{"id":368207,"date":"2025-11-30T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-11-30T05:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=368207"},"modified":"2025-12-01T10:04:22","modified_gmt":"2025-12-01T04:34:22","slug":"know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory &amp; notable judgments"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Born on 30-11-1961, in the culturally rich city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma&#8217;s life has been a journey marked by excellence, dedication, and a relentless pursuit of justice. His illustrious career spans across various legal roles, showcasing his prowess and commitment to the legal fraternity.<\/p>\n<h2>Early Life and Education<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Satish Chandra Sharma&#8217;s academic and professional foundations were laid in a family deeply rooted in education and public service. His father, Dr. B. N. Sharma, was not only a respected agriculturalist but also a renowned professor of Jabalpur University<a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma | Supreme Court of India | India\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>, who later served as the Vice Chancellor of Barkatullah University, Bhopal. His mother, Shanti Sharma, contributed significantly to education as a school principal and later as the District Education Officer in Jabalpur.<a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\" title=\"2. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, Delhi Judicial Academy.\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Sharma embarked on his educational journey at Christ Church Boys Higher Secondary School and completed his 10th and 12th standards at Central School, Jabalpur. In 1979, he enrolled in Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar, to pursue a Bachelor of Science degree. His academic prowess was evident as he graduated with distinction in three subjects in 1981.<a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\" title=\"3. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, High Court of Delhi.\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Legal Journey<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Awarded with the National Merit Scholarship for Post Graduate Studies, Justice Sharma chose to further pursue his education in law, in 1981, at Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar. In 1984, he graduated at the top of his class, earning his LL.B. degree with three university Gold Medals. His legal career began on 1-9-1984, when he got enrolled as an advocate.<a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\" title=\"4. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, Delhi Judicial Academy.\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Sharma&#8217;s practice focused on Constitutional, Service, Civil, and Criminal matters before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. His expertise and dedication led to his appointment as Additional Central Government Counsel on 28-5-1993 and subsequently as a Senior Panel Counsel by the Government of India on 28-6-2004.<a id=\"fnref5\" href=\"#fn5\" title=\"5. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma | Supreme Court of India | India\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a> In a remarkable achievement, he was designated as a Senior Advocate by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, in 2003, at the age of 42 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">*Did You Know?<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">In 2003, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma became one of the youngest Senior Advocates of Madhya Pradesh High Court.<a id=\"fnref6\" href=\"#fn6\" title=\"6. Supra.\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Judicial Ascension<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Sharma&#8217;s judicial journey began when he was elevated as an Additional Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 18-1-2008. His exemplary performance led to his appointment as a Permanent Judge on 15-1-2010.<a id=\"fnref7\" href=\"#fn7\" title=\"7. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, Delhi Judicial Academy.\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Known for his voracious reading habits and academic contributions, Justice Sharma has been associated with several National Law universities and serves on the Advisory Board of institutions like the National Law Institute University, Bhopal, and India International University of Legal Education and Research, Goa. His published research articles and papers attest to his commitment to legal scholarship.<a id=\"fnref8\" href=\"#fn8\" title=\"8. Supra.\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With his transfer to the Karnataka High Court as a Judge on 31-12-2020, Justice Sharma continued to leave an indelible mark.<a id=\"fnref9\" href=\"#fn9\" title=\"9. MP HC | Justice Satish Chandra Sharma appointed as a Judge of Karnataka HC, SCC Blog\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a> His appointment as Acting Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court on 31-8-2021 showcased the trust placed in his capabilities.<a id=\"fnref10\" href=\"#fn10\" title=\"10. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma appointed as Acting Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, SCC Blog\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Elevated as Chief Justice of the Telangana High Court on 11-10-2021, Justice Sharma&#8217;s journey took another significant turn. His dedication and leadership qualities were further recognized when he was transferred to the Delhi High Court as Chief Justice, taking the oath of office on 28-6-2022.<a id=\"fnref11\" href=\"#fn11\" title=\"11. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, High Court of Delhi.\"><sup>11<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The pinnacle of Justice Sharma&#8217;s career came when the Supreme Court collegium recommended his appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 6-11-2023<a id=\"fnref12\" href=\"#fn12\" title=\"12. SC Collegium recommends appointment of 3 Chief Justices of High Courts as Judges of the Supreme Court of India, SCC Blog\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/a>. He was appointed as the Judge of the Supreme Court on 9-11-2023<a id=\"fnref13\" href=\"#fn13\" title=\"13. Three new Judges of the Supreme Court of India take oath, SCC Blog\"><sup>13<\/sup><\/a> and this achievement crowns a lifetime dedicated to the pursuit of justice and service of the legal system.<\/p>\n<h2>Notable Judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma in Supreme Court<\/h2>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/02\/supreme-court-restores-conviction-of-men-who-raped-minor-girl-in-2016\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Procedure is not supposed to control justice&#8221;; SC restores conviction &amp; sentence of men who raped a minor girl in 2016<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering a criminal appeal challenging the setting aside of the Respondents&#8217; convictions under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012<\/a> by Patna High Court, the Division Bench of Sanjay Kumar and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ., set aside the High Court&#8217;s decision and restored the Respondents&#8217; conviction and sentence as given by the Trial Court, while pointing out that, in the present case, a fairly consistent and creditworthy case of the prosecution was discarded on basis of misapplication of procedure. The Court further pointed out that the victims often find themselves in conflict with the procedural intricacies of the laws in place. Despite the importance of procedural sanctity, it is always a matter of utter failure for the system when a culprit, that too of a heinous sexual offence, manages to walk free by entangling the victim in misapplication of procedural rules, without the knowledge of the victim and without any control of the victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;Procedure is not supposed to control justice&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further shed light on the misunderstanding of the principle of beyond reasonable doubt, stating that underlying foundation of the principle is that no innocent should face punishment for a crime that he has not done; however, a flipside of the same is that at times, owing to a misapplication of this principle, actual culprits manage to find their way out of the clutches of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;Every instance of acquittal of an actual culprit revolt against the sense of security of the society and acts as a blot on the criminal justice system&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">X v. Y<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/g4oz08dG\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1878<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/09\/judicial-officer-7-years-law-practice-eligible-for-district-judge-appointment-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">Judicial Officers with 7 years&#8217; experience in law practice are eligible for direct appointment as District Judge\/Additional District Judge: Supreme Court<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a landmark ruling, a 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.R. Gavai, CJI.*<\/span>, M.M. Sundresh, Aravind Kumar, S.C. Sharma and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ., while deciding a reference on issues related to appointment of Judicial Officers as District Judges, held the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Judicial Officers who have already completed 7 years in Bar before they were recruited in the subordinate judicial service, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">would be entitled for being appointed as a District Judge\/Additional District Judge<\/span> in the selection process for the post of District Judges in the direct recruitment process.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The eligibility for appointment as a District Judge\/Additional District Judge is to be seen at the time of application.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Though <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">there is no eligibility prescribed under<\/span> Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574979\" target=\"_blank\">233(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">for a person already in judicial service<\/span> of the Union or of the State for being appointed as District Judge; in order to provide a level playing field, the Court directed that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">a candidate applying as an in-service candidate should have 7 years&#8217; combined experience as a Judicial Officer and an advocate.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>A person who has been or who is in judicial service <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">and<\/span> has a combined experience of 7 years or more as an advocate or a Judicial Officer, would be eligible for being considered and appointed as a District Judge\/Additional District Judge under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574979\" target=\"_blank\">233<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>In order to ensure level playing field, the Court directed that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">minimum age for being considered and appointed as a District Judge\/Additional District Judge<\/span> for both advocates and Judicial Officers would be 35 years of age as on the date of application.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The Court held that view taken in Satya Narain Singh v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, (1985) 1 SCC 225, till Dheeraj Mor v. High Court of Delhi, (2018) 4 SCC 619, which takes a view contrary to what has been held above, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">do not lay down the correct proposition of law.