{"id":367469,"date":"2025-11-24T09:30:05","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T04:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=367469"},"modified":"2025-11-26T09:58:50","modified_gmt":"2025-11-26T04:28:50","slug":"mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madras High Court:<\/span> In a case concerning disciplinary proceedings against Superintendents of Police for alleged lapses in monitoring a 2015 jewel missing investigation, a Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">N. Sathish Kumar*<\/span> and M. Jothiraman, JJ., allowed the appeal filed by the State authorities, holding that the duty to file reports lay with the Investigating Officer (&#8216;IO&#8217;) and that negligence could not be attributed to the Superintendents of Police merely on account of their supervisory role. The Court accordingly set aside the direction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the Superintendents of Police who had held office from 2015, while making it clear that all other directions of the Single Judge were to be scrupulously followed by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The dispute arose from a complaint that was lodged in 2015 regarding a jewel missing case. Although the complaint was made at that time, no effective action was taken. The police later informed that the case was undetected and was closed on 12-11-2017, but no final report was filed and no RCS was served.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Single Judge, upon examining the matter, directed disciplinary action against 14 Station House Officers (&#8216;SHOs&#8217;) who had served from the date of FIR registration until 16-07-2025. Show cause notices were subsequently issued to those officers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Single Judge also sought details of the Superintendents of Police who had served between 02-09-2015 and the filing of the petition. Observing that they had supervisory powers and had not properly monitored the case or verified whether the final report was filed in court, the Single Judge directed disciplinary proceedings against them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, it was contended that the filing of reports was the duty of the IO, and negligence in this regard could not be attributed to the Superintendents of Police, even though they held supervisory powers.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the Single Judge took a serious view of how the investigation was proceeded and noted that the investigating officer violated the procedure contemplated under the Code. While doing so, the Single Judge also directed disciplinary proceedings against the Superintendent of Police.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that, while issuing such directions, disciplinary proceedings were also ordered against the Superintendent of Police who was holding posts from 02-09-2015 to the date of filing of the petition. The Court highlighted that although the Superintendent of Police are required to monitor investigations conducted by lower-level officers, merely because some officers violated procedure and failed to file final reports or closure reports in time, such negligence cannot be attributed to the Superintendent of Police.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court analysed that the duty to file reports lies with the IO, and therefore the direction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the Superintendent of Police holding the post from 2015 was not proper.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court set aside the direction to take action against the Superintendent of Police for mistakes committed by the SHOs\/Inspectors of Police. The Court made it clear that, except for this portion, all other directions were to be scrupulously followed by the Director General of Police. The Court, thus, allowed the appeal, ordered that there would be no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of T. N. v. Vijayarani, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CO4dCQp7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Mad 10030<\/a>, decided on 19-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice N. Sathish Kumar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellants:<\/span> A. Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent:<\/span> N. Palani Kumar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;No doubt, the Superintendents of Police have to monitor the investigation conducted by the lower-level officers; however, merely because some of the officers have violated the procedure and not filed the final report or closure report in time, that negligence cannot be attributed to the Superintendents of Police.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":367509,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[93208,5061,93207,84294,92625,2567,93210,72101,93209,13021,93206,93211],"class_list":["post-367469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-chargesheet-failure","tag-disciplinary-action","tag-io-negligence","tag-justice-m-jothiraman","tag-justice-n-sathish-kumar","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-police-discipline","tag-procedural-lapses","tag-procedural-violation","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-sps-accountability","tag-supervisory-role"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Disciplinary action against SPs IO\u2019s failure to file report unjustified: Madras HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Discover Madras High Court ruling holding disciplinary action against SPs unjustified for IO\u2019s failure to file chargesheet or closure report, clarifying filing duty rests solely with IO, not SPs.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Discover Madras High Court ruling holding disciplinary action against SPs unjustified for IO\u2019s failure to file chargesheet or closure report, clarifying filing duty rests solely with IO, not SPs.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-24T04:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-26T04:28:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/\",\"name\":\"Disciplinary action against SPs IO\u2019s failure to file report unjustified: Madras HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-24T04:00:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-26T04:28:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Discover Madras High Court ruling holding disciplinary action against SPs unjustified for IO\u2019s failure to file chargesheet or closure report, clarifying filing duty rests solely with IO, not SPs.