{"id":368553,"date":"2025-12-03T13:00:38","date_gmt":"2025-12-03T07:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=368553"},"modified":"2025-12-04T17:00:26","modified_gmt":"2025-12-04T11:30:26","slug":"divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court<\/span>: In a significant judgment reinforcing the rights of divorced Muslim women, the bench of Sanjay Karol<\/span> and N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ has held that the interpretation of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986<\/a> must be done, keeping at the forefront equality, dignity, autonomy and the lived experiences of women where particularly in smaller towns and rural areas, inherent patriarchal discrimination is still the order of the day.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the object of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act is to secure the dignity and financial protection of a Muslim women post her divorce which aligns with the rights of a women under Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Background of the Case<\/h3>\n

In the case at hand, the parties were married on 28-08- 2005 but differences arose shortly thereafter. The appellant (the wife) left the matrimonial home in May 2009 and eventually, the marriage ended in divorce on 13-12- 2011. The appellant sought the return of gifts, gold ornaments, and other properties given at the time of marriage, claiming a total of Rs. 17,67,980. She approached the courts under Section 3<\/a> of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act<\/a> as well as Sections 125<\/a> and 498A<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>\/IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The case passed through multiple rounds in the lower courts. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate partly allowed the appellant’s claim, granting Rs. 8 lakhs and 30 bhories of gold. Subsequent appeals and revisions were filed, and eventually, the Calcutta High Court allowed the respondent’s petition, relying on statements of the appellant’s father that the gifts had been given to the husband, not the wife.<\/p>\n

Supreme Court Analysis<\/h3>\n

The main question before the Supreme Court was whether gifts and properties given at the time of marriage to the daughter or bridegroom can be reclaimed by the divorced wife under the 1986 Act.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that Section 3(1)<\/a> of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act<\/a> deals with mehr<\/span>\/dower and\/or other properties given to a woman at the time of her marriage- clearing the way for the woman to set up a claim against her husband in the above situations, or claim back from her husband properties given, as the case may be.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court disagreed with the reasoning of the High Court, wherein the High Court had refused to return the amount and gold to the appellant, relying on an apparent contradiction between the statements of the marriage registrar (Kazi) and the father of the appellant. While the Kazi had stated in his evidence that the entry recording the amount and gold being given to the husband was erroneously done so and it should have been that the said amount(s) were only given without specifying, to whom, the father of the appellant, on the other hand, stated that he had given the amount(s) in question to the respondent (i.e. the husband). The High Court gave more weight to the father’s statement because he was directly responsible for giving the gifts.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court, however, noted that the High Court lost sight of is the end result of the proceedings in which the said statement of the father was given, namely, the proceedings under Section 498A<\/a>–IPC<\/a> and Section(s) 3<\/a>\/4<\/a> of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a>, wherein, despite such a direct statement by the father of the appellant the Trial Court acquitted the respondent and the said judgment had attained finality.<\/p>\n

The Court, hence, held that the evidentiary value of that statement cannot be said to be either equal to or greater than the statement of the marriage registrar. It is also worth noting that the High Court had recorded that the statement regarding writing and overwriting in the entry in the marriage register was supported by documentary proof. Hence, the Court held that in such case, mere allegation as to his conduct being suspicious on account of overwriting in the marriage register was not sufficient to discard his testimony.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court also noted while it is a settled rule that the Supreme Court under its plenary, Article 136 jurisdiction does not interfere with the findings of the High Court simply because there are two views possible, the case at hand, did not fall under this exception as the High Court missed the purposive construction goalpost and instead proceeded to adjudicate the matter purely as a civil dispute<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Underscoring the importance of purposive interpretation of laws to uphold social justice, the Court observed that,<\/p>\n

“The Constitution of India<\/a> prescribes an aspiration for all, i.e. equality which is, obviously, yet to be achieved. Courts, in doing their bit to this end must ground their reasoning in social justice adjudication.”<\/p>\n

The Court, hence, allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court order. The respondent was directed to pay the amount to the appellant. Payment was directed to be made via bank transfer within three working days, with a compliance affidavit to be filed within six weeks. The Court also made clear that non-compliance would attract 9% interest per annum.<\/p>\n

