{"id":371666,"date":"2026-01-05T11:00:19","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T05:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=371666"},"modified":"2026-01-08T10:44:54","modified_gmt":"2026-01-08T05:14:54","slug":"bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/","title":{"rendered":"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In an interim application arising from a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;), a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Somasekhar Sundaresan<\/span>, J., held that the amount withdrawn by the award holder pursuant to a court ordered deposit could not continue to remain with it after the corporate debtor had undergone resolution under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (&#8216;IBC&#8217;). Emphasising that the resolution plan had extinguished the right to receive the arbitral award, the Court directed that the withdrawn sum be brought back to the Registry, failing which the bank guarantee furnished would be invoked. Clarifying further, the Court rejected the claim for interest, holding that such pursuit entailed a separate cause of action.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">An arbitral award dated 31-08-2015 directed payment of approximately Rs 49.11 crores. During pendency of the Section 34 petition challenging the award, pursuant to an order dated 20-02-2017, a deposit of Rs 12,76,91,279 was made with the Registry. This amount was withdrawn by the award-holder upon furnishing a bank guarantee valid until 30-04-2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, the corporate debtor was admitted to the corporate insolvency resolution process, and a resolution plan was approved on 23-12-2022, reducing the debt due under the award from Rs 49.11 crores to Re 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicant sought release of the withdrawn amount along with interest at 18 per cent per annum from 20-02-2017. The respondent contended that the withdrawal was validly made against the deposit and secured by a bank guarantee, and that no basis existed for the claim of interest under the interim application.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that once the resolution plan had reduced the claim under the arbitral award to Re 1, the withdrawn amount could not continue to remain with the award-holder. The Court noted that the amount deposited in Court was <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">custodia legis<\/span> and had been released only on the strength of the bank guarantee. It was observed that it is only proper that the amount so withdrawn should now be brought back since the underlying Arbitral Award itself stands extinguished.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that the law was well covered by <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ghanashyam Mishra &amp; Sons (P) Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3kbN5891\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 9 SCC 657<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Siti Networks Ltd. v. Rajiv Suri<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cYaF0wt3\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 257 Comp Cas 623<\/a>, and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Garden Silk Mills Ltd. v. Gayatri Industries, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/495V907Y\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 258 Comp Cas 725<\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">.<\/span> The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Siti Networks Ltd.<\/span> (supra), wherein it was held that the amounts deposited in Court by a judgment debtor, who later became a corporate debtor admitted to corporate insolvency resolution process (&#8216;CIRP&#8217;) under the IBC, were liable to be returned to the resolution professional of the corporate debtor during the conduct of the CIRP, in order to conserve both the insolvency estate and the future liquidation estate of the judgment debtor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that in the present matter the resolution plan has indeed been approved and has been completed and moreover the Petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544939\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> itself is rendered infructuous since the Arbitral Award stands effaced, with nothing awarded in it capable of being enjoyed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the claim for interest, the Court noted that there is no basis for awarding interest generally, and indeed specifically at the rate of interest as claimed. Further, the Court highlighted that the claim for interest entails pursuit of a separate cause of action and such a claim cannot be provided under the interim application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, therefore, directed that the withdrawn amount of Rs 12,76,91,279 be brought back to the Registry within four weeks, failing which, the Registry must invoke the bank guarantee to recover the amount and pay it to the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the claim for interest was rejected, leaving it open for pursuit in appropriate proceedings, and the interim application was disposed of with no order as to costs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Reliance Naval &amp; Engineering Ltd. v. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/bZJ6M9Xe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 5594<\/a>, decided on 17-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Applicant:<\/span> Cyrus Ardeshir with Amir Ariswala and Rahul Gupta<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Janak Dwarkadas with Naushad Engineer, instructed by Meenakshi Iyer<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png\" alt=\"arbitration and conciliation act, 1996\" width=\"191\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294803\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png 191w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-38x60.png 38w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 191px) 100vw, 191px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Once the resolution plan had reduced the claim under the arbitral award to Re.1, the withdrawn amount could not continue to remain with the award-holder.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":371679,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[96201,96204,2569,96202,96203,22064,96205,72782,96200],"class_list":["post-371666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral-award-extinguished","tag-bank-guarantee-invocation","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-cirp-resolution-plan","tag-custodia-legis","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-interest-claim-rejected","tag-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan","tag-section-34-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Withdrawn arbitral deposit to be returned after insolvency: Bombay HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court directs award-holder to return Rs. 12.76 crore withdrawn deposit after insolvency resolution extinguished arbitral award, rules bank guarantee must be invoked if not repaid, and rejects claim for interest under interim application.