{"id":372388,"date":"2026-01-13T09:30:49","date_gmt":"2026-01-13T04:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=372388"},"modified":"2026-01-17T11:14:47","modified_gmt":"2026-01-17T05:44:47","slug":"forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&#8221;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0e101a;\">In a petition filed by a husband for quashing a rape case filed against him by his wife, the Single Judge Bench of Rajesh Kumar Gupta, J., partially allowed the petition, holding that forced unnatural sex by a husband is cruelty, but cannot be prosecuted as rape.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused and prosecutrix married in 2022; however, soon after, the couple started quarrelling, and the wife alleged that the accused used to exert violence on her in private. Allegedly, once the accused smashed her head into a wall, and she went to her maternal house and reported the incident at Mahila Thana, Padav, Gwalior. However, the dispute subsided after counselling, and she went back to her matrimonial home. The wife also alleged that the accused would forcefully make physical relations with her and commit unnatural acts on many occasions against her will.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Allegedly, on the day of the incident, the accused hurled abuses and assaulted her, and her mother and sister counselled her to report the same. Thus, she filed the present FIR under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(n)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\">294<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8220;IPC&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the present application for quashing.<\/p>\n<h3>Issue<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the offence of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> between husband and wife can be weighed parallel to the offence of rape as defined under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561700\" target=\"_blank\">375<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>?<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the contention that the present FIR was filed with the intent of extorting money\/property, the Court remarked that the claims did not disclose any details of the offence, were general and omnibus in nature, and were not explained by any encouraging evidence. Thus, the Court remarked that the accused husband&#8217;s prosecution was an abuse of process of law, which, to secure the ends of justice, was liable to be annulled at the threshold.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the aspect of rape, the Court held that sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, where the wife is a major, and there is no force\/coercion, falls within Exception 2 of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561700\" target=\"_blank\">375<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. Hence, a charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> could not be sustained. Thus, in the present case, wherein the wife was not underage, sexual intercourse or sexual act by the husband with his wife could not be termed as rape, even if alleged to be without consent. In this regard, the Court placed reliance on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kuldeep Singh v. State of Punjab<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/09PDrI2W\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #4a6ee0;\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 211<\/span><\/a><span style=\"color: #0e101a;\">, wherein it was held that since the complainant and the accused were legally married, the intercourse fell under Exception 2 to Section 375 and no prima facie case of rape under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> was made out.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court opined that, <span style=\"font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;forced unnatural sex by a husband on his wife amounts to cruelty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, but cannot be prosecuted as rape under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> as in a Section 377 context, marital rape concept is not recognized under current law because of the express marital exception in Section 375.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #0e101a;\">Thereafter, the Court analysed Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561700\" target=\"_blank\">375<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> to assess what act is &#8220;unnatural&#8221;. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India<\/span><\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8gd9DlY2\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"color: #4a6ee0;\">(2018) 10 SCC 1<\/span><\/a><span style=\"color: #0e101a;\">, wherein the Supreme Court interpreted to include oral and anal sex in &#8216;carnal intercourse against the order of nature&#8217; in Section 377. The Supreme Court also held that if an unnatural offence was consensual, then an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> was not made out.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> was not well-equipped and that an unnatural offence had not been defined anywhere.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that the amended definition of Section 375 makes it clear that two things are common in the offence of Section 375 and Section 377, firstly, the relationship between the offence is committed, i.e., husband and wife, and secondly, consent between the offender and victim. As per the amended definition of rape in Section 375, if the offender and victim are married, then consent is immaterial, and no offence is made out. For offence under Section 377, as has been laid down by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Navtej Singh Johar (supra)<\/span>, the offence is not made out if there is consent. <span style=\"font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;\">There is repugnancy because if no offence could be made out, with or without consent, between a married couple under Section 375, how could Section 377 be attracted if it is committed, without consent, between husband and wife.