{"id":367626,"date":"2025-11-25T11:00:34","date_gmt":"2025-11-25T05:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=367626"},"modified":"2025-11-29T10:09:05","modified_gmt":"2025-11-29T04:39:05","slug":"mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Disclaimer:<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This has been reported after the availability of the order of the Court and not on media reports so as to give an accurate report to our readers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0e101a;\">In an appeal filed by the husband against the Family Court&#8217;s judgment whereby his application for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion was rejected, the Division Bench of Vishal Dhagat and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B. P. Sharma*<\/span>, JJ., upheld the impugned judgment, holding that there was no error or perversity warranting interference and the Family Court correctly held that the husband had failed to prove the grounds of cruelty and desertion.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The parties got married in 2018 as per Hindu rites and customs. According to the husband, soon after the marriage, the wife started behaving rudely, avoided her marital responsibilities, frequently quarrelled without cause, and insulted him and his family members. On 08-12-2018, the wife left the matrimonial home without justification and did not return despite repeated requests and efforts made by him. He mentioned certain dates when he allegedly attempted reconciliation, claiming that the respondent on all these occasions refused to accompany him to the matrimonial home.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On these assertions, the husband contended that the conduct of the wife amounted to cruelty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(ia)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a>(&#8220;HMA&#8221;) and that she had also deserted him without reasonable cause as per Section 13(1)(ib).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the other hand, the wife specifically denied all allegations of cruelty. She stated that she always intended to continue marital life and made sincere efforts for reconciliation, but her attempts were not reciprocated. She asserted that whatever separation occurred was due to the conduct and behaviour of the husband and his family members, as she was subjected to taunts and mental stress at the matrimonial home and was compelled to leave as the circumstances became intolerable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Family Court noted that the husband merely asserted certain dates as attempts at reconciliation but produced no evidence to prove those attempts or to show that the wife intentionally refused cohabitation. Accordingly, the Family Court passed the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court remarked that, &#8220;<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">cruelty in matrimonial law need not always be physical; mental cruelty, which causes deep anguish, disappointment, and frustration, can also be sufficient ground for dissolution of marriage.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Court examined the husband&#8217;s allegations in detail as follows:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Regarding the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">allegation that the wife was extravagant and overspent on expensive items<\/span>, the Court noted that the husband admitted during his cross-examination that he did not produce any bills, receipts, or documentary proof to show that such expenses were incurred on account of the wife&#8217;s conduct. Although he further stated that he would be able to produce such bills if called for, no such documents were ever produced either during the trial or at any subsequent stage.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The second allegation was that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">wife refused to do household chores and remained engrossed on her mobile phone for prolonged periods<\/span>, and that her conduct caused stress to the mother-in-law, allegedly to the extent of affecting her cardiac health. The Court noted that during cross-examination, the husband admitted that no medical records, prescriptions, doctor&#8217;s opinion, or any evidence whatsoever was produced to establish that the wife&#8217;s conduct resulted in any deterioration of his mother&#8217;s health.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: #0e101a;\">&#8220;The husband married the wife of his own volition through social media, and if household habits or lifestyle preferences were material factors to him, they could have been ascertained before marriage. Even otherwise, such allegations about spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, do not fall within the statutory meaning of cruelty as required under law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>The third allegation was that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">wife used to quarrel with customers and employees at the beauty parlour and restaurant owned by the husband&#8217;s family<\/span>, which allegedly caused financial loss to the businesses and reduced their clientele. The Court noted that, yet again, apart from making these assertions, the husband did not produce any ledger sheet, audit report, financial records, or any other documentary proof to substantiate that any financial loss occurred due to the wife&#8217;s conduct. Noting this, the Court stated that as a business proprietor, such documents would naturally be within his possession and could have easily been produced before the Family Court. Thus, the failure to do so rendered the allegation unsubstantiated.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Regarding the allegation that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">wife used to threaten him with false criminal complaints<\/span>, the Court noted that in his cross-examination, the husband admitted that no complaint, report, or FIR was ever registered by her against him or any of his family members.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The final grievance was that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">wife refused to accompany him to a social function<\/span>, which caused him embarrassment. The Court opined that a refusal by a spouse to attend a social event, even if such refusal caused displeasure to the other spouse, did not constitute cruelty in the eyes of the law.