{"id":366889,"date":"2025-11-17T09:00:37","date_gmt":"2025-11-17T03:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=366889"},"modified":"2025-11-17T09:25:17","modified_gmt":"2025-11-17T03:55:17","slug":"a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (hereinafter referred to as “the new Code”) which received the assent of the President of India on 25-12-2023 and having come into force on 1-7-2024 is an Act that has not only repealed the erstwhile procedural Code (Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a>) but has also introduced and interposed a slew of radical statutory changes so as to address issues plaguing the dispensation of the criminal justice system of our country which included low conviction rates, underutilisation of technology and latest forensic techniques and other procedural delays.<\/p>\n

Some of the statutory and procedural changes introduced by the new Code<\/a> include utilisation of technology and forensic science in the investigation of a crime, registration of a first information report (FIR) through electronic means\/mode, service of summons through electronic means, specific time-bound preliminary enquiries prior to the registration of an FIR, additional magisterial remedy under Section 173(4) to name a few.<\/p>\n

One such significant departure from the procedure prescribed under Chapter XV of the repealed Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> is the introduction of a proviso to Section 223(1) that has completely changed the manner in which the Magistracy would be dealing with private complaints preferred before them whether under the new Penal Code (Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a>) or under special statutes like the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a>; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a>, etc.<\/p>\n

Before proceeding further with an analysis and cogitation of the judicial postulations on this newly introduced procedural requirement, it would be germane to encapsulate the difference between the erstwhile Section 200<\/a>, Criminal Procedure Code<\/a> as well as Section 223<\/a> of the new Code<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n
\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNSS)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Section 200<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

200. Examination of complainant<\/span>.— A Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence on complaint shall examine upon oath the complainant and the witnesses present, if any, and the substance of such examination shall be reduced to writing and shall be signed by the complainant and the witnesses, and also by the Magistrate:<\/p>\n

Provided that when the complaint is made in writing, the Magistrate need not examine the complainant and the witnesses—<\/p>\n

(a<\/span>) if a public servant acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties or a court has made the complaint; or<\/p>\n

(b<\/span>) if the Magistrate makes over the case for inquiry or trial to another Magistrate under Section 192:<\/p>\n

Provided further that if the Magistrate makes over the case to another Magistrate under Section 192 after examining the complainant and the witnesses, the latter Magistrate need not re-examine them.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Section 223<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

223. Examination of complainant<\/span>.— (1) A Magistrate having jurisdiction while taking cognizance of an offence on complaint shall examine upon oath the complainant and the witnesses present, if any, and the substance of such examination shall be reduced to writing and shall be signed by the complainant and the witnesses, and also by the Magistrate:<\/p>\n

Provided that no cognizance of an offence shall be taken by the Magistrate without giving the accused an opportunity of being heard:<\/p>\n

Provided further that when the complaint is made in writing, the Magistrate need not examine the complainant and the witnesses—<\/p>\n

(a<\/span>) if a public servant acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties or a Court has made the complaint; or<\/p>\n

(b<\/span>) if the Magistrate makes over the case for inquiry or trial to another Magistrate under Section 212:<\/p>\n

Provided also that if the Magistrate makes over the case to another Magistrate under Section 212 after examining the complainant and the witnesses, the latter Magistrate need not re-examine them.<\/p>\n

(2) A Magistrate shall not take cognizance on a complaint against a public servant for any offence alleged to have been committed in course of the discharge of his official functions or duties unless—<\/p>\n

(a<\/span>) such public servant is given an opportunity to make assertions as to the situation that led to the incident so alleged; and<\/p>\n

(b<\/span>) a report containing facts and circumstances of the incident from the officer superior to such public servant is received.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

A bare perusal of the aforementioned sections would reveal that the legislature in its wisdom while following the maxim of “audi alteram partem” has introduced a statutory safeguard in the proviso under sub-section (1) of Section 223<\/a> of the new Code<\/a> with a twofold objective:<\/p>\n

(i<\/span>) to provide the proposed accused in a private complaint an opportunity of being heard before cognizance and summoning; and<\/p>\n

(ii<\/span>) to discourage filing of private criminal complaints laden with subterfuges, concealments and misrepresentation of facts.<\/p>\n

A slew of questions arose with regard to the applicability of the newly added proviso which the author will try to encapsulate in the following paragraphs by referring to various judicial postulations that have been rendered on this very subject.<\/p>\n

Retrospective or prospective applicability<\/h3>\n

A significant question that arose upon the enforcement of the new Code was whether the newly added proviso to Section 223 would have retrospective or prospective applicability wherein the complaints have been filed prior to 1-7-2024, however the cognizance was taken after 1-7-2024.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court has recently issued notice on 13-8-2025 on this very issue in a case titled as Parvinder Singh<\/span> v. Enforcement Directorate<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a> which is pending adjudication for 7-10-2025.<\/p>\n