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rejanish K.V. v. K. Deepa<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/iMp6kW1Y\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2196<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/sc-quashes-s-306-ipc-proceedings-against-mother-abetting-suicide-son-girlfriend\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Acts of accused were too remote and indirect to constitute offence under S. 306 IPC&#8217;; SC quashes proceedings against mother accused of abetting suicide of son&#8217;s girlfriend<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a criminal appeal against Calcutta High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the chargesheet for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\">306<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) against the other two accused persons was quashed, while the present applicant&#8217;s (&#8216;accused&#8217;) plea for quashing the chargesheet was rejected, the Division Bench of BV Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court&#8217;s decision to the extent of refusing to quash the chargesheet qua the present accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Laxmi Das v. State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UVFAcp7p\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 120<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"\" target=\"_blank\">Only arguing counsel appearing physically and assisting counsel will be recorded in appearance; Senior Advocate shall not appear without AOR: Supreme Court<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a set of two miscellaneous applications filed jointly by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) seeking clarification\/ modification of the directions in para 42 of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhagwan Singh v. State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UKx9R1qU\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2599<\/a>, wherein it was directed that the Advocates-on-Record may mark the appearances of only those Advocates who are authorized to appear and argue the case on the particular day of hearing, the Division Bench of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. gave a slew of directions to regulate practice and procedure on the following issues:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>whether the Advocates have an indefeasible right to appear for a party or to get their appearances marked for a party, though not duly authorised to appear in the court proceedings; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">whether the impugned directions given by the court impinge or affect any of the legal, fundamental or statutory rights of the Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;A right of an Advocate to appear for a party and to practice in the Courts is coupled with the duty to remain present in the Court at the time of hearing, and to participate and conduct the proceedings diligently, sincerely, honestly and to the best of his ability. Rights and duties are two sides of the same coin, and they are inherently connected with each other.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court held that the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 as amended by Rules, 2019 having the statutory force, have to be adhered to and complied with by all the officers of the Court as also the Advocates practicing in the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Supreme Court Bar Association v. State of UP<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/R7mq8JXV\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 587<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/18\/contempt-of-court-sc-spilt-verdict-acceptance-apology-advocates-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Contempt of Court | SC delivers split verdict on acceptance of unconditional apology by errant Advocates; Matter to be placed before CJI<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering the instant matter concerning abuse of process of Court by an Advocate on Record (AoR) and a lawyer, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bela M. Trivedi**<\/span> and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>*, JJ., reached a spilt verdict on the issue of acceptance of unconditional apology by the errant advocates. As a result, the matter was directed to be placed before the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bela M. Trivedi, J.<\/span>, directed that the name of the AoR be removed from the Register of Advocates-on- Record for a period of one month from the date of the instant judgment. Vis-a-vis the other errant Advocate, Trivedi, J., directed that he shall pay cost of Rs.1,00,000\/- from his own pocket to be deposited by him with the SCAORA to be utilized for the welfare of the Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">Meanwhile, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">S.C. Sharma, J.<\/span>, agreed with Trivedi, J., that the errant Advocates did not keep in mind the honour and dignity of the institution, and they have also failed to discharge their duties to the Court. However, Sharma, J., opined that Justice Trivedi&#8217;s directions are too onerous on the errant Advocates as the same would cast a stigma on their future especially when both the Advocates belong from a remote village in Tamil Nadu. Given the unconditional apology tendered by the errant Advocates and their unblemished track record so far, Sharma J., accepted the apology and cautioned the advocates to be careful in not repeating any such misconduct in future. They were also directed to ensure that they shall appear before all cases where they have entered appearances.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">N. Eswaranathan v. State<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/s3aSGA6B\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 805<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/11\/sc-quashes-rape-case-former-judge-consensual-relationship\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Consensual relationships, where possibility of marriage may exist, cannot be given a colour of false pretext to marry after fall out&#8221;; SC quashes rape case against former judge<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a criminal appeal filed by the accused against the order passed by the Calcutta High Court, wherein the Court refused to discharge the accused charged under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561754\" target=\"_blank\">417<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), the division bench of BV Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. said that there is a growing tendency of resorting to initiation of criminal proceedings when relationships turn sour. Every consensual relationship, where a possibility of marriage may exist, cannot be given a colour of a false pretext to marry, in the event of fallout. It is such lis that amounts to an abuse of process of law. Thus, the Court set aside the impugned order and terminated the proceedings as the physical relationship between the complainant and the accused was consensual.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Biswajyoti Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/YNME32G6\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 741<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/supreme-court-article-142-restore-original-sentence-release-excess-term-pocso\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to restore original sentence and order release after convict serves excess term in POCSO case<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a criminal appeal concerning a matter under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (&#8216;POCSO Act&#8217;), the division bench of B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. noted that the convict had already undergone eleven years and eight months of incarceration. Observing that this period far exceeded the original sentence, the Court concluded that the ends of justice would be best served by bringing the matter to a close. Accordingly, the convict was directed to be released from custody forthwith.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sachin v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FrtQy70F\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 834<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/14\/supreme-court-cruelty-498a-ipc-misuse-acquittal\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court acquits husband in 498A IPC case, expresses concern over misuse of dowry and cruelty provisions<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal filed by the convict against the order passed by the Allahabad High Court, which had upheld the convict&#8217;s conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546434\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a> (&#8216;DP Act, 1961&#8217;), the Division Bench of B.V. Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. expressed concern over the misuse of Sections 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the DP Act, 1961. The Court highlighted a growing trend where complainant-wives indiscriminately array aged parents, distant relatives, and married sisters living separately as accused in matrimonial disputes. The Bench observed that such practices undermine the credibility of the allegations and vitiate the very core intent of these protective legal provisions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further emphasised that the term &#8220;cruelty&#8221; under Section 498A IPC is often subject to misuse and cannot be established by general or vague allegations alone. It must be supported by specific instances detailing the time, date, and manner of the alleged cruelty. The Court remarked that invoking these penal provisions without providing clear, concrete instances significantly weakens the prosecution&#8217;s case and raises serious doubts about the credibility of the complainant&#8217;s version.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">Given these considerations, the Court allowed the appeals, set aside the judgment passed by the High Court, and acquitted the convict of all charges under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the DP Act, 1961.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajesh Chaddha v. State of Uttar Pradesh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/x989y2t3\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1094<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years&#8217; rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">While considering the instant petition challenging Bombay High Court&#8217;s decision to upholding the conviction of the petitioner (convict) under 6 of the Protection of the Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) thereby sentencing him to 20 years&#8217; rigorous imprisonment; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.,*<\/span> dismissed the petition finding no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sachin v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Icm96wj5\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1255<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/27\/non-disclosure-past-govt-service-no-ground-for-discharge-woman-civil-judge-reinstated-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Non-disclosure of past government service can&#8217;t be a ground for discharge&#8217;: Supreme Court reinstates woman Civil Judge<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While deliberating over instant appeal whereby Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition filed by the appellant challenging her discharge from Rajasthan Judicial Services (RJS); the Division Bench of B.V. Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ., set aside the order of discharge and directed the respondent to reinstate the appellant. The Court opined that non-disclosure of past government service, cannot be a ground to discharge the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">While deciding the matter, the Court emphasised on the necessity of women&#8217;s participation in the judiciary and said that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">country will greatly benefit from a judicial force that is competent, committed and most importantly, diverse.<\/span> The Court also commended the appellant for her perseverance by fighting societal stigmas and gaining a rich education that will ultimately benefit the judicial system and the democratic project.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pinky Mehta v. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0SeAVcBA\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1214<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/cbec-circular-on-1-percent-duty-drawback-not-prospective-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;CBEC circular on 1% duty drawback not prospective&#8217;; SC clarifies retrospective entitlement under All Industry Rate Scheme<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a civil appeal against Madhya Pradesh High Court&#8217;s decision whereby the applicability of Customs Circular No. 35\/2010-Cus. Dated 17-09-2010 for the purposes of All Industry Rate (AIR) Duty Drawbacks was held to be prospective in nature, the Division Bench of B.V. Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. relating to the applicability of duty drawback provisions for exporters, held that the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), must be retrospectively applied. The Court ruled in favour of Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) restoring their entitlement to 1% AIR customs duty drawback for Soyabean Meal (SBM) exports made prior to 20-09-2010.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Suraj Impex (India) (P) Ltd. V. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CbN4Y4I1\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1226<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/09\/circumstantial-evidence-inability-to-explain-situations-prosecution-primary-burden-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Circumstantial Evidence | Inability to explain certain situations can&#8217;t be made a basis to relieve prosecution from discharging its primary burden: SC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering a matter wherein the appellant (convict) who was convicted for murdering his friend had challenged his conviction, the Division Bench of B.V. Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ., took note of the inconsistent version of events presented by the prosecution and opined that accused person&#8217;s inability to explain certain circumstances, could not be made the basis to relieve the prosecution from discharging its primary burden of proving the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">It was stated that in criminal jurisprudence, it is a time-tested proposition that the primary burden falls upon the shoulders of the prosecution and it is only if the prosecution succeeds in discharging its burden beyond reasonable doubt that the burden shifts upon the accused to explain the evidence against him or to present a defence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vaibhav v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8Q80tqZL\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1304<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/02\/supreme-court-quashes-rape-case-consensual-relationship\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;A consensual relationship turning sour not ground for criminal prosecution&#8217;: Supreme Court quashes rape case against 25-year-old<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal filed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court , wherein the petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) seeking quashing of criminal proceedings was dismissed, involving allegations under Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 377, 504, and 506 of the Penal Code (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), 1860, the Division Bench of B.V. Nagarathna and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. observed that the present case did not involve a false promise to marry from the outset. The Court held that a consensual relationship, which subsequently deteriorates or results in estrangement between the parties, cannot form the basis for invoking the criminal machinery of the State. It further emphasised that such actions unnecessarily burden the courts and irreversibly damage the reputation of individuals accused of serious offences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Taking into account that the accused was a young individual of 25 years with his entire future ahead of him, the Court was of the considered opinion that subjecting him to a protracted criminal trial would not subserve the ends of justice. To prevent undue hardship and miscarriage of justice, the Court found it appropriate to quash the criminal proceedings at this stage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">Accordingly, the appeal was allowed. The impugned order of the Bombay High Court was set aside. Consequently, the accused was discharged from the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amol Bhagwan Nehul v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L5y7bGcr\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1230<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/15\/secretly-recorded-spousal-conversations-admissible-evidence-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Privacy vs. Evidence: Supreme Court allows secretly recorded spousal conversations as admissible evidence in matrimonial disputes<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal against the judgment passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, where the High Court had ruled that recorded conversations between a husband and wife could not be the basis for deciding a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">BV Nagarathna*<\/span> and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. held that the founding rationale for Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516706\" target=\"_blank\">122<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> as acknowledged by the Law Commission and various High Courts, was to protect the sanctity of marriage rather than focusing on the right to privacy of the individuals involved. Consequently, the Court stated that the right to privacy is not a relevant consideration in situations where the privilege under Section 122 is not granted, such as in proceedings between spouses (an exception recognized in Section 122 itself).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that spousal communications were deemed privileged under Section 122 for the purpose of protecting the sanctity of the marital relationship, and not for safeguarding individual privacy rights.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">As a result, the Court set aside the impugned order of the High Court and restored the Family Court&#8217;s order. The Court directed the Family Court to accept the supplementary affidavit filed by the husband, which included evidence such as the memory card\/chip of the mobile phones, compact disc (CD), and the transcript of the recorded conversations from the relevant period. The Family Court was instructed to consider this evidence in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vibhor Garg v. Neha<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t4j9wNyk\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1421<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/supreme-court-aid-to-2023-akola-city-communal-riots-assault-victim\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court comes to the aid of 2023 Akola City communal riots assault victim; Directs constitution of SIT &amp; sensitisation drive for Police Dept<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering this matter whereby the appellant was aggrieved at the dismissal of his complaint regarding police inaction apropos the attack and assault on him during communal riots in Akola City, Maharashtra on 13-05-2023 by Bombay High Court after expressing suspicions on the appellant&#8217;s bonafides; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Kumar*<\/span> and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ., directed the Secretary, Home Ministry, Government of Maharashtra, to constitute a special investigation team (SIT), comprising senior police officers of both Hindu and Muslim communities, to undertake an investigation into all the allegations made by the appellant, by registering an FIR in connection with the assault upon him, and take appropriate action thereon as warranted. The Court further directed to <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">initiate measures to instruct and sensitize the rank and file in the police department as to what law requires of them in the discharge of their duties.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">Taking note of the approach taken by the Police in the present case, the Court emphasised that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">when members of the police force don their uniforms, they are required to shed their personal predilections and biases<\/span>, be they religious, racial, casteist or otherwise. They must be true to the call of duty attached to their office and their uniform with absolute and total integrity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8N00teiI\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1955<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/12\/sc-directs-rs-10-lakh-refund-to-doctor-in-medical-negligence-case\/\" target=\"_blank\">NCDRC cannot travel beyond pleadings and build a new case: Supreme Court sets aside order in medical negligence case; directs Rs 10 lakh refund to doctor<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, an appeal was filed assailing the order passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (&#8216;NCDRC&#8217;) whereby it was held that, there was no liability attached to the Nursing Home, Chandigarh (&#8216;nursing home&#8217;) for the death of Respondent 1&#8217;s wife and his new born son, and the entire responsibility of paying Rs. 20,26,000 was upon the Obstetrician\/Gynaecologist, consulted by Respondent 1 and his wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Kumar*<\/span> and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ., stated that the entire focus of NCDRC was only upon the antenatal care and management of the patient, which was never the subject matter of the complaint case. In doing so, the NCDRC overstepped its power and jurisdiction, as it was not for it to travel beyond the pleadings and build up a new case on its own. Thus, the Court stated that the NCDRC clearly transgressed its jurisdiction in building a new case for the complainants, contrary to their pleadings. Accordingly, the Court set aside the impugned order passed by NCDRC, stated that Respondent 1 should return and refund the sum of 10,00,000 received by him, to Obstetrician\/Gynaecologist, &#8216;Dr. G&#8217; and the insurer, New India Assurance Company Ltd.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;####\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deep Nursing Home v. Manmeet Singh Mattewal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/i2HL5fmZ\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1934<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/04\/sc-dismisses-13-slps-chhattisgarh-liquor-scam-anil-tuteja-bail\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court dismisses 13 SLPs in Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam case, including bail plea by former IAS Anil Tuteja<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a batch of 13 Special Leave Petitions (&#8216;SLPs&#8217;) filed in connection with the Chhattisgarh liquor scam case, the division bench comprising of M.M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. dismissed all the petitions. The SLPs challenged various FIRs registered in the States of Chhattisgarh and Uttar Pradesh, an Enforcement Case Information Report (&#8216;ECIR&#8217;), as well as the rejection of bail applications, including one filed by IAS officer Anil Tuteja.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anil Tuteja v Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4EWH8BQZ\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 2110<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/supreme-court-dismisses-rajasthan-khetri-estate-upholds-will-khetri-trust\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court dismisses Rajasthan&#8217;s claim over Khetri Estate; Affirms validity of Raja Sardar Singh Will and Probate in favour of Khetri Trust<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment passed by the Delhi High Court, wherein the Court upheld the validity of the Will of Late Raja Bahadur Sardar Singh of Khetri, holding that there had been due compliance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555650\" target=\"_blank\">63<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002835343\" target=\"_blank\">Indian Succession Act, 1925<\/a> (&#8216;IS Act&#8217;) and that the Will had been duly proved in accordance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516819\" target=\"_blank\">68<\/a> of the &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>, the division bench of B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. held that a State has no locus to challenge a Probate granted to a Will.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court further clarified that Section 29 of the Hindu Succession Act (which allows for escheat of property to the Government) would apply only in the event of a failure of heirs upon intestate succession. Therefore, until such a situation arises, the Government remains a stranger to both probate proceedings and succession under personal law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan v Ajit Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ApRKxZjH\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1992<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/amu-minority-status-verdict-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">[AMU Verdict] Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration: Supreme Court holds in 4:3 verdict<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal against Allahabad High Court&#8217;s Order in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naresh Agarwal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RNOoz813\" target=\"_blank\">2005 SCC OnLine All 1705<\/a>, whereby, Aligarh Muslim University&#8217;s (&#8216;AMU&#8217;) action of 50 per cent seat reservation in postgraduate medical courses for Muslim candidates by claiming it to be a minority institution, was struck down and held that AMU cannot have an exclusive reservation because it is not a minority institution, the Seven-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. DY Chandrachud,* CJ.