{"id":367201,"date":"2025-11-19T17:30:52","date_gmt":"2025-11-19T12:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=367201"},"modified":"2025-11-25T10:06:51","modified_gmt":"2025-11-25T04:36:51","slug":"prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#8216;greener pasture&#8217;: Kerala HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a case revolving around the question whether an eight-year long consensual relationship, allegedly induced by a promise of marriage, could be classified as rape, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">G. Girish<\/span>, J., observed that the facts did not satisfy the essential requirements for prosecuting the accused for the offence of rape, and therefore, the proceedings against the accused were unsustainable and liable to be quashed.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 2009, the accused befriended the de facto complainant, a widow with two children, by calling her over mobile phone and rendering financial assistance to her. He came to the room which the widow was occupying in connection with her business and indulged in a sexual relationship after making her believe that he would marry her. Following her husband&#8217;s death in 2013, the accused resided with her and continued the relationship. At one point, he even tied a knot in her gold chain before a lamp and candle, making her believe that he had married her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Later, she found out that he had married another woman, but he continued to assure her that she alone was his wife and continued the physical relationship with her. The widow also told the accused&#8217;s wife that even before he had married the woman, he was living as husband and wife with her. But on 04-11-2017, the accused called and informed the widow that he did not want to continue the relationship, and thereafter, she alleged the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561844\" target=\"_blank\">493<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561847\" target=\"_blank\">496<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the accused contended that the relationship was consensual and that the offences alleged were not legally sustainable. He denied the accusation that he had offered to marry the de facto complainant.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the prosecution for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561844\" target=\"_blank\">493<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561847\" target=\"_blank\">496<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> incorporated in the final report is, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span>, not maintainable as the Court concerned is proscribed from taking cognizance of the said offences except upon a complaint made by a person aggrieved by the offence as provided under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519444\" target=\"_blank\">198<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;), and therefore, the accused could not be compelled to face trial for the offences upon a final report filed by the police under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519414\" target=\"_blank\">173(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the sexual relationship between the accused and the widow was consensual and that the said relationship could not be classified as rape as she had maintained the relationship even when her husband was alive, and continued it for years after his death, knowing that the accused had married another woman in 2014.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the consent given by the prosecutrix to sexual intercourse with a person with whom she is deeply in love with, on a promise that he would marry her, cannot be considered to be given under a misconception of fact. A false promise is not a fact within the meaning of the Code, and a promise to marry without anything more will not give rise to a misconception of fact under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561912\" target=\"_blank\">90<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. However, the position will be different if it is shown that the accused, with a view to eliciting the victim&#8217;s assent, gave the false promise of marriage, without having the intention to marry her, and made the victim submit herself to him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deepak Gulati<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QGHaIcmD\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2013) 7 SCC 675<\/span><\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">there is a clear distinction between rape and consensual sex and in a case like this, the Court must very carefully examine whether the accused had actually wanted to marry the victim, or had mala fide motives, and had made a false promise to this effect only to satisfy his lust, as the latter falls within the ambit of cheating or deception. There is a distinction between the mere breach of a promise and not fulfilling a false promise. There may be a case where the prosecutrix agrees to have sexual intercourse on account of her love and passion for the accused, and not solely on account of misrepresentation made to her by the accused, or where an accused on account of circumstances which he could not have foreseen, or which were beyond his control, was unable to marry her, despite having every intention to do so<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the consistent view being followed is that the absence of consent cannot be presumed in every case where the prosecutrix alleges that she indulged in sexual intercourse with the offender believing the offer of marriage made by him. For the offence of rape, it must be established that from the very beginning the accused did not have any intention to marry her and that the offer of marriage was made as a ploy to make her surrender to him to satiate his carnal desires.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the long cohabitation of more than eight years, where the parties behaved like husband and wife, clearly indicated consensual sex, and the fact that the accused went in search of a greener pasture for giving vent to his promiscuous sexual urge, and started a new relationship in the nature of marriage with another lady, by itself, will not bring his prior relationship with the victim within the meaning of rape.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the Court held that the proceeding initiated against the accused in connection with the commission of rape, was <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> unsustainable. The Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings against the accused, holding that the final report and accompanying records relied on by the prosecution failed to bring out the essential requirements for the alleged offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Pradeep v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pxpoIh28\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 12351<\/a>, decided on 17-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Accused:<\/span> B. Mohanlal, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Seena. C, Public Prosecutor, Ajith Krishnan, Advocate.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The consent given by the prosecutrix to sexual intercourse with a person with whom she is deeply in love with, on a promise that he would marry her, cannot be considered to be given under a misconception of fact.