{"id":373186,"date":"2026-01-20T09:00:12","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T03:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=373186"},"modified":"2026-01-23T11:52:41","modified_gmt":"2026-01-23T06:22:41","slug":"sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/","title":{"rendered":"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &#038; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In an appeal while deciding whether, after suspension of sentence and grant of bail in a criminal appeal, the appellate\/revisional court is justified in insisting upon the personal appearance of accused on every date of hearing and in cancelling bail with issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW), a Division Bench of Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ., held that directing personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &amp; grant of bail is not warranted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the appellant, accused in a case under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (NI Act), was initially granted suspension of sentence and released on bail, which was extended from time to time. Subsequently, the appellate court cancelled the bail, issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW), and took the appellant into custody.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved, the appellant approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court, however, the Court adjourned the proceedings on 14.11.2025. That adjournment order was assailed before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While issuing notice on 27-11-2025, the Supreme Court recorded that the petitioner&#8217;s counsel had been changed on more than six occasions; petitioner&#8217;s mother expired in between; petitioner had sought exemption on medical grounds (Herpes Zoster), which was allowed; yet, when the matter was called, the order of suspension and grant of bail was recalled and NBW issued. The Court noted that the petitioner surrendered and sought bail which was later rejected. The petitioner approached High Court for the bail, the proceedings stood adjourned from time to time &#8220;due to paucity of time,&#8221; and on account of pendency of the appeal before the Sessions Judge, the High Court proceedings were also adjourned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that once the appellate\/revisional court, being satisfied of the necessity, should suspend the sentence and grant bail, as the appeal may remain pending &#8220;for months or years together&#8221; and may be adjourned for various reasons at the instance of the appellant&#8212;accused, the State, or the complainant. In such circumstances, calling for personal appearance of accused on every date <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;would be burdensome to such accused and same is not warranted at all and it would serve no purpose.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that, in the event of dismissal of the appeal or revision, the consequences would automatically follow, and the jurisdictional Magistrate would be fully empowered to secure the presence of the accused in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it was &#8220;appalling and shocking&#8221; that the appellate court insisted on personal appearance of accused on every date despite suspension of sentence, and that the proper course would have been to appoint an amicus curiae and hear the appeal on merits or grant an opportunity to make alternate arrangements if counsel was not assisting the court. The Court asserted that the pendency of the appeal for more than eight years was unjustifiable, but that by itself could not justify the course adopted by the appellate court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court disposed of the appeal and held that directing the appellant&#8212;accused to be present before the appellate or revisional court <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;would not be warranted particularly after an order for suspension of sentence has been passed and bail has been granted.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed that the bail granted by its order dated 27-11-2025 shall continue to operate till disposal of appeal before Sessions Court and that the appellant shall cooperate for expeditious disposal, preferably within three months. The Court also directed that a copy of the order be placed before the Hon&#8217;ble Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court for circulation to the District Judiciary through an appropriate circular.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Meenakshi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t6x5SPJo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine SC 94<\/a>, Decided on 07-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The proper course is to proceed with the appeal on merits, ensuring representation, while securing presence only in accordance with law upon dismissal or as otherwise required.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":373189,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[93877,31096,6711,34511,56504,63858,97106,13291,5363,33816],"class_list":["post-373186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-bail-jurisprudence","tag-criminal-appeal","tag-criminal-law","tag-grant-of-bail","tag-justice-aravind-kumar","tag-justice-prasanna-b-varale","tag-personal-appearance-of-accused","tag-practice-and-procedure","tag-supreme-court","tag-suspension-of-sentence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SC: Personal appearance of accused not mandatory after suspension of sentence and bail | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court held that after suspension of sentence and grant of bail insisting on the personal presence of accused on every date of hearing is unwarranted and burdensome.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &amp; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court held that after suspension of sentence and grant of bail insisting on the personal presence of accused on every date of hearing is unwarranted and burdensome.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-20T03:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-23T06:22:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &amp; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\\\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &#038; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-20T03:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-23T06:22:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":637,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Bail Jurisprudence\",\"criminal appeal\",\"criminal law\",\"Grant of Bail\",\"justice Aravind Kumar\",\"Justice Prasanna B. Varale\",\"Personal Appearance of accused\",\"Practice and procedure\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Suspension of Sentence\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/\",\"name\":\"SC: Personal appearance of accused not mandatory after suspension of sentence and bail | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-20T03:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-23T06:22:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court held that after suspension of sentence and grant of bail insisting on the personal presence of accused on every date of hearing is unwarranted and burdensome.