<\/span>, Sanjiv Khanna, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Surya Kant,**<\/span> JB Pardiwala, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dipankar Datta,**<\/span> Manoj Misra and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma,**<\/span> JJ. in 4: 3 overruled the Five-Judge Bench verdict in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S. Azeez Basha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6qqzNsAx\" target=\"_blank\">1967 SCC OnLine SC 321<\/a>, which held that an institution incorporated by a statute cannot claim to be a minority institution, hence AMU as created by an Act of Parliament, is not a minority institution so as to be covered under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;To be a minority institution, it only had to be established by the minority and not necessarily be administered by the minority members. Minority institutions may wish to emphasise secular education and for that minority members are not needed in administration&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Chief Justice authored the majority opinion in the case, joined by Justices Sanjiv Khanna, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra. In contrast, Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Satish Chandra Sharma each wrote separate dissenting opinions, outlining their differing perspectives on the matter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In his dissenting opinion, Justice Sharma said that the bench of two judges in Anjuman (supra) could not have referred the matter to a bench of seven Judges directly, without the Chief Justice of India, being a part of the bench. He mentioned that &#8220;establishment&#8221; of an institution by the minority is necessary for the said minority to claim right of administration under Article 30. The words &#8220;establish&#8221; and &#8220;administer&#8221; are used conjunctively in Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. He clarified that the term &#8220;establish&#8221; in Article 30 means &#8220;to bring into existence or to create&#8221; and cannot be conflated with generic phrases such as &#8220;genesis of the institution&#8221; or the &#8220;founding moment of the institution&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aligarh Muslim University<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naresh Agarwal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5u01SECg\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3213<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/dissent-amu-minority-status-verdict-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">We dissent! Here&#8217;s why 3 out of 7 Supreme Court Judges ruled against AMU&#8217;s minority status<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/03\/sc-policy-identifying-creamy-layer-in-sc-st-to-exclude-them-from-reservation-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Identify and exclude &#8216;creamy layer&#8217; among SC\/ STs from reservation: Supreme Court in Sub-classification of SC\/STs Verdict<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a batch of civil appeal and special leave petitions, the seven Judge Constitution Bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. DY Chandrachud,* CJI, B.R. Gavai,* Vikram Nath,* Bela M. Trivedi,** Pankaj Mithal<\/span>, Manoj Misra, and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma,*<\/span> JJ., by a majority of 6:1, held that sub-classification of Scheduled Castes among reserved categories is permissible for granting separate quotas for more backwards within the SC categories. Justice Bela M. Trivedi dissented, holding that such sub-classification is not permissible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Punjab<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Davinder Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/goj4JjTP\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1860<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/05\/not-all-private-properties-are-material-resources-of-community-under-art-39b-for-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Not all private properties are &#8216;material resources of community&#8217; under Art. 39(b) for state to equally distribute; Supreme Court rules in landmark 7:2 verdict<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Nine-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. DY Chandrachud,* CJI.<\/span>, Hrishikesh Roy, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.V. Nagarathna,**<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sudhanshu Dhulia,*<\/span> J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Rajesh Bindal, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih, JJ., delivered its judgment on the issue of whether private resources form part of the &#8216;material resource of the community&#8217; under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575241\" target=\"_blank\">39(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The majority judgment delivered by CJI Dr. DY Chandrachud by ratio of 7:2 held that that all the &#8216;private properties&#8217; cannot form part of the &#8216;material resources of the community&#8217; under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575241\" target=\"_blank\">39(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The Court unanimously held that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575139\" target=\"_blank\">31-C<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> to the extent that it was upheld in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225 remains in force.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Property Owners Assn.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/W9794pFI\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3122<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/06\/private-resource-can-become-resource-of-community-distributed-for-common-good-justice-bv-nagarathna\/\" target=\"_blank\">How private resources become resources &#8216;of community&#8217; &amp; distributed for common good? Deciphering Justice BV Nagarathna&#8217;s partial dissent in 9-J Bench verdict<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/29\/supreme-court-sets-aside-patna-hc-order-postponing-bail-implementation-six-months\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court overturns Patna High Court&#8217;s Order postponing bail implementation for six months<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a special leave petition filed against the order of Patna High Court, wherein without deciding the matter on merits, the High Court has granted the bail to the accused, subject to the condition that the accused shall furnish the bail bonds after six months of the passing of the order, the division bench of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. said that there are no reasons assigned as to why the implementation of the order granting bail was postponed for six months. The Bench opined that no such condition could be imposed for grant of bail to a person\/accused. If the Court is satisfied on merits, it should grant bail or otherwise, reject the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nanhak Manjhi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/j6hXgz68\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3110<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/23\/states-have-power-to-regulate-intoxicating-liquor-majority-opinion-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"Hyperlink\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read Supreme Court&#8217;s Majority Opinion on States&#8217; power to regulate industry of &#8216;Intoxicating Liquor&#8217;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a significant ruling, the 9-Judge Bench of the Court with a ratio of 8:1, held that States have the legislative power to regulate &#8216;intoxicating liquor&#8217;. The majority of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dr. DY Chandrachud,* CJ.<\/span>, Hrishikesh Roy, Abhay S. Oka, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Ujjal Bhuyan, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih, JJ., had held that Entry 8 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution is both an industry-based entry and a product-based entry. The words that follow the expression &#8220;that is to say&#8221; in the Entry are not exhaustive of its contents. It includes the regulation of everything from the raw materials to the consumption of &#8216;intoxicating liquor&#8217;. The majority also overruled 7-Judge Bench ruling in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P., (1990) 1 SCC 109. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.V. Nagarathna, J**.<\/span>, was the sole dissenting voice on several aspects of the majority decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Lalta Prasad Vaish<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5i08CRDJ\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3029<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Also Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/25\/dissenting-opinion-justice-bv-nagarathna-state-power-regulate-intoxicating-liquor-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">What Justice Nagarathna held on States&#8217; power to regulate &#8216;Industrial alcohol&#8217; as lone dissenting voice in 8:1 verdict<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder &amp; abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case&#8217;s foundations<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering the instant appeal challenging 2015 decision by Patna High Court to uphold conviction and sentencing of 5 accused persons and reversing acquittal of 2 accused persons in connection to a murder case in 1985; the Division Bench of Bela M. Trivedi and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ., on detailed analysis of the case, found that the prosecution failed to discharge its burden to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The reasonable doubts were irreconcilable and struck at the foundation of the prosecution&#8217;s case. Therefore, the Court set aside the conviction and sentence of the 7 accused persons and acquitted them of all charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court emphasised that in order to reverse a finding of acquittal, a higher threshold is required. The presumption of innocence operating in favour of an accused throughout the trial gets concretized with a finding of acquittal by the Trial Court. Thus, such a finding could not be reversed merely because the possibility of an alternate view was alive.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vijay Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/28f2g5Jx\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2623<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/31\/case-of-impersonation-and-conspiracy-sc-seeks-explanation-from-notary-registry\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court seeks explanation from Notary &amp; Registry over alleged attestation of fake signatures and inclusion of names of non-appeared advocates<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a criminal special leave petition before the Division Bench of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. it was pointed out by the petitioner, present in person before the Court that he did not know either of the advocates\/ AORs who were representing him and that he came to know about the present proceedings filed in his name only when the Police Station of his area came to serve Court notice upon him. The Division Bench of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. expressed utter shock in the matter, which disclosed notarisation of fake signatures, inclusion of names of advocates\/AORs who did not appear and allegations of conspiracy against a witness in a famous case. The Bench directed the Notary to file an affidavit explaining the procedure of notarizing any document and also explaining as to why he attested the signatures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhagwan Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Rbu3Arnj\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 2318<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/29\/supreme-court-verdict-royalty-as-tax-states-power-to-levy-cess-on-mining-mineral-use-activities\/\" target=\"_blank\">Explained | Supreme Court&#8217;s verdict on &#8216;royalty&#8217; as tax and States power to levy cess on mining and mineral-use activities<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a matter concerning the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States on the taxation of mineral rights, the Nine Judge Constitution Bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI, Hrishikesh Roy, Abhay S Oka, BV Nagarathna, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Ujjal Bhuyan, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih JJ. has held that royalty paid by mining operators to the Central government is not a tax and that States have the power to levy cesses on mining and mineral-use activities. Whereas, Justice BV Nagarathna, gave a dissenting opinion.<\/p>\n<p>The Majority held the following:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Royalty is not a tax. Royalty is a contractual consideration paid by the mining lessee to the lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights. The liability to pay royalty arises out of the contractual conditions of the mining lease. The payments made to the Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because the statute provides for their recovery as arrears.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Entry 50 of List II does not constitute an exception to the position of law laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M. P. V. Sundararamier &amp; Co.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of A.