{"id":371689,"date":"2026-01-05T13:00:24","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T07:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=371689"},"modified":"2026-01-14T16:08:46","modified_gmt":"2026-01-14T10:38:46","slug":"ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Spectacles’ not broad enough to include ‘Sunglasses’; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Disclaimer:<\/span> This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> While considering set of eight appeals pertaining to whether or not sunglasses could be classified as spectacles, parts and components thereof for the purpose of taxability, the Division Bench of Lisa Gill*<\/span> and Meenakshi I. Mehta, JJ., held that ‘spectacles’ is not a term broad enough to include ‘sunglasses’, therefore entailing taxation of sunglasses under the entry relatable to spectacles and not under the residual entry could not be correct.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In November 2010, the Excise and Taxation Officer passed an order stating that sunglasses were not covered under Entry 110 of Schedule-B of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005<\/a> (‘Punjab VAT Act’) Act and would thus be taxable @ 12.5 per cent. The said order was challenged by the appellants, which was dismissed by the Tribunal in September 2012. Aggrieved by the same, they approached the High Court.<\/p>\n

They contended that the item ‘sunglasses’ was covered under the definition of ‘spectacles’, hence should be taxable at the rate as applicable to spectacles under the Entry 110 of Schedule-B of the Punjab VAT Act<\/a> and Entry 100-E of Schedule-C of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003<\/a> (‘Haryana VAT Act’). They further maintained that thus, sunglasses could not be taxed at the rate applicable to unclassified items under the residual entry.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

Regarding the appellant’s argument pertaining to ‘spectacles’ being a broad and a generic term inclusive of sunglasses irrespective of whether primary purpose was vision correction or vision protection, the Court held that it is a settled position that an entry in taxation matters may be either illustrative and an inclusive entry or a restrictive and exhaustive entry. The Court stated that Entry 110 of Schedule-B of the Punjab VAT Act<\/a> was an exhaustive and restrictive one which called for no addition, substitution or reading of any other words into it.<\/p>\n

Appellants had further contended that the word ‘Chashme’ being derived from the Persian word Cacsma, of Indo-Iranian origin, which because means sight should be included in the definition of spectacles. The Court held that the argument was devoid of any merit as there was nothing placed on record which could indicate that ‘sunglasses’ could be a part of the term ‘spectacles’ or that ‘Chasme’ or ‘Ainak’ would include sunglasses within their ambit.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court stated that sunglasses and spectacles were indeed different products it couldn’t be viewed that the term ‘spectacles’ was broad enough to include ‘sunglasses’ entailing its taxation under the entry relatable to spectacles and not under the residual entry.<\/p>\n

The Court took into account the appellants’ contention that in certain areas, especially snow-clad terrains, it was impossible to venture out without proper sunglasses\/goggles and held that stated that the said issue did not arise in the case at hand. Further, referring to another contention of appellants that photochromatic lens were an example of the blurred distinction between the terms in question, the Court stated that once such a ‘lens’ was for corrective vision, it would be admittedly exigible to tax as applicable to spectacles. Therefore, sunglasses were indeed a distinct commodity, which was not covered under Entry 110 of Schedule-B of the Punjab VAT Act<\/a> and Entry 100-E of Schedule-C of the Haryana VAT Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court noted the amendment brought about in the Punjab VAT Act in January 2011 proved the point that Sunglasses are not ‘spectacles’. . Hence, the classification of sunglasses as residuary item was correct because it did not fall under any specified Schedule, thus, exigible to tax at the rate of 12.50 per cent. The Court further stated that inclusion of sunglasses in said entries at a later stage would not buttress the case of appellants.<\/p>\n

The Court disposed of the appeals and upheld the impugned orders.<\/p>\n

[Himalaya Optical Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab, 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 18413<\/a>, decided on 8-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgement authored by Justice Lisa Gill<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Appellants:<\/span> Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, Prakyat J.S. Advocate and Suresh Kumar Yadav, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana and Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

