{"id":371682,"date":"2026-01-05T12:00:11","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T06:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=371682"},"modified":"2026-01-14T15:50:18","modified_gmt":"2026-01-14T10:20:18","slug":"all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/","title":{"rendered":"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Disclaimer:<\/span> This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> While considering a petition challenging orders passed by Respondents 3 and 4 whereby services of the petitioners were terminated for mentioning increased marks in the application form while applying for Assistant teachers, a Single Judge Bench of Manju Rani Chauhan*<\/span>, J., held that entering higher marks than actually obtained was not a mere clerical lapse but a deliberate act capable of altering the merit position and could not be regularised under the guise of ‘human error’.<\/p>\n

The Court further stated that public employment is a matter of public trust which beings upon the State a constitutional obligation to uphold the integrity of the selection process and any illegality could not ripen into a legal right merely because it remained unnoticed for some time.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In December 2018, the State Government issued a Government Order notifying the holding of Teachers Recruitment Examination 2019 Assistant for the appointment against 69000 posts of Assistant Teachers. The petitioners, being eligible for the post, applied to the said advertisement. When the result was declared in May 2020, the petitioners qualified.<\/p>\n

In May 2020, the State Government issued a Government Order for consideration of the appointments of selected candidates as Assistant Teachers pursuant to which petitioners applied for the appointment. Thereafter, a final select list was published by which the petitioners were duly selected.<\/p>\n

The District Basic Education Officer (‘District Officer’) conducted counselling and initially some objections were raised against the petitioners. Therefore, the said District Officer published a list of candidates whose cases were kept pending on account of such objections. For rectification, the matter was considered at the level of the State Government, whereafter Government Orders were issued requiring the candidates to furnish individual affidavits before the District Officer. After consideration of petitioners’ cases, appointment orders were issued, and petitioners accordingly joined their services.<\/p>\n

In May 2025, Respondent 3 terminated their services in compliance with the instructions issued by Respondent 2 stating that appointments of all teachers who were placed in an advantageous position by mentioning higher marks than they actually secured were to be cancelled. Thus, the petitioners approached the High Court.<\/p>\n

The petitioners contended that they had efficiently discharged their duties for almost five years and they were holding regular and permanent appointments, thus, their services could not be dispensed with without following the procedure as specified under the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973 and Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that the petitioners failed to satisfactorily respond to the objections raised by the respondents 3 and 4 that the petitioners concerned had mentioned higher marks than those actually secured. The Court further noted that Petitioners 1, 5, 6 and 7 did not mention higher marks than they actually possess, though, the mistake occurred at their end was bonafide.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that entering higher marks than actually obtained was not a mere clerical lapse but a deliberate act capable of altering the merit position, therefore it could not be regularised under the guise of ‘human error’. The Court further stated that any undue advantage so obtained was illegal and vitiated the selection itself as entering marks higher than the candidate has actually secured is a conscious act that materially alters the candidate’s position in the merit list. Such conduct cannot be trivialised as a human error.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that “It is a cardinal principle of service jurisprudence that fraud vitiates every solemn act. A candidate who enters the selection process by misrepresenting material particulars, such as academic marks that constitute the very basis of merit-based recruitment, cannot invoke the equitable doctrine of estoppel.<\/span>” Further, the Court stated that public appointments should strictly conform to statutory norms and prescribed eligibility criteria and “Where an applicant manipulates higher marks to obtain an undeserved advantage, the appointment becomes tainted from its inception.<\/span>” Thus, the Court held that since there could be no estoppel against statute, the employer was empowered and indeed duty-bound to annul an appointment obtained in derogation of the recruitment rules, notwithstanding any administrative lapse or delay.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court clarified that the time granted by the appointing authority to rectify the application form was meant to correct bonafide clerical or inadvertent errors, not to sanitise a deliberate falsification of essential data. A procedural indulgence extended by the authority could not be construed as a waiver of its right to scrutinise the veracity of the information furnished or to act upon detection of misrepresentation. Even the issuance of an appointment letter does not confer any indefeasible or vested right to continue in service when the very foundation of the appointment got vitiated. The Court stated that “An employment secured by deceit is voidable at the instance of the employer, and neither length of service nor any administrative oversight can breathe legitimacy into an appointment that is tainted from the outset.<\/span>”<\/p>\n

The Court stated that public employment is a matter of public trust, and the State is under a constitutional obligation to uphold the integrity of the selection process, and an illegality does not ripen into a legal right merely because it remained unnoticed for some time. Once the appointment was shown to have been procured by misrepresentation of marks, the employer was under no legal obligation to continue such an appointment. Since the very entry into service was tainted, the candidate could not claim protection under Articles 14<\/a> or 311<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court further viewed that permitting estoppel in such circumstances would undermine the sanctity of meritocracy, distort the selection process, and result in the displacement of genuinely more meritorious candidates. Thus, the Court held that where a candidate deliberately enters marks higher than those actually secured, thereby placing himself\/herself in a position of unwarranted advantage and ultimately securing appointment, such appointment cannot be termed legal or valid. Such an act, by any stretch of reasoning, could not be treated as a mere human error or an inadvertent mistake, as it conferred an undue advantage upon the candidate to the prejudice of other eligible aspirants and struck at the very root of fairness and transparency in the selection process. Therefore, their subsequent appointment was vitiated ab initio, and no estoppel could arise to protect an appointment that was fundamentally illegal.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court held that since it was a case of deliberate attempt to mention higher marks than actually possessed, the petitioners were not entitled for any relief. However, the case Petitioners 1, 5, 6 and 7 fell within the criteria of disadvantage, thus, their appointme5, 6nts were based on the merit criteria they possessed. Thus, the Court quashed the termination order with respect to them.<\/p>\n