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Personal appearance of accused\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/20\\\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\\\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &#038; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC: Personal appearance of accused not mandatory after suspension of sentence and bail | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court held that after suspension of sentence and grant of bail insisting on the personal presence of accused on every date of hearing is unwarranted and burdensome.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence & grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court","og_description":"Supreme Court held that after suspension of sentence and grant of bail insisting on the personal presence of accused on every date of hearing is unwarranted and burdensome.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-20T03:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-23T06:22:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence & grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &#038; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court","datePublished":"2026-01-20T03:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-23T06:22:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/"},"wordCount":637,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp","keywords":["Bail Jurisprudence","criminal appeal","criminal law","Grant of Bail","justice Aravind Kumar","Justice Prasanna B. Varale","Personal Appearance of accused","Practice and procedure","Supreme Court","Suspension of Sentence"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/","name":"SC: Personal appearance of accused not mandatory after suspension of sentence and bail | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-20T03:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-23T06:22:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Supreme Court held that after suspension of sentence and grant of bail insisting on the personal presence of accused on every date of hearing is unwarranted and burdensome.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Personal appearance of accused"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/sc-personal-appearance-of-accused-not-mandatory-after-suspension-of-sentence-and-bail\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Personal appearance of accused before appellate\/revisional court on every date after suspension of sentence &#038; grant of bail not warranted: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Personal-appearance-of-accused.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":248827,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/28\/jk-hc-bail-cannot-be-granted-on-the-ground-of-delay-unless-the-matter-was-pending-for-5-years-or-more\/","url_meta":{"origin":373186,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Bail cannot be granted on the ground of delay unless the matter was pending for 5 years or more","author":"Editor","date":"May 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Division Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Puneet Gupta, JJ., dismissed the application seeking suspension of sentence and for grant of bail to the applicant\/appellant on the ground of delay. The applicant had submitted that he had been put in jail for more than\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":249383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/07\/law-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":373186,"position":1},"title":"J&#038;K HC | \u201cHeinous offence against serving Law Officer\u201d; HC rejects bail application of convicts who killed Dy. AG, Ajit Singh Dogra","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu And Kashmir High Court: Terming it \u201cheinous\u201d, the Division Bench comprising of Tashi Rabstan and Javed Iqbal Wani, JJ., refused to grant suspension of sentence and bail to the applicants convicted for murder of a Ajit Singh Dogra, Deputy Adv. General. The Bench stated, \u201cThe accused\/applicants have been held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/18\/decree-or-order-of-supreme-court-in-exercise-of-its-extraordinary-power-does-not-lay-down-precedent-for-subordinate-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":373186,"position":2},"title":"Decree or Order of Supreme Court in exercise of its extraordinary power does not lay down precedent for subordinate courts","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 18, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The\u00a0 division bench comprising of Atul Kumar Jain and Govind Mathur, JJ, on reference of the matter by the single bench, made clear that order or decree made by Supreme Court in exercise of its extraordinary power does not form precedent for other subordinate Courts. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/j-no-relief-granted-under-s-426-of-jk-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":373186,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Bail denied; no relief granted under S. 426 of J&#038;K CrPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sanjay Kumar Gupta, JJ. dismissed this petition as no special circumstances could be made out for suspension of sentence and for grant of bail at this stage. The present application was filed to seek a stay of operation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":284146,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/supreme-court-grants-bail-to-accused-for-economic-offences-under-pmla-on-having-served-50-of-his-sentence-legal-news-legal-resreach-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":373186,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court grants bail to the accused for economic offences under PMLA on having served 50% of his sentence","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner had contended that on account of his wife's death, he was released on interim bail and had duly complied with all the conditions and had timely surrendered himself. The petitioner had also mentioned the fact that the two main accused in the case were enlarged on bail three\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-409.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":212360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/25\/pak-sc-considerations-for-grant-of-bail-entirely-different-from-considerations-for-cancellation-of-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":373186,"position":5},"title":"Pak SC | Considerations for grant of bail entirely different from considerations for cancellation of bail","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Five-Judge Bench of Mian Saqib Nisar, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Gulzar Ahmed, Mushir Alam and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ., \u00a0refused to interfere with the Judgment of Division Bench of Islamabad High Court granting bail to former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373186\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}