{"id":373252,"date":"2026-01-20T13:30:55","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T08:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=373252"},"modified":"2026-01-22T14:19:28","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T08:49:28","slug":"complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In an appeal revolving around whether the accused was entitled to discharge from charges under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(r)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (&#8216;SC\/ST Act&#8217;), a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">A. Badharudeen<\/span>, J., held that the Special Court&#8217;s order dismissing the plea of discharge did not warrant interference as the aggrieved person&#8217;s (complainant) testimony alone was sufficient to sustain the charge under the SC\/ST Act, as it disclosed a prima facie case against the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 31-3-2023, during a meeting held in front of the Bharat Services Facility Management Office the accused allegedly humiliated the complainant by calling her by her caste name in public view, thereby attracting the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(r)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">SC\/ST Act<\/a>. The accused sought discharge before the Special Court, but the plea was dismissed finding a prima facie case against the accused, thereby leading to the present appeal. The accused&#8217;s counsel contended that the statements of witnesses did not disclose any overt acts sufficient to fasten criminal culpability on the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the complainant&#8217;s statement specifically alleged that she was abused by being called her caste name in the presence of cleaning staff, thereby fulfilling the essential ingredients of Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(r)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">SC\/ST Act<\/a>. The Court observed that to constitute an offence under Section 3(1)(r), there must be <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8216;an intentional insult or intimidation&#8217;<\/span> by a non-member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe against a member of such community, with the intention to humiliate within public view.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that just because the witnesses&#8217; statements do not disclose any overt act, that by itself would not be a ground to discharge the accused as law does not insist plenty of witnesses to prove an offence and the evidence of a solitary wholly reliable witness would suffice the purpose. The Court observed that the statement of the aggrieved person <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> disclosed the ingredients for the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(r)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">SC\/ST Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that while considering a plea of discharge, the Court&#8217;s duty is limited to verifying whether the prosecution records disclose a <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> case or at least a strong suspicion to frame charges. However, mere suspicion would not suffice. Applying this principle, the Court, while dismissing the appeal, concluded that the order of the Special Court did not require interference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Reshmi Saseendran v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gU89iQTo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Ker 588<\/a>, decided on 13-1-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Editorial Note:<\/span> The judgment mentions Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2018. However, in 2018 an amendment was made to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a>, that inserted Section 18-A to the Act of 1989. The case deals with Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(r)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(s)<\/a> which are in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">SC\/ST Act of 1989<\/a> and not the Amending Act of 2018.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Accused:<\/span> P. Rahul, Roopkumar G., Abhina L., Namitha Neethu Balachandran, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Public Prosecutor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Just because the witnesses&#8217; statements do not disclose any overt act, that by itself would not be a ground to discharge the accused as law does not insist plenty of witnesses to prove an offence and the evidence of a solitary wholly reliable witness would suffice the purpose.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67538,"featured_media":373270,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[71475,2523,63237,97144,97145],"class_list":["post-373252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-justice-a-badharudeen","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-scheduled-castes-and-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989","tag-sections-31r-sc-st-act","tag-sections-31s-sc-st-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Complainant&#039;s testimony sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Ker HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court observs that complainant&#039;s testimony alone sufficient to sustain charges under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court observs that complainant&#039;s testimony alone sufficient to sustain charges under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-20T08:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-22T08:49:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sunaina\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Complainant's testimony sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Ker HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-20T08:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-22T08:49:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court observs that complainant's testimony alone sufficient to sustain charges under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"charges under SCST Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f\",\"name\":\"Sunaina\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sunaina\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Complainant's testimony sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Ker HC | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court observs that complainant's testimony alone sufficient to sustain charges under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC","og_description":"Kerala High Court observs that complainant's testimony alone sufficient to sustain charges under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-20T08:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-22T08:49:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sunaina","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sunaina","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","name":"Complainant's testimony sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Ker HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-20T08:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-22T08:49:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f"},"description":"Kerala High Court observs that complainant's testimony alone sufficient to sustain charges under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"charges under SCST Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/34835827e9e9e8def4f8c83ccef5727f","name":"Sunaina","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a354bf6ec74d2631ada87f05d4d0974c39ba4fa4100c0cd4972b767e8824247?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sunaina"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sunaina\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/guj-hc-held-not-every-insult-offence-under-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":373252,"position":0},"title":"Gujarat High Court: Not every insult or intimidation amounts to an offence under SC ST Act","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFrom the allegations made in the complaint, the prosecution has not proved that the accused is guilty of an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"not every insult offence under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/19\/what-should-be-analysed-by-courts-for-considering-the-question-of-prima-facie-case-when-dealing-with-pre-arrest-bail-pleas-under-sc-st-act-kerala-high-court-answers-legal-rese\/","url_meta":{"origin":373252,"position":1},"title":"Kerala High Court | Courts should carefully analyse cases while dealing with pre-arrest bail pleas under SC\/ST Act","author":"Editor","date":"December 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It is shocking, rather a mind-blowing fact that many innocent persons are victims of false implication under the SC\/ST Act","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":172504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/30\/cognizance-offences-committed-sc-st-prevention-atrocities-act-can-taken-special-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":373252,"position":2},"title":"Cognizance of offences committed under SC &#038; ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act can only be taken by a Special Court","author":"Saba","date":"November 30, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi: The Court recently addressed a petition which had been filed for quashing a previous order given by the Chief Judicial Magistrate wherein the CJM took cognizance of offences under certain sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274577,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/kerala-high-court-anticipatory-bail-penal-code-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989-scheduled-caste-section-18-and-18-a-of-sc-st-act-section-32va-of-sc-st-act-sections-452\/","url_meta":{"origin":373252,"position":3},"title":"Kerala High Court explains scope of grant of anticipatory bail in offences under SC\/ST Act; true import of \u2018knowing&#8217; or \u2018knowledge&#8217; under Section 3(2)(va) of the Act","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Kerala High Court: In an appeal relating to the grant of anticipatory bail for the commission of offences under Sections 452, 506(ii) and 195-A of the Penal Code, 1860 as well as under Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (SC\/ST Act) 1989, A. Badharudeen,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/supreme-court-grants-anticipatory-bail-journalist-shajan-skaria-in-sc-st-act-case-making-derogatory-remarks-against-mla-pv-sreenijin\/","url_meta":{"origin":373252,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to journalist Shajan Skaria in SC\/ST Act case for making derogatory remarks against MLA PV Sreenijin","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAll insults or intimidations to a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe will not amount to an offence under the Act, 1989 unless such insult or intimidation is on the ground that the victim belongs to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Shajan Skaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Shajan-Skaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":373252,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act","author":"Ritu","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe words used were not caste name nor there is allegation that the petitioners were known to the caste of the public servants, who had gone to remove the encroachments.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373252\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}