{"id":371361,"date":"2025-12-31T15:00:01","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T09:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=371361"},"modified":"2026-01-06T10:15:42","modified_gmt":"2026-01-06T04:45:42","slug":"jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","title":{"rendered":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging the cognizance order passed by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> (‘PMLA’), a Single Judge Bench of Justice Ambuj Nath<\/span> held that the absence of prior sanction under Section 197<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) does not invalidate the order. Emphasising that siphoning State funds and amassing ill-gotten wealth can never be considered part of a public servant’s official duty, the Court clarified that the Section 197<\/a> CrPC<\/a> corruption shield cannot be invoked to protect acts of corruption. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The prosecution complaint was filed after multiple FIRs were registered by the Jharkhand Police at Khunti, where audit reports confirmed large-scale defalcation of government funds running into crores. It was alleged that between 16-02-2009 and 19-07-2010, funds sanctioned for development projects were misappropriated to the tune of Rs 18.06 crore, in connivance with engineers. Subsequent raids and searches led to the recovery of Rs 19.76 crore in cash, along with documents and digital devices. The petitioner failed to provide any lawful source of income and was arrested on 11-05-2022.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that cognizance was taken without obtaining prior sanction under Section 197(1)<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, which is mandatory for prosecuting public servants. It was argued that the cognizance order was legally flawed as this requirement had not been met. The Enforcement Directorate, however, submitted that sanction is intended to protect responsible public servants from vexatious proceedings only when the alleged act is reasonably connected with the discharge of official duty, and not when official duty is used merely as a cloak for objectionable or corrupt acts.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court emphasised that Section 197<\/a> CrPC<\/a> gives protection to public servants employed in the Central or State Government against vexatious criminal proceedings while acting as public servants. The Court noted that protection has been extended to acts exceeding official duty if there is reasonable connection between the act and performance of duty. However, the Court observed that accumulating ill-gotten wealth by siphoning State funds cannot be said to be part of official duty of any public servant.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted that sanction under Section 197<\/a> CrPC<\/a> is only for acts reasonably connected to official duty, not personal illegal acts even if done by public servants. The Court stressed that sanction is not for shielding corrupt officials. The Court noted that the guiding principle governing necessity of prior sanction is whether the impugned act is reasonably connected to discharge of official duty. If the act is wholly unconnected or manifestly devoid of nexus to official functions, the requirement of sanction obviates.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the issue of sanction can be taken up before the Trial Court at any stage of the proceedings, depending on the nature of evidence that the prosecution may lead. Sanction can be obtained at any stage before pronouncement of judgment.<\/p>\n

Consequently, the Court held that taking cognizance without sanction in the present case will not vitiate the cognizance order. Accordingly, the writ application was dismissed, and pending interlocutory applications also stood disposed of.<\/p>\n

[Pooja Singhal v. Enforcement Directorate, 2025 SCC OnLine Jhar 3961<\/a>, decided on 22-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Indrajit Sinha, Sneh Singh, Akhouri Awinash Kumar, Ashwini Priya<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Zoheb Hossain, Amit Kumar Das, Sourav Kumar, Varun Girdhar, Pranjal Tripathi<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Sanction under section 197 CrPC is only for the acts reasonably connected to official duty, not personal illegal acts even if done by the public servants.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":371364,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3726,3638,5791,95979,19261,25244,79079,2694,34362,95980],"class_list":["post-371361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizance","tag-corruption","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-justice-ambuj-nath","tag-money-laundering","tag-prevention-of-money-laundering-act","tag-public-servant-protection","tag-Sanction","tag-section-197-crpc","tag-siphoning-state-funds"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC: Sanction under CrPC\u2019s S.197 not corruption shield | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court holds that Section 197 not corruption shield and that cognizance under PMLA against ex-IAS officer without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC will not vitiate the order; writ petition dismissed.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court holds that Section 197 not corruption shield and that cognizance under PMLA against ex-IAS officer without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC will not vitiate the order; writ petition dismissed.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-31T09:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-06T04:45:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC: Sanction under CrPC\u2019s S.197 not corruption shield | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-31T09:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-06T04:45:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court holds that Section 197 not corruption shield and that cognizance under PMLA against ex-IAS officer without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC will not vitiate the order; writ petition dismissed.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Section 197 not corruption shield\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC: Sanction under CrPC\u2019s S.197 not corruption shield | SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court holds that Section 197 not corruption shield and that cognizance under PMLA against ex-IAS officer without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC will not vitiate the order; writ petition dismissed.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court holds that Section 197 not corruption shield and that cognizance under PMLA against ex-IAS officer without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC will not vitiate the order; writ petition dismissed.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-31T09:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-06T04:45:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","name":"Jhar HC: Sanction under CrPC\u2019s S.197 not corruption shield | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-31T09:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-06T04:45:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court holds that Section 197 not corruption shield and that cognizance under PMLA against ex-IAS officer without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC will not vitiate the order; writ petition dismissed.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Section 197 not corruption shield"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":53721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":371361,"position":0},"title":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity of Invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 197 , the Notification dated 16.05.1980 issued by Bihar Government, invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/effect-on-trial-for-offences-under-ipc-if-sanction-under-pc-act-declined-sc-highlights-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":371361,"position":1},"title":"How Trial for offences under IPC would be affected if Sanction for offences under PC Act is declined? SC Highlights","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction contemplated under Section 197 of the CrPC concerns a public servant who \u2018is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty\u2019 whereas, the offences contemplated in the PC Act, 1988 are those which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sanction under pc act declined","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/07\/sanction-reasonable-nexus-section-197-seizure-criminal-procedure-cognizance-discharge-of-duty-legal-updates-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":371361,"position":2},"title":"Orissa High Court| Sanction must be issued under Section 197 of CrPC for taking cognizance on having \u2018reasonable nexus\u2019 with official duty","author":"Editor","date":"November 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: In a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (\u2018Code\u2019) challenging the legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order of cognizance, on the ground that it is not tenable in law and hence, liable to be quashed in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334676,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/section-1971-crpc-applicability-complaint-under-pmla-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":371361,"position":3},"title":"[Money Laundering] Section 197(1) CrPC applicable to complaint under Section 44(1)(b) of PMLA: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pointed out that there is no embargo on considering the plea of absence of sanction, after cognizance is taken by the Special Court of the offences punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"money laundering S. 197","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/money-laundering-S.-197.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/money-laundering-S.-197.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/money-laundering-S.-197.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/money-laundering-S.-197.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/orissa-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-nesco-orissa-officials-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":371361,"position":4},"title":"Orissa HC quashes Criminal proceedings against NESCO Orissa Officials on grounds of absence of Sanction under Section 197 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The officers on duty cannot be subjected to undue harassment in the hands of unscrupulous litigants, to prevent malicious prosecution provisions such as Section 168 of the Electricity Act, 2003, are put in place.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/07\/no-prosecution-against-public-servants\/","url_meta":{"origin":371361,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | No prosecution against public servants without prior approval of government; HC dismisses CBI\u2019s revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Narayana Pisharadi, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by CBI due to its failure to obtain prior sanction of government before prosecuting public servants. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had filed the instant revision petition to assail the order of the Special Judge for CBI Cases,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371361","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371361\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}