{"id":373445,"date":"2026-01-22T13:00:45","date_gmt":"2026-01-22T07:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=373445"},"modified":"2026-01-23T16:53:06","modified_gmt":"2026-01-23T11:23:06","slug":"all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/","title":{"rendered":"Allahabad HC flags &#8220;systemic inaction&#8221; by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a batch of writ petitions filed against non-execution of demarcation orders passed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006<\/a> (&#8220;the Code&#8221;), the Single Judge Bench of Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., allowed the petitions, holding that the respondents concerned, particularly the Sub-Divisional Officer (&#8220;SDO&#8221;). and Collector, were under law bound to ensure that orders under Section 24 are effectively enforced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court directed the respondents, particularly the SDOs concerned, to execute all subject orders in the instant batch of writ petitions, within four weeks, strictly as per the approved site memo\/demarcation report, by ensuring affixation of boundary marks and also possession restoration, wherever required.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A batch of nine writ petitions was filed raising a common grievance about the non-execution of demarcation orders passed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">the Code<\/a>. The orders passed in favour of the petitioners attained finality after a due inquiry, submission of reports, and issuance of notices to the concerned parties. However, the statutory authorities failed to execute the said orders, thereby rendering the entire proceedings ineffective.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners contended that the State deliberately delayed execution, adopted obstructive tactics, and failed to discharge their statutory and administrative duties, despite repeated requests.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court remarked that the present batch of writ petitions brought forth a seemingly systemic inaction of the revenue authorities concerned.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Despite having successfully navigated the statutory procedures, undergoing summary inquiries, site inspections, and obtaining final execution orders for affixation of boundary marks, the petitioners find themselves to be in a situation where the end relief remains illusory. The orders in their favour remain on paper, unimplemented on the spot due to inaction on the part of the revenue authorities.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">the Code<\/a> provides a statutory mechanism for the resolution of disputes relating to boundaries of land or villages through a summary inquiry conducted by the SDO. The scheme of Section 24 underscores the legislative intent to provide a speedy and effective mechanism for the resolution of boundary disputes, based on documentary evidence in the form of survey maps or, where necessary, of actual possession.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court added that pursuant to an order passed under Section 24, the SDO is expressly empowered to restore or secure possession in favour of the entitled party while deciding the boundary dispute by employing necessary force to give effect to such restoration, thereby combining quasi-judicial determination with executive enforcement to ensure the efficacy of the order. However, the use of force for restoration of possession must be proportionate, necessary, and limited to the extent required to secure compliance with the order and to maintain peace. The Court also stated that although an appeal lies to the Commissioner against an order passed under Section 24, the order of the SDO, including directions relating to possession, remains operative and enforceable unless stayed or set aside by the appellate authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that Section 24 mandates that the entire summary proceeding, including the determination of boundaries and restoration or fixation of possession, shall be completed, as far as possible, within three months from the date of the application. Thus, the SDO was under a statutory obligation to endeavour to conclude proceedings within the prescribed period of three months under the Code and to ensure that all consequential steps are undertaken within the stipulated time frame. Unexplained or avoidable delay in deciding the case or in implementing the final order constitutes failure of statutory duty.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Section 24 provides a speedy, statutory recourse for the resolution of boundary disputes with direct possession enforcement powers. The statutory object of Section 24 is to avoid protracted litigation and to ensure prompt resolution of boundary disputes along with effective delivery of possession.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding Rule 22 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 (&#8220;the Rules&#8221;), the Court stated that it has been consistently interpreted as laying down mandatory procedural requirements which must be complied with before proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">the Code<\/a> can validly be undertaken. It has been held that non-compliance with Rule 22 would vitiate the summary inquiry contemplated under Section 24.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court added that the SDO is required to satisfy himself, at the threshold, that the application conforms to the requirements of Rule 22, and only thereafter proceed to adjudicate the boundary dispute.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The procedure prescribed under Rule 22 is not to be a mere technical or formal requirement, but a substantive safeguard intended to prevent ambiguity in land identification, protect the rights of all affected parties, and ensure fairness in summary adjudication. Any order passed under Section 24 in disregard of the requirements of Rule 22 has to be held to be vulnerable to challenge on the ground of procedural illegality.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As far as the SDO was concerned, the Court stated that the SDO exercises both quasi-judicial and administrative functions under Section 24 and is bound by the rule of law. The SDO must also act within the four corners of the Code, the Rules, and binding Government Orders, without being guided by extraneous or irrelevant considerations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, as a quasi-judicial authority, the SDO must follow the principles of natural justice and balance individual rights with the larger public interest in ensuring sanctity of land records, predictability and stability of possession, and avoidance of conflict and law and order issues.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Discretion must not be exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or selectively. Similarly situated litigants in boundary disputes should receive consistent treatment, in line with statutory provisions.