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/23z5A6cu\" target=\"_blank\">1958 SCC OnLine SC 22<\/a>. The legislative power to tax mineral rights vests with the State legislatures. Parliament does not have legislative competence to tax mineral rights under Entry 54 of List I, it being a general entry. Since the power to tax mineral rights is enumerated in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers with respect to that subject-matter.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mineral Area Development Authority<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SAIL<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/IuqM46pR\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1796<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/14\/judgment-on-state-power-levy-tax-mining-mineral-use-activities-apply-retrospectively-from-2005-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">Judgment on States&#8217; power to levy tax on mining and mineral-use activities to apply retrospectively from 2005: Supreme Court<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a matter concerning the question of applicability of the judgment dated 25-7-2024 in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mineral Area Development Authority<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SAIL<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/IuqM46pR\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1796<\/a> (&#8216;MADA&#8217;) , the 8 judges, who wrote the majority view in the 9- Judge Constitution Bench verdict, directed that while the States may levy or renew demands of tax, if any, pertaining to Entries 49 and 50 of List II of the Seventh Schedule in terms of the law laid down in the decision in MADA (supra), the demand of tax shall not operate on transactions made prior to 1-4-2005.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mineral Area Development Authority<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Steel Authority of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pzSpzJCE\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1974<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/supreme-court-settles-child-custody-battle-after-9-yrs\/\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court settles child custody battle after 9 yrs; Discusses seriousness of allegations of parental alienation syndrome<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a civil appeal against the Delhi High Court&#8217;s decision partly allowing the appeal filed by the Respondent- mother against the Family Court&#8217;s decision and setting aside the underlying order, whereby the permanent custody of minor children was granted to the appellant-father and provided visitation rights to the mother, the Division Bench of Vikram Nath and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court&#8217;s decision. The Court directed that the custody of the minor children be retained by the father, subject to the mother&#8217;s visitation rights as granted by the Family Court vide the underlying order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;The Courts ought not to prematurely and without identification of individual instances of &#8216;alienating behaviour&#8217;, label any parent as propagator and or potential promoter of such behaviour and that this label has far-reaching implications which must not be imputed or attributed to an individual parent routinely.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramneesh Pal Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sugandhi Aggarwal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/46DAb6E4\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 847<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/18\/sc-grants-interim-relief-allows-participation-in-selection-of-navik-in-indian-coast-guard-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Candidature rejected for late submission of OBC certificate | Supreme Court grants ad interim relief, allows participation in selection process of Navik in Indian Coast Guard<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a special leave to appeal against Delhi High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the petitioner&#8217;s writ petition challenging the rejection of his candidature for appointment to the post of Navik (General Duty) in the Indian Coast Guard (respondent) was dismissed, the three Judge Bench comprising of BR Gavai, Satish Chandra Sharma and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. issued notice and gave interim relief by way of an ad interim direction to the respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the selection process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Chanchali Gowrinaidu<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Indian Coast Guard<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mo2Ta64q\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 557<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/14\/sc-alters-conviction-under-section-302-to-s-304-part-ii-ipc-for-firing-in-marriage-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Celebratory firing during marriage ceremonies has disastrous consequences; Supreme Court alters conviction u\/s 302 to S. 304 Part II IPC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a criminal appeal against Allahabad High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the convict&#8217;s application against his conviction and life imprisonment sentence by the Trial Court for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and five years rigorous imprisonment for offence under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567304\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001567306\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002775593\" target=\"_blank\">Arms Act, 1959<\/a> (&#8216;Arms Act&#8217;) was dismissed, the Division Bench of Vikram Nath and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ. allowed the appeal and altered the conviction to offence under Section 299 of the IPC i.e., punishable under Section 304 Part II of the IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shahid Ali<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/29wpEdP6\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 259<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<h3>Notable High Court Judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma<\/h3>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/07\/dhc-directs-mcd-to-conduct-regular-monitoring-of-azad-market-delhi-to-identify-persons-violating-fire-norms-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court directs MCD to conduct regular monitoring of Azad Market, Delhi to identify persons violating fire norms<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The present petition was filed as a public interest litigation (&#8216;PIL&#8217;) seeking directions from this Court to be issued to respondents in relation to inter alia (i) conducting a survey in order to identify unauthorized and illegal construction in the Azad Market, Delhi (&#8216;the Subject Area&#8217;); and (ii) to take action against such properties situated in the Subject Area. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.*<\/span>, and Tushar Rao Gedela, J., opined that the grievance raised by petitioner had been sufficiently addressed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (&#8216;MCD&#8217;) through the considerable efforts it had made in relation to clearing unauthorized and illegal construction in the Subject Area. However, the Court opined that it could not turn a blind eye towards any potential violations of Fire Norms, and accordingly directed the MCD and the Delhi Fire Services to ensure scrupulous and rigorous enforcement of the Fire Norms pertaining to premises specified under Rule 27 of the Delhi Fire Service Rules, 2010 (&#8216;the Delhi Fire Rules&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Azad Market Residents Welfare Assn.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ministry of Home Affairs<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v98U6833\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 7115<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/06\/delhi-hc-directs-jal-board-enforcement-prohibition-employment-manual-scavengers-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court directs State, Delhi Jal Board and MCD to comply with Supreme Court directions for enforcement of PEMSR Act, 2013<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">A petition was filed for strict enforcement of the provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002935515\" target=\"_blank\">Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013<\/a> (&#8220;PEMSR Act&#8221;) and the Rules framed thereunder. A division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ.*<\/span>, and Tushar Rao Gedela, J., directed the Government of NCT of Delhi, the Delhi Jal Board, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to strictly comply with the directions as laid down by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Balram Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uy4R3Q0V\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1386<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ashok Agarwal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5r7aQ5ce\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 7114<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/03\/delhi-hc-directs-issue-guidelines-implementation-reservation-policy-disabled-persons-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Disabled persons compelled to run pillar to post by organisation like KVS&#8217;; Delhi High Court directs Social Justice Ministry to issue guidelines for the implementation of reservation policy<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">A PIL was filed based upon a letter dated 7-12-2022 of the National Association of Deaf (NAD) through its President Mr. A.S. Narayanan being aggrieved by advertisements issued by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) inviting applications for various posts of Principal, Vice Principal, Post-Graduate Teacher (PGT), Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT), Librarian, Primary Teacher (Music), Finance Officer, as well as other posts. A division bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ., and Sanjeev Narula, JJ., held that the KVS in respect of the identified posts as per the notification dated 4-1-2021, shall issue an advertisement and shall clear the backlog of vacancies within six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the judgment. The Court directed the Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment concerned to issue suitable guidelines for the implementation of reservation policy by all departments in a uniform manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Court on its own motion<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">KVS<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5r7aQ5ce\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 6993<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/30\/delhi-high-court-change-policy-contrary-group-interests-unconstitutional-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">[National Policy on Biofuels] Change in policy causing hardship or contrary to group interest does not necessarily render it unconstitutional: Delhi High Court<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">A PIL was filed raising concerns regarding the National Policy on Biofuels, 2018 [&#8220;NBP 2018&#8221;], promulgated by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India (respondent 2) on 4-6-2018, and subsequently amended on 15-6-2022. A division bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ., and Sanjeev Narula, J., held that given the in-built mechanism of the NBP 2018, aimed at balancing the country&#8217;s competing needs, the Petitioner&#8217;s anxiety over the possible ramifications on accessibility and availability of food as well as the industry, does not call for this Court&#8217;s intervention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Neeraj Kumar Dubey<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, W.P.(C) 12262 of 2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/notification-disallowing-use-of-donor-gametes-in-surrogacy-contradicts-surrogacy-act-art-act-dhc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Notification disallowing use of donor gametes in surrogacy contradicts principles under Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021: Delhi High Court<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioners before this Court were intending couples availing surrogacy services under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000996527\" target=\"_blank\">Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021<\/a> (&#8216;Surrogacy Act&#8217;), whose long-anticipated surrogacy procedures had been abruptly halted on account of the Notification No. 179(E) dated 14-03-2023, issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (&#8216;Impugned Notification&#8217;), by which the use of donor gametes in surrogacy procedures was disallowed by amending Paragraph 1(d) of Form 2 under Rule 7 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022 (&#8216;Surrogacy Rules&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J., and Sanjeev Narula, J., held that prima facie, the Impugned Notification violated the basic rights of a married infertile couple to parenthood by denying them access to legally and medically regulated procedures and services. Further, the Impugned Notification did not disclose any rational justification, basis, or intelligible criteria for discriminating between citizens based on their ability to produce gametes for the purpose of availing Surrogacy services. Further, the Court opined that petitioners possessed a vested and constitutionally protected right to parenthood and the amendment could not be allowed to retroactively render their legally fertilized embryo unviable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ravikant Chauhan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, W.P.