{"id":372358,"date":"2026-01-12T16:30:05","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T11:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=372358"},"modified":"2026-01-13T17:33:48","modified_gmt":"2026-01-13T12:03:48","slug":"del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed by assessee, Microsoft Corporation, along with applicable interest, arising from Fringe Benefit Tax, a Division Bench of Dinesh Mehta*<\/span> and Vinod Kumar, JJ., while expressing shock for “not paying the refundable amount to an assessee for eight years,”<\/span> directed the respondents to pay refund to Microsoft along with applicable interest, including interest under Section 244-A(1A)<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (Income Tax Act).<\/p>\n

The petitioner placed reliance on a communication dated 16.06.2017 issued by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-6, New Delhi, wherein the Assessing Officer had found amounts of Rs. 6,94,56,509\/- and Rs. 5,37,77,310\/- as payable to the petitioner. While the amount of Rs. 6,94,56,509\/- was later refunded, the sum of Rs. 5,37,77,310\/- remained unpaid.<\/p>\n

The petitioner submitted that the Assessing Officer was merely waiting for a refund adjustment challan and that the respondents had taken more than eight years to carry out the ministerial work, and the amount had not been paid even till the date of hearing.<\/p>\n

The petitioner further asserted entitlement not only to the refund amount but also to interest under Section 244 and Section 244A(1A)<\/a> of the Income Tax Act<\/a>, and sought imposition of exemplary costs.<\/p>\n

The Court expressed strong displeasure over the conduct of the Income Tax Department and stated that the officers of the Department have been “callous towards petitioner’s grievance”.<\/span> The Court stated that “not paying the refundable amount to an assessee for eight years is shocking and is an issue which should have pricked the conscience of the officers at the helms of affairs.”<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court found the prayer for twelve weeks’ time to be “an unreasonable prayer and shows that they take not only the citizen but even the High Court for granted.”<\/span>The Court also noted with concern that even after filing of the writ petition, the amount had not been refunded.<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the writ petition and issued following directions —<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    The respondents shall pay the refund to Microsoft of entire amount of Rs. 5,37,77,310\/- along with applicable interest, including interest under Section 244A(1A)<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a>,<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    The payment shall be made latest by 15-02-2026 into the petitioner’s HSBC Bank account.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    In case of failure to make payment by the stipulated date, Respondent 1 (Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax) shall personally pay costs of Rs. 1,00,000\/- from his own pocket.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    [Microsoft Corporation India (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. CIT<\/span>, 2026 SCC OnLine Del 83<\/a>, Decided on 06-01-2026<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Dinesh Mehta<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    Mr. Nageswar Rao, Mr. Parth and Mr. Pratik Rath, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n

    Mr. Shlok Chandra, Sr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, Jr. SC, Ms. Naincy Jain, Jr. SC and Mr. Udit Dad, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n

