{"id":373865,"date":"2026-01-28T11:00:28","date_gmt":"2026-01-28T05:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=373865"},"modified":"2026-02-02T09:29:49","modified_gmt":"2026-02-02T03:59:49","slug":"bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> While hearing an Interim Application filed in a Commercial IP Suit under the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (‘Trade Marks Act’), a Single Judge Bench of Arif S. Doctor<\/span> held the defendant’s impugned mark “TRACK-ON” to be virtually identical and deceptively similar to the registered mark “TRACKON” and likely to cause confusion. The Court accordingly restrained the defendant from using the impugned mark, observing that its adoption was dishonest and lacking in bona fides.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The plaintiff company has been engaged in the business of courier services, international shipping, e-commerce logistics and supply chain management since the year 2002. In connection with its services, the plaintiff coined and adopted the mark “TRACKON” and secured registrations of composite label marks in Class 39 viz. \"\", \"\" and \"\", all of which are valid and subsisting.<\/p>\n

In 2016, the defendant was appointed as a business associate of the plaintiff for promoting its services in the States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Pursuant to this arrangement, the defendant carried on business under the name incorporating the word “TRACKON” until 2023.<\/p>\n

In October 2023, the plaintiff called upon the defendant to discontinue the use of “TRACKON” and to change its business name. The correspondence exchanged between October and November 2023 clearly reflected that the defendant had agreed to comply with the plaintiff’s demand.<\/p>\n

However, in 2024, the plaintiff discovered that the defendant had filed an application for registration of the mark \"\" “TRACK-ON EXPRESS” on a “proposed-to-be-used” basis and had also constituted a new partnership firm under the name \"\" “TRACK-ON EXPRESS LOGISTICS.” Upon such discovery, the plaintiff issued a cease-and-desist notice and terminated the business association with the defendant.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court emphasised that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the TRACKON marks, each containing “TRACKON” as its dominant, essential, and leading feature. It was noted that all registrations were valid and subsisting and had not been assailed.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that where a word constitutes a prominent and essential part of a registered composite mark, unauthorised use of that word amounts to infringement under Section 29(9)<\/a> of the Trade Marks Act<\/a>. It was highlighted that “TRACKON” had acquired substantial goodwill through long, continuous, and extensive use, and the defendant had not disputed this.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the impugned mark “TRACK-ON” was virtually identical and deceptively similar to “TRACKON,” and the services offered by the defendant were the same as those of the plaintiff. It was further observed that the defendant had abandoned its plea of prior use and had not disputed the similarity of marks or services.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasised that the defendant had made no attempt to demonstrate that its adoption of “TRACK-ON” was honest or bona fide. On the contrary, the adoption was dishonest and lacking in bona fides, evident from the fact that the defendant’s application for registration was on a “proposed-to-be-used” basis and correspondence showed agreement to change its name.<\/p>\n

The Court rejected the contention of suppression, noting that the letter dated 05-05-2016 recorded that the defendant was a “Business Associate” acting “on behalf of” the plaintiff, thereby supporting the plaintiff’s case of permissive user. The Court also rejected the jurisdictional objection, holding that leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent had already been granted and that such objections must be decided at trial.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court held that the plaintiff had clearly established a case for interim reliefs, both in law and equity, and restrained the defendant from using the impugned mark.<\/p>\n

[Trackon Couriers (P) Ltd. v. B. N. Srinivas, 2026 SCC OnLine Bom 344<\/a>, decided on 22-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Venkatesh Dhond, Sr. Adv. a\/w Anand Mohan, Alhan Kayser, Varsha Vasave, i\/b Avesh Kayser<\/p>\n