(C) 6020 of 2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/22\/dhc-issues-directives-to-increase-awareness-about-schemes-for-prisoners-their-dependents-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court issues directions to increase awareness about social, developmental schemes for prisoners and their dependents<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a case wherein a suo motu Public Interest Litigation (&#8216;PIL&#8217;) was registered in respect of the well-being of the family members of under trial prisoners as well as convicts, the Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J., and Sanjeev Narula, J., opined that various departments and ministries including Ministry of Skill Development, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, and Ministry of Rural Development, etc. were actively implementing social and developmental schemes and the dependents of prisoners were eligible to benefit from these programs. However, the Court issued directions to increase awareness and publicity of the existing schemes, ensuring that prisoners and their dependents were informed and could readily access the respective benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;By ensuring that convicts, undertrials, and their dependents are aware of and can access benefits designed for their welfare will be crucial in rehabilitation and social reintegration.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Court on its Own Motion<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, W.P.(C) 1481 of 2015<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/21\/dhc-directs-administration-to-ensure-functionality-of-commercial-courts-when-infrastructure-officers-are-available-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court directs its administration to ensure that Commercial Courts are made fully functional whenever infrastructure and Officers are available<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">A PIL was filed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the respondents to set up Commercial Courts in Delhi, in furtherance of the decision taken by the Cabinet of the Government of Delhi for creation of 22 Commercial Courts and 42 additional posts of judges in Delhi. The Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J., and Sanjeev Narula, J., directed that the Delhi High Court (&#8216;High Court&#8217;) shall ensure that all the Commercial Courts were made fully functional as and when the infrastructure was available and Officers were available to be appointed to the post of District Judge, Commercial Courts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amit Sahni<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">High Court of Delhi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4YDY3A7f\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 6718<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/17\/dhc-sets-aside-2018-recruitment-advertisement-published-by-kvs-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Failed to implement 4% reservation criteria for persons with benchmark disability&#8217;; Delhi HC sets aside 2018 recruitment advertisement published by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner, National Federation of the Blind (&#8216;federation&#8217;) was aggrieved by non-implementation of statutory reservation for Persons with Disabilities (&#8216;PwDs&#8217;), particularly for blind persons, in recruitment process by respondent, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (&#8216;Sangathan&#8217;). The petitioner seeks implementation of statutory and constitutional mandate regarding reservations for persons with visual disabilities. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.*<\/span>, and Sanjeev Narula, J., held that respondent has failed to implement minimum 4% reservation criteria as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002338239\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776237\" target=\"_blank\">Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) in Advertisement No. 14 (&#8216;impugned advertisement&#8217;) published by respondent for recruitment and thus, the same was set aside. The Court further held that the impugned advertisement distinguished persons with disabilities from others and had put a restriction on their potential to participate in the recruitment process to their full ability and as per Section 33 of the Act, the primary function of identification of posts was of appropriate government, thus, there was no power with respondent or its committee to revisit and cut short the list notified by the government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;An act of discrimination is not only a denial of promise of equal protection before the law. Rather, every act of exclusion is an assault on the dignity of a person. Instead of providing an equal space to grow, we have been compelling the persons with disabilities to prove, time and again, that they are capable of a lot more than we think.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">National Federation of the Blind<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">KVS<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0S5h2CHH\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 6545<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/29\/delhi-high-court-dismiss-pil-degree-not-specified-ugc-act-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court dismisses PIL highlighting inaction of UGC in relation to Universities providing unspecified courses; Directs UGC for compliance with UGC Act, 1956<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">n a petition filed by the petitioner highlighting the inaction of the University Grants Commission (&#8216;UGC&#8217;) with respect to Universities\/ Institution\/ Colleges providing unspecified courses, a division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma,* CJ.<\/span>, and Sanjeev Narula, J., did not pass specific order and directed UGC to comply with the provisions of the UGC Act, 1956.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rahul Mahajan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ministry of Education<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9069J48Z\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 6117<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/11\/delhi-high-court-directs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-to-conduct-recruitment-drive-and-fill-up-vacancies-reserved-for-persons-with-disabilities-national-federation-of-blind-legal-news-research-awareness\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court directs GNCTD to undertake special recruitment drive for filling up backlog of vacancies for Persons with Disabilities<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a petition filed by the National Federation of the Blind (NFB) (petitioner) alleging inaction on the part of the State (respondent) in filling up the vacancies which are reserved for Blind and Low Vision candidates. It is further challenging the inaction on the part of the State in not providing reservations to Disabled Persons (Blind and Low Vision) keeping in view Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001518274\" target=\"_blank\">33<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000067742\" target=\"_blank\">Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995<\/a> read with Right of Persons with Disabilities Rules 2017. A division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ.*<\/span>, and Subramonium Prasad, J., directed the Chief Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) to undertake a special recruitment drive for filling up the backlog of vacancies for the Persons with Disabilities in a time bound manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">National Federation of the Blind<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qoD0gM3v\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 1403<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/delhi-hc-directs-to-conduct-training-programme-for-newly-recruited-public-prosecutors-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Post of Public Prosecutor is an integral part of criminal court system&#8217;; Delhi High Court directs Government of Delhi to conduct training of newly recruited public prosecutors<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a case which was inherently for the revision of pay scales of Assistant Public Prosecutors, the Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. and Sanjeev Narula, J., directed Government of Delhi to coordinate with Delhi Judicial Academy to conduct training of the newly recruited public prosecutors, and file a status report regarding the implementation of direction regarding training programmes, and the latest position of vacancies in respect of public prosecutors. A letter dated 13-9-2023 issued by the Government of India to Anil Soni, Central Government Standing Counsel, was brought to the notice of this Court by Chetan Sharma, ASG, informing that the matter in respect of revision of pay scales of Assistant Public Prosecutors was under active consideration of Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Further it was stated that the Union of India had requested the Chief Secretary, Government of Delhi to provide &#8216;total financial implication&#8217; for revision of pay scales of Assistant Public Prosecutors working under the Directorate of Prosecution, Government of Delhi, as per their proposal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Delhi Prosecutors Welfare Assn.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajiv Mehrishi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/I6M5npGe\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 5814<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/20\/delhi-high-court-directs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-bsnl-to-initiate-departmental-action-on-allegations-of-criminal-conspiracy-relating-to-tender-phase-vii-expansion-cellular-mobile-network-legalnew\/#%3A%7E%3Atext%3DVii%2520Expansion%2520Tender-%2CDelhi%2520High%2520Court%2520directs%2520BSNL%2520to%2520initiate%2520departmental%2520action%2520against%2Cmust%2520be%2520initiated%2520against%2520Mr.\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court directs BSNL to initiate departmental action against officers on allegations of criminal conspiracy relating to Cellular Mobile Network&#8217;s Phase-VII Expansion tender<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a petition filed by the petitioner, a society working towards protecting the interests of consumers in the telecom sector, seeking direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate a complaint dated 11-3-2016, sent by the petitioner to the CBI alleging a criminal conspiracy between some officials of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) &amp; Chinese vendor M\/S ZTE Telecom Ltd. in relation to a tender invited by the BSNL for Planning, Engineering, Supply, Installation, Testing, Commissioning and Annual Maintenance of 14.37 million Lines for Phase-VII Expansion of GSM\/UMTS Based Cellular Mobile Network in North, East &amp; South Zones, a division bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ., and Subramonium Prasad, J., directed BSNL to initiate departmental action, as suggested by the CBI, against its officers without giving any opinion on the merits of the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Telecom Watchdog<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CBI<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/i941O444\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 759<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/ensure-periodic-audit-for-safety-security-measures-at-stations-delhi-hc-directs-railways\/\" target=\"_blank\">Delhi High Court directs Indian Railways to ensure periodic audit for safety and security measures at Stations<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a case wherein a writ petition had been filed as a Public Interest Litigation under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> by the petitioner, who was a practicing advocate in the Delhi High Court, wherein he prayed for directing the respondents to provide safety and security measures at every railway station in India, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.