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: #0e101a;\">&#8220;Matrimonial life involves individual choices and personal preferences, and isolated acts of refusal to participate in social engagements cannot be elevated to the level of matrimonial cruelty warranting dissolution of marriage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, after considering the submissions and perusing the Family Court&#8217;s record, the Court held that the Family Court marshalled the facts and evidence correctly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: #0e101a;\">&#8220;Cruelty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(ia)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act<\/a> must be proven through definite and convincing evidence. The allegations must be specific, supported by instances, dates, and, where possible, independent testimony.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that in the present case<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">, no particular incident of cruelty was proved by the husband, and the allegations were sweeping in nature and devoid of specific details<\/span>. Even the contention that the wife refused reconciliation on specific dates remained unsubstantiated because no witness who was present on those occasions was examined, nor was any documentary proof filed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt;\">&#8220;<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">The material evidence does not establish that the behaviour of the wife was consistently hostile, abusive, and disrespectful towards the husband and his mother.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the wife&#8217;s conduct, as reflected in her statements and the evidence, indicated that she was willing to resume her matrimonial life.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: #0e101a;\">&#8220;The husband could not demonstrate that the wife intended permanent separation or that she left the matrimonial home with the settled intention not to return. Desertion requires the element of animus deserendi, which was not proved.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Remarking this, the Court stated that the Family Court rightly held that the burden of proving cruelty and desertion lies on the party who asserts it, and the husband failed to discharge that burden.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: #0e101a;\">&#8220;a decree of divorce cannot be granted merely because the marriage has become strained or the parties are living separately. Matrimonial ties cannot be dissolved based on general allegations or because of incompatibility alone.&#8221;<\/span> The law required the husband to establish matrimonial misconduct amounting to cruelty, and he had failed to establish even a single act through reliable evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court upheld the impugned judgment, holding that there was no error or perversity warranting interference and the Family Court correctly held that the husband had failed to prove the grounds of cruelty and desertion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">C v. D, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5wrJ8tbZ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine MP 8458<\/a>, decided on 06-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice B. P. Sharma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Senior Advocate R. K. Sanghi and Advocate Raghav Sanghi<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Suneesh Tiwari<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The husband married the wife of his own volition through social media, and if household habits or lifestyle preferences were material factors to him, they could have been ascertained before marriage.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":367650,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3228,2570,93315,93312,93310,63235,7201,8391,93313,93311,93314],"class_list":["post-367626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-burden_of_proof","tag-Cruelty","tag-false-cruelty-case","tag-household-contribution","tag-justice-b-p-sharma","tag-justice-vishal-dhagat","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-mental-cruelty","tag-mobile-usage-not-cruelty","tag-spending-habits","tag-unproved-allegations-of-severe-mental-harassment"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Unproved allegations of Spending habits, mobile usage, not cruelty: MP HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC held that allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage not cruelty in absence of proof of severe mental harassment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&quot;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&quot;: Madhya Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC held that allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage not cruelty in absence of proof of severe mental harassment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-25T05:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-29T04:39:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"&quot;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&quot;: Madhya Pradesh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"headline\":\"&#8220;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-25T05:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-29T04:39:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1254,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"burden of proof\",\"Cruelty\",\"False Cruelty case\",\"household contribution\",\"Justice B. P. Sharma\",\"Justice Vishal Dhagat\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"mental cruelty\",\"mobile usage not cruelty\",\"Spending habits\",\"Unproved allegations of severe mental harassment\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/\",\"name\":\"Unproved allegations of Spending habits, mobile usage, not cruelty: MP HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-25T05:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-29T04:39:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh HC held that allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage not cruelty in absence of proof of severe mental harassment\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"mobile usage not cruelty\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/25\\\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8220;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/sonali\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unproved allegations of Spending habits, mobile usage, not cruelty: MP HC | SCC Times","description":"Madhya Pradesh HC held that allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage not cruelty in absence of proof of severe mental harassment","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty\": Madhya Pradesh HC","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh HC held that allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage not cruelty in absence of proof of severe mental harassment","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-25T05:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-29T04:39:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\"Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty\": Madhya Pradesh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/"},"author":{"name":"Sonali