{"id":368881,"date":"2025-12-05T15:30:36","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T10:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=368881"},"modified":"2025-12-05T17:33:08","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T12:03:08","slug":"india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/","title":{"rendered":"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India&#8217;s Evolving Law of Personality Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-style: italic; text-align: center;\">The fundamental rights to privacy and dignity, guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, have been linked to &#8220;personality&#8221; or &#8220;publicity&#8221; rights by the judiciary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The word &#8220;Jhakaas&#8221; immediately makes you recall Anil Kapoor. Outstretched hands in a mustard field with multiple hues of sunlight in the background evoke the king of bollywood, Shah Rukh Khan. This takes us to an important legal concept &#8212; the persona of a celebrity and the immense value attached to it. The persona is an amalgamation of multiple characteristics and has huge commercial value. With the advent of multiple social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram and rapid digitalisation, it is becoming increasingly difficult to protect these personas and their inherent attributes as intellectual property or personality. The newly emerging menace of deepfakes and voice cloning due to proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) has made protection of personality rights a necessity. There is a vital requirement to address this evolving concept to safeguard individual dignity, protect against commercial fraud, and remedy the legal gaps in current legislation.<\/p>\n<h2>The legislative vacuum and the constitutional bridge<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Indian intellectual property statutes do not have a specific description for &#8220;celebrity&#8221; or &#8220;personality rights&#8221;. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>, includes the term &#8220;performer&#8221;<a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Copyright Act, 1957, S. 2(qq).\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> and grants &#8220;special rights&#8221; under Section 38<!-- Xml to hyperlink copyright act -->. However, the definition of &#8220;performer&#8221; (which includes actors, singers, and musicians)<a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. Copyright Act, 1957, S. 38.\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a> is not comprehensive and does not completely cover the concept of a celebrity, a person under massive public limelight. A celebrity is not necessarily is a &#8220;performer&#8221;, and vice versa.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Indian judiciary has had to intervene to fill this legislative void. The &#8220;personality&#8221; of an individual, a composite package of characteristics including name, voice, image, likeness, mannerisms, and gestures,<a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf v. Peppy Store, (2024) 2 HCC (Del) 253.\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a> has been given judicial protection. The fundamental rights to privacy and dignity, guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, have been linked to &#8220;personality&#8221; or &#8220;publicity&#8221; rights by the judiciary.<a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. R. Rajagopal v. State of T.N., (1994) 6 SCC 632.\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a> This safeguard provided by courts whereby celebrities could safely commercialise and control use of identity is under threat today. Recently, celebrities like Jackie Shroff and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921880\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ravi Shankar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">John Doe(s)\/Ashok Kumar(s)<\/span><\/a><!-- LE to check party name --><!-- correct --><a id=\"fnref5\" href=\"#fn5\" title=\"5. 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6332.\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a> had to take action in order to protect their identities from AI-driven exploitation. This is a testament to the critical nature of this judicial armour.<\/p>\n<h2>The evolution of Indian jurisprudence<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Personality rights and protection attached with it are a result of judicial innovation over the last 30 years and are not statutory in nature. There are several landmark judgments in this judicial journey. Foremost is the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000019796\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">R. Rajagopal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of T.N.<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref6\" href=\"#fn6\" title=\"6. (1994) 6 SCC 632.\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a> (the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Auto Shankar case<\/span>) which established the groundwork for personality rights. An individual&#8217;s right to control the commercial use of their identity was declared as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21, upholding the &#8220;right to be let alone&#8221; against unlicensed misuse. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002191412\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ICC Development (International) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arvee Enterprises<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref7\" href=\"#fn7\" title=\"7. 2003 SCC OnLine Del 2.\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a>, the Delhi High Court explained that the right of publicity derives from the right to privacy and inheres only in individuals, not in corporations or events. It proscribed the commercial monopolisation of a person&#8217;s characteristics without agreement. A clear definition was provided by the Delhi High Court, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002162609\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Titan Industries Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramkumar Jewellers<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref8\" href=\"#fn8\" title=\"8. 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a>, the right of publicity is &#8220;the right to control commercial use of human identity&#8221;. The Madras High Court in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001116766\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shivaji Rao Gaikwad<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Varsha Productions<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref9\" href=\"#fn9\" title=\"9. 2015 SCC OnLine Mad 158.