{"id":367338,"date":"2025-11-21T12:00:21","date_gmt":"2025-11-21T06:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=367338"},"modified":"2025-11-25T10:34:19","modified_gmt":"2025-11-25T05:04:19","slug":"delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act’: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> Explaining the scope of the procedural safeguards under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013<\/a> (the Act), the Division Bench of Anil Kshetarpal, J and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, J*<\/span>, held that requirement of considering the explanation of the accused public servant under Section 20(3)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> is mandatory in nature and leaves no scope for discretion.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court allowed the instant writ petition and quashed the impugned orders.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In 2023, the petitioner had participated in the exam for the post of Chief Loco Inspector in the West Central Railway and had been declared successful. In 2024, a complaint had been lodged before the Lokpal alleging tampering of OMR sheets of the exam in exchange for bribe. On the basis of a preliminary inquiry report, the Lokpal issued show cause notices to five officers of the West Central Railway after which the Lokpal passed the first impugned order.<\/p>\n

Vide order dated 21-2-2015 (‘first impugned order’), the Lokpal had concluded that the OMR sheets in possession with the Evaluating officer had been tampered with. Therefore, the Lokpal invoked Section 20(3)(a)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> and directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (‘CBI’) to carry out a detailed investigation.<\/p>\n

On the basis of the investigation report submitted by CBI, the lokpal passed the order dated 23-9-2025 (‘second impugned order’) seeking the petitioner’s comments on the investigation report within two weeks.<\/p>\n

By the instant petition, the petitioner approached the Court and contended that he had not been named as an officer of the west Central Railway (‘RPS officer’) under Section 20(3)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> prior to the initiation of investigation or registration of FIR and, therefore, the impugned orders and subsequent proceedings were contrary to principles of natural justice and void.<\/p>\n

The question for adjudication before the Court was, whether adherence to the procedural safeguards enshrined under Section 20(3)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> was a mandatory provision where, pursuant to an inquiry or investigation, a person who was not originally named or arrayed in the complaint is subsequently found to be connected with the alleged acts.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that even though the petitioner had been named in the complaint before the lokpal, no notice had been issued to him prior to the passing of the first impugned order. The Court also noted that unlike the other RPSs arraigned, the petitioner had not been afforded any opportunity to either file a response or to be heard at the stage of consideration under Section 20(3)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the statutory framework of Section 20 categorically provides that the requirement of providing an opportunity of hearing at the pre-investigation stage as well as at the post-investigation stage is mandatory. Section 20(3) clearly provides that the lokpal ‘shall’<\/span>, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the concerned public servant<\/span>, decide whether a prima facie case exists and thereafter proceed to direct an investigation.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that even at the stage of preliminary inquiry under Section 20(1)(a), proviso three mandates that the lokpal ‘shall’ call for an explanation from the public servant so as to determine whether a prima facie case for investigation exists. A similar mandate is also contained under Section 20(7) which operates in the post-investigation stage.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that the mandate under Section 20(3)<\/a> if the Act<\/a> is peremptory and leaves no room for discretion. The legislative intent behind this is that the prima facie satisfaction necessary for directing an investigation under the Act must be reached only after considering the explanation offered by the public servant. Omission of this step, especially when it results in the registration of an FIR and the initiation of a criminal investigation, constitutes a violation of the statutory mandate and of the principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n

