. 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a> in respect of the dishonoured cheques. The respondents approached the Delhi High Court seeking quashing of the complaints. The High Court quashed one complaint on the ground that multiple prosecutions arising from the same transaction amounted to parallel proceedings, while refusing to quash other complaints. Aggrieved by the quashing of the one complaint, the appellant approached the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Ruling by the Supreme Court<\/h3>\n

The main issue before the Court was whether multiple complaints under S. 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a> are maintainable when multiple cheques, arising from the same transaction, are dishonoured, and whether the High Court was justified in quashing one complaint at the threshold by examining disputed questions of fact.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court held that each dishonoured cheque constitutes a distinct cause of action under Section 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a>, even if arising from the same underlying transaction.<\/p>\n

“It is well settled that under Section 138<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a>, a separate cause of action arises upon each dishonour of a cheque provided the statutory sequence of presentation, dishonour, notice, and failure to pay is complete. The fact that multiple cheques arise from one transaction will not merge them into a single cause of action.”<\/p>\n

The Court emphasized that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by prematurely evaluating facts during quashing:<\/p>\n

“Whether those cheques were issued as alternative or supplementary instruments, or represented fresh undertakings, is a disputed question of fact requiring evidence at trial and cannot be resolved at the threshold. Questions such as whether the firm’s cheques were issued in substitution of the personal cheques, whether the parties treated them as alternative securities, and whether both were intended to be simultaneously enforceable, are all mixed questions of fact. The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482<\/a> CrPC<\/a> cannot be used to decide such disputed issues.”<\/p>\n

The Court, further, observed that the statutory presumption under Section 139<\/a> NI Act<\/a> operates in favour of the complainant and issues relating to legally enforceable debt or liability must be decided at trial.<\/p>\n

“A bare perusal of Section 139<\/a> of the NI Act<\/a> would indicate that once a cheque is issued in discharge of liability and dishonoured, a presumption of liability in favour of the complainant arises. The accused person is then required to rebut the presumption by raising facts that either there was no debt or liability when the cheque was drawn, or the cheque was not drawn in discharge of liability, or notice was not served in time. The statutory presumption attached to the issuance of a cheque, being one made in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability, is required to be accorded due weight.”<\/p>\n

Therefore, it was held that in circumstances where the accused approaches the Court seeking quashing of proceedings even before the commencement of trial, the Court must exercise circumspection and refrain from prematurely stifling the prosecution at the threshold, particularly by overlooking the legal presumption that operates in favour of the complainant.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n

The Court clarified that mere multiplicity of complaints under S. 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a> does not constitute abuse of process when statutory requirements are fulfilled. In the case at hand, cheques were dishonoured, statutory notices served, and summons issued. The Court, hence, held that “the complaint prima facie stands”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