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court reiterated that if the provisions of a later enactment are so inconsistent or repugnant to the provisions of an earlier one that the two cannot stand together, the earlier one is abrogated by the latter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the Court noted that the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> had been alleged, but relevant medical reports were not collected, and the trial for Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> had begun based only on the oral submissions. The validity of the offence also fell under more doubt when it was alleged that there was an extreme matrimonial dispute between the couple before the Family Court. The Court further noted that even the medical examination report of the wife indicated nothing regarding unnatural sex, and no definite opinion was given by the examining Doctor on fellatio or buggery, as no injury signs were detected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the offences under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\">294<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, the Court held that the prosecution had established its case; therefore, the validity of these offences had to be proved during trial before the Court concerned at the appropriate stage. Hence, the Court did not draw any view on the aforesaid offences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Court partially allowed the petition to the extent that the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(n)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> were quashed, but charges under Sections 323, 294, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> were maintained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Shubham Mangal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/02Nv98I3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 SCC OnLine MP 177<\/a>, decided on 07-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Harshit Sharma<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Public Prosecutor Satendra Singh Sikarwar and Advocate Yogesh Singhal<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Forced unnatural sex by a husband on his wife amounts to cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC, but cannot be prosecuted as rape under Section 376 of the IPC as in a Section 377 context, marital rape concept is not recognized under current law because of the express marital exception in Section 375.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":372412,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,82819,96680,96679,7201,21092,49411,30932],"class_list":["post-372388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-forced-unnatural-sex","tag-forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty","tag-justice-rakesh-kumar-gupta","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-marital-rape","tag-section-375","tag-section-377"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Forced unnatural sex by husband amounts is cruelty, not rape: MP HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP HC grants relief to man accused of rape, unnatural offence by wife holding that forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty but can&#039;t be prosecuted as rape\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&quot;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&quot;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP HC grants relief to man accused of rape, unnatural offence by wife holding that forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty but can&#039;t be prosecuted as rape\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-13T04:00:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-17T05:44:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"&quot;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&quot;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"headline\":\"&#8220;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&#8221;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-13T04:00:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T05:44:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1042,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Cruelty\",\"Forced Unnatural Sex\",\"forced unnatural sex by husband amounts to cruelty\",\"Justice Rakesh Kumar Gupta\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"marital rape\",\"Section 375\",\"Section 377\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Forced unnatural sex by husband amounts is cruelty, not rape: MP HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-13T04:00:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-17T05:44:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"MP HC grants relief to man accused of rape, unnatural offence by wife holding that forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty but can't be prosecuted as rape\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/13\\\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8220;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&#8221;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/sonali\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Forced unnatural sex by husband amounts is cruelty, not rape: MP HC | SCC Times","description":"MP HC grants relief to man accused of rape, unnatural offence by wife holding that forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty but can't be prosecuted as rape","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape\": MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges","og_description":"MP HC grants relief to man accused of rape, unnatural offence by wife holding that forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty but can't be prosecuted as rape","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-13T04:00:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-17T05:44:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\"Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape\": MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/"},"author":{"name":"Sonali Ahuja","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"headline":"&#8220;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&#8221;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges","datePublished":"2026-01-13T04:00:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T05:44:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/"},"wordCount":1042,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp","keywords":["Cruelty","Forced Unnatural Sex","forced unnatural sex by husband amounts to cruelty","Justice Rakesh Kumar Gupta","Madhya Pradesh High Court","marital rape","Section 375","Section 377"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/","name":"Forced unnatural sex by husband amounts is cruelty, not rape: MP HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-13T04:00:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-17T05:44:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"MP HC grants relief to man accused of rape, unnatural offence by wife holding that forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty but can't be prosecuted as rape","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-amounts-to-cruelty-but-cant-be-rape-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8220;Forced unnatural sex by husband is cruelty under S. 498A IPC, not rape&#8221;: MP HC quashes Rape, Section 377 IPC charges"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Forced-unnatural-sex-by-husband-is-cruelty.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=372388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372388\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/372412"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=372388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=372388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=372388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}