However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court vide judgment pronounced on 29-7-2025 titled as Sikander Singh<\/span> v. Enforcement Directorate<\/span><\/a>2<\/sup><\/a> wherein the complaint was filed on 27-6-2024 has held as under:<\/p>\n

“When an ex post facto law can be applied to give the benefit of reduced punishment to a person accused of committing an offence under the unamended statute by invoking the rule of beneficial construction, it can be made applicable to the instant case as well. It is accordingly held that the varied procedure of giving prior hearing to the accused before taking cognizance will apply to the prosecution complaint in question, which gives the petitioner right of hearing in terms of Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a>.”<\/p>\n

Applicability to special statutes<\/h2>\n

Before a cogitation of the aforementioned issue in light of the judicial postulations and pronouncements being referred to below it would be quintessential to refer to Section 5<\/a> of the new Code<\/a> which reads as under:<\/p>\n

5. Saving<\/span>.— Nothing contained in this Sanhita shall, in the absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any special or local law for the time being in force, or any special jurisdiction or power conferred, or any special form of procedure prescribed, by any other law for the time being in force.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court in a widely reported and recent postulation in Kushal Kumar Agarwal<\/span> v. Enforcement Directorate<\/span><\/a>3<\/sup><\/a> has held the newly added proviso of Section 223(1) to be applicable to complaints under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> (PMLA) with the following observations:<\/p>\n

5<\/span>. This Court has taken a consistent view that a complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 44(1)(b)<\/a> PMLA<\/a> will be governed by Sections 200<\/a> to 204<\/a> CrPC<\/a>. This view has been taken by this Court in the cases of Yash Tuteja<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span><\/a>4<\/sup><\/a> and Tarsem Lal<\/span> v. Enforcement Directorate<\/span><\/a>5<\/sup><\/a>. Therefore, the provisions of Chapter XVI, containing Sections 223 to 226, will also apply to a complaint under Section 44 PMLA. As the complaint has been filed after 1-7-2024, Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a> will apply to the present complaint.<\/p>\n

This has also been reiterated in a recent judgment of the Delhi High Court in Lakshay Vij<\/span> v. Enforcement Directorate<\/span><\/a>6<\/sup><\/a> and the Calcutta High Court in Kirity Bhusan Mahata<\/span> v. State of W.B.<\/span><\/a>7<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court in Mohd Afzal Beigh<\/span> v. Noor Hussain<\/span><\/a>8<\/sup><\/a> has affirmed the applicability of Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a> along with the newly added statutory safeguard to complaints under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (NI Act) with the following findings:<\/p>\n

6.<\/span> … Section 142 of the Act or any other provision of the Chapter (xvii) of the Act does not bar the satisfaction in terms of the requirements as mentioned under Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a> corresponding to Section 200 of the Code viz examination upon oath of the complainant\/payee\/holder of the cheque and the witnesses present as also of the issuance of the pre-cognizance notice. Such requirements are mandatory in respect of the complaints filed before the criminal Courts for taking cognizance on penal offences especially covered under BNS (corresponding to repealed IPC<\/a>). Since, the remedy for an offence under Section 138 of the Act is a complaint, as referred to under Section 142 of the Act, therefore, the observance of the requirements as mentioned under Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a> regarding examination of the complainant\/payee and the witnesses present on oath as also the issuance of the pre-cognizance notice introduced by the new legislation, is not at all barred but desired in respect of a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Act.<\/p>\n

The Karnataka High Court in Ashok<\/span> v. Fayaz Aahmad<\/span><\/a>9<\/sup><\/a> has rendered a divergent view with the following observations:<\/p>\n

22<\/span>. The coordinate Bench of this Court in Hanumesh<\/span> v. Karanagi Brothers Enterprise<\/span><\/a>10<\/sup><\/a> has relied upon the decision in Basanagouda R. Patil (Yatnal)<\/span> and held that before taking cognizance of offence under Section 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a>, the Magistrate shall comply the requirement of Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a>. In the said case, the Court has not considered that the Negotiable Instrument Act is special statute and procedure provided for offence punishable under Section 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a> for trial is a summary procedure and Section 5<\/a> BNSS<\/a>.<\/p>\n

23.<\/span> Since Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881<\/a> is special enactment and in view of Section 5<\/a> BNSS<\/a> r\/w Section 143<\/a> NI Act<\/a> as far as the cases tried by the learned Magistrates under Section 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a>, there is no need for the Magistrate to give an opportunity of being heard to the accused before taking cognizance on the complaint of payee\/holder in due course of cheque for offence punishable under Section 138<\/a> NI Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Procedure to be adopted by magistracy<\/h2>\n

The Karnataka High Court in Basanagouda R. Patil<\/span> v. Shivananda S. Patil<\/span><\/a>11<\/sup><\/a> after analysing