\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a> said that once a person becomes a celebrity, any unlawful use of their persona is illegal, regardless of whether it causes public confusion. The Delhi High Court&#8217;s decision in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001677978\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anil Kapoor<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Simply Life India<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref10\" href=\"#fn10\" title=\"10. 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6914.\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a> broadened the canvas of protection in a singularly significant judgment. It went beyond name and resemblance to protect distinguishing elements of a celebrity&#8217;s persona, including voice, gestures, and catchphrases. The Court made a pivotal point that fame exposes individuals to misuse that can violate their right to livelihood, dignity, and privacy.<\/p>\n<h2>The modern enforcement toolkit<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A practical toolkit exists for enforcement beyond the constitutional framework. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Mark Act, 1999<\/a>, permits the registration of names, signatures, and catchphrases. Additionally, the common law action of &#8220;passing off&#8221; protects a person&#8217;s goodwill from false endorsements.<a id=\"fnref11\" href=\"#fn11\" title=\"11. Copyright Act, 1957, S. 27.\"><sup>11<\/sup><\/a> Penalties for online identity misuse and morphing are provided in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\">Information Technology Act, 2000<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Last couple of years has seen the evolution of the &#8220;John Doe\/Ashok Kumar Order&#8221;<!-- LE to check if fn.5 case will be hyperlinked here. XML to follow as per LE --><!-- no hyperlinking required here. --> as the most critical judicial tool for combating unspecified online infringement. Ex parte interim injunctions are issued against unidentified infringers (John Doe(s)\/Ashok Kumar) which allows a crucial exemption to the typical procedural requirement of a named defendant. This enables courts to grant rapid, pre-emptive relief against fast-moving violations like film piracy, image misappropriation, and AI-driven impersonation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A string of 2025 rulings support this trend. The Delhi High Court granted extensive injunctions protecting <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002884826\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Abhishek Bachchan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bollywood Tee Shop<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref12\" href=\"#fn12\" title=\"12. 2025 SCC OnLine Del 5944.\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/a> from fake AI videos. Likewise, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002580102\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Karan Johar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">India Pride Advisory (P) Ltd.<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref13\" href=\"#fn13\" title=\"13. 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 546.\"><sup>13<\/sup><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921884\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Akkineni Nagarjuna<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">WWW.BFXXX.ORG<\/span><\/a><a id=\"fnref14\" href=\"#fn14\" title=\"14. 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6331.\"><sup>14<\/sup><\/a> and <span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"font-style: italic;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921880\" target=\"_blank\">Ravi Shankar case<\/a><\/span><a id=\"fnref15\" href=\"#fn15\" title=\"15. Ravi Shankar v. John Doe(s)\/Ashok Kumar(s), 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6332.\"><sup>15<\/sup><\/a> secured protection from deepfakes and misleading endorsements. Asha Bhosle was provided protection from AI-driven replication of her distinctive voice by the Bombay High Court. Recently, Sunil Shetty secured relief from the Bombay High Court, which<a id=\"fnref16\" href=\"#fn16\" title=\"16. Suniel V. Shetty v. John Doe S. Ashok Kumar, I.A No. 32198 of 2025, decided on: 10-10-2025.\"><sup>16<\/sup><\/a><\/span><!-- Xml to hyperlink the case in fn. --> explicitly recognised his personality rights under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>, and moral rights under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>, and ordered removal of infringing AI-generated content.<\/p>\n<h2>A comparative law perspective<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Globally most prominent legal frameworks for protection of personality rights exist in the USA and Europe. Personality rights of celebrities have been a long developing concept in the USA. Judicial verdicts have built a legal framework that treats a celebrity&#8217;s identity as a &#8220;right of publicity&#8221;. This allows famous people to legally control, licence, or even sell the rights to their own name, image, and likeness, similar to any other asset. Certain US States allow this right to be passed down to the heirs of a deceased celebrity as part of their estate. There is no overarching, nationwide rule for these rights. Different States have a wide ambit and sometimes conflicting ideas about the exact nature of this right and how far its protection should go.<a id=\"fnref17\" href=\"#fn17\" title=\"17. Kateryna Moskalenko, &#8220;The Right of Publicity in the USA, the EU, and Ukraine&#8221;, (2015) 1(2) Int'l. Comparative Juris.\"><sup>17<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Majority of continental European law recognises a &#8220;right of personality&#8221; or a &#8220;right of privacy&#8221;. In simple terms an individual&#8217;s name and likeness (their image) are protected. This also extends protection to other parts of an individual&#8217;s identity, even if they are not specifically listed in the law books. But the key fact is that these traditional rights are seen as deeply personal. The major aim is to protect people from having their private lives attacked, being maligned, or simply having their feelings wounded. The focus is on protecting personal feelings and not a commercial asset. These rights are completely tied to an individual as a person. As a general rule, you cannot sell them or pass them down in a will. Over a period of time, some European countries have started to recognise that a person&#8217;s identity also has a commercial value and that, this too, needs to be protected.<a id=\"fnref18\" href=\"#fn18\" title=\"18. Anna E. Helling, &#8220;Protection of &#8216;Persona&#8217; in the EU and in the US: A Comparative Analysis&#8221; (2005) LLM Theses and Essays 45, available at &lt;https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.uga.edu\/stu_llm\/45&gt;.