{"id":369535,"date":"2025-12-11T12:00:50","date_gmt":"2025-12-11T06:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=369535"},"modified":"2025-12-19T18:09:05","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T12:39:05","slug":"del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; mark"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> While hearing an application filed under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523435\" target=\"_blank\">39, Rules 1<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523437\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>, wherein the petitioner, Himalaya Wellness sought a permanent injunction against the defendants restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, dilution, tarnishment, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages etc., the Single Judge Bench of Tejas Karia, J, held that the defendants use of the mark &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; amounted to trade mark infringement as the impugned mark was visually, phonetically and deceptively similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling or distributing such items containing the impugned marks.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiffs, Himalaya, are engaged in the manufacturing and distribution of ayurvedic medicaments and preparations since 1930 and have been continuously and extensively using the mark &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; since 1930. By virtue of continuous and extensive use, the mark &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; has acquired reputation and goodwill across the world. Under the mark &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217;, the plaintiffs are offering multiple products in the category of nutrition, pharmaceutical, baby care, animal health, personal care, beauty, wellness, organic range etc. The plaintiffs&#8217; products are sold across the world in over 100 countries under the Mark &#8216;Himalaya&#8217; and several HIMALAYA logos such as, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"117\" height=\"50\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"117\" height=\"52\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"107\" height=\"34\"\/> and <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-4.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"49\" height=\"50\"\/> (&#8216;Subject Marks&#8217;)<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The subject marks are well-known to the Indian and global consumers due to the exposure of such consumers to advertisements of the plaintiffs&#8217; products through various social and audio-visual mediums including advertisements on print, social media, internet presence, prominent magazines. The subject marks are unique to the plaintiffs and have acquired a secondary meaning to denote the plaintiffs&#8217; products by virtue of their long-standing use for over almost a century. The plaintiffs are the prior adopters, users and registered proprietor of the subject marks and have been using the same extensively and continuously. The subject marks are identifiable and recognizable by both the members of the trade and public as being exclusively associated with the plaintiffs&#8217; products and act as a source identifier of the plaintiffs&#8217; products.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In June 2025, the plaintiff came across the defendant&#8217;s nutraceutical and wellness products sold under an identical mark, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-5.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"105\" height=\"31\"\/> (&#8216;impugned mark&#8217;). The plaintiffs averred that the defendants had merely removed the orange leaf device<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-6.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"49\" height=\"34\"\/> from the letter H to create a deceptively similar color, font style and device mark.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners further submitted that through an investigator they had unearthed that the defendant was a sole proprietorship operating out of Delhi. According to the proprietor of the defendant, she had been selling unbranded products obtained from the open market and re-branding them under the impugned mark for almost 6 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners also submitted that a naked eye comparison of the subject marks and the impugned marks reflect that the impugned marks lack in originality and are a blatant copy of the essential features forming part of the subject marks indicating the mala fide intention of the defendant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners further averred that despite carrying on a parallel business of ayurvedic and wellness products identical to that of the plaintiffs, under the mark &#8216;GREENLAND&#8217;, the defendant has deliberately chosen to adopt and use the impugned mark, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-7.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"110\" height=\"38\"\/> in relation to identical category of products, evidently with the intent to come close to the plaintiffs&#8217; well-known subject marks, thereby causing deception and confusion in the minds of the public.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that it was a case of triple identity where the impugned mark, the product category, the trade channel as well as the consumer base is identical. Prima facie the Court opined that the impugned mark is visually, phonetically, structurally and deceptively similar to the subject marks. To an unwary consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, one of the impugned marks and the subject marks are likely to appear identical, thereby leading to confusion regarding the source or origin of the products sold thereunder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court considered the prior use and adoption of the mark by the plaintiff and recorded that a prima facie case was made out in favor if the plaintiffs. Balance of cconvenience lies in favour of the plaintiffs, as continued use of the impugned mark &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; would erode the distinctiveness of the subject marks and dilute the plaintiffs&#8217; goodwill built over decades. The plaintiffs were likely to suffer irreparable injury, particularly given that the competing products relate to health and wellness, where consumer confusion may have serious consequences and where loss of reputation cannot be compensated monetarily. Accordingly, the Court restrained the defendants and all persons acting on its behalf from manufacturing, selling, advertising or dealing in any manner with regards to products and services under the marks <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/12_Himalaya-trade-mark-8.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"110\" height=\"38\" \/> &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; or any other deceptively similar mark.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter was further listed for 12-3-2026.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Himalaya Wellness Co. v. Greenland Trading Co., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6xuAw3m7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 9036<\/a>, decided on 27-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Pravin Anand, Prachi Agarwal, Manan Mondal, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The plaintiffs are the prior adopters and long-standing users of the subject mark &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; since 1930 in connection with ayurvedic, wellness, pharmaceutical and personal care products.