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Court added that every order under Section 24 must be a speaking order, demonstrating application of mind to (pleadings of the parties, revenue records relied upon (khatauni, khasra, maps, etc.), and demarcation report and any objections thereto. The order must also clearly:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-roman;\">\n<li>\n<p>record the facts and the nature of the boundary dispute;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>specify the basis on which the boundary is fixed.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>record findings on claim of possession or wrongful dispossession, where applicable;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">direct, in explicit terms, the demarcation, fixation of boundary pillars, and, where necessary, restoration of possession.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Reasoned orders are essential to ensure transparency, accountability, judicial review, and to prevent arbitrariness.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">From the perspective of administrative law, the Court underscored the importance of effective enforcement to the exercise of quasi-judicial power. Executive aids (Tehsildar, Revenue Inspector, police authorities) are to be utilized as implementing arms of the SDO&#8217;s quasi-judicial order.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;An order which is not implemented on the spot reduces the entire proceeding to a paper exercise and defeats the legislative intent.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the aspect of appeal to the Commissioner, the Court remarked that it serves as an internal check against error, perversity, or illegality in the SDO&#8217;s order, but does not suspend enforcement unless specifically ordered. However, mere filing of an appeal would not operate as an automatic stay. Unless an express interim order is granted by the appellate authority, the SDO&#8217;s order remains operative and must be executed. The appellate jurisdiction is also quasi-judicial and thus, subject to the same requirements of fairness, reasoned decision-making, and adherence to statutory limits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that the proceedings contemplated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">the Code<\/a> are strictly confined to the demarcation of boundaries and restoration of possession based on the relevant revenue records. The jurisdiction of the SDO under this provision does not extend to the adjudication of complex questions of title or ownership. <span style=\"font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;\">In cases where a genuine dispute regarding title arises, the SDO&#8217;s authority remains limited to the determination of boundaries; any attempt to adjudicate proprietary rights under the guise of a Section 24 inquiry would be ultra vires and beyond the scope of the powers to be exercised.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the Court issued some guidelines for the enforcement of orders under Section 24 to obviate recurring grievances arising out of non-enforcement of such orders, considering the statutory provisions and relevant government orders.<\/p>\n<h3>Guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24:<\/h3>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Pre-Adjudication: Application &amp; Registration:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>The revenue authorities, at the threshold, shall ensure that every application filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">the Code<\/a> strictly conforms to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001677472\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002862348\" target=\"_blank\">the Code<\/a>, Rule 22 of the Rules, Government Order dated 16-12-2025, and administrative law principles.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The application under Section 24 shall fully comply with Rule 22 requirements, i.e., two copies containing Gata particulars, updated khatauni, contiguous Gata details, and challan receipt, before proceedings commence.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>On receipt of an application for demarcation, on the same or next working day, the SDO shall register the case in the Revenue Court Computerised Management System (&#8220;RCCMS&#8221;).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Three copies of notices shall be issued from the computerized system and delivered to the Revenue Inspector through the Tehsildar.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"color: #0e101a;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Demarcation &amp; Inquiry:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>After fixing the date of demarcation and intimation to all the concerned tenure holders, the Revenue Inspector or any other revenue official would demarcate the land, parcel or parcels, as the case may be.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>During demarcation, if any affected tenure holder is not a party to the case, such tenure holder shall be made a party to the case by the Revenue Inspector on the spot, and the same would be mentioned in the demarcation report.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Demarcation shall be completed within a month from the date of the order for the same by the SDO.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The Revenue Inspector shall prepare the demarcation report along with the site memo. If there are no objections to the same, then after getting the consent and signature of all the concerned parties on the demarcation report, the same shall be sent to the SDO through the Tehsildar within a week.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>On receipt of the report, the SDO shall pass an order confirming the same. If the affected parties do not give their consent or if there is any objection to the demarcation report, notice would be issued by the SDO to all parties, fixing a date of hearing which shall not be beyond 15 days from the date of notice, and thereafter, pass an order of boundary demarcation after hearing all concerned parties.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"color: #0e101a;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Execution, Physical enforcement, Prompt and Effective restoration of Possession:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>The SDO, after having ascertained by summary inquiry the person best entitled to the property, shall put such person in possession.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>If, in the course of inquiry, it is shown that possession has been obtained by wrongful dispossession of the lawful occupant, the SDO shall put the person, so dispossessed, in possession and, for that purpose, use or cause to use such force as may be necessary and shall fix the boundary accordingly.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>SDO&#8217;s written requisition to Station House Officer under Rule 22(14) of the Rules for police force would be mandatory where any resistance or obstruction is apprehended.