The Court further opined that contrary to the respondent’s contention, when the statutory opportunity of hearing under Section 20(3) has already been denied, subsequent participation at the post-investigation stage under Section 20(7)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> cannot retrospectively validate the order that has been passed.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court allowed the instant writ petition and quashed the impugned orders for want of non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of Section 20(3)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[Mujahat Ali Khan v. Lokpal of India, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 8481<\/a>, decided on 14-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Judgement Authored by: Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Hitesh Kumar, Nishant Singh, Vishal Yadav, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Nishant Katneshwar, Vijay Singh, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The language employed in Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act is peremptory and admits of no discretion. The legislative intent is that the prima facie satisfaction necessary for directing an investigation under the Act must be reached only after considering the explanation of the concerned public servant.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":367341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,93096,75265,83730,93094,41062,11611,93095],"class_list":["post-367338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-hearing-before-investigation","tag-justice-anil-kshetarpal","tag-justice-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar","tag-lokpal-and-lokyukta-act-2013","tag-lokpal-of-india","tag-principles-of-natural-justice","tag-section-20-of-lokpal-act"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC on mandatory hearing of public servant under Lokpal Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ruling on mandatory hearing of public servant under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing an investigation against him, the Delhi High Court has held that non-compliance with the same renders the subsequent process void.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"'Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act': Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ruling on mandatory hearing of public servant under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing an investigation against him, the Delhi High Court has held that non-compliance with the same renders the subsequent process void.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-21T06:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-25T05:04:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"'Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act': Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC on mandatory hearing of public servant under Lokpal Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-21T06:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-25T05:04:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Ruling on mandatory hearing of public servant under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing an investigation against him, the Delhi High Court has held that non-compliance with the same renders the subsequent process void.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"mandatory hearing of public officer\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"‘Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act’: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC on mandatory hearing of public servant under Lokpal Act | SCC Times","description":"Ruling on mandatory hearing of public servant under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing an investigation against him, the Delhi High Court has held that non-compliance with the same renders the subsequent process void.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"'Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act': Delhi HC","og_description":"Ruling on mandatory hearing of public servant under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing an investigation against him, the Delhi High Court has held that non-compliance with the same renders the subsequent process void.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-21T06:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-25T05:04:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"'Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act': Delhi HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/","name":"Delhi HC on mandatory hearing of public servant under Lokpal Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-21T06:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-25T05:04:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Ruling on mandatory hearing of public servant under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing an investigation against him, the Delhi High Court has held that non-compliance with the same renders the subsequent process void.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"mandatory hearing of public officer"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/delhi-hc-on-requirement-of-mandatory-hearing-of-public-servant-under-lokpal-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"‘Hearing accused public servant before directing investigation mandatory under Sec. 20 of Lokpal Act’: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/mandatory-hearing-of-public-officer.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292571,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/19\/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-interfere-in-inquiry-directed-against-ex-ias-ramesh-abhishek-for-corruption-charges-by-lokpal-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":367338,"position":0},"title":"Corruption inquiry directed against Ex-IAS Ramesh Abhishek by Lokpal; Delhi High Court refuses to interfere","author":"Arunima","date":"May 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that repeated petitions seeking to interdict the proceedings before Lokpal would defeat the very purpose of the legislation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312147,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/delhi-high-court-refuses-interference-lokpal-corruption-charges-shibu-soren-jharkhand-mukti-morcha-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":367338,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses to interfere with corruption proceedings against Jharkhand Mukti Morcha\u2019s Shibu Soren","author":"Arunima","date":"January 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The accused is the President of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, a State Political party in the State of Jharkhand and a sitting Member of the Parliament in Rajya Sabha nominated from the State of Jharkhand.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344146,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/22\/delhi-hc-stays-lokpal-proceedings-against-defence-secretary-rajesh-kumar-singh-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":367338,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court stays Lokpal proceedings against Rajesh Kumar Singh, Defence Secretary of India","author":"Arunima","date":"March 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The only allegation from the very inception was that there were irregularities in the promotions conducted by the National Productivity Council on 28-03-2023, which pertain to a period even before petitioner 1 joined as Secretary, DPIIT on 21-01-2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212236,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/lokpal-act-justice-p-c-ghose-former-supreme-court-judge-to-be-indias-first-lokpal\/","url_meta":{"origin":367338,"position":3},"title":"Lokpal Appointment | Justice P.C. Ghose, Former Supreme Court Judge becomes India’s First Lokpal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported by media, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose\u00a0appointed as the chairperson of the Lokpal, though the official announcement is awaited. Lokpal will work with the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). It has the powers to ask investigating agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe allegations against public servants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226476,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/03\/ministry-of-personnel-public-grievances-and-pensions-notifies-lokpal-complaint-rules-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":367338,"position":4},"title":"Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions notifies — Lokpal (Complaint) Rules, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Government in the exercise of Section 59 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 has made the following rules: The Lokpal (Complaint) Rules, 2020 The gist of the rules are as follows: 3. Form and manner of complaint -- (1) For the purposes of clause (e) of sub-section (1)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lokpal.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":59251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/01\/lokpal-and-lokayuktas-amendment-act-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":367338,"position":5},"title":"Lokpal and Lokayuktas (Amendment) Act, 2016","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Lokpal and Lokayuktas (Amendment) Act, 2016 receives President\u2019s assent on 29 July, 2016 in order to amend the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. The following amendments are mentioned below: Amendment of section 44: On and from the date of commencement of this Act, every public servant shall make a declaration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/rashtrapatibhawan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/rashtrapatibhawan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/rashtrapatibhawan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/rashtrapatibhawan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/rashtrapatibhawan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367338\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}