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67539,"featured_media":369548,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[52955,2543,94669,59328,2943,27643,25414,87202,13291,46158,52951],"class_list":["post-369535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deceptively-similar","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-greenland-trading","tag-himalaya","tag-injunction","tag-intellectual-property","tag-interim-relief","tag-justice-tejas-karia","tag-practice-and-procedure","tag-trade-mark-infringement","tag-trade-marks-act-1999"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC grants injunction in favour of Himalaya in trade mark case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants selling ayurvedic, wellness and pharmaceutical products using the mark &#039;HIMALAYA&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of &#039;HIMALAYA&#039; mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants selling ayurvedic, wellness and pharmaceutical products using the mark &#039;HIMALAYA&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-11T06:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-19T12:39:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prarthana Gupta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of &#039;HIMALAYA&#039; mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prarthana Gupta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC grants injunction in favour of Himalaya in trade mark case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-11T06:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-19T12:39:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ffe9a3c7eae30c883786fd440bcab382\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants selling ayurvedic, wellness and pharmaceutical products using the mark 'HIMALAYA'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Himalaya trade mark\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; mark\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ffe9a3c7eae30c883786fd440bcab382\",\"name\":\"Prarthana Gupta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd5380f62642d388922bf1a84a49cf7fe9acb150b43abdb5e1c20c15c40a94a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd5380f62642d388922bf1a84a49cf7fe9acb150b43abdb5e1c20c15c40a94a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Prarthana Gupta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/prarthana\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC grants injunction in favour of Himalaya in trade mark case | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants selling ayurvedic, wellness and pharmaceutical products using the mark 'HIMALAYA'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of 'HIMALAYA' mark","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants selling ayurvedic, wellness and pharmaceutical products using the mark 'HIMALAYA'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-11T06:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-19T12:39:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prarthana Gupta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of 'HIMALAYA' mark","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prarthana Gupta","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/","name":"Del HC grants injunction in favour of Himalaya in trade mark case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-11T06:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-19T12:39:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ffe9a3c7eae30c883786fd440bcab382"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants selling ayurvedic, wellness and pharmaceutical products using the mark 'HIMALAYA'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Himalaya trade mark"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/11\/del-hc-grants-injunction-in-himalaya-trade-mark-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC grants injunction restraining infringement of &#8216;HIMALAYA&#8217; mark"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ffe9a3c7eae30c883786fd440bcab382","name":"Prarthana Gupta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd5380f62642d388922bf1a84a49cf7fe9acb150b43abdb5e1c20c15c40a94a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cd5380f62642d388922bf1a84a49cf7fe9acb150b43abdb5e1c20c15c40a94a9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Prarthana Gupta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/prarthana\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Himalaya-trade-mark.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":369535,"position":0},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":369535,"position":1},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Intellectual Property&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Intellectual Property","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/intellectual_property\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/04\/legal-roundup-ipr-november-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":369535,"position":2},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025: Key IPR rulings of the Month","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Compiling key judgments from High Courts across India, this roundup presents November\u2019s significant developments in copyright, trade mark, trade dress, and personality rights, reflecting evolving trends in IP protection and enforcement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/04\/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-protecting-mankind-pharmas-kind-trade-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":369535,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction protecting Mankind Pharma\u2019s \u2018KIND\u2019 trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe identity in the defendant\u2019s marks is so close to Mankind\u2019s trade marks that the two are indistinguishable. The infringing activities of the defendant is likely to cause confusion in the course of trade of Mankind leading to erosion of consumers\u2019 trust.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"protecting Mankind Pharma","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/protecting-Mankind-Pharma.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/delhi-high-court-30-lakh-costs-damages-himalaya-liv52-trademark-infringement-liv333-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":369535,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court awards \u20b930.91 lakh costs &amp; damages to Himalaya for \u2018Liv.52\u2019 trademark infringement by \u2018Liv-333&#8242;","author":"Arunima","date":"March 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The unauthorized use of the \u201cLIV\u201d element in a manner that does not materially differentiate the defendants\u2019 mark from the plaintiffs' well-established \u201cLiv.52\u201d mark amounts to a violation of the plaintiffs\u2019 statutory rights.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/23\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-along-with-2-lakhs-damages-in-favour-of-ebay-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":369535,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction along with 2 lakhs damages in favour of eBay in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark \u2018Shopibay\u2019 which was similar to the plaintiff's mark \u2018eBay\/EBAY\u2019, the Single Judge Bench of Navin Chawla, J. granted permanent injunction to \u2018eBay\u2019 and held that the adoption of mark by the defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67539"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=369535"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369535\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/369548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=369535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=369535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=369535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}