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The SDO would endeavour to complete the process within the stipulated time period of three months as specified in Section 24 (3) and, if the process is not completed within such time, then the reason for the same shall be recorded.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"color: #0e101a;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Post-Execution Compliance &amp; Reporting:<\/span> Compliance report detailing pillar locations, possession status must accompany geo-tagged photographs (GPS-enabled) and form part of the record. RCCMS upload of the verification report in the Board of Revenue-prescribed format would be mandatory.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Expeditious disposal of Appeals:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Appeals preferred before the Commissioner against orders passed under Section 24 shall be taken up and disposed of promptly.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>As a matter of practice, such appeals should ordinarily be decided without undue delay. Mere filing would cause no automatic stay, i.e., execution shall continue unless an express interim stay is granted. Pendency of Section 30 proceedings or title dispute would ipso facto not suspend Section 24 execution in the absence of any stay order having been granted.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"color: #0e101a;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Interim protection and preventive measures:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Pending inquiry\/enforcement, SDO may pass interim orders, including maintaining the status quo, restraining illegal construction, interference, or dispossession.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Where disputes threaten breach of the peace, SDO shall exercise administrative powers concurrently for urgent possession restoration.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The police authorities shall render requisite protection and assistance in the discharge of their duties.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"color: #0e101a;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Enforcement of the order as part of proceedings:<\/span> An application under Section 24 shall not be treated as &#8216;decided&#8217; and proceedings not &#8216;concluded&#8217; unless boundary marks have been made on the spot consequent to the order. The file shall not be consigned to the record room unless a physical verification report with a geo-tagged photograph is uploaded.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Monitoring, Reporting, and Accountability:<\/span> The SDO shall maintain periodic records of compliance showing the status of enforcement of orders passed under Section 24.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Accountability and Consequences of Non-compliance:<\/span> Persistent delay beyond statutory timelines, repeated non-execution, or any wilful failure\/deliberate inaction on the part of the officials in complying with orders relating to possession shall invite appropriate departmental action.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Implementation Protocol:<\/span> The Board of Revenue shall endeavour to expeditiously develop Standard Operating Procedures for RCCMS verification format and also appropriate training modules for the concerned revenue officers.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jurisdictional limits:<\/span> These proceedings, being summary, exclude genuine title disputes as the SDO&#8217;s jurisdiction is strictly confined to boundary disputes and possession. Complex ownership claims would require civil adjudication, and any overreach would render the orders ultra vires.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Reiterating the nature of an order under Section 24 and the consequence of failure in enforcement, the Court stated that the aforementioned broad guidelines aimed to provide a structured framework harmonizing statutory, executive instructions, administrative law principles, and constitutional imperatives of fairness and public order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the merits of the issue at hand, the Court held that the respondents concerned, particularly the SDO and Collector, were under law bound to ensure that orders under Section 24 are effectively enforced.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court directed that the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, shall ensure state-wide circulation of the aforementioned guidelines to all revenue authorities within the State. A mechanism for providing mandatory training and RCCMS protocol compliance might also be ensured.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court directed the respondents, particularly the SDOs concerned, to execute all subject orders in the instant batch of writ petitions, within four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, strictly as per the approved site memo\/demarcation report, by ensuring affixation of boundary marks and also possession restoration, wherever required.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Meena Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/43rRbZ9P\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine All 8494<\/a>, decided on 18-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioners:<\/span> Rohit Pandey Sandeep Kumar Singh, Digamber Dwivedi, Munna Tiwari, Sandeep Kumar Singh, Dharamdas, Vijay Bahadur Yadav, Anoop Kumar Sharma, Anurag Shukla, Shubham Dwivedi, Raj Kumar Shukla, Arvind Kumar Srivastava<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Additional Advocate General Manish Goyal, Chief Standing Counsel J N Maurya, Additional Chief Standing Counsel Abhishek Shukla, Ravi Anand Agarwal, Azad Rai<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Despite having successfully navigated the statutory procedures, undergoing summary inquiries, site inspections, and obtaining final execution orders for affixation of boundary marks, the petitioners find themselves to be in a situation where the end relief remains illusory.