[Sumit Bansal v. MGI Developers & Promoters, 2026 SCC OnLine SC 49<\/a>, decided on 08-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment Authored by: Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For Appellant(s):<\/span> Mr. Sameer Rohatgi, Adv., Mr. Namit Suri, AOR, Mr. Rameezudin Raja, Adv., Ms. Pepakayala Geetanjali, Adv., Mr. Anish Singh, Adv., Dr. Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Sr. Adv., Dr. Harshvir Pratapm Sharma, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tejas Patel, AOR, Mr. Akul Krishnan, Adv., Ms. Sakshi Apurva, Adv.<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span> Dr. Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tejas Patel, AOR, Mr. Akul Krishnan, Adv., Ms. Sakshi Apurva, Adv., Mr. Sameer Rohatgi, Adv., Mr. Namit Suri, AOR, Mr. Rameezudin Raja, Adv., Ms. Pepakayala Geetanjali, Adv., Mr. Anish Singh, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“A separate cause of action arises upon each dishonour of a cheque provided the statutory sequence of presentation, dishonour, notice, and failure to pay is complete.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":374038,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3029,34505,55015,97688,23584,97687,13021,5363],"class_list":["post-374034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-cheque_bounce","tag-justice-prashant-kumar-mishra","tag-justice-sanjay-karol","tag-multiple-complaints-under-section-138-ni-act","tag-section-138-ni-act","tag-section-139-presumption","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court on Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-29T08:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"headline\":\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-29T08:30:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":823,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"cheque bounce\",\"Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra\",\"Justice Sanjay Karol\",\"Multiple Complaints under Section 138 NI Act\",\"Section 138 NI Act\",\"Section 139 presumption\",\"section 482 crpc\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court on Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-29T08:30:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"description\":\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"multiple complaints under S. 138 NI Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_3\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court on Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act| SCC Times","description":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction","og_description":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-29T08:30:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"headline":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction","datePublished":"2026-01-29T08:30:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/"},"wordCount":823,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp","keywords":["cheque bounce","Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra","Justice Sanjay Karol","Multiple Complaints under Section 138 NI Act","Section 138 NI Act","Section 139 presumption","section 482 crpc","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/","name":"Supreme Court on Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-29T08:30:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"description":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"multiple complaints under S. 138 NI Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/29\/multiple-complaints-under-s-138-ni-act-supreme-court-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cheques Bounced? Supreme Court Confirms You Can File Multiple Complaints under S. 138 NI Act for the Same Transaction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/multiple-complaints-under-S.-138-NI-Act.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/10\/section-138-ni-act-once-settlement-has-been-entered-into-the-complainant-cannot-pursue-the-original-complaint-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":374034,"position":0},"title":"Section 138 NI Act| Once settlement has been entered into, the complainant cannot pursue the original complaint: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The settlement agreement subsumes the original complaint.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/12\/dishonour-cheques-section-138-ni-act-legally-enforceable-debt-encashment-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":374034,"position":1},"title":"Dishonour of Cheques| Section 138 NI Act would not attract if cheque does not represent a legally enforceable debt at the time of encashment","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Supreme Court was called upon to decide whether the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 would deem to be committed if the cheque that is dishonoured does not represent the enforceable debt at the time of encashment, the bench\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-would-not-attract-if-cheque-does-not-represent-a-legally-enforceable-debt-at-the-time-of-encashment-1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-would-not-attract-if-cheque-does-not-represent-a-legally-enforceable-debt-at-the-time-of-encashment-1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-would-not-attract-if-cheque-does-not-represent-a-legally-enforceable-debt-at-the-time-of-encashment-1-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-would-not-attract-if-cheque-does-not-represent-a-legally-enforceable-debt-at-the-time-of-encashment-1-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-would-not-attract-if-cheque-does-not-represent-a-legally-enforceable-debt-at-the-time-of-encashment-1-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266788,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/12\/banks-slip-denoting-cheque-has-been-dishonoured-a-prima-facie-evidence-tis-hazari-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":374034,"position":2},"title":"Law on S. 146 NI Act | Bank\u2019s slip denoting cheque has been dishonoured: A prima facie evidence? Explained by Tis Hazari Courts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi: While addressing a decision revolving around Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Sanjay Sharma-II, Additional Sessions Judge-03, upheld the decision of the Trial Court and held that all the ingredients of Section 138 NI Act were fulfilled by the complainant. A criminal appeal under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270259,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/whether-concurrent-prosecutions-under-s-138-ni-act-and-s-420-ipc-will-amount-to-double-jeopardy-jk-and-ladakh-hc-analyses\/","url_meta":{"origin":374034,"position":3},"title":"Whether concurrent prosecutions under S. 138, NI Act and S. 420, IPC, will amount to double jeopardy? J&K and Ladakh HC analyses","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deciding the instant petitions, the question that came up before that Court was whether a person can be prosecuted for offence under Section 420 of IPC as also for offence under Section 138 of NI Act, on the same set\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/25\/madras-hc-s-1422-of-negotiable-instruments-amendment-act-2015-not-ultra-vires-of-art-14-of-constitution-legislation-can-take-away-the-basis-of-a-judgment\/","url_meta":{"origin":374034,"position":4},"title":"Madras HC | S. 142(2) of Negotiable Instruments Amendment Act, 2015 — not ultra vires of Art. 14 of Constitution; Legislation can take away the basis of a Judgment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Division Bench of A.P. Sahi, CJ and Subramonium Prasad, J., while deciding a petition filed in regard to declaring Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as ultra vires Article 14 of Constitution, held by placing reliance on certain cases that, \u201cParliament is competent to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251535,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/section-141-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":374034,"position":5},"title":"Is it mandatory to arraign firm as accused to make partner liable for dishonor of cheque under Ss. 138\/141 of NI Act? HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Alok Kumar Verma, J., addressed a matter revolving around dishonour of cheque. Appellant-Complainant preferred an appeal against the decision of the trial court wherein the respondent accused was acquitted from the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Facts Accused had requested money\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374034\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/374038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}