{"id":367681,"date":"2025-11-25T16:30:47","date_gmt":"2025-11-25T11:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=367681"},"modified":"2025-12-01T09:36:22","modified_gmt":"2025-12-01T04:06:22","slug":"unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Adverse action against doctor who didn&#8217;t rise upon MLA&#8217;s arrival &#8220;highly disturbing&#8221; and unjust: P&#038;H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> The petition filed by the petitioner, a Casualty Medical Officer working with the Government of Haryana, challenging the withholding of his No Objection Certificate (&#8216;NOC&#8217;) by his employer, required to obtain admission in a Post-Graduate (&#8216;PG&#8217;) course, on account of pending disciplinary proceedings against him, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ashwani Kumar Mishra*<\/span> and Rohit Kapoor, JJ., held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA and keeping such proceedings pending for years and denying the petitioner an NOC on such basis, therefore, could not be sustained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court imposed a cost of Rs 50,000 on the respondent and directed the issuance of NOC to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During the COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner was on duty in the emergency ward of the Government Hospital. A Member of the Legislative Assembly (&#8216;MLA&#8217;) visited the hospital and was annoyed that the petitioner did not rise upon his arrival.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Show Cause Notice (&#8216;SCN&#8217;) was issued to the petitioner as the State proposed to impose a minor punishment under Rule 8 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 2016.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner had contended that he did not recognize the MLA and that his failure to stand was unintentional and did not amount to discourtesy. However, no final order was passed till date.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner had secured sufficient marks to obtain admission to a PG course and to apply as an in-service candidate, he required a NOC from his employer. The said certificate was withheld on the grounds that disciplinary proceedings were pending against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved thereby, he approached the High Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that, &#8220;<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">We are anguished and amazed at the action of the State in issuing the SCN to a Government Doctor who was on emergency duty during the COVID-19 period only because he did not rise when the MLA arrived.<\/span>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court stated that expecting a doctor to rise when an MLA enters the emergency ward of the hospital and to propose disciplinary action against him if he does not rise is highly disturbing. Considering that petitioner&#8217;s explanation regarding not doing anything to inflict insult was completely ignored, the Court held that it was insensitive on the part of the State to proceed against the petitioner on such a charge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that it would be equally arbitrary to deny the right to pursue higher medical education by withholding the NOC only because SCN was pending against him. The Court noted that pursuing medical education is a tough challenge, and students must perform exceptionally well even to secure admission in MBBS Course. Further, the Court stressed that it is well-known that medical courses require deep dedication and commitment over prolonged periods and after completing MBBS and joining Government service, a doctor is expected to provide medical facilities to the masses. The Court held that the public representatives and others responsible must extend respect and basic courtesies to such dedicated professionals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that &#8220;With anguish, we note that frequent reports surface in newspapers of dedicated medical professionals being ill-treated by relatives of patients or public representatives without valid cause. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Time has come when such undesirable incidents are checked and due recognition is extended to sincere medical professionals.<\/span>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA<\/span>. Keeping such proceedings pending for years and denying the petitioner an NOC on such a basis, therefore, could not be sustained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, thus, directed the respondent to issue the NOC to the petitioner. Further, the Court imposed a cost of Rs 50,000 on the respondent; to be deposited with Poor Patient Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Manoj v. State of Haryana, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zXppnsXT\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine P&#038;H 14627<\/a>, decided on 21-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ankit Chahal, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, Nihar Bala, Advocate, Sunanda Rani, Advocate and H. S. Gill, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">During the COVID-19 pandemic, an MLA visited hospital and was annoyed that the Government Casualty Medical Officer did not rise upon his arrival. Thus, a Show Cause Notice was issued to him regarding initiation of disciplinary proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":367682,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39924,14371,36115,93339,93338,93336,83531,20161,73146,32804,21584,93337,2670,18281],"class_list":["post-367681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-covid-19","tag-disciplinary-proceedings","tag-doctor","tag-government-casualty-medical-officer","tag-haryana-civil-services-punishment-and-appeal-rules-2016","tag-justice-ashwani-kumar-mishra","tag-justice-rohit-kapoor","tag-mbbs","tag-medical-exam","tag-mla","tag-no-objection-certificate","tag-post-graduate-course","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-show-cause-notice"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Unjust to allow adverse action against doctor because he did not rise upon MLA&#039;s arrival | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA; imposes Rs 50,000 cost on the State.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adverse action against doctor who didn&#039;t rise upon MLA&#039;s arrival &quot;highly disturbing&quot; and unjust: P&amp;H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA; imposes Rs 50,000 cost on the State.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-25T11:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-01T04:06:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Adverse action against doctor who didn&#039;t rise upon MLA&#039;s arrival &quot;highly disturbing&quot; and unjust: P&amp;H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Unjust to allow adverse action against doctor because he did not rise upon MLA's arrival | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-25T11:00:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-01T04:06:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA; imposes Rs 50,000 cost on the State.