{"id":371807,"date":"2026-01-06T11:00:58","date_gmt":"2026-01-06T05:30:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=371807"},"modified":"2026-01-12T10:04:01","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T04:34:01","slug":"bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/","title":{"rendered":"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL&#8217;s sound recording across 94 outlets"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a commercial IP suit concerning infringement of copyright in sound recordings, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sharmila U. Deshmukh<\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">, J.<\/span>, held that Phonographic Performance Ltd. (&#8216;PPL&#8217;), as an exclusive licensee, is entitled to maintain an action for infringement under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532767\" target=\"_blank\">54<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532768\" target=\"_blank\">55<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>. The Court observed that objections regarding non-impleadment of the owner, incomplete agreements, and unstamped documents could not defeat interim relief at this stage. Consequently, the defendants were restrained from publicly performing or communicating the plaintiff&#8217;s repertoire of sound recordings without obtaining a licence.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The suit was filed for infringement of copyright and quia-timet action for apprehended future violation. The plaintiff claimed ownership\/exclusive licence in sound recordings on the basis of assignment deeds and exclusive agreements with several music companies, asserting entitlement to grant licences for communication to the public under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532722\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was alleged that the defendants, who operate about 94 restaurants, were broadcasting sound recordings without securing licences. Cease and desist notices were issued, and affidavits supported by video recordings of unauthorised broadcasts were placed on record.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The defendants contended that the suit was not maintainable for non-impleadment of the owner under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532775\" target=\"_blank\">61<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>, that the plaintiff was not a registered copyright society, that material facts were suppressed, and that the agreements annexed were incomplete and inadequately stamped. They further argued that the licensing terms were unreasonable.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the issue of the plaintiff&#8217;s right to grant licences without being registered as a copyright society under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532732\" target=\"_blank\">33(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> was no longer res integra, as this Court had upheld such right <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">in Novex Communications (P) Ltd. v. Trade Wings Hotesl Ltd<\/span>., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Yy90aTY9\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 252<\/a>. It was highlighted that the decision being rendered by Co-ordinate bench of this Court binds this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532775\" target=\"_blank\">61<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> requires impleadment of the owner unless the Court otherwise directs but observed that non-impleadment would not result in an absolute embargo. It was highlighted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532767\" target=\"_blank\">54<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> includes an exclusive licensee within the expression &#8220;owner of copyright,&#8221; and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532768\" target=\"_blank\">55<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> entitles such owner to maintain an action for infringement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that objections regarding incomplete agreements were irrelevant since voluminous documents were placed on record through a compact disk and a sample agreement annexed. It was accepted that redacted agreements were permissible to protect confidential information. As regards unstamped agreements, the Court noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001518741\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831277\" target=\"_blank\">Stamp Act, 1899<\/a> places a statutory embargo on admissibility at the stage of evidence, but at the interim stage such objection would not prevent grant of relief.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that unreasonable licensing fee structures could not be pressed into service as a defence in an infringement action, since Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532724\" target=\"_blank\">31<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a> proceedings were distinct. The Court noted that specific pleadings of infringement supported by affidavit and video recordings and observed that the defendants had not demonstrated entitlement to broadcast the copyrighted sound recordings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the defendants are operating about 94 establishments, and continuing infringement would result in loss and damage to the plaintiff tilting the balance of convenience in favour of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court held that prima facie infringement was established, PPL had laid the foundation for apprehended violation, and continuing infringement would result in loss and damage. The Court restrained the defendants from publicly performing or communicating the sound recordings without obtaining a licence, thereby allowing the interim applications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Phonographic Performance Ltd. v. Trinetra Venture, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GfJ6B350\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 5649<\/a>, decided on 24-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate along with Amogh Singh, Avanti, Asmant Nimbalkar, Neeraj Nawar, Shikha Dutta, Sheryl D&#8217;souza i\/by D.P. Singh, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Defendants:<\/span> Sandeep Parikh along with Arsalan A. Thaver i\/by Abhiraj Parab, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The defendants are operating about 94 establishments, and continuing infringement would result in loss and damage to the plaintiff tilting the balance of convenience in favour of the plaintiff.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":371810,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,9461,96276,96279,25414,66917,96278,96277,96275,96280],"class_list":["post-371807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-copyright-act","tag-exclusive-licensee","tag-incomplete-agreements","tag-interim-relief","tag-justice-sharmila-u-deshmukh","tag-non-impleadment","tag-public-performance","tag-section-34-stamp-act","tag-unstamped-agreements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL sound recording at 94 outlets| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court restrains unauthorised public performance of sound recordings of Phonographic Performance Ltd., holding that exclusive licensee can maintain infringement action and objections on non-impleadment, incomplete or unstamped agreements cannot defeat interim relief.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL&#039;s sound recording across 94 outlets\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court restrains unauthorised public performance of sound recordings of Phonographic Performance Ltd., holding that exclusive licensee can maintain infringement action and objections on non-impleadment, incomplete or unstamped agreements cannot defeat interim relief.