‘Sunglasses’ did not fall under any specified Schedule of Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, thus, exigible to tax at the rate of 12.50%.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67540,"featured_media":371696,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[96210,96208,82779,2670,96209,54546,96211,96212],"class_list":["post-371689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-haryana-value-added-tax-act-2003","tag-justice-lisa-gill","tag-justice-meenakshi-i-mehta","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-punjab-value-added-tax-act-2005","tag-spectacles","tag-sunglasses","tag-taxability-of-sunglasses"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC: Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles'; Taxable as Residuary Item| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles': Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the classification of sunglasses as a residuary item for taxation under Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act 2003.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"'Spectacles' not broad enough to include 'Sunglasses'; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles': Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the classification of sunglasses as a residuary item for taxation under Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act 2003.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-05T07:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-14T10:38:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"'Spectacles' not broad enough to include 'Sunglasses'; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC: Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles'; Taxable as Residuary Item| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-05T07:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-14T10:38:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"description\":\"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles': Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the classification of sunglasses as a residuary item for taxation under Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act 2003.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles'\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"‘Spectacles’ not broad enough to include ‘Sunglasses’; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\",\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shriya Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC: Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles'; Taxable as Residuary Item| SCC Times","description":"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles': Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the classification of sunglasses as a residuary item for taxation under Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act 2003.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Spectacles' not broad enough to include 'Sunglasses'; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court","og_description":"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles': Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the classification of sunglasses as a residuary item for taxation under Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act 2003.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-05T07:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-14T10:38:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shriya Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"'Spectacles' not broad enough to include 'Sunglasses'; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shriya Singh","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/","name":"P&H HC: Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles'; Taxable as Residuary Item| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-05T07:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-14T10:38:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"description":"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles': Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the classification of sunglasses as a residuary item for taxation under Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 and Haryana Value Added Tax Act 2003.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Sunglasses Are Not 'Spectacles'"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/ph-high-court-sunglasses-are-not-spectacles-taxable-as-residuary-item\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"‘Spectacles’ not broad enough to include ‘Sunglasses’; Taxable as Residuary Item: Punjab and Haryana High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0","name":"Shriya Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shriya Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Sunglasses-Are-Not-Spectacles.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":256024,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/25\/10-additional-judges-appointed-as-judges-of-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":371689,"position":0},"title":"10 Additional Judges appointed as Judges of Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Appointment of Judges | Punjab and Haryana High Court President appoints the following Additional Judges as Judges of the P&H High Court: Suvir Sehgal Alka Sarin Jasgurpreet Singh Puri Ashok Kumar Verma Sant Parkash Meenakshi I. Mehta Karamjit Singh Vivek Puri Archana Puri Rajesh Bhardwaj Ministry of Law and Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222563,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-appointment-of-6-addl-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":371689,"position":1},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC | Appointment of 6 Addl. Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appointment of Additional Judges of P&H High Court President is pleased to appoint\u00a0 the following as Additional Judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in that order of seniority, for a period of two years with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices: S\/Shri (i)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/04\/additional-judges-of-the-punjab-and-haryana-high-court-appointed-by-the-president-of-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":371689,"position":2},"title":"Additional Judges appointed by the President of India","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 4, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 18-12-2014, the President of India appointed the following Additional Judges of Punjab and Haryana High Court to be Judges of the same Court with effect from the date they assume the charge of their respective offices: Justice Rekha Mittal Justice Inderjit Singh Justice Amol Rattan Singh Justice Bharat Bhushan\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/sc-collegium-elevates-6-judicial-officers-as-judges-of-p-one-case-remitted-back-to-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":371689,"position":3},"title":"SC Collegium elevates 6 Judicial Officers as Judges of P&H HC; One case remitted back to HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for appointment of following seven Judicial Officers as Judges of the Punjab & Haryana High Court: 1. Shri Satish Kumar Aggarwal, 2. Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, 3. Shri Sant Parkash Phutela, 4. Shri Karamjit Singh, 5. Shri Vivek Puri, 6. Mrs. Meenakshi I. Mehta, and 7. Mrs. Archana Puri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235556,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/09\/punjab-haryana-hc-7-additional-judges-appointed-as-permanent-of-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":371689,"position":4},"title":"Punjab & Haryana HC | 7 Additional Judges appointed as Permanent of P&H HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"President appoints 7 Additional Judges as Permanent Judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court: Manjari Nehru Kaul Harsimran Singh Sethi Arun Monga Manoj Bajaj Lalit Batra Arun Kumar Tyagi Harnaresh Singh Gill Read the notification here: NOTIFICATION Ministry of Law and Justice [Notification dt. 08-09-2020]","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":294160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/08\/punjab-haryana-high-court-refuses-anticipatory-bail-to-ias-vijay-singh-dahiya-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":371689,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court refuses grant of anticipatory bail to IAS Vijay Singh Dahiya","author":"Editor","date":"June 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner allegedly took bribe to clear bills of the complainant","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67540"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371689\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}