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"doctor did not rise upon MLA's arrival\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adverse action against doctor who didn&#8217;t rise upon MLA&#8217;s arrival &#8220;highly disturbing&#8221; and unjust: P&#038;H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unjust to allow adverse action against doctor because he did not rise upon MLA's arrival | SCC Times","description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA; imposes Rs 50,000 cost on the State.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adverse action against doctor who didn't rise upon MLA's arrival \"highly disturbing\" and unjust: P&H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA; imposes Rs 50,000 cost on the State.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-25T11:00:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-01T04:06:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Adverse action against doctor who didn't rise upon MLA's arrival \"highly disturbing\" and unjust: P&H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/","name":"Unjust to allow adverse action against doctor because he did not rise upon MLA's arrival | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-25T11:00:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-01T04:06:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court held that it would be wholly unjust and manifestly arbitrary to allow adverse action against a Doctor merely because he did not rise upon the arrival of an MLA; imposes Rs 50,000 cost on the State.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"doctor did not rise upon MLA's arrival"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/unjust-to-allow-adverse-action-against-doctor-because-he-did-not-rise-upo-mlas-arrival-ph-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adverse action against doctor who didn&#8217;t rise upon MLA&#8217;s arrival &#8220;highly disturbing&#8221; and unjust: P&#038;H High Court imposes Rs 50,000 cost on State"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/doctor-did-not-rise-upon-MLAs-arrival.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296379,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/10\/punjab-haryana-high-court-quashes-fir-against-makers-ram-siya-ke-luv-kush\/","url_meta":{"origin":367681,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court quashes FIR against makers of Colors TV serial \u2018Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush\u2019","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court was dealing with a matter involving allegations made by certain members of the Valmiki community regarding the role of Bhagwan Valmiki Ji being incorrectly depicted and telecast in Colors TV serial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237719,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/19\/kar-hc-approval-from-the-medical-council-for-the-purpose-of-practicing-as-a-private-medical-practitioner-cannot-be-withheld-by-the-authorities-on-arbitrary-grounds-writ-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":367681,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Approval from the Medical Council for the purpose of practicing as a private medical practitioner cannot be withheld by the authorities on arbitrary grounds; Writ Petition Allowed\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"October 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: R. Devdas, J., while allowing the present Writ Petition, directed the Medical Council to issue the No Objection Certificate to the Petitioner pending departmental enquiry. \u00a0Brief Facts That the petitioner, after completing MBBS graduation registered with respondent 5; Karnataka Medical Council and was thereby selected to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/07\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-proceedings-in-non-compoundable-offences-can-be-quashed-on-the-basis-of-compromise-between-accused-and-victim\/","url_meta":{"origin":367681,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Proceedings in non-compoundable offences can be quashed on the basis of compromise between accused and victim","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In the case relating to the compundable offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, 1860 and the non-compoundable offence under Section 13 of the Punjab Prevention of Human Smuggling Act, 2012, Anoop Chitkara, J., invoking the power under Section 482 CrPC, has quashed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/22\/punjab-haryana-high-court-orders-arrest-of-dismissed-punjab-dsp-balwinder-singh-sekhon-in-contempt-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":367681,"position":3},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court orders for arrest of dismissed Punjab DSP Balwinder Singh Sekhon in Contempt Case","author":"Editor","date":"February 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a case of circulating malicious, libelous and derogatory videos pertaining to the judicial proceedings, the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered the arrest of dismissed DSP Balwinder Singh Sekhon and another. The Court also directed global blocking of access to all the videos circulated so far.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/collegium-resolution-justice-p-v-sanjay-kumar-judge-telangana-hc-to-be-transferred-to-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":367681,"position":4},"title":"Collegium Resolution | Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar, Judge, Telangana HC to be transferred to P&#038;H HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium comprising of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and S.A. Bobde, N.V. Ramana, Arun Mishra and R.F. Nariman, JJ.\u00a0 resolves to recommend that Mr. Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar, Judge, Telangana High Court, be transferred, in the interest of better administration of justice, to Punjab & Haryana High Court. [Collegium Resolution dt.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220465,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-transfer-orders-of-justice-puligoru-venkata-sanjay-kumar-of-telangana-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":367681,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC | Transfer orders of Justice Puligoru Venkata Sanjay Kumar of Telangana HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Transfer Orders President is pleased to transfer Justice Puligoru Venkata Sanjay Kumar, Judge of the Telangana High Court, as a Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Punjab and Haryana High Court on or before 17th October,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367681\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}