{"id":371073,"date":"2025-12-29T10:00:24","date_gmt":"2025-12-29T04:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=371073"},"modified":"2026-01-05T10:23:52","modified_gmt":"2026-01-05T04:53:52","slug":"del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Disclaimer: This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/p>\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an application seeking refund of the full court fees paid on the appeal, in light of the remand ordered by the High Court after setting aside the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC), a Division Bench of C. Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla, JJ., held that the appellant was entitled to refund of the court fees deposited on the appeal.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant had instituted a commercial suit which was dismissed by the Commercial Court at the threshold. The plaint was rejected qua Respondent 1 under Order VII Rule 11(A)<\/a> CPC<\/a> and was returned qua Respondents 2 to 5 under Order VII Rule 10<\/a> CPC<\/a>. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant preferred appeal before the Delhi High Court.<\/p>\n

The Division Bench, vide order dated 16-09-2025, set aside the Commercial Court’s order and remanded the suit for reconsideration and held the suit was maintainable against all the respondents before the Commercial Court. Pursuant to the remand, the appellant moved the present application seeking refund of the court fees paid on the appeal, invoking the provisions of Section 13<\/a> of the Court Fees Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court examined Section 13<\/a> of the Court Fees Act<\/a>, which clearly states that, if a suit is remanded in appeal on any of the grounds mentioned in Section 351 of the erstwhile CPC, the appellant would be entitled to a certificate authorising him to receive back the full amount of the court fees paid on the appeal. Relying on State of U.P.<\/span> v. Chandra Bhushan Misra<\/span>, the Court reiterated that the reference to Section 351 of the erstwhile CPC must be construed as a reference to Order XLI Rule 23<\/a> of the present CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Applying this principle to the facts at hand, the Court noted that the Commercial Court had rejected the plaint on a preliminary objection and the appellant court set aside the rejection order, resulting in a remand. The Court held that “the remand is on one of the grounds envisaged by Order XLI Rule 23<\/a> of the CPC<\/a>.”<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court held that the appellant was entitled to refund of the court fees deposited on the appeal and directed the Registry to issue a certificate enabling refund of the court fees within a period of four weeks from the date of the order.<\/p>\n

[Nilesh Girkar<\/span> v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd.<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 9618<\/a>, Decided on 15-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Rahul Ajatshatru, Ms. Daisy Roy, Ms. Swati Chanana, Ms. Shilpi Mehta Nanda and Ms. Yukti, Counsel for the Appellant<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Christopher Thomas, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Order XLI Rule 23 of the CPC envisages remand in a situation in which the suit was decreed by the Court of first instance on a preliminary point and the decree is reversed in appeal by the appellate court.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":371079,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44196,49102,2543,68986,88462,22434,95800,95799,22424,95801],"class_list":["post-371073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-commercial-courts-act","tag-court-fees-act","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-c-hari-shankar","tag-justice-om-prakash-shukla","tag-order-vii-rule-11-cpc","tag-order-xli-rule-23-cpc","tag-refund-of-court-fees","tag-rejection-of-plaint","tag-remand-in-appeal"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC: Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that party is entitled to Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that party is entitled to Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-29T04:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-05T04:53:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC: Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-29T04:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-05T04:53:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that party is entitled to Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"refund of Court fees\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC: Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that party is entitled to Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that party is entitled to Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-29T04:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-05T04:53:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/","name":"Del HC: Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-29T04:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-05T04:53:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that party is entitled to Refund of Court Fees on Remand after Rejection of Plaint","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"refund of Court fees"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/del-hc-refund-of-court-fees-remand-rejection-of-plaint-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Remand after reversal of Rejection of Plaint creates entitlement to refund of Court fees: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/refund-of-Court-fees.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204769,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/defendant-making-payments-towards-amount-claimed-does-not-vanish-cause-of-action-rejection-of-plaint-under-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-reversed-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":371073,"position":0},"title":"Defendant making payments towards amount claimed does not vanish cause of action; rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC reversed: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. allowed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant's plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The appellant had brought a suit against the respondent for recovery of a certain amount. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/09\/ker-hc-suit-instituted-on-behalf-of-alleged-mentally-infirm-person-court-obliged-to-enquire-and-follow-procedure-under-order-xxxii-rules-12-and-15-of-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":371073,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Suit instituted on behalf of alleged mentally infirm person \u2013 Court obliged to enquire and follow procedure under Order XXXII Rules 12 and 15 of CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of A. Hariprasad, J. hearing an appeal against remand order, answered substantial questions of law in relation to suits instituted by a next friend. Respondent, purportedly on behalf of his alleged mentally infirm sister Rohini, filed a suit for declaration that a registered document executed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/law-on-rejection-of-plaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":371073,"position":2},"title":"Law on Rejection of Plaint | Contents of plaint or Examining sufficiency of plaint? Del HC explains the bounden duty of Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prateek Jalan, J., expressed that, For the purposes of an order under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, the Court must come to the conclusion that the plaint is required to be rejected. Present petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution for directing against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/24\/law-on-rejection-of-plaint-under-order-vii-rule-11-of-cpc-as-explained-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":371073,"position":3},"title":"Law on rejection of plaint under\u00a0Order\u00a0VII\u00a0Rule\u00a011\u00a0of\u00a0CPC as explained by the Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has lucidly explained the law on rejection of plaints under\u00a0Order\u00a0VII\u00a0Rule\u00a011\u00a0of\u00a0CPC for want of cause of action and has held that in each the question that will have to be considered is as to whether the reliefs as claimed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/delhi-high-court-negligence-of-counsel-not-a-reasonable-ground-within-order-xi-rule-15-cpc-facts-of-the-case-must-disclose-urgency-to-avail-benefit-under-or-xi-r-14-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":371073,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court| Negligence of counsel not a reasonable ground within Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC; Facts of the case must disclose \u2018urgency\u2019 to avail benefit under Or. XI R. 1(4) CPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking to place on record, certain additional documents which, according to the application, were a necessary and essential part of the suit, but could not be filed with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/mp-hc-plaint-filed-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-can-be-rejected-based-on-grounds-mentioned-in-rule-11-or-if-the-cause-of-action-has-not-been-disclosed\/","url_meta":{"origin":371073,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Plaint filed under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC can be rejected based on grounds mentioned in Rule 11 or if the cause of action has not been disclosed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Prakash Shrivastava, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 115 CPC where they challenged the order of the Trial Court, whereby their application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The respondents had filed the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371073"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":371663,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371073\/revisions\/371663"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}