Ahuja","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"headline":"&#8220;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC","datePublished":"2025-11-25T05:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-29T04:39:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/"},"wordCount":1254,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp","keywords":["burden of proof","Cruelty","False Cruelty case","household contribution","Justice B. P. Sharma","Justice Vishal Dhagat","Madhya Pradesh High Court","mental cruelty","mobile usage not cruelty","Spending habits","Unproved allegations of severe mental harassment"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/","name":"Unproved allegations of Spending habits, mobile usage, not cruelty: MP HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-25T05:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-29T04:39:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh HC held that allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage not cruelty in absence of proof of severe mental harassment","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"mobile usage not cruelty"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/25\/mp-hc-spending-habits-household-contribution-mobile-usage-not-cruelty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8220;Allegations of spending habits, household contribution, or mobile usage, without proof of severe mental harassment, not cruelty&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mobile-usage-not-cruelty.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":343800,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/if-husband-wife-indulge-in-vulgar-chatting-with-opposite-gender-despite-objections-it-amounts-to-mental-cruelty-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":367626,"position":0},"title":"Spouse indulging in vulgar conversation with opposite gender, despite objections, amounts to Mental Cruelty: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo husband will tolerate that his wife is in undignified or indecent conversation through mobile by way of vulgar chatting.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335655,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/21\/husband-forcing-wife-to-quit-job-live-as-per-his-wish-and-style-amounts-to-cruelty-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":367626,"position":1},"title":"Husband forcing wife to quit job &amp; live as per his wish and style amounts to cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"November 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The wife was appointed as Assistant Manager in LIC Housing Finance Ltd., and at time the respondent was doing nothing, this was the reason why husband compelled the appellant to leave the job and stay with him.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/not-providing-food-to-wife-over-dowry-demands-constitutes-physical-mental-harassment-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":367626,"position":2},"title":"Not providing food to married woman over dowry demands constitutes physical &amp; mental harassment: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Regarding the timing of the FIR in relation to the divorce petition, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the pendency of a civil proceeding does not bar criminal proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/31\/false-allegations-of-illicit-relationship-cause-mental-agony-doom-marriage-mp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":367626,"position":3},"title":"&#8216;False allegations cause mental agony, doom marriage&#8217;; MP HC grants divorce to husband over wife&#8217;s false claims of his illicit relationships","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"October 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe are aware that relationship between the parties had gone so bitter that neither of them was having any empathy for the other, but even this kind of relationship cannot be an excuse to make false allegations regarding the moral character of the other party.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"false allegations of illicit relationship","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/false-allegations-of-illicit-relationship.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/false-allegations-of-illicit-relationship.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/false-allegations-of-illicit-relationship.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/false-allegations-of-illicit-relationship.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367808,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/26\/mp-hc-grants-divorce-to-wife-after-husbands-refusal-despite-irretrievably-broken-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":367626,"position":4},"title":"&#8220;Deriving pleasure from difficulties &#038; tension of other is cruelty&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC grants divorce to woman after husband&#8217;s refusal despite irretrievably broken marriage","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court remarked that when the other party opposes the prayer for divorce despite their being no possibility of them living together, such conduct of party deriving pleasure from difficulties and tension of the other party also amounts to cruelty.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Husband Refused To Divorce","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Husband-Refused-To-Divorce.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Husband-Refused-To-Divorce.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Husband-Refused-To-Divorce.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Husband-Refused-To-Divorce.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374393,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/02\/mp-hc-denies-relief-to-husband-who-sought-virginity-test-of-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":367626,"position":5},"title":"&#8220;Invasion of privacy and humiliation&#8221;: Madhya Pradesh HC denies relief to husband who sought virginity test of his wife","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"February 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSo far as the medical examination to ascertain whether the wife has ever entered into a sexual relationship or not, is concerned, it is nothing but seeking a virginity test of the wife, in other words.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"virginity test of wife","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/virginity-test-of-wife.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/virginity-test-of-wife.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/virginity-test-of-wife.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/virginity-test-of-wife.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367626\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}