*<\/span>, and Saurabh Banerjee, J., opined that the measures undertaken by the Indian Railways clearly reflected that the safety and security of passengers was of paramount importance to the Railways, and they had been taking all necessary safeguards to ensure that there was no breach in respect of safety and security of passengers. The Court directed that the respondents should ensure that there was a periodic audit in respect of the safety and security measures in the Indian Railways.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kush Kalra<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O5RXmgpR\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 4370<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/18\/delhi-high-court-dismisses-pil-electric-vehicle-rule-compliance-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">A frivolous PIL wasting precious judicial time; Delhi High Court dismisses PIL highlighting issues regarding use of EVs in India<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a PIL filed by an advocate under Article 226 highlighting various issues pertaining to the use of electric vehicles (EVs) in the country, a division bench of Satish Chandra Sharma and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., dismissed the petition stating that the issues raised by the petitioner in the instant PIL have already been addressed through relevant statutes, rules and notifications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court held that no orders or directions are required to be passed as the relevant provisions of the MV Act and CMV Rules are already applicable to EVs, specifically pertaining to mandatory insurance cover, wearing of headgear on two-wheelers and penal provisions for noncompliance of the provisions. Similarly, as the Union of India has already prescribed standards to be followed by manufacturers for batteries to be used in battery operated vehicles\/EVs, there is no need for any orders\/directions to be passed by this Court in that regard as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajat Kapoor Advocate<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d28PHDHc\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 5666<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/delhi-hc-allows-continuation-of-stem-cell-treatment-for-children-with-autism-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Abrupt cessation might not be in best interest of patients&#8217;; Delhi High Court allows continuation of stem cell treatment for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a case wherein the petitioners filed the present petition impugning recommendations dated 6-12-2022 issued by the Committee on Stem Cell Use in Autism Spectrum Disorder constituted by Ethics and Medical Registration Board (&#8216;EMRB&#8217;) of the National Medical Commission (&#8216;NMC&#8217;), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.*<\/span>, and Sanjeev Narula, J., held that an abrupt cessation of the stem cell treatment might not be in the best interests of the patients involved and while granting permission to the petitioners to continue the stem cell treatment, the Court opined that they must do so with full knowledge and at their own risk.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dalip Kaur<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/67BURL54\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 5491<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/no-permission-to-be-granted-for-installation-of-any-statue-or-construction-of-any-structure-in-public-roads-pavements-sideways-and-other-public-utility-places\/\" target=\"_blank\">Karnataka High Court | No permission to be granted for installation of any statue or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma CJ. and Sachin Shankar Magadum J. allowed the petition and quashed the orders passed by the State Govbernment dated 3-3-2017 and the order dated 28-8-2017 of Mysuru Mahanagara Palike.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court observed that Supreme Court has categorically directed the State Governments not to grant any permission for installation of any statue or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places and therefore on account of the order passed by the Supreme Court, the question of permitting the State Government and Mysuru Mahanagar Palike to install the statue does not arise. The Court thus held &#8220;neither the petitioners nor any one can install the statue on the island which is on the road (circle which is on the road) keeping in view the judgment delivered by the Supreme Court&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Akhila Bharata Kshatriya Mahasabha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, Writ petition No. 49960 of 2017, decided on 7-9-2021<\/span>]<\/p>\n<h3>Telangana High Court upholds the legality of the land regularization process<\/h3>\n<p style=\"\">In an appeal challenging the action of the Government of Andhra Pradesh in regularizing the occupation of respondent in relation to a piece of land, as per Government Order dated 17-1-2005, a Division bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.*<\/span> and Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J., affirmed the Single Judge&#8217;s decision, emphasising that the appellant lacked any right or possession over the land. The Court upheld the legality of the land regularization process and dismissed the appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nagarjuna Nagar Welfare Assn.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Telangana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0CA4kPA0\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine TS 775<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/25\/karnataka-high-court-2\/\" target=\"_blank\">Karnataka High Court directs State to ensure that no display boards, unauthorized advertisements, hoardings in respect of various Government projects are to be displayed in public places<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ and Sachin Shankar Magadum, J. directed State Government to ensure that no display boards, unauthorized advertisements, hoardings at public places as well as in respect of various Government projects are displayed in future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court directed respondent State <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;to ensure that in future also, no display boards, unauthorized advertisements, hoardings at public places as well as in respect of various Government projects are displayed in future.&#8221;<\/span> The Court further directed the Government <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;to take prompt action in the matter keeping in view the Circular and the orders passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Common Cause (supra).&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">H.M. Venkatesh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1zhpcF6i\" target=\"_blank\">2021 SCC OnLine Kar 14703<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/19\/public-trust-doctrine\/\" target=\"_blank\">[Public Trust Doctrine] State largesse should not be marred by any arbitrariness while dealing with alienation of natural resources: Karnataka High Court<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma CJ and Sachin Shankar Magadum J allowed the petition, quashed the initial allotment of the site to respondent 3 and sets aside the allotment order made in favour of respondent 3.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The most shocking aspect of the case is that an instrumentality of the State i.e., KHB has allotted the site in question without following the allotment regulations. There is a detailed procedure provided under the KHB Regulations for allotment of sites and the procedure has not been followed at all especially when the site was reserved as a Civic Amenity Site.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court held that in the present case, the land has been allotted by the KHB without following a transparent procedure. Therefore, &#8220;the allotment order, as well as the subsequent sale deed in favour of respondent No.3, deserves to be quashed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Adinarayan Shetty<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Principal Secretary<\/span>, Writ Petition 9616 of 2020, decided on 30-9-2021<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/29\/kar-hc-directs-state-government-to-provide-text-books-in-braille-for-all-special-children-visual-disabilities-positively-within-a-period-of-15-days-from-the-date-of-order\/\" target=\"_blank\">Karnataka High Court directs State Government to provide text books in Braille for all special children (visual disabilities) positively within a period of 15 days from the date of order<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ. and Sachin Shankar Magadum J. directed the State Government to provide textbooks in Braille for all specially abled children having visual disabilities within a period of 15 days. The Court directed <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;as next academic year has already been commenced, the State Government is directed to provide text books in Brailee for all special children (visual disabilities) positively within a period of 15 days from today, if the same has not been done&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">National Federation of Blind<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, WP No. 52201 of 2019, decided on 17-9-2021<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/covid-19-10\/\" target=\"_blank\">Karnataka High Court | Freedom struggle cannot be compared to the lockdown imposed due to COVID &#8212; 19 pandemic; Misuse of PIL a serious concern<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a case where the petitioner is an advocate and a trade unionist as well as a social activist who filed this present public interest litigation stating that the Karnataka Police is assaulting persons as and when they are going out from houses during the lockdown period, the Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma and M. Nagaprasanna, JJ., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the petitioner has not been brought on record any instance or documentary proof to demonstrate that persons have been assaulted by the police for violating the lockdown orders. It was also observed that the petitioner being a party in person, who is also an Advocate is fully aware of the process of filing an FIR and in case, the police is not registering a case, he has a remedy of filing a complaint under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519450\" target=\"_blank\">200<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court further observed <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;This Court does not rule out the possibility of one or two cases of such alleged atrocities, but there is a remedy available in law of filing a compliant under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Roving enquiry cannot be done as prayed for by the learned counsel for petitioner.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S. Balakrishnan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/x6wo7I75\" target=\"_blank\">2021 SCC OnLine Kar 12782<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/09\/mp-hc-no-interference-of-court-required-in-auction-process-if-account-has-been-rightly-declared-npa\/\" target=\"_blank\">Madhya Pradesh High Court | No interference of Court required in auction process if account has been rightly declared NPA<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In ad petition file against a judgment passed in appeal by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, a Division bench comprising of Satish Chandra Sharma and Virender Singh, JJ., while going through the process of auction, Court found no illegality on part of the Bank while recovering the dues from the mortgaged property. The Court found no reason to interfere with the auction process conducted by the Bank, therefore, this writ petition was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mayunk Industries<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union Bank of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/OeTf88n1\" target=\"_blank\">2019 SCC OnLine MP 9<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/mp-hc-no-orders-passed-in-pil-as-municipal-corpn-undertook-satisfactory-measures-to-manage-stray-animals-and-allied-problems\/\" target=\"_blank\">Madhya Pradesh High Court | No orders passed in PIL as municipal corpn. undertook satisfactory measures to manage stray animals and allied problems<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"\">In a PIL seeking directions to the State for necessary action to control and prevent rabies to the resident by the expanded population of stray dogs in the locality, a Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma and Virendra Singh, JJ., held Municipal Corporation has taken all possible steps to control the population of stray dogs and its ongoing process. Resultantly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. It further directed the Corporation to continue with the sterilization until all strays are sterilized and to start with a campaign for public awareness related to birth and control of strays, it directed State to provide a free supply of rabies vaccines for all aggrieved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sanjay<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">District Collector<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dXjeA54Z\" target=\"_blank\">2019 SCC OnLine MP 855<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<h3>Madhya Pradesh High Court declined to interfere with the reassessment where identity of cash creditors was found doubtful<\/h3>\n<p style=\"\">While deciding whether the Assessing Authority had sufficient reason to believe that the petitioner&#8217;s income had escaped assessment, a division bench comprising of Shantanu Kemkar and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Satish Chandra Sharma,*<\/span> JJ., held that there was a valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment because though the petitioner had furnished information about parties from whom it received cash, but the identity of these parties was doubtful. The Court declined admission, noting that the petitioner had an alternate remedy under the Income-tax Act, and there was no ground for interference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dewas Soya Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CIT<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/J1h4ZH73\" target=\"_blank\">2011 SCC OnLine MP 2315<\/a><\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">* Judge who has penned the judgment.