\"><sup>18<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In absence of a dedicated legislative framework, the Indian judiciary has nimbly created a formidable doctrine of personality rights. The courts have anchored this right in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and provided a supple and powerful instrument for celebrities to protect their persona. Recent court judgments allowing &#8220;John Doe&#8221; orders against amorphous digital threats demonstrate their adaptability towards rapidly evolving technological threats to personality rights including AI deepfakes and voice cloning. These rulings indicate a new phase where the &#8220;digital likeness&#8221; of a celebrity is treated as a proprietary right, deserving of fast and robust protection.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Partner, Khaitan &amp; Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">**Principal Associate, Khaitan &amp; Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>, S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532709\" target=\"_blank\">2(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">qq<\/span>)<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>, S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532740\" target=\"_blank\">38<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002362847\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Peppy Store<\/span><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002362847\" target=\"_blank\">(2024) 2 HCC (Del) 253<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000019796\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">R. Rajagopal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of T.N.<\/span><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000019796\" target=\"_blank\">(1994) 6 SCC 632<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921880\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 6332<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000019796\" target=\"_blank\">(1994) 6 SCC 632<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002191412\" target=\"_blank\">2003 SCC OnLine Del 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002162609\" target=\"_blank\">2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001116766\" target=\"_blank\">2015 SCC OnLine Mad 158<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001677978\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 6914<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn11\" href=\"#fnref11\">11.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>, S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532717\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn12\" href=\"#fnref12\">12.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002884826\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 5944<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn13\" href=\"#fnref13\">13.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002580102\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 546<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn14\" href=\"#fnref14\">14.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921884\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 6331<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn15\" href=\"#fnref15\">15.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921880\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ravi Shankar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">John Doe(s)\/Ashok Kumar(s)<\/span><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002921880\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 6332<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn16\" href=\"#fnref16\">16.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Suniel V. Shetty<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">John Doe S. Ashok Kumar<\/span>, I.A No. 32198 of 2025, decided on: 10-10-2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn17\" href=\"#fnref17\">17.<\/a> Kateryna Moskalenko, &#8220;The Right of Publicity in the USA, the EU, and Ukraine&#8221;, (2015) 1(2) Int&#8217;l. Comparative Juris.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn18\" href=\"#fnref18\">18.<\/a> Anna E. Helling, &#8220;Protection of &#8216;Persona&#8217; in the EU and in the US: A Comparative Analysis&#8221; (2005) LLM Theses and Essays 45, available at &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.uga.edu\/stu_llm\/45\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.uga.edu\/stu_llm\/45<\/a>&gt;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Ajay Bhargava* and Phalguni Nigam**<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":368919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20271,47404],"tags":[94194,94197,94191,94192,94199,94198,94195,94190,94193,94196],"class_list":["post-368881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-experts_corner","category-khaitan-co","tag-ai-voice-cloning-law","tag-celebrity-identity-protection","tag-celebrity-rights-law","tag-deepfake-legal-issues-india","tag-digital-likeness-rights","tag-indian-ip-law-gaps","tag-john-doe-orders-india","tag-personality-rights-india","tag-publicity-rights-india","tag-right-to-privacy-article-21"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>India&#039;s Evolving Personality Rights Law | Judicial Protection from Deepfakes &amp; Misuse | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Analysis of India&#039;s evolving personality rights jurisprudence and judicial tools protecting celebrity identity from AI misuse.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India&#039;s Evolving Law of Personality Rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Analysis of India&#039;s evolving personality rights jurisprudence and judicial tools protecting celebrity identity from AI misuse.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-05T10:00:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-05T12:03:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India&#039;s Evolving Law of Personality Rights\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/\",\"name\":\"India's Evolving Personality Rights Law | Judicial Protection from Deepfakes & Misuse | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-05T10:00:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-05T12:03:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Analysis of India's evolving personality rights jurisprudence and judicial tools protecting celebrity identity from AI misuse.