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":373454,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,97302,97300,47495,97305,97304,97299,85190],"class_list":["post-373445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-justice-dr-yogendra-kumar-srivastava","tag-land-demarcation-order","tag-land-law","tag-rule-22-up-revenue-rules","tag-s-24-up-revenue-code","tag-u-p-revenue-code-rules","tag-uttar-pradesh-revenue-code"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC issues guidelines for enforcement of orders under S. 24 UP Revenue Code | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Allahabad HC flags &quot;systemic inaction&quot; by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-22T07:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-23T11:23:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Allahabad HC flags &quot;systemic inaction&quot; by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/\",\"name\":\"All HC issues guidelines for enforcement of orders under S. 24 UP Revenue Code | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-22T07:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-23T11:23:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Enforcement of Orders under S. 24 of UP Revenue Code\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Allahabad HC flags &#8220;systemic inaction&#8221; by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC issues guidelines for enforcement of orders under S. 24 UP Revenue Code | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Allahabad HC flags \"systemic inaction\" by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006","og_description":"Allahabad HC issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-22T07:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-23T11:23:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Allahabad HC flags \"systemic inaction\" by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/","name":"All HC issues guidelines for enforcement of orders under S. 24 UP Revenue Code | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-22T07:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-23T11:23:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Allahabad HC issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Enforcement of Orders under S. 24 of UP Revenue Code"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/all-hc-issues-guidelines-for-enforcement-of-orders-under-s-24-up-revenue-code\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Allahabad HC flags &#8220;systemic inaction&#8221; by revenue authorities; Issues guidelines for Enforcement of Orders under Section 24 of UP Revenue Code, 2006"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Enforcement-of-Orders-under-S.-24-of-UP-Revenue-Code.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":357193,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/all-hc-expresses-surprise-on-68-adjournments-due-to-bar-council-strikes\/","url_meta":{"origin":373445,"position":0},"title":"\u201cRevenue proceedings pending endlessly, poor litigants only able to file writ petitions\u201d: Allahabad HC expresses surprise over 68 adjournments due to Bar Council strikes","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is surprising that out of the 102 dates fixed in the case, on 68 dates the case was adjourned due to calls for boycott or condolence by the local bar association.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"68 Adjournments","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/68-Adjournments.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277756,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/allahabad-high-court-conditions-required-for-granting-permission-to-a-bhumidhar-seeking-to-transfer-land-are-clearly-specified-under-the-u-p-revenue-code-and-rules-reference-made\/","url_meta":{"origin":373445,"position":1},"title":"Allahabad High Court| Conditions required for granting permission to a bhumidhar, clearly specified under the U.P Revenue Code and Rules; Other reasons to reject the application, renders discretionary power ultra vires and invalid","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: In a writ petition filed against the order passed by the Collector under Section 98(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, praying for a direction to the respondent authorities to grant permission for executing the sale deed in pursuance of an agreement to sell as per\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/17\/allahabad-hc-pulls-up-police-for-preventing-man-from-offering-namaz\/","url_meta":{"origin":373445,"position":2},"title":"\u201cResign or seek transfer if not competent to enforce rule of law\u201d; Allahabad HC pulls up police over preventing man from offering Namaz","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"March 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the local authorities, i.e., Superintendent of Police and Collector, feel that the law and order situation could arise because of which they want to limit the number of worshipers within the premises. They should either resign from their post or seek transfer outside Sambhal if they feel they are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"preventing man from offering Namaz","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/preventing-man-from-offering-Namaz.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/preventing-man-from-offering-Namaz.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/preventing-man-from-offering-Namaz.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/preventing-man-from-offering-Namaz.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293183,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/26\/sdm-exercising-adjudicatory-powers-acts-as-revenue-court-subject-to-supervision-of-board-of-revenue-allahabad-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":373445,"position":3},"title":"Sub Divisional Magistrate exercising adjudicatory powers, acts as Revenue Court subject to control and supervision of Board of Revenue: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that when a superior court issues an order of remand to an inferior court with certain directions, the latter is obligated to decide in accordance with the said directions.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202025,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/agricultural-land-cannot-be-declared-as-non-agricultural-just-because-the-plot-was-found-vacant-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":373445,"position":4},"title":"Agricultural land cannot be declared as non-agricultural just because the plot was found vacant: Allahabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Siddhartha Varma, J., allowed a writ petition which was in respect to Section 82 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Facts of the case are that petitioner\u2019s agricultural land was declared as non-agricultural. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed an application\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":293277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/27\/5-high-courts-to-get-new-chief-justices\/","url_meta":{"origin":373445,"position":5},"title":"5 High Courts to get new Chief Justices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"KERALA HIGH COURT \u21aa Shri Justice Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti, Judge, Kerala High Court, appointed as the Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office. HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT \u21aa\u00a0Shri Justice Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Judge, Punjab & Haryana\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new chief justices of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373445"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373445\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373454"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}