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":367202,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[93006,39800,89449,2523,93005,2572,34822,13431],"class_list":["post-367201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-breach-of-promise-versus-false-promise","tag-false-promise-of-marriage","tag-justice-g-girish","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-prior-consensual-relationship","tag-Rape","tag-section-198-crpc","tag-section-376-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Prior consensual relationship not rape if accused marries another lady: Kerala HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court holds that prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#039;greener pasture&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#039;greener pasture&#039;: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court holds that prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#039;greener pasture&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-19T12:00:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-25T04:36:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#039;greener pasture&#039;: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Prior consensual relationship not rape if accused marries another lady: Kerala HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-19T12:00:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-25T04:36:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court holds that prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of 'greener pasture'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"prior consensual relationship not rape\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#8216;greener pasture&#8217;: Kerala HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prior consensual relationship not rape if accused marries another lady: Kerala HC | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court holds that prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of 'greener pasture'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of 'greener pasture': Kerala HC","og_description":"Kerala High Court holds that prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of 'greener pasture'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-19T12:00:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-25T04:36:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of 'greener pasture': Kerala HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/","name":"Prior consensual relationship not rape if accused marries another lady: Kerala HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-19T12:00:52+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-25T04:36:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kerala High Court holds that prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of 'greener pasture'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"prior consensual relationship not rape"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape-if-accused-marries-another-lady-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prior consensual relationship does not amount to rape if accused marries another lady in search of &#8216;greener pasture&#8217;: Kerala HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/prior-consensual-relationship-not-rape.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":231997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/09\/ker-hc-if-consent-given-out-of-love-and-passion-on-a-promise-of-marriage-sexual-intercourse-is-not-rape-court-while-granting-pre-arrest-bail-to-rape-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":367201,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | If consent given out of love and passion on a promise of marriage, sexual intercourse is not rape: Court while granting pre-arrest bail to rape accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court:\u00a0Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J., allowed pre-arrest bail to the applicant accused of raping a women whom he allegedly met on facebook. Accused preferred a pre-arrest bail application for offence punishable under Section 376(1) of the Penal Code, 1860. Petitioner and informant were in a relationship for 1.5 years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/11\/kerala-high-court-false-promise-breach-of-promise-section-376-ipc-rape-first-information-report-consent-fraudulent-dishonest-inducement-section-482-crpc-cheating-criminal-breach-of-trust-legal-res\/","url_meta":{"origin":367201,"position":1},"title":"Kerala High Court| Allegation of rape on false promise to marriage unsustainable, if the relationship between the two continued even after marriage of accused","author":"Editor","date":"October 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Kerala High Court: In a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for quashing the First Information Report (FIR) for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 376 of the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), Kauser Edappagath, J. has reiterated that if a man retracts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/gujarat-hc-discharges-man-from-rape-case-says-it-was-case-of-consensual-sex\/","url_meta":{"origin":367201,"position":2},"title":"Gujarat High Court discharges Man from charges of rape by calling it a case of consensual sex and not false promise of marriage","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Complainant had filed a second FIR against the accused just after the parties had arrived at a settlement before the Court and the first FIR against the accused was quashed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/can-promise-to-marry-a-married-woman-be-legally-enforceable-wherein-she-voluntarily-formed-sexual-relations-with-a-man\/","url_meta":{"origin":367201,"position":3},"title":"Can promise to marry a married woman be legally enforceable wherein she voluntarily formed sexual relations with a man? Ker HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Dr Kauser Edappagath, J., addressed a matter wherein a married woman voluntarily had sex with her former lover. In the present matter, the petitioner who was the sole accused faced trial for the offences punishable under Sections 376(1) and 376(2)(n) of the Penal Code, 1860. The prosecution\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":352425,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/kerala-hc-false-promise-to-marry-by-married-person\/","url_meta":{"origin":367201,"position":4},"title":"Rape on false promise to marry can\u2019t be claimed if both parties aware of existing marriage: Kerala HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile considering the cases alleging rape based on the promise of marriage, it is difficult for this Court at this juncture to enter a conclusion regarding whether the relationship was consensual or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"false promise to marry by married person","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/false-promise-to-marry-by-married-person.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/false-promise-to-marry-by-married-person.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/false-promise-to-marry-by-married-person.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/false-promise-to-marry-by-married-person.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/18\/reneging-on-a-promise-of-marriage-does-not-render-a-consensual-sexual-relationship-as-rape-jk-hc-quashes-malicious-fir-filed-to-wreak-vengeance-on-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":367201,"position":5},"title":"Reneging on a promise of marriage does not render a consensual sexual relationship as rape: J&#038;K HC quashes malicious FIR filed to wreak vengeance on the accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. quashed an FIR forrape, holding the same to be guided by ulterior motive of settling personal grudges. Petitioner, who was proposed to be married to respondent 2 were refused for marriage when he came to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367201"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":367631,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367201\/revisions\/367631"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}