{"id":369869,"date":"2025-12-15T17:00:24","date_gmt":"2025-12-15T11:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=369869"},"modified":"2025-12-17T10:40:05","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T05:10:05","slug":"bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/","title":{"rendered":"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#8217;s appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> While deciding an appeal under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) challenging the validity of proceedings initiated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559402\" target=\"_blank\">153-C<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a>, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.S. Sonak*<\/span> and Advait M. Sethna, JJ., dismissed the appeal after holding that the approval granted under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559403\" target=\"_blank\">153D<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> was vitiated by non-application of mind. The Court noted that the approval dated 06-08-2010 did not reflect even a minimum application of mind and had been granted mechanically. Therefore, in the absence of a valid approval, the proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559402\" target=\"_blank\">153C<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> were incompetent.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The dispute arose from approval dated 06-08-2010 granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range Thane for proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559402\" target=\"_blank\">153C<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a>. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (&#8216;ITAT&#8217;), in its order, transcribed the approval letter and held that it did not indicate even prima facie any application of mind, deeming the approval to have been granted mechanically.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Revenue argued that the case involved a raid by the State Police followed by a Special Audit under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002249043\" target=\"_blank\">142(2A)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a>. It was submitted that statements of the assessee were recorded, and most of the additions were based on the Special Audit Report. Despite opportunities, no clarification or details were offered by the assessee. On this basis, it was contended that the approval was granted in the above circumstances and that such approval was not required to resemble a reasoned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was, however, pointed out that the issue was already covered by decisions of various High Courts, and Special Leave Petitions against some of them were dismissed. It was submitted that the approval in question was mechanical and therefore invalid.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that although an approval order is not required to resemble a reasoned judgment, it must reflect at least a minimum application of mind. The Court noted that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">an order which does not reflect even minimum application of mind cannot be saved by filing an affidavit claiming that there was material based upon which such approval could have been granted.<\/span> The Court observed that such arguments had been expressly rejected in several decisions, including those referred to by the ITAT in its impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted its earlier judgment in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CIT v. Citron Infraprojects Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k1Dpmfbs\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 4795<\/a> where several decisions on the aspect of grant of approvals under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559402\" target=\"_blank\">153C<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> were considered. It was noted that some of those decisions were questioned before the Supreme Court, but the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">By following the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Citron Infraprojects<\/span> (supra) and the various decisions referred therein, the Court concluded that the approval dated 06-08-2010 was vitiated by non-application of mind. The Court observed that such approval is a mandatory pre-requisite, and in its absence, the proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559402\" target=\"_blank\">153C<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">the Act<\/a> would not be competent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the substantial question of law was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">CIT v. Vrushali Sanjay Shinde, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/34P4EBMa\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 4960<\/a>, decided on 10-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice M.S. Sonak<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Akhileshwar Sharma<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Vidhi Punamiya, Sankalp Mallik (through VC) &amp; Sanket S. Bora, i\/b Malik &amp; Co, &amp; SPCM Legal<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;An order, which does not reflect even minimum application of mind, cannot be saved by filing an affidavit claiming that there was material based upon which such approval could have been granted.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":369872,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31400,2569,51086,30953,3528,77423,71533,94952,31666,94951,94950,39470],"class_list":["post-369869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-approval","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-income-tax-act-1961","tag-itat","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-justice-advait-m-sethna","tag-justice-m-s-sonak","tag-mechanical-approval","tag-non-application-of-mind","tag-section-153c","tag-section-153d-income-tax-act","tag-special-audit"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Application of mind required for Section 153D approval: Bom HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that application of mind required for Section 153D approval; mechanical approval vitiates proceedings under Section 153C of Income Tax Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#039;s appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that application of mind required for Section 153D approval; mechanical approval vitiates proceedings under Section 153C of Income Tax Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-15T11:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-17T05:10:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#039;s appeal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"headline\":\"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#8217;s appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-15T11:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-17T05:10:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":581,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Approval\",\"Bombay High Court\",\"Income Tax Act 1961\",\"ITAT\",\"Judicial Review\",\"Justice Advait M. Sethna\",\"Justice M.S. Sonak\",\"Mechanical approval\",\"Non- Application of mind\",\"Section 153C\",\"Section 153D Income Tax Act\",\"Special Audit\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/\",\"name\":\"Application of mind required for Section 153D approval: Bom HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-15T11:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-17T05:10:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court held that application of mind required for Section 153D approval; mechanical approval vitiates proceedings under Section 153C of Income Tax Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Application of mind required for Section 153D approval\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/15\\\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#8217;s appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/soumya\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Application of mind required for Section 153D approval: Bom HC | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court held that application of mind required for Section 153D approval; mechanical approval vitiates proceedings under Section 153C of Income Tax Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue's appeal","og_description":"Bombay High Court held that application of mind required for Section 153D approval; mechanical approval vitiates proceedings under Section 153C of Income Tax Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-15T11:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-17T05:10:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue's appeal","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/"},"author":{"name":"Soumya Yadav","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"headline":"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#8217;s appeal","datePublished":"2025-12-15T11:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-17T05:10:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/"},"wordCount":581,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp","keywords":["Approval","Bombay High Court","Income Tax Act 1961","ITAT","Judicial Review","Justice Advait M. Sethna","Justice M.S. Sonak","Mechanical approval","Non- Application of mind","Section 153C","Section 153D Income Tax Act","Special Audit"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/","name":"Application of mind required for Section 153D approval: Bom HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-15T11:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-17T05:10:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court held that application of mind required for Section 153D approval; mechanical approval vitiates proceedings under Section 153C of Income Tax Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Application of mind required for Section 153D approval"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/15\/bom-hc-application-of-mind-required-for-section-153d-approval\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act must reflect application of mind: Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue&#8217;s appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Application-of-mind-required-for-Section-153D-approval.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=369869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369869\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/369872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=369869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=369869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=369869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}