For the Defendant:<\/span> Veerendra Tulzapurkar, Sr. Adv. a\/w Ankit Tiwari, i\/b Shashipal Shankar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Where a word constitutes a prominent and essential part of a registered composite\/label mark, the unauthorised use of that word would amount to infringement within the meaning of Section 29(9) of the Trade Marks Act.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":373876,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,97589,14321,67868,14722,70657,97588,97587,46158],"class_list":["post-373865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-courier-services-trade-mark-dispute","tag-interim-injunction","tag-justice-arif-s-doctor","tag-passing-off","tag-section-134-trade-marks-act","tag-track-on-mark","tag-trackon-trade-mark","tag-trade-mark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nBombay HC protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement; restrains defendant from using deceptively similar mark.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement; restrains defendant from using deceptively similar mark.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-28T05:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-02T03:59:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-28T05:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-02T03:59:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement; restrains defendant from using deceptively similar mark.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"TRACKON trade mark\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement; restrains defendant from using deceptively similar mark.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement","og_description":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement; restrains defendant from using deceptively similar mark.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-28T05:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-02T03:59:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/","name":"Bombay HC protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-28T05:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-02T03:59:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON trade mark from infringement; restrains defendant from using deceptively similar mark.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"TRACKON trade mark"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/28\/bombay-hc-protects-trackon-trade-mark-from-infringement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court protects TRACKON courier service trade mark from infringement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/TRACKON-trade-mark.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":347795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/bomhc-grants-temporary-injunction-to-metro-brands-for-mark-metro-restrains-use-of-mark-metbrands\/","url_meta":{"origin":373865,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC grants temporary injunction to Metro Brands for mark \u2018Metro\u2019; restrains MetBrands (P) Ltd. from using mark \u2018MetBrands\u2019","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Around December 2021, when the applicant decided to go public by floating an IPO that the defendant commenced use of the name METBRANDS and until that time, the defendant was operating and offering goods and services under the name \u2018METRENDS\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/16\/bombay-hc-protects-siyaram-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":373865,"position":1},"title":"Bombay High Court protects “Siyaram” trademark; restrains Dishonest use by interim injunction","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 16, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPlaintiff\u2019s reputation and goodwill was such that the plaintiff\u2019s tagline, \u2018Come home to Siyaram\u2019 was indelibly etched in public memory.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Siyaram trademark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Siyaram-trademark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Siyaram-trademark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Siyaram-trademark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Siyaram-trademark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/legal-roundup-intellectual-property-right-roundup-june-2025-copyright-infringement-trade-mark-infringement-scc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":373865,"position":2},"title":"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ROUNDUP: A quick recap of the latest Intellectual Property Rights rulings from June 2025.","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important intellectual property rights cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, latest legal updates in intellectual property rights and links to other roundups.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights Roundup June 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-in-favour-of-whitehat-education-technology-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-for-its-mark-whitehat-jr\/","url_meta":{"origin":373865,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction in favour of WhiteHat Education Technology in a trade mark infringement suit for its mark \u2018WhiteHat Jr\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the marks \u2018WhiteHat Jr\u2019 and \u2018WhiteHat Sr\u2019 were deceptively similar and therefore, restrained the defendants from using any trade mark, trade name and domain name which would amount to infringement of plaintiff's mark \u2018WhiteHat Jr\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":364760,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/25\/bom-hc-grants-ex-parte-relief-to-skechers-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":373865,"position":4},"title":"Bombay HC grants ex-parte injunction to Skechers in trade mark and copyright dispute over counterfeit goods","author":"Editor","date":"October 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court Receiver was directed to visit and search all premises of the defendants, forcibly breaking open locks if necessary and taking police assistance where required to seize and seal all offending goods.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ex-parte relief to Skechers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-sukam-systems-p-ltd-for-its-trade-mark-su-kam-against-lithium-power-energy-p-ltd-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":373865,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction to Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. for its trade mark \u2018Su-Kam\u2019 against Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. alleged infringement and passing of by Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd. of its registered trade marks \u2018Su-Kam\u2019, \u2018BIG conqueror Tubular Battery\u2019 and \u2018BIG Warrior Tubular Battery\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373865\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}