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Disciplinary action against SPs\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Disciplinary action against SPs IO\u2019s failure to file report unjustified: Madras HC | SCC Times","description":"Discover Madras High Court ruling holding disciplinary action against SPs unjustified for IO\u2019s failure to file chargesheet or closure report, clarifying filing duty rests solely with IO, not SPs.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC","og_description":"Discover Madras High Court ruling holding disciplinary action against SPs unjustified for IO\u2019s failure to file chargesheet or closure report, clarifying filing duty rests solely with IO, not SPs.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-24T04:00:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-26T04:28:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/","name":"Disciplinary action against SPs IO\u2019s failure to file report unjustified: Madras HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-24T04:00:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-26T04:28:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Discover Madras High Court ruling holding disciplinary action against SPs unjustified for IO\u2019s failure to file chargesheet or closure report, clarifying filing duty rests solely with IO, not SPs.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Disciplinary action against SPs"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Disciplinary action against Superintendents of Police unjustified for Investigating Officer\u2019s failure to file chargesheet\/closure report: Madras HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Disciplinary-action-against-SPs.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/mere-allegation-of-bias-is-not-fatal-to-disciplinary-inquiry-unless-supported-by-materials-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":367469,"position":0},"title":"Mere allegation of bias is not fatal to disciplinary inquiry unless supported by materials: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Ajay Rastogi* and Abhay S. Oka, JJ., held that non-supply of demanded documents is not sufficient to challenge a disciplinary inquiry unless it is showed what prejudice has been caused due to non-supply. Twelve Lakhs Stolen from UCO Bank The respondent delinquent was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/05\/madras-high-court-quashes-disciplinary-proceedings-canara-bank-employee-justice-hurried-justice-buried\/","url_meta":{"origin":367469,"position":1},"title":"\u201cInconceivable that entire proceedings could have been concluded fairly within two weeks\u201d: Madras HC upholds order quashing disciplinary action against Canara Bank employee","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA disciplinary proceeding should not resemble a point-to-point bullet train journey. A charge memo need not necessarily culminate in punishment.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/madras-high-court-judges-judicial-officers-recommendation-sc-collegium-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":367469,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of Judges for Madras High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium recommended the appointment of 5 Permanent Judges and 3 Judicial Officers as new Judges of Madras High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SC Collegium judges appointment Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SC-Collegium-judges-appointment-Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SC-Collegium-judges-appointment-Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SC-Collegium-judges-appointment-Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SC-Collegium-judges-appointment-Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/09\/madras-hc-1000-culprits-can-escape-but-one-innocent-person-should-not-be-punished-hc-states-in-perfunctory-investigation-of-a-brutal-murder\/","url_meta":{"origin":367469,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | 1000 culprits can escape, but, one innocent person should not be punished: HC states in perfunctory investigation of a brutal murder","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0B. Pugalendhi, J., while addressing a petition, observed that, \"An impartial investigation is the basic requirement for any investigation. A fair investigation is also a part of constitutional right guaranteed under Articles 20 & 21 of the Constitution of India.\" \"Majority of people are now hailing the police\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287395,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/21\/government-servant-erred-in-making-claim-that-there-was-no-approval-for-the-issuance-of-charge-memo-madras-hc-upholds-central-administrative-tribunal-order-legal-research-legal\/","url_meta":{"origin":367469,"position":4},"title":"\u201cFinance Minister approved initiation of disciplinary proceedings against IRS Officer accused of supporting Sri Lankan Tamils\u201d; Madras HC upholds CAT order","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras HC dismissed a plea filed by IRS Officer who supported Sri Lankan Tamils through a hunger strike and criticised the Indian government's policies on the Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":85211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/14\/appointment-of-addl-judges-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":367469,"position":5},"title":"Appointment of Addl. Judges, Madras High Court","author":"Saba","date":"November 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the\u00a0Constitution of India appointed\u00a0Shri R.M.T. Teeka Raman, Shri N. Sathish Kumar, and Shri N.\u00a0Seshasayee, to be Additional Judges of the Madras High Court, in that order of\u00a0seniority, for a period of two years with effect\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367469\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}