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">** Judge who penned the dissenting judgment.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sci.gov.in\/judge\/justice-satish-chandra-sharma\/\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Satish Chandra Sharma | Supreme Court of India | India<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/judicialacademy.nic.in\/organisation\/hon%E2%80%99ble-mr-justice-satish-chandra-sharma\" target=\"_blank\">JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA<\/a>, Delhi Judicial Academy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/delhihighcourt.nic.in\/judges\/court\/cj_sitting\/former\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Satish Chandra Sharma<\/a>, High Court of Delhi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/judicialacademy.nic.in\/organisation\/hon%E2%80%99ble-mr-justice-satish-chandra-sharma\" target=\"_blank\">JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA<\/a>, Delhi Judicial Academy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sci.gov.in\/judge\/justice-satish-chandra-sharma\/\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Satish Chandra Sharma | Supreme Court of India | India<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> Supra.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/judicialacademy.nic.in\/organisation\/hon%E2%80%99ble-mr-justice-satish-chandra-sharma\" target=\"_blank\">JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA<\/a>, Delhi Judicial Academy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> Supra.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/31\/mp-hc-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-transferred-as-a-judge-of-karnataka-hc\/\" target=\"_blank\">MP HC | Justice Satish Chandra Sharma appointed as a Judge of Karnataka HC<\/a>, SCC Blog<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/27\/justice-satish-chandra-sharma\/\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Satish Chandra Sharma appointed as Acting Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court<\/a>, SCC Blog<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn11\" href=\"#fnref11\">11.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.delhihighcourt.nic.in\/web\/Judges\/justice-satish-chandra-sharma\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Satish Chandra Sharma<\/a>, High Court of Delhi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn12\" href=\"#fnref12\">12.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/07\/sc-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-3-chief-justices-of-hc-as-judges-of-sc-of-india-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">SC Collegium recommends appointment of 3 Chief Justices of High Courts as Judges of the Supreme Court of India<\/a>, SCC Blog<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn13\" href=\"#fnref13\">13.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/09\/centre-clears-appointment-of-three-chief-justices-of-high-court-as-the-supreme-court-of-indias-cc-blog-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">Three new Judges of the Supreme Court of India take oath<\/a>, SCC Blog<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Following a meticulous assessment of the qualifications, integrity, capabilities and giving due consideration to a range of factors, the President appointed Justice Satish Chandra Sharma as Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 9-11-2023.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":368237,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38347],"tags":[38877,75810,13191,75809,87131,74409,10101,44666,71641,12191,23204,2672,34169],"class_list":["post-368207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-judges-information","tag-aligarh-muslim-university","tag-ceremonial-firing","tag-child-custody","tag-creamy-layer-for-sc-st","tag-district-judge-appointment","tag-industrial-alcohol","tag-judicial-officer","tag-justice-satish-chandra-sharma","tag-mining-royalty","tag-minority-institution","tag-pocso","tag-reservation","tag-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Know Your Judge | Supreme Court: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Profile | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Know all about the career and notable judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory &amp; notable judgments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Know all about the career and notable judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-30T05:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-01T04:34:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory &amp; notable judgments\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"47 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/\",\"name\":\"Know Your Judge | Supreme Court: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Profile | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-30T05:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-01T04:34:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Know all about the career and notable judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory &amp; notable judgments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Know Your Judge | Supreme Court: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Profile | SCC Times","description":"Know all about the career and notable judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory & notable judgments","og_description":"Know all about the career and notable judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-30T05:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-01T04:34:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory &amp; notable judgments","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"47 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/","name":"Know Your Judge | Supreme Court: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Profile | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-30T05:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-01T04:34:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Know all about the career and notable judgments by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, sitting Judge of the Supreme Court of India.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Justice Satish Chandra Sharma"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma\u2019s remarkable career trajectory &amp; notable judgments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-9-18.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":306707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/07\/sc-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-3-chief-justices-of-hc-as-judges-of-sc-of-india-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":368207,"position":0},"title":"SC Collegium recommends appointment of 3 Chief Justices of High Courts as Judges of the Supreme Court of India","author":"Ritu","date":"November 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Following a meticulous assessment of the qualifications, the Collegium on 06-11-2023, recommended the names of the Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Justice Augustine George Masih, and Justice Sandeep Mehta, Chief Justices of High Courts of Delhi, Rajasthan and Gauhati respectively, to be elevated as Judges of the Supreme Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court Collegium-2","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Collegium-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Collegium-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Collegium-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Supreme-Court-Collegium-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253375,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/27\/justice-satish-chandra-sharma\/","url_meta":{"origin":368207,"position":1},"title":"Justice Satish Chandra Sharma appointed as Acting Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Appointment of Acting Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court President appoints Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, senior-most Judge of Karnataka High Court, to perform the duties of the office of the Chief Justice of that High Court with effect from the date Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka relinquishes the charge as Chief\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/31\/mp-hc-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-transferred-as-a-judge-of-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":368207,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Justice Satish Chandra Sharma appointed as a Judge of Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Transfer Orders Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court transferred as a Judge of the Karnataka High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Karnataka High Court. ORDER Ministry of Law and Justice [Notification dt. 30-12-2020]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":336278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/30\/know-thy-judge-justice-satish-chandra-sharma-supreme-court-of-india-scc-times-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":368207,"position":3},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Satish Chandra Sharma &#8211; Supreme Court of India","author":"Ritu","date":"November 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Following a meticulous assessment of the qualifications, integrity, capabilities and giving due consideration to a range of factors, the President appointed Justice Satish Chandra Sharma as Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 09-11-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Satish Chandra Sharma","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-2024-11-30T114729.669.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-2024-11-30T114729.669.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-2024-11-30T114729.669.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-2024-11-30T114729.669.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266975,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/17\/sc-collegium-recommends-transfer-of-chief-justice-of-satish-chandra-sharma-of-telangana-hc-to-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":368207,"position":4},"title":"SC Collegium recommends transfer of Chief Justice of Satish Chandra Sharma of Telangana HC to Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the transfer of Mr Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Chief Justice, Telangana High Court to Delhi High Court. Supreme Court Collegium [Notification dt. 17-5-2022]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/13\/justice-satish-chandra-sharma-newly-appointed-judge-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":368207,"position":5},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge | Justice Satish Chandra Sharma","author":"Ritu","date":"November 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Following a meticulous assessment of the qualifications, integrity, capabilities and giving due consideration to a range of factors, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended and Centre Government approved the appointment of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma as Judge of the Supreme Court of India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Satish Chandra Sharma","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Justice-Satish-Chandra-Sharma.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Justice-Satish-Chandra-Sharma.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Justice-Satish-Chandra-Sharma.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Justice-Satish-Chandra-Sharma.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368207\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/368237"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}