[Rousanara Begum v. SK Salahuddin, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2602<\/a>, decided on 02-12-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment Authored by Justice Sanjay Karol<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Mr. Mohd Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jamil Husain, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Ms. Pooja Kumari, Adv. Mr. S Prasada Rao, Adv.<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span> Ms. Kumud Lata Das, Adv. Mr. Sukesh Ghosh, Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, AOR Ms. Pooja Rathore, Adv. Mr. Siddhant N. Das, Adv. Mr. Kunal Mimani, AOR Ms. Shraddha Chirania, Adv<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The object of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act is to secure the dignity and financial protection of a Muslim women post her divorce which aligns with the rights of a women under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":368560,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[37393,78753,93946,2855,8601,71871,55015,2863,31838,93945,61925,93947,93948,38238,5363],"class_list":["post-368553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-article-21-of-the-constitution","tag-divorced-muslim-women","tag-divorced-women","tag-Dowry","tag-family-and-personal-law","tag-justice-n-kotiswar-singh","tag-justice-sanjay-karol","tag-maintenance","tag-muslim-law","tag-muslim-women-protection-of-rights-on-divorce-act-1986","tag-purposive-interpretation","tag-right-to-property-of-women","tag-rights-of-divorced-women","tag-social-justice","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSC upholds Divorced Muslim Women's rights to Reclaim Marriage Gifts| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court reinforces divorced Muslim women's rights, allowing them to reclaim gifts, gold, and property given at marriage under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court reinforces divorced Muslim women's rights, allowing them to reclaim gifts, gold, and property given at marriage under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-03T07:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-04T11:30:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/\",\"name\":\"SC upholds Divorced Muslim Women's rights to Reclaim Marriage Gifts| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-03T07:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-04T11:30:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court reinforces divorced Muslim women's rights, allowing them to reclaim gifts, gold, and property given at marriage under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Divorced Muslim Women Rights\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC upholds Divorced Muslim Women's rights to Reclaim Marriage Gifts| SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court reinforces divorced Muslim women's rights, allowing them to reclaim gifts, gold, and property given at marriage under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act","og_description":"Supreme Court reinforces divorced Muslim women's rights, allowing them to reclaim gifts, gold, and property given at marriage under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-03T07:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-04T11:30:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/","name":"SC upholds Divorced Muslim Women's rights to Reclaim Marriage Gifts| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-03T07:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-04T11:30:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"description":"Supreme Court reinforces divorced Muslim women's rights, allowing them to reclaim gifts, gold, and property given at marriage under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Divorced Muslim Women Rights"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/03\/divorced-muslim-women-rights-reclaim-marriage-gifts-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Divorced Muslim Women can reclaim Gifts and Property Given at Marriage: Supreme Court stresses on Social Justice in Interpreting 1986 Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Divorced-Muslim-Women-Rights.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-section-125-crpc-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":368553,"position":0},"title":"Divorced Muslim woman can seek maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the husband had argued that in view of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, a divorced Muslim woman is not entitled to maintain a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC and has to proceed under the provisions of the 1986\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Divorced Muslim woman","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Divorced-Muslim-woman.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Divorced-Muslim-woman.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Divorced-Muslim-woman.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Divorced-Muslim-woman.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/11\/divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-section-125-crpc-supreme-court-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":368553,"position":1},"title":"Comprehensive breakdown of the Supreme Court Verdict on Divorced Muslim women\u2019s right to seek maintenance under Section 125 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the husband had argued that in view of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, a divorced Muslim woman is not entitled to maintain a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC and has to proceed under the provisions of the 1986\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Divorced Muslim woman","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/07\/guj-hc-will-permanent-alimony-granted-to-a-muslim-woman-be-conditional-to-wifes-remarriage-detailed-report-untangling-significance-of-permanent-alimony-periodical-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":368553,"position":2},"title":"Guj HC | Will permanent alimony granted to a Muslim woman be conditional to her remarriage? Detailed report untangling significance of ‘Permanent Alimony’ & ‘Periodical Maintenance’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of J.B. Pardiwala and Vireshkumar B. Mayani, JJ., while addressing the issue of grant of permanent alimony to a Muslim Woman noted the significant difference between permanent alimony and periodical maintenance. An instant appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 was filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231057,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/19\/can-family-court-convert-petition-for-maintenance-under-section-125-crpc-to-one-under-muslim-womens-protection-act-split-verdict-by-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":368553,"position":3},"title":"Can Family Court convert petition for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC to one under Muslim Women\u2019s Protection Act? Split verdict by SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of R Banumathi and Indira Banerjee, JJ has given a split verdict on the issue whether a Family Court can convert the petition for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. to one under Section 3 or Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/28\/maintenance-to-muslim-wife-all-hc-s-125-crpc-perhaps-one-of-the-most-secular-enactment-ever-made-in-this-country-hc-while-upholding-maintenance-awarded-to-divorced-muslim-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":368553,"position":4},"title":"[Maintenance to Muslim wife] All HC | \u201cS. 125 CrPC perhaps one of the most secular enactment ever made in this country\u201d: HC while upholding maintenance awarded to divorced Muslim wife","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J., while addressing the present matter, observed that: \u2026 right of maintenance available to wife from husband is an absolute right and even divorce cannot affect this right unless the wife is disqualified on account of remarriage or her sufficient earning. It was also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":285757,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/divorced-muslim-woman-is-entitled-to-claim-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-even-after-iddat-and-for-whole-life-unless-she-remarries-allahabad-high-court-reiterates-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":368553,"position":5},"title":"Divorced Muslim woman is entitled to claim maintenance under S. 125 CrPC even after iddat and for whole life, unless she remarries, Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court sets aside Family Court's order holding that divorced Muslim woman is not entitled for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368553\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/368560"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}