{"id":370626,"date":"2025-12-23T13:30:51","date_gmt":"2025-12-23T08:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=370626"},"modified":"2025-12-24T18:25:38","modified_gmt":"2025-12-24T12:55:38","slug":"bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> In a case revolving around whether computation of interest amounts, received after conclusion of arbitration, could be made the subject of a fresh reference under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘Arbitration and Conciliation Act’), a Single Judge Bench of Somasekhar Sundaresan<\/span>, J., held that such an attempt was barred by constructive res judicata. The Court, while disposing of the petition, concluded that no arbitration agreement subsists in relation to the subject matter now sought to be agitated, and therefore declined to constitute an Arbitral Tribunal.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The dispute arose out of a Concession Agreement dated 09-07-2018, which contained an arbitration clause. Arbitration proceedings had already been conducted earlier, culminating in an arbitral award dated 15-07-2022. In those proceedings, one side was the claimant while the other filed a counter-claim. It was indicated that computation of interest amounts payable had been raised during those proceedings. However, while filing the counter-claim, the opposing party did not raise a claim on interest.<\/p>\n

The present petition was filed on the basis that a fresh computation of interest was received only in 2024, which had not been available during the earlier arbitration. The contention raised in opposition was that this petition is merely an attempt to re-open a matter adjudicated long ago, amounting to a second bite at the cherry, and that all issues incidental to the earlier arbitration had already been conclusively adjudicated.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court emphasised that since disputes had already been subjected to arbitration and culminated in the Arbitral Award, the disputes and differences, including differences over interest payment prior to commencement of arbitration, are issues that are covered by constructive res judicata. The Court noted that the contention of interest being computed only after the arbitration concluded does not lend itself to acceptance, since the interest relates to the period already covered by the earlier arbitration.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted the Henderson Principle as explained by the Supreme Court in Celir LLP v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) (P) Ltd.<\/span>, (2024) 2 SCC 1<\/a> observing that all claims and issues that could and ought to have been raised in previous litigation should not be relitigated in subsequent proceedings. The Court observed that the fundamental policy of law requires finality to litigation, and multiplicity of proceedings undermines judicial efficiency and fairness.<\/p>\n

It was further noted that taking any other approach would be hyper-technical, reductive, and erosive of the integrity of the arbitral process. The Court therefore held that no arbitration agreement exists in form or substance for a reference to arbitration in relation to the disputes now sought to be raised. The petition was finally disposed of without constituting an Arbitral Tribunal.<\/p>\n

[AAI v. Lite Bite Foods (P) Ltd., 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 5230<\/a>, decided on 09-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> S.D. Kothari, Advocate.<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Rohan Shah, Anirudh Krishna Gandhi, Megha Khandelwal & Rounak Doshi i\/b Saraf & Partners.<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Since disputes had already been subjected to arbitration and culminated in the Arbitral Award, the disputes and differences, including differences over interest payment prior to commencement of arbitration, are issues that are covered by constructive res judicata.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":370638,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2633,40741,2569,95475,95476,95477,72782,45421],"class_list":["post-370626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral_award","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-constructive-res-judicata","tag-henderson-principle","tag-interest-claims","tag-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan","tag-section-11"],"yoast_head":"\nConstructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims: Bom HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court holds that once disputes have culminated in an arbitral award, incidental issues such as interest computation cannot be reopened through a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court holds that once disputes have culminated in an arbitral award, incidental issues such as interest computation cannot be reopened through a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-23T08:00:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-24T12:55:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/\",\"name\":\"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims: Bom HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-23T08:00:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-24T12:55:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court holds that once disputes have culminated in an arbitral award, incidental issues such as interest computation cannot be reopened through a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"res judicata bars re-litigation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims: Bom HC | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court holds that once disputes have culminated in an arbitral award, incidental issues such as interest computation cannot be reopened through a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court","og_description":"Bombay High Court holds that once disputes have culminated in an arbitral award, incidental issues such as interest computation cannot be reopened through a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-23T08:00:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-24T12:55:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","name":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims: Bom HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-23T08:00:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-24T12:55:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court holds that once disputes have culminated in an arbitral award, incidental issues such as interest computation cannot be reopened through a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"res judicata bars re-litigation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":372159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/india-corporate-commercial-law-developments-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":370626,"position":0},"title":"Corporate & Commercial Law 2025: How Courts, Regulators and Lawmakers reinforced accountability and curbed abuse","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundup highlights key 2025 corporate and commercial law developments from Adani\u2019s HDIL resolution and Vedanta\u2019s demerger setback to SEBI\u2019s insider trading penalties, Google\u2019s CCI settlement, and the pump-and-dump ban involving actor Arshad Warsi.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"India Corporate & Commercial Law Developments 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/India-Corporate-Commercial-Law-Developments-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285619,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/27\/delhi-high-court-states-effect-of-res-judicata-on-section-11-of-arbitration-act-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":370626,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court clarifies the position of Res Judicata with respect to Section 11 of the Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court was of the view that it would be within its right to dismiss the petition at the threshold if the petition is not maintainable, otherwise an unacceptable position of law would arise where despite a petition being not maintainable due to lack of territorial jurisdiction would need\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/set-aside-arbitral-award-findings-not-alive-and-final-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":370626,"position":2},"title":"Findings of already set-aside arbitral award cannot be treated as “alive and final”; Kerala HC quashes subsequent award","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 26, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is trite law that if the Arbitrator fails to decide the counter claim in accordance with law, it will vitiate the award and that it is within the Arbitrator\u2019s jurisdiction to decide both the claim and counter claim.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"set aside arbitral award findings not alive and final","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/set-aside-arbitral-award-findings-not-alive-and-final.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/set-aside-arbitral-award-findings-not-alive-and-final.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/set-aside-arbitral-award-findings-not-alive-and-final.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/set-aside-arbitral-award-findings-not-alive-and-final.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370975,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/26\/del-hc-civil-suit-cannot-nullify-arbitral-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":370626,"position":3},"title":"Civil suit cannot vitiate arbitral awards on grounds of fraud: Delhi High Court upholds Single Judge’s order","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"December 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Once arbitral award attains finality up to the Supreme Court, separate civil suit challenging underlying transaction on grounds of fraud is barred by Section 5 of the Arbitration Act and principles of finality.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"civil suit cannot nullify arbitral award","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/civil-suit-cannot-nullify-arbitral-award.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/civil-suit-cannot-nullify-arbitral-award.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/civil-suit-cannot-nullify-arbitral-award.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/civil-suit-cannot-nullify-arbitral-award.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313944,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/13\/award-facilitation-council-without-recording-failure-conciliation-reference-arbitration-nullity-jharkhand-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":370626,"position":4},"title":"Award by Facilitation Council without recording failure of conciliation or reference to arbitration void; Jharkhand High Court remits matter","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court noticed that the Facilitation Council proceeded with an award, with no record of failure of conciliation or parties going for arbitration.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/bom-hc-directs-amazon-delist-victorinox-products-sold-by-gute-reise\/","url_meta":{"origin":370626,"position":5},"title":"Know why Bombay HC directed Amazon to delist Victorinox products sold by former dealer Gute Reise","author":"Editor","date":"July 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cShould Gute Reise be desirous of using its account with Amazon for selling any products other than Victorinox\u2019s branded products, it shall be free to do so, and Amazon shall not stand in the way of Gute Reise selling other products.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delisting Victorinox products on Amazon","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/370626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=370626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/370626\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/370638"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=370626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=370626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=370626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}