{"id":368307,"date":"2025-12-01T16:00:16","date_gmt":"2025-12-01T10:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=368307"},"modified":"2025-12-06T09:42:04","modified_gmt":"2025-12-06T04:12:04","slug":"no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Disclaimer: This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a review petition filed by the respondents, Customs Department under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523540\" target=\"_blank\">XLVII Rule 1<\/a> read with Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523700\" target=\"_blank\">114<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523743\" target=\"_blank\">151<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) seeking review of this Court&#8217;s order dated 30-10-2025 directing the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to conduct an inter-ministerial consultation for a uniform policy regarding imports of products declared as body massagers or sex toys, a Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Prathiba M. Singh*<\/span> and Shail Jain, JJ., opined that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;petitioners are being harassed unnecessarily&#8221;<\/span> and imposed a Costs of Rs. 25,000\/- in each petition, to be deducted from the salary of Assistant Commissioner of Customs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioners imported wellness\/body massager devices, commonly called sex toys, which were seized by the Customs Department. The petitioners had earlier obtained an order dated 30-11-2025 where this Court directed provisional release of the imported goods and also directed CBIC to initiate a uniform policy consultation regarding import categorization of body massagers\/sex toys.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Customs department contended that these goods require the approval of the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) and the petitioners failed to provide an EPR certificate under Battery Waste Management Rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the petitioners contended that these arguments were already raised earlier, hence not grounds for review, and DCGI FAQ No. 51 expressly provided that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;if the massager is intended for soothing or general wellness purpose&#8230; then it does not come under the regulation.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners asserted that similar products of companies such as Reckitt Benckiser (Durex) and Huha Care Pvt. Ltd. were cleared by Customs department without objection and that non-clearance was a violation of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the Customs department failed to deny that these similar products were permitted to be imported, which clearly <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;answered that they were permitted to import.&#8221;<\/span> The Court found that the Customs department had concealed material documents, specifically the DCGI FAQs and the Public Notice 46\/2023, from the Court. The Court held that the same arguments had already been raised during the earlier hearing, therefore, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;there is no ground for a review.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court affirmed that as per DCGI FAQ No. 51, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;massagers&#8230; do not require any approval under the Medical Device Rules&#8230; as they are only for wellness and soothing purposes.&#8221;<\/span> The Court noted that Public Notice 46\/2023 clearly states that the EPR certificate can be filed even after release, and one petitioner had already filed such an application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the Customs department had cleared similar products by Reckitt Benckiser and others, yet targeted petitioners even when petitioner has demonstrated that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;similar goods are being imported&#8230; cleared for home consumption, without any objections.&#8221;<\/span> The Court found that the Customs Department is clearly harassing the Petitioners for no reason.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The Petitioners are being harassed unnecessarily, when clearly the earlier consignments of the Petitioners were cleared&#8230; and the consignments of various third parties were also cleared.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the review petitions with costs of Rs. 25,000\/- per petition and directed to be deducted the same from the salary of Assistant Commissioner of Customs. The Court stated that the provisional release of the goods to be effected within two working days upon EPR application filing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">TECHSYNC<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Superintendent of Customs<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Hv50N0h0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 8725<\/a>, Decided on 21-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Prathiba M. Singh<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Ms. Piyushi Garg, Mr. Ananay Chopra, Mr. Ajay Kr Yadav, Mr. Chandravijay Sharma, Mr. Hardik Saxena and Mr. Rajat Yadav, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Petitioner<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, SSC with Ms. Drishti Rawal, Mr. Mayur Goyal and Mr. Sarthak Srivastava, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondents<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Massagers &#8230;do not require any approval under the Medical Device Rules, 2017 as they are not being used for therapeutic or alleviation of disease.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":368319,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[93752,93750,93749,52223,93748,2543,71561,93755,46510,93746,93753,93754,93751,93747],"class_list":["post-368307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-battery-waste-management-rules-2022","tag-body-massagers","tag-customs-review-petition","tag-dcgi","tag-debanjan-impex","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-epr-certificate","tag-harassment-by-customs","tag-justice-prathiba-m-singh","tag-justice-shail-jain","tag-public-notice-46-2023-discriminatory-seizure","tag-release-of-goods","tag-sex-toys","tag-techsync"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DHC on DCGI approval for import of body massagers for General Wellness | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that no DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for Soothing or General Wellness purposes\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that no DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for Soothing or General Wellness purposes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-01T10:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-06T04:12:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"DHC on DCGI approval for import of body massagers for General Wellness | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-01T10:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-06T04:12:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that no DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for Soothing or General Wellness purposes\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"import of body massagers Keyphrase\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC on DCGI approval for import of body massagers for General Wellness | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that no DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for Soothing or General Wellness purposes","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that no DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for Soothing or General Wellness purposes","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-01T10:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-06T04:12:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"DHC on DCGI approval for import of body massagers for General Wellness | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp","datePublished":"2025-12-01T10:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-06T04:12:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that no DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for Soothing or General Wellness purposes","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"import of body massagers Keyphrase"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/01\/no-dcgi-approval-for-import-of-body-massagers-general-wellness-delhi-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No DCGI approval required for import of body massagers or sex toys used for General Wellness: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/import-of-body-massagers-Keyphrase.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":366778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/15\/not-liable-to-pay-redemption-fine-customs-delays-show-cause-notice-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":368307,"position":0},"title":"Delayed Show Cause notice by Customs &mdash; Is the Owner of goods still liable for redemption fine, penalty or interest? Delhi HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"November 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court considered how the timing of a Show Cause Notice by Customs Department impacts the owner\u2019s liability.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs delays show cause notice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Customs-delays-show-cause-notice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Customs-delays-show-cause-notice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Customs-delays-show-cause-notice.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Customs-delays-show-cause-notice.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-slams-customs-department-for-wasting-judicial-time-due-to-non-appearance-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":368307,"position":1},"title":"\u201cJudicial time wasted\u201d; Delhi High Court slams Customs Department for non-appearance and lack of coordination","author":"Arunima","date":"March 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn a large number of customs matters, the Counsels are either not appearing or appear without proper instructions. In cases of non-appearance, the Court is compelled to request Standing Counsels present in Court to accept notice. This reflects a clear lack of coordination between the Department and the learned panel\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/06\/delhi-hc-quashes-detention-of-personal-gold-jewellery-exempts-personal-effects-customs-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":368307,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside detention order on woman&#8217;s personal gold jewellery, Exempts \u2018personal effects\u2019 from customs duty","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Personal jewellery which is not found to have been acquired on an overseas trip and was always a used personal effect of the passenger would not be subject to the monetary prescriptions incorporated in Rules 3 and 4 of Baggage Rules, 2016.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-directs-trial-court-return-passport-accused-cofeposa-customs-act-modifying-bail-condition\/","url_meta":{"origin":368307,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Trial Court to return passport of accused under COFEPOSA and Customs Act by modifying bail condition","author":"Editor","date":"November 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Trial Court was directed to return the passport surrendered by the accused within 2 weeks of submission of application for the same.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/17\/baggage-rules-required-to-be-re-looked-to-ensure-no-harassment-of-genuine-tourists-carrying-gold-jewellery-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":368307,"position":4},"title":"Baggage Rules required to be re-looked to ensure no harassment of genuine tourists\/travellers carrying gold jewellery: Delhi High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"January 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Bona fide tourists\/travellers, travelling for social engagements in India with gold, which could be of a much higher value than the permissible limits, cannot to be expected to file detailed declarations, as this can make the entire process of entering India and exiting from airports extremely unfriendly or onerous.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206128,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/co-accused-persons-entitled-to-same-benefit-sentence-waived-on-grounds-of-parity-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":368307,"position":5},"title":"Co-accused persons entitled to same benefit; sentence waived on grounds of parity: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rekha Palli, J. while disposing of a petition, waived of the sentence awarded to the petitioner on grounds of parity with the co-accused. The petitioner was convicted by the Magistrate under Section 132 and 135(1) (a) of the Customs Act for evading\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368307\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/368319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}