    Mr. P.S. Singh, CGSC with Mr. Ashutosh Bharti, Ms. Minakshi Singh and Mr. Rajeesh Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Union of India<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Income Tax Department officers’ “utterly negligent attitude” compelled the petitioner to approach the Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":372359,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[96658,2543,96655,13081,96654,66819,95917,53606,96659,96656,96657],"class_list":["post-372358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitrary-delay","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-fringe-benefit-tax","tag-income-tax-act","tag-income-tax-refund","tag-justice-dinesh-mehta","tag-justice-vinod-kumar","tag-microsoft-corporation","tag-personal-costs-on-officer","tag-section-244-a","tag-tax-refund-interest"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC shocked at 8-year delay in ITR refund to Microsoft | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While condemning an 8-year delay, Delhi High Court directs the Income Tax Department to \u20b95.37 Crore refund to Microsoft with statutory interest.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While condemning an 8-year delay, Delhi High Court directs the Income Tax Department to \u20b95.37 Crore refund to Microsoft with statutory interest.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-12T11:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-13T12:03:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC shocked at 8-year delay in ITR refund to Microsoft | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-12T11:00:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-13T12:03:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"While condemning an 8-year delay, Delhi High Court directs the Income Tax Department to \u20b95.37 Crore refund to Microsoft with statutory interest.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"refund to Microsoft\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC shocked at 8-year delay in ITR refund to Microsoft | SCC Times","description":"While condemning an 8-year delay, Delhi High Court directs the Income Tax Department to \u20b95.37 Crore refund to Microsoft with statutory interest.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest","og_description":"While condemning an 8-year delay, Delhi High Court directs the Income Tax Department to \u20b95.37 Crore refund to Microsoft with statutory interest.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-12T11:00:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-13T12:03:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/","name":"Del HC shocked at 8-year delay in ITR refund to Microsoft | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-12T11:00:05+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-13T12:03:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"While condemning an 8-year delay, Delhi High Court directs the Income Tax Department to \u20b95.37 Crore refund to Microsoft with statutory interest.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"refund to Microsoft"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/12\/del-hc-8-year-delay-income-tax-refund-to-microsoft\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC slams Income Tax Department for 8-Year delay in Refund to Microsoft; orders refund of \u20b95.37 Crore with interest"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/refund-to-Microsoft.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/21\/income-tax-tax-at-source-tds-refund\/","url_meta":{"origin":372358,"position":0},"title":"Income Tax \u2014 Tax at Source\/TDS \u2014 Refund","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 21, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Cases Reported in \u00a02014 SCC Vol. 6 July 14, 2014 Part 3When collection is illegal, Revenue is obliged to refund such amount with interest as money so deposited is retained and enjoyed by it. Hence, resident\/deductor who had deducted tax at source and deposited the same before remitting amounts payable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "SCC Weekly"","block_context":{"text":"SCC Weekly","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/supremecourtcases\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252705,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/when-is-the-intimation-for-setting-off-of-refunds-against-tax-remaining-payable-under-s-245-income-tax-act-be-given-bom-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":372358,"position":1},"title":"When is the intimation for setting off of refunds against tax remaining payable under S. 245, Income Tax Act, be given? Bom HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Abhay Ahuja and K.R. Shriram, JJ., held that the intimation is to be given before setting off of refunds against tax remaining payable under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act prior to the officer sets off the amount. Petitioner sought issuance of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/25\/excise-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":372358,"position":2},"title":"P&H HC | Entitlement to compensation on general principles for inordinate delay in receiving monies due; Interest on refund of excise duty granted","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Ajay Tewari and Pankaj Jain, JJ., contemplated the appeal where the interest on refund of excise duty was rejected by the authorities. The main question before the Court was whether the assessee was entitled to interest. Factual Matrix of the case:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/05\/latest-cases-on-income-tax-laws-itr-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":372358,"position":3},"title":"Cases Reported in ITR | Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"November 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC\u2019s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Appeal, Refund, Assessment, Revision, Business expenditure, Recovery of Tax, Revision, Capital or Revenue receipt, Search and Seizure, Benami Transactions and much more.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/tax-27.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/18\/ker-hc-if-a-particular-income-is-not-taxable-under-the-income-tax-act-it-cannot-be-taxed-on-the-basis-of-estoppel-or-any-other-equitable-doctrine-court-reiterates-principles-for-recovery-under-inc\/","url_meta":{"origin":372358,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | If a particular income is not taxable under Income Tax Act, it cannot be taxed on basis of estoppel or any other equitable doctrine; Court reiterates principles for recovery under Income Tax Act","author":"Editor","date":"November 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Vinod Chandran J., while answering the law points in favour of the Revenue department, restrained from any recovery of the amounts refunded, \u201c(\u2026)since as of now the levy of service tax on the payment in lieu of foreign agency commission will not be leviable as 'Business Auxiliary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265202,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/08\/advertisment-in-urdu-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":372358,"position":5},"title":"If an advertisement regarding scholarship was published in Urdu language, can it be presumed that it was targeted at students belonging to a particular community only? Del HC addresses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Manmohan and Dinesh Kumar Sharma, JJ., expressed that just because the scholarship advertisement was published in the Urdu language, does not mean that it was targeted at students belonging to a particular community only. Appellant\u2019s Counsel submitted that the Income Tax Tribunal while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=372358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372358\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/372359"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=372358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=372358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=372358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}