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Personality Rights in India\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India&#8217;s Evolving Law of Personality Rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"India's Evolving Personality Rights Law | Judicial Protection from Deepfakes & Misuse | SCC Times","description":"Analysis of India's evolving personality rights jurisprudence and judicial tools protecting celebrity identity from AI misuse.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India's Evolving Law of Personality Rights","og_description":"Analysis of India's evolving personality rights jurisprudence and judicial tools protecting celebrity identity from AI misuse.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-05T10:00:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-05T12:03:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India's Evolving Law of Personality Rights","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/","name":"India's Evolving Personality Rights Law | Judicial Protection from Deepfakes & Misuse | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-05T10:00:36+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-05T12:03:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Analysis of India's evolving personality rights jurisprudence and judicial tools protecting celebrity identity from AI misuse.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Personality Rights in India"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/05\/india-personality-rights-evolving-law-celebrity-protection\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Judicially Crafted Shield: India&#8217;s Evolving Law of Personality Rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Personality-Rights-in-India.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260548,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/24\/a-cause-celebre-publicity-rights-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":368881,"position":0},"title":"A Cause C\u00e9l\u00e9bre : Publicity Rights in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Nina R. Nariman\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;OP. ED.&quot;","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-237.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-237.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-237.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-237.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-237.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/13\/delhi-hc-refuses-to-stay-nyay-the-justice-movie-based-on-sushant-singh-rajput-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":368881,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Privacy, publicity and personality rights not heritable\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to stay \u201cNyay : The Justice\u201d movie based on Sushant Singh Rajput","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe rights ventilated in the plaint, that is, the right to privacy, the right to publicity and the personality rights which vested in Sushant Singh Rajput, were not heritable. They died with his death. The said rights, therefore, did not survive for espousal by the plaintiff.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364202,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/17\/what-are-personality-rights-of-celebrities-in-india-hrithik-roshan-akshay-kumar-lawsuits-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":368881,"position":2},"title":"What are Personality Rights? The rise of Celebrity Lawsuits Explained","author":"Adyasha Mohanty","date":"October 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This article explains the concept of personality rights and how a surge in celebrity lawsuits is reshaping the law on identity, privacy, and digital misuse in India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Personality rights","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Personality-rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Personality-rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Personality-rights.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Personality-rights.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305548,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/24\/beyond-the-grave-exploring-the-legality-of-posthumous-publicity-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":368881,"position":3},"title":"Beyond the Grave: Exploring the Legality of Posthumous Publicity Rights","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr Pratima Narayan*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Legality of Posthumous Publicity Rights","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Legality-of-Posthumous-Publicity-Rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Legality-of-Posthumous-Publicity-Rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Legality-of-Posthumous-Publicity-Rights.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Legality-of-Posthumous-Publicity-Rights.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/02\/bomhc-grants-ad-interim-injunction-to-arijit-singh-to-protect-his-personality-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":368881,"position":4},"title":"\u2018AI tools infringe individual\u2019s right to control and protect their own likeness\/voice\u2019; Bombay HC grants ad-interim injunction in favour of Arijit Singh to protect his personality rights","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Making AI tools available that enable conversion of any voice into that of a celebrity without their permission constitutes a violation of their personality rights and such tools facilitate unauthorized appropriation and manipulation of a celebrity's voice, which is a key component of their personal identity and public persona.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/13\/injunction-to-restrain-the-makers-of-main-hoon-rajnikanth-for-infringement-of-acclaimed-actor-rajnikanth-s-personality-rights-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":368881,"position":5},"title":"Injunction to restrain the makers of \u2018Main Hoon Rajnikanth\u2019 for infringement of acclaimed actor Rajnikanth\u2019s personality rights granted","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 13, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Deciding upon the application filed by well known film actor Rajnikanth whereupon he prayed to the Court for the grant of permanent injunction restraining the makers of the forthcoming film \u2018Main Hoon Rajnikanth\u2019 from using his name\/caricature\/style\/image as the same would amount to the infringement of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368881"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368881\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":368921,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368881\/revisions\/368921"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/368919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}