{"id":369112,"date":"2025-12-08T12:30:49","date_gmt":"2025-12-08T07:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=369112"},"modified":"2025-12-09T18:26:13","modified_gmt":"2025-12-09T12:56:13","slug":"bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to ‘outraging modesty’ & ‘stalking’"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> While deciding an application under Section 482<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’), the Division Bench of Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Nandesh S. Deshpande<\/span>*, JJ., held that posting objectionable material on a social site such as Facebook would amount to committing offences punishable under Sections 354<\/a> and 354-D<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’). The Court observed that even if there had been a prior relationship or financial assistance extended on the assurance of marriage, such circumstances cannot be construed as giving a license to post objectionable content online . Emphasising that the inherent powers under Section 482<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’), are to be sparingly used and not as a tool to stifle legitimate prosecution, the Court rejected the application seeking quashing of the FIR.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The complaint was lodged by a married woman who stated that she had become acquainted with the applicant via Facebook prior to her marriage and that he had proposed marriage, which she refused. On this refusal, objectionable material was posted on her Facebook account on different occasions, allegedly to defame and cause harassment. It was further alleged that the applicant had once been to her house with a bottle of poison and threatened to commit suicide and thereafter continued stalking her by posting defamatory and objectionable material, thereby causing hurdles and disturbance in her marital life.<\/p>\n

It was contended in response that the relationship had been ongoing since 2014—2015 and that financial help amounting to Rs 2,88,000 had been extended in good faith on the assurance of marriage. It was further submitted that demands of Rs 5,00,000 along with land were made, and when these were not fulfilled, disputes arose. It was asserted that the allegations in the FIR were false, vexatious, and lacked the essential ingredients to constitute a crime of harassment.<\/p>\n

The State, however, opposed these submissions, noting that the statement of the complainant and several other witnesses had been recorded, and that there was a prima facie case against the applicant.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court observed that Section 354<\/a> IPC<\/a> contemplates assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty, while Section 354-D<\/a> IPC<\/a> speaks about stalking and includes monitoring the use of internet or electronic communication. It was noted that posting objectionable material on a social site amount to committing an offence under these provisions.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasised that even assuming the married lady had some relation prior to her marriage with the applicant, and even assuming that the applicant had lent money to her on assurance of marriage, that cannot be construed as giving a license to the applicant herein to post some objectionable post over the social site. It was further highlighted that these aspects are matters to be decided at the stage of evidence in a full-fledged trial.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to the judgment in State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan<\/span>, (2019) 5 SCC 688<\/a>, reiterating that powers under Section 482<\/a> CrPC<\/a> are to be sparingly used and cannot be a tool to stifle a legitimate prosecution.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court observed that overwhelming material existed at least at a prima facie stage, and therefore, this was not a case to quash the proceedings at the threshold.<\/p>\n

[Tukaram v. State of Maharashtra, 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 4846<\/a>, decided on 02-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice Nandesh S. Deshpande<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Applicant:<\/span> Sunil Kulkarni, Advocate h\/f S.D. Chande, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the State:<\/span> S.S. Dhote, APP<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Even assuming the married lady had some relation prior to her marriage with the applicant, and that the applicant had lent money to her on assurance of marriage, that cannot be construed as giving a license to the applicant to post objectionable post over the social site.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67537,"featured_media":369119,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,41001,94337,72860,94340,94339,66122,94341,74086,13021,94338,45603],"class_list":["post-369112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-false-allegations","tag-justice-nandesh-s-deshpande","tag-justice-urmila-joshi-phalke","tag-objectionable-facebook-post","tag-objectionable-material-online","tag-online-harassment","tag-online-threats","tag-section-354-d-ipc","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-sections-354-ipc","tag-stalking"],"yoast_head":"\nPrior relationship no defence for objectionable posts: Bom HC| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that lending money or prior relationship is no defence for objectionable posts on social media , attracting offences under Sections 354 and 354-D IPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to 'outraging modesty' & 'stalking'\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that lending money or prior relationship is no defence for objectionable posts on social media , attracting offences under Sections 354 and 354-D IPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-08T07:00:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-09T12:56:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to 'outraging modesty' & 'stalking'\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Soumya Yadav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"headline\":\"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to ‘outraging modesty’ & ‘stalking’\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-08T07:00:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-09T12:56:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":604,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"False Allegations\",\"Justice Nandesh S. Deshpande\",\"Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke\",\"objectionable Facebook post\",\"objectionable material online\",\"Online Harassment\",\"online threats\",\"Section 354-D IPC\",\"section 482 crpc\",\"Sections 354 IPC\",\"stalking\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/\",\"name\":\"Prior relationship no defence for objectionable posts: Bom HC| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-08T07:00:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-09T12:56:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court held that lending money or prior relationship is no defence for objectionable posts on social media , attracting offences under Sections 354 and 354-D IPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"prior relationship no defence for objectionable posts\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/08\\\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to ‘outraging modesty’ & ‘stalking’\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7\",\"name\":\"Soumya Yadav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Soumya Yadav\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/soumya\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prior relationship no defence for objectionable posts: Bom HC| SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court held that lending money or prior relationship is no defence for objectionable posts on social media , attracting offences under Sections 354 and 354-D IPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to 'outraging modesty' & 'stalking'","og_description":"Bombay High Court held that lending money or prior relationship is no defence for objectionable posts on social media , attracting offences under Sections 354 and 354-D IPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-08T07:00:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-09T12:56:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Soumya Yadav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to 'outraging modesty' & 'stalking'","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Soumya Yadav","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/"},"author":{"name":"Soumya Yadav","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"headline":"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to ‘outraging modesty’ & ‘stalking’","datePublished":"2025-12-08T07:00:49+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-09T12:56:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/"},"wordCount":604,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp","keywords":["Bombay High Court","False Allegations","Justice Nandesh S. Deshpande","Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke","objectionable Facebook post","objectionable material online","Online Harassment","online threats","Section 354-D IPC","section 482 crpc","Sections 354 IPC","stalking"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/","name":"Prior relationship no defence for objectionable posts: Bom HC| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-08T07:00:49+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-09T12:56:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7"},"description":"Bombay High Court held that lending money or prior relationship is no defence for objectionable posts on social media , attracting offences under Sections 354 and 354-D IPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"prior relationship no defence for objectionable posts"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/08\/bom-hc-prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts-outraging-modesty-stalking\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC: Prior relationship or lending money not a license for Objectionable Posts; Conduct may amount to ‘outraging modesty’ & ‘stalking’"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/352812a68de79340babca39b2fea18c7","name":"Soumya Yadav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2363aa3509ea5744057dbee913f279c33e94e40e89a96de9ff58ec27fde9881d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Soumya Yadav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/soumya\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/prior-relationship-no-defence-for-objectionable-posts.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67537"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=369112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369112\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/369119"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=369112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=369112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=369112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}