{"id":369994,"date":"2025-12-16T18:30:44","date_gmt":"2025-12-16T13:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=369994"},"modified":"2025-12-17T18:09:44","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T12:39:44","slug":"sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering this matter revolving around sexual assault of a 4-year-old-girl (child victim) which was found to be &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">enveloped in layers of investigative apathy and procedural infirmities<\/span>&#8221;, the Division Bench of Vikram Nath and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sandeep Mehta*<\/span>, JJ., opined that a more <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">structured and uniform practice must be adopted to enhance the legibility of criminal judgments<\/span>. Accordingly, to ensure a systematic presentation of evidence that enables efficient appreciation of the record, the Court issued the following directions to all Trial Courts with the aim to institutionalize a standardized format for cataloguing witnesses, documentary evidence, and material objects, in order to facilitate better comprehension and immediate reference for all stakeholders, including the Appellate Courts:<\/p>\n<h3>Preparation of Tabulated Charts in all the judgments:<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>All trial Courts dealing with criminal matters shall, at the conclusion of the judgment, incorporate tabulated charts summarizing- <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">a.<\/span> Witnesses examined; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">b.<\/span> Documents exhibited, and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">c.<\/span> Material objects (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">muddamal<\/span>) produced and exhibited.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">These charts shall form an appendix or concluding segment of the judgment and shall be prepared in a clear, structured and easily comprehensible format<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Standardized Chart of Witnesses<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Each criminal judgment shall contain a witness chart with at least these columns- <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">a.<\/span> Serial Number; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">b<\/span>. Name of the Witness <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">c.<\/span> Brief Description\/Role of the Witness, such as: Informant, Eyewitness, Medical Jurist\/Doctor, Investigating Officer (I.O.), Panch Witness, etc.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The description should be succinct but sufficient to indicate the evidentiary character of the witness. This structured presentation will allow quick reference to the nature of testimony, assist in locating the witness in the record and minimize ambiguity.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The judgment featured a Specimen Chart for Witnesses Examined for reference.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Standardized Chart of Exhibited Documents<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>A separate chart shall be prepared for all documents exhibited during trial. This chart shall include- <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">a.<\/span> Exhibit Number; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">b.<\/span> Description of document; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">c.<\/span> The Witness who proved or attested the document.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Illustratively, the description may include: FIR, complaint, panchnamas, medical certificates, FSL reports, seizure memos, site plans, dying declarations, etc.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The requirement of specifying the witness who proved the document ensures traceability of proof and assist the Court in appreciating compliance with the Evidence Act, 1872\/Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Judgment also attached a Specimen Chart for Exhibited Documents for reference.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Standardized Chart of Material Objects\/Muddamals<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whenever material objects are produced and marked as exhibits, the trial Court shall prepare a third chart with-<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> a.<\/span> Material Object (M.O.) Number; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">b.<\/span> Description of the Object; <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">c.<\/span> Witness who proved the Object&#8217;s Relevance (e.g., weapon, clothing, tool, article seized under panchnama, etc.)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>This enables clarity regarding the physical evidence relied upon.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The judgment attached a Specimen Chart for Material Objects\/Muddamals<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Special Provisions for Cases Involving Voluminous Evidence<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In complex cases, such as conspiracies, economic offences or trials involving voluminous oral or documentary evidence, the list of witnesses and exhibits may be substantially long. Where the number of witnesses or documents is unusually large, the trial Court may prepare charts only for the material, relevant, and relied-upon witnesses and documents, clearly indicating that the chart is confined to such items. This ensures that the charts remain functional reference tools rather than unwieldy compilations.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Application to Defence Witnesses and Evidence<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The aforesaid directions shall apply, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">mutatis mutandis<\/span>, to all witnesses examined and all evidence adduced by the defence.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Adoption of Specimen Format and Permissible Deviations<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The specimen charts provided in the judgment shall ordinarily serve as the standard format to be followed by trial Courts across the country.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Observations Regarding Applicability to Civil Proceedings<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While these directions are primarily intended to streamline criminal trials, we leave it open to the High Courts to consider, wherever appropriate, the adoption of similar tabulated formats in civil matters as well, particularly in cases involving voluminous documentary or oral evidence, so as to promote clarity, uniformity, and ease of reference.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that the High Courts may consider incorporating the above directions in their respective rules governing the procedure of trial Courts.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant was arraigned as an accused in connection with FIR registered at Kalol Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\" target=\"_blank\">363<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)(i)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550508\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561734\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> for alleged sexual assault of the child victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant was subjected to trial before the learned Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Panchmahal, Godhra and he was convicted and sentenced thusly. The appellant&#8217;s challenge to the Trial Court&#8217;s verdict was rejected by Gujarat High Court. Hence, the present appeal was preferred before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the appeal, the Court firstly pointed out that there was no direct evidence in the present case, and the case of the prosecution rested entirely on circumstantial evidence, to be specific, in form of last seen together circumstance, incriminating recoveries and medical evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Elucidating the principles on evaluating circumstantial evidence, the Court pointed out that evidence of the witnesses in the present case was absolutely unconvincing and that they seem to have cooked up the last seen together theory so as to somehow implicate the appellant in the case for oblique motives. The Court opined that entire story felt dubitable and there existed grave doubts regarding the identity of the witnesses and the credibility of their evidence. The Court further pointed out that omission of material facts in the FIR brought the entire case of the prosecution under a grave cloud of doubt. The Court also highlighted the flawed approach towards appreciating the evidence as adopted by the Trial Court and High Court. It was pointed out that neither the Trial Court nor the High Court, adverted to the glaring shortcomings in the case and mechanically accepted the case of prosecution even though the conduct of the material witnesses was sufficient to raise a strong suspicion that they might have been the actual perpetrators of the crime.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found that the conduct of the police officers who conducted the investigation of the case was highly pedantic and gravely negligent. The Court noted that the investigation was casually proceeded with. The so-called witnesses of last seen together circumstance, namely, somehow popped up and presented themselves before the Investigating Officer on the next day of the incident. The police officers casually proceeded to the house of the appellant. The incriminating material viz. blood stain clothes, bedsheet, curtain, etc. were lying scattered in the house as if to serve the incriminating evidence to the Investigating Officer on a platter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court sternly stated that the Investigating Officer had ample opportunity to secure and preserve crucial forensic material, particularly by securing samples necessary for conducting DNA profiling of the child victim and the appellant. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Such scientific examination, now an integral component of modern criminal investigation, would have provided objective corroboration and materially assisted in ascertaining the truth&#8221;<\/span>. However, no effort was made to obtain or preserve such forensic material and other incriminating materials.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court opined that the prosecution case was clearly missing the key component of an unbroken chain of incriminating circumstances to convict the appellant on the basis of last seen together circumstance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, with the afore-stated assessment, the Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant of the charges with directions to be released and the afore-stated directions for systematic presentation of evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Manojbhai Jethabhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eW8BcI47\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2803<\/a>, decided on 15-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Sandeep Mehta<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span> Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR Ms. Vidushi Garg, Adv.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR Mr. Rishi Yadav, Adv<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The directions were issued with the aim to institutionalize a standardized format for cataloguing witnesses, documentary evidence, and material objects, in order to facilitate better comprehension and immediate reference for all stakeholders, including the Appellate Courts<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":370002,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[28814,95044,2557,34313,32850,3067,55486,31650],"class_list":["post-369994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-appreciation-of-evidence","tag-cataloguing-witnesses","tag-Criminal_Trial","tag-documentary-evidence","tag-evidence-on-record","tag-FIR","tag-justice-sandeep-mehta","tag-panchnama"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC directions on systematic presentation of evidence before courts | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court issues directions for Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence before courts for efficient appreciation of record.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court issues directions for Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence before courts for efficient appreciation of record.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-16T13:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-17T12:39:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/\",\"name\":\"SC directions on systematic presentation of evidence before courts | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-16T13:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-17T12:39:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court issues directions for Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence before courts for efficient appreciation of record.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"systematic presentation of evidence before courts\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC directions on systematic presentation of evidence before courts | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court issues directions for Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence before courts for efficient appreciation of record.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record","og_description":"Supreme Court issues directions for Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence before courts for efficient appreciation of record.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-16T13:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-17T12:39:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/","name":"SC directions on systematic presentation of evidence before courts | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-16T13:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-17T12:39:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Supreme Court issues directions for Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence before courts for efficient appreciation of record.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"systematic presentation of evidence before courts"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/sc-directions-on-systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court issues directions to Trial Courts for ensuring systematic presentation of evidence for efficient appreciation of record"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/systematic-presentation-of-evidence-before-courts.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/31\/evidence-witness-recording-language-vernacular-appreciation-supreme-court-section-277-crpc-trial-court-criminal-law-supreme-court-legal-research-knowledge-update-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":369994,"position":0},"title":"Evidence can be appreciated best only when it is recorded in the language of the witness: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The observation of the Supreme Court came in a case where the deposition of the prosecutrix was recorded by the trial court in English language though she had deposed in her vernacular language.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-237.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":243271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/high-court-being-first-appellate-court-cannot-acquit-an-accused-without-re-appreciation-of-evidence-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":369994,"position":1},"title":"High Court, being First Appellate Court, cannot acquit an accused without re-appreciation of evidence: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNon-re-appreciation of the evidence on record may affect the case of either the prosecution or even the accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/are-strict-principles-of-evidence-and-standards-of-proof-like-in-a-criminal-trial-applicable-in-motor-accident-claims-cases-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":369994,"position":2},"title":"Are strict principles of evidence and standards of proof like in a criminal trial applicable in Motor Accident Claims cases? Supreme Court answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has held that the strict principles of evidence and standards of proof like in a criminal trial are inapplicable in Motor Accident Claims cases. \u201cThe standard of proof in such like matters is one of preponderance of probabilities, rather\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/05\/findings-high-court-based-conjectures-surmises-supreme-court-acquits-murder-convicts\/","url_meta":{"origin":369994,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court acquits murder convicts; reverses High Court findings based on conjectures and surmises","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the elaborate exercise of the trial Judge has been washed away by the High Court in a totally cursory manner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"murder convicts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/07\/supreme-court-set-aside-conviction-under-ndps-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":369994,"position":4},"title":"\u201cEvidence of police witnesses full of contradictions and thoroughly unconvincing\u201d; SC sets aside conviction under NDPS Act","author":"Editor","date":"March 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found glaring loopholes in the prosecution case regarding the preparation of the samples of the contraband and safe keeping of the samples.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"set aside conviction under NDPS Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/set-aside-conviction-under-NDPS-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/set-aside-conviction-under-NDPS-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/set-aside-conviction-under-NDPS-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/set-aside-conviction-under-NDPS-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/27\/trial-court-framing-of-charges-discharge-of-accused-murder-postmortem-report-wrong-supreme-court-legal-updates-criminal-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":369994,"position":5},"title":"Trial Court not a &#8216;mere post office&#8217;; must apply its mind while framing charges: SC unimpressed with discharge of murder accused based on postmortem report only\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Ultimately, upon appreciation of the entire evidence on record at the end of the trial, the trial court may take one view or the other i.e. whether it is a case of murder or case of culpable homicide. But at the stage of framing of the charge, the trial court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=369994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369994\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/370002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=369994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=369994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=369994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}