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court directs award-holder to return Rs. 12.76 crore withdrawn deposit after insolvency resolution extinguished arbitral award, rules bank guarantee must be invoked if not repaid, and rejects claim for interest under interim application.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-05T05:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-08T05:14:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/\",\"name\":\"Withdrawn arbitral deposit to be returned after insolvency: Bombay HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-05T05:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-08T05:14:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court directs award-holder to return Rs. 12.76 crore withdrawn deposit after insolvency resolution extinguished arbitral award, rules bank guarantee must be invoked if not repaid, and rejects claim for interest under interim application.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Withdrawn arbitral deposit to be returned after insolvency\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Withdrawn arbitral deposit to be returned after insolvency: Bombay HC| SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court directs award-holder to return Rs. 12.76 crore withdrawn deposit after insolvency resolution extinguished arbitral award, rules bank guarantee must be invoked if not repaid, and rejects claim for interest under interim application.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution","og_description":"Bombay High Court directs award-holder to return Rs. 12.76 crore withdrawn deposit after insolvency resolution extinguished arbitral award, rules bank guarantee must be invoked if not repaid, and rejects claim for interest under interim application.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-05T05:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-08T05:14:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/","name":"Withdrawn arbitral deposit to be returned after insolvency: Bombay HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp","datePublished":"2026-01-05T05:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-08T05:14:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court directs award-holder to return Rs. 12.76 crore withdrawn deposit after insolvency resolution extinguished arbitral award, rules bank guarantee must be invoked if not repaid, and rejects claim for interest under interim application.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Withdrawn arbitral deposit to be returned after insolvency"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/05\/bom-hc-withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Custodia legis principle applied: Bombay HC directs return of withdrawn arbitral deposit after insolvency resolution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Withdrawn-arbitral-deposit-to-be-returned-after-insolvency.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252947,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/sirpur-paper-mills\/","url_meta":{"origin":371666,"position":0},"title":"Sirpur Paper Mills case: Fate of an arbitral award after approval of resolution plan","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Priyal Jain\u2020 and Prasann Malviya\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-103.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-103.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-103.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-103.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-103.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/india-corporate-commercial-law-developments-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":371666,"position":1},"title":"Corporate &#038; Commercial Law 2025: How Courts, Regulators and Lawmakers reinforced accountability and curbed abuse","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundup highlights key 2025 corporate and commercial law developments from Adani\u2019s HDIL resolution and Vedanta\u2019s demerger setback to SEBI\u2019s insider trading penalties, Google\u2019s CCI settlement, and the pump-and-dump ban involving actor Arshad Warsi.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"India Corporate & Commercial Law Developments 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-reiterated-earlier-proposal-to-elevate-advocate-somasekhar-sundaresan-as-judge-bombay-high-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":371666,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan elevation as a Bombay High Court Judge; says he can&#39;t be denied judgeship for expressing his views","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court Collegium added that there are no indications of Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan's links with any political parties with strong ideological leanings and emphasised on the right to free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-143.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":296119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/nclat-application-s-9-ibc-for-implementation-of-arbitral-award-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":371666,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Arbitration Proceedings\u2019 and \u2018IBC Proceedings\u2019 cannot go on together; NCLAT upholds NCLT&#8217;s order rejecting Section 9 application","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that an application preferred under Section 9 of the IBC for implementation of an Arbitral Award is not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","url_meta":{"origin":371666,"position":4},"title":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSince disputes had already been subjected to arbitration and culminated in the Arbitral Award, the disputes and differences, including differences over interest payment prior to commencement of arbitration, are issues that are covered by constructive res judicata.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"res judicata bars re-litigation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266044,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/28\/mere-filing-of-a-proceeding-under-section-7-of-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-would-amount-to-an-embargo-on-the-court-considering-an-application-under-section-11-of-the-arbitration-and-conci\/","url_meta":{"origin":371666,"position":5},"title":"Can mere filing of proceedings under S. 7 IBC be treated as an embargo on Court exercising jurisdiction under S. 11 of Arbitration &#038; Conciliation Act? Bom HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A very interesting question was considered by G.S. Kulkarni, J., the question being, whether mere filing of a proceeding under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would amount to an embargo on the Court considering an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371666\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}