-\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-06T05:30:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-12T04:34:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL&#039;s sound recording across 94 outlets\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL sound recording at 94 outlets| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-06T05:30:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-12T04:34:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court restrains unauthorised public performance of sound recordings of Phonographic Performance Ltd., holding that exclusive licensee can maintain infringement action and objections on non-impleadment, incomplete or unstamped agreements cannot defeat interim relief.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"PPL sound recording at 94 outlets\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL&#8217;s sound recording across 94 outlets\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL sound recording at 94 outlets| SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court restrains unauthorised public performance of sound recordings of Phonographic Performance Ltd., holding that exclusive licensee can maintain infringement action and objections on non-impleadment, incomplete or unstamped agreements cannot defeat interim relief.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL's sound recording across 94 outlets","og_description":"Bombay High Court restrains unauthorised public performance of sound recordings of Phonographic Performance Ltd., holding that exclusive licensee can maintain infringement action and objections on non-impleadment, incomplete or unstamped agreements cannot defeat interim relief.-","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-06T05:30:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-12T04:34:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL's sound recording across 94 outlets","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/","name":"Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL sound recording at 94 outlets| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-06T05:30:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-12T04:34:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court restrains unauthorised public performance of sound recordings of Phonographic Performance Ltd., holding that exclusive licensee can maintain infringement action and objections on non-impleadment, incomplete or unstamped agreements cannot defeat interim relief.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"PPL sound recording at 94 outlets"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/06\/bom-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-ppl-sound-recording-94-outlets\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Copyright infringement action maintainable by exclusive licensee: Bombay HC restrains unauthorised use of PPL&#8217;s sound recording across 94 outlets"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/PPL-sound-recording-at-94-outlets.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377760,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony-s-521za-copyright-act-bom-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":371807,"position":0},"title":"Ticketed event not \u201creligious ceremony\u201d; S. 52(1)(za), Copyright Act inapplicable if exclusive licensee\u2019s rights in sound recordings established: Bombay HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"March 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe plaintiff was entitled to grant licences for communication to the public and public performance under Section 30, Copyright Act, and since 2014, was issuing licence as the licence-holder of the copyright.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ticketed event not religious ceremony","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Ticketed-event-not-religious-ceremony.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/13\/bom-hc-bars-unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches\/","url_meta":{"origin":371807,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC bars Legends League Cricket from unauthorised use of PPL\u2019s sound recordings in upcoming cricket matches","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe procurement of license by the respondent in the past would indicate the knowledge of the respondents that, for the purpose of communicating the plaintiff\u2019s copyrighted sound recordings, it is necessary to obtain the license from the plaintiff.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unauthorised use of sound recordings in cricket matches","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/unauthorised-use-of-sound-recordings-in-cricket-matches.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372171,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/bhc-bars-salon-use-jawed-habib-trademarks-after-franchise-expiry\/","url_meta":{"origin":371807,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court bars salon&#8217;s continued use of &#8216;Jawed Habib&#8217; trademarks and copyrights following expiry of franchise agreement; Issues ad-interim injunction","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe franchise agreement prima facie indicated acceptance of ownership of the plaintiff in the registered trademarks and permitted use only during subsistence of the agreement.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jawed Habib trademarks","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Jawed-Habib-trademarks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Jawed-Habib-trademarks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Jawed-Habib-trademarks.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Jawed-Habib-trademarks.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367559,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/bom-hc-upholds-interim-relief-asian-paints-trademark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":371807,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court upholds interim relief to Asian Paints in trade mark dispute, finds rival marks confusingly similar","author":"Editor","date":"November 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court came to a prima facie finding of overall deceptive similarity in the rival marks and that the impugned marks and the artwork adopted by the defendant is deceptively and confusingly similar to that of the Asian Paint Ltd.\u2019s mark.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Asian Paints trade mark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Asian-Paints-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Asian-Paints-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Asian-Paints-trade-mark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Asian-Paints-trade-mark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294267,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/bombay-hc-refuses-interim-injunction-shemaroo-entertainment-copyright-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":371807,"position":4},"title":"[Copyright Infringement] Bombay High Court refuses to grant interim injunction to Shemaroo Entertainment","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court perused the assignment deed pertaining to the film \u2018Amba\u2019 and opined that \u2018the said work\u2019 indicates plaintiff's failure in making out a prima facie case of only audio rights being assigned to the defendant.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/06\/ipr-march-2026-roundup-key-high-court-judgments-on-domain-name-copyright-trade-mark-patents-and-more\/","url_meta":{"origin":371807,"position":5},"title":"IPR March 2026 Roundup: Key High Court Judgments on Domain Name, Copyright, Trade Mark, Patents and More","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"April 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories of March 2026 on Intellectual Property Rights from all High Courts; covering key updates on Domain name fraud, Trade mark and Copyright infringement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"IPR March 2026","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IPR-March-2026.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371807\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}