[Awadhesh Kumar Chaudhary v. State of UP, 2025 SCC OnLine All 8077<\/a>, decided on 16-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Siddharth Khare, Sr. Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Archana Singh, C.S.C<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Where an applicant manipulates higher marks to obtain an undeserved advantage, the appointment becomes tainted from its inception.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67540,"featured_media":371685,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,68894,58769,54808,92882,44139,44707,30012,96206,96207],"class_list":["post-371682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-application-process","tag-assistant-teachers","tag-doctrine-of-estoppel","tag-justice-manju-rani-chauhan","tag-public-employment","tag-public-trust","tag-termination-order","tag-uttar-pradesh-basic-education-staff-rules-1973","tag-uttar-pradesh-government-servant-discipline-and-appeal-rules-1999"],"yoast_head":"\nAll HC on Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a case relating to Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks, Allahabad High Court held that deliberate inflation of marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised as 'human error'\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a case relating to Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks, Allahabad High Court held that deliberate inflation of marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised as 'human error'\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-05T06:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-14T10:20:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shriya Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/\",\"name\":\"All HC on Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-05T06:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-14T10:20:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\"},\"description\":\"In a case relating to Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks, Allahabad High Court held that deliberate inflation of marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised as 'human error'\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0\",\"name\":\"Shriya Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shriya Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC on Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks | SCC Times","description":"In a case relating to Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks, Allahabad High Court held that deliberate inflation of marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised as 'human error'","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court","og_description":"In a case relating to Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks, Allahabad High Court held that deliberate inflation of marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised as 'human error'","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-05T06:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-14T10:20:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shriya Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shriya Singh","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/","name":"All HC on Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-05T06:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-14T10:20:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0"},"description":"In a case relating to Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks, Allahabad High Court held that deliberate inflation of marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised as 'human error'","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"Assistant Teachers' termination over entering higher marks"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/all-hc-on-assistant-teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Deliberate Entering of higher marks in recruitment forms cannot be regularised under guise of \u2018human error\u2019: Allahabad High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/05f52c55c599f9992b3c0535de8a5ed0","name":"Shriya Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/856f9d1200cef7ba5579e8b2c5d144170675fbadcc29a89d7f20ca99f3d28c7e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Shriya Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/shriyasingh\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Assistant-Teachers-termination-over-entering-higher-marks.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/sc-collegium-28-additional-judges-of-allahabad-hc-to-be-permanent\/","url_meta":{"origin":371682,"position":0},"title":"SC Collegium | 28 Additional Judges of Allahabad HC to be Permanent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court Collegium approves the proposal for appointment of following Additional Judges of Allahabad High Court as Permanent Judges of that High Court: Justice Prakash Padia, Justice Alok Mathur, Justice Pankaj Bhatia, Justice Saurabh Lavania, Justice Vivek Varma, Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh, Justice Piyush Agrawal, Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/digitalisation-is-bridging-the-gap-between-the-courts-and-the-litigant-allahabad-high-court-rejects-transfer-application-citing-alternative-of-video-conference-facility\/","url_meta":{"origin":371682,"position":1},"title":"“Digitalisation is bridging the gap between the courts and the litigant”; Allahabad High Court rejects transfer application citing alternative of video conference facility","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Vikram D. Chauhan, J. took cognizance of transfer application which was filed for the transfer of the case under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhadohi at Gyanpur to the court having competence jurisdiction in District Prayagraj disallowing it and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/20\/all-hc-if-a-judge-makes-a-mistake-then-from-where-will-the-general-public-get-fair-justice-hc-warns-judicial-magistrate-to-remain-careful-while-passing-judicial-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":371682,"position":2},"title":"All HC | “If a Judge makes a mistake, then from where will the general public get fair justice”; HC warns Judicial Magistrate to remain careful while passing Judicial Orders","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Manju Rani Chauhan, J., expressed that: \u201cAt the present time, only from the temple of justice like Courts, everyone hopes for right and fair justice.\u201d Pursuant to an order, a letter had been sent by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra along with the explanation, who has passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/24\/amendments-in-relevant-rules-insofar-as-they-prescribe-absorption-of-shiksha-mitras-as-assistant-teachers-held-ultra-vires\/","url_meta":{"origin":371682,"position":3},"title":"Amendments in relevant Rules, insofar as they prescribe absorption of Shiksha Mitras as Assistant Teachers, held ultra vires","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 24, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court- Deciding on writ petitions wherein relief was sought to set aside two notifications issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh as a result of which Rule 16-A was introduced in Uttar Pradesh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 to reserve to the State\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/president-appoints-28-additional-judges-as-judges-of-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":371682,"position":4},"title":"President appoints 28 Additional Judges as Judges of Allahabad High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"President of India in the exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, appointed Justices Prakash Padia, Alok Mathur, Pankaj Bhatia, Saurabh Lavania,\u00a0 Vivek Varma, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Piyush Agrawal, Shriaurabh Shyam Shamshery, Jaspreet Singh, Rajeev Singh, Manju Rani Chauhan, Karunesh Singh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":286199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/mass-religious-conversion-case-not-only-period-of-punishment-but-nature-of-offence-should-also-be-taken-into-consideration-while-granting-anticipatory-bail-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":371682,"position":5},"title":"[Mass Religious Conversion Case] Not only period of punishment, but nature of offence should also be taken into consideration while granting anticipatory bail: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that it cannot close its eyes to the fact that the material evidence has been collected regarding mass conversion of persons and this case has taken a far more serious turn where the victims are coming forward to give evidence, thus, in case anticipatory bail is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67540"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371682\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}