{"id":372967,"date":"2026-01-17T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-17T03:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=372967"},"modified":"2026-01-22T14:15:38","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T08:45:38","slug":"ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/","title":{"rendered":"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife&#8217;s death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Orissa High Court:<\/span> In a matter concerning entitlement to family pension under the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 (&#8216;Rules&#8217;), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dixit Krishna Shripad*<\/span> and Chittaranjan Dash, JJ., held that a second wife, whose marriage was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage, is not entitled to family pension, as such marriage is void in law. The Court noted that the Rules are payable to the widow on the death of an employee, subject to compliance with certain terms and conditions, and that to be a widow, a valid marriage between the woman and the deceased employee is a sine qua non; what is void ab initio does not become valid by the happening of a subsequent event.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The dispute arose from an order dated 12-11-2021, whereby the competent authority negatived the claim for family pension. It was observed that the deceased employee had acquired a second wife during the lifetime of his first wife. Relying on the Note below Clause (d) of Sub-Rule (6) of the Rules, the authority held that the second wife was not entitled to family pension, not being the legally married wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant argued that the Rules specifically employ the expression &#8220;wife\/wives,&#8221; and therefore, the second wife should be entitled to family pension, particularly after the demise of the first wife. The respondents opposed the appeal, justifying the impugned order and the reasons on which it was structured.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that after the enactment of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;), monogamy is the thumb rule with no exception whatsoever. It was noted that the idea of a second marriage during the subsistence of the first abhors the pith and substance of the Act. The Court observed that the Act does not recognise childlessness as a justifiable circumstance for entering into wedlock with a person who is already in the subsisting wedlock with another.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted Mayne&#8217;s Hindu Law, which state that the bigamous marriages are void and punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543739\" target=\"_blank\">17<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Act<\/a> read with Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561845\" target=\"_blank\">494<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561846\" target=\"_blank\">495<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;). It was further observed that family pension under the Rules is payable to the widow on the death of an employee subject to complying with certain terms &amp; conditions and to be a widow, a valid marriage between the woman and the deceased employee is a sine qua non. The Court held that the word &#8216;wives&#8217; appearing in the Rules does not authorise an employee to contract marriage with multiple persons by way of polygamy or polyandry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the appellant entered the wedlock with the deceased employee during the subsistence of first marriage with another woman and that act itself constitutes the offence of bigamy punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543739\" target=\"_blank\">17<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Act<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561846\" target=\"_blank\">495<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, therefore granting family pension to the so called &#8216;second wife&#8217;, amounts to placing premium on illegality. The Court further noted that what is void ab initio, does not become valid by the happening of subsequent event.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mahalakshmamma v. Department of Rural Development &amp; Panchayathraj<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d9jV9kZZ\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Kar 100<\/a>, wherein it was held that recognizing such relations arising from second marriage during the subsistence of first one is detrimental to public interest inasmuch as that would facilitate directly or indirectly the employees contracting the second marriage, which is legally impermissible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, in the above circumstances, the Court rejected the writ appeal as devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kankalata Dwibedi v. State of Orissa, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mAxKidm4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine Ori 147<\/a>, decided on 13-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Dixit Krishna Shripad<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Madhumita Panda, J. Bhuyan &amp; D. Behera, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> J.K. Khandayatray, ASC<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The Hindu Marriage Act does not recognise childlessness as a justifiable circumstance for entering into wedlock with a person who is already in the subsisting wedlock with another.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":372970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2898,4031,71863,84103,96980,3166,96978,37146,96979,96977,39698,93223,30079],"class_list":["post-372967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Family_Pension","tag-hindu-marriage-act","tag-justice-chittaranjan-dash","tag-justice-dixit-krishna-shripad","tag-marriage-subsistence","tag-monogamy","tag-ocs-pension-rules-1992","tag-orissa-high-court","tag-second-wife-pension-claim","tag-section-17-hma","tag-section-494-ipc","tag-section-495-ipc","tag-void-marriage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore Orissa High Court ruling denying family pension to second wife, holding such marriage void under Hindu Marriage Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife&#039;s death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore Orissa High Court ruling denying family pension to second wife, holding such marriage void under Hindu Marriage Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-17T03:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-22T08:45:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife&#039;s death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/\",\"name\":\"Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-17T03:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-22T08:45:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Explore Orissa High Court ruling denying family pension to second wife, holding such marriage void under Hindu Marriage Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Family pension to second wife\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife&#8217;s death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife | SCC Times","description":"Explore Orissa High Court ruling denying family pension to second wife, holding such marriage void under Hindu Marriage Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife's death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife","og_description":"Explore Orissa High Court ruling denying family pension to second wife, holding such marriage void under Hindu Marriage Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-17T03:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-22T08:45:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife's death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/","name":"Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-17T03:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-22T08:45:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Explore Orissa High Court ruling denying family pension to second wife, holding such marriage void under Hindu Marriage Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Family pension to second wife"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife&#8217;s death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":199006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/25\/family-pension-denied-to-second-wife-as-marriage-was-solemnized-during-subsistence-of-first-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":372967,"position":0},"title":"Family pension denied to second wife as marriage was solemnized during subsistence of first marriage","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of denial of family pension to the petitioner. Husband of the petitioner was in the Police Department under State of Meghalaya. After his death, the petitioner claimed family pension.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/chh-hc-second-wife-wedded-in-contravention-of-s-5-hma-held-not-entitled-to-share-in-family-pension-of-deceased-government-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":372967,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Second wife, wedded in contravention of S. 5 HMA, held not entitled to share in family pension of deceased Government employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. allowed a second appeal filed by the first wife of the deceased who died in harness while working as Supervisor in Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Co. Ltd., and held that his second wife was not entitled to any share in the family pension. Provisions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-second-wife-entitled-to-family-pension-only-when-personal-law-of-deceased-employee-allows-bigamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":372967,"position":2},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court | Second Wife entitled to family pension only when personal law of deceased employee allows Bigamy","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: In a petition related to family pension, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J has held that the second wife of a deceased employee is not entitled to family pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 unless the personal law of the deceased employee allows more than\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/andhra-pradesh-hc-second-wife-is-entitled-for-service-benefits-of-deceased-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":372967,"position":3},"title":"Second wife though not legally wedded in a strict sense, is entitled for service benefits of deceased husband: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRule 50 of the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980 is with intend to give relief to the woman becoming wife. Under such circumstances, even the wife from the second marriage was made entitled for family pension.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374680,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/04\/service-law-january-2026\/","url_meta":{"origin":372967,"position":4},"title":"Service Law January 2026: A Look at Key Decisions of the Month","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Bringing together significant service law rulings from the Supreme Court and various High Courts, this roundup offers brief summaries of the month\u2019s important cases along with references to related roundups.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Service Law January 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Service-Law-January-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Service-Law-January-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Service-Law-January-2026.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Service-Law-January-2026.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/09\/every-hc-must-give-due-deference-to-the-law-laid-down-by-other-high-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":372967,"position":5},"title":"Every HC must give due deference to the law laid down by other High Courts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. allowed the family pension to be paid to the parents of a Martyred Armyman after his wife performed the second marriage. The Court based its Judgment on an earlier decision of Kerala High Court. The petitioners\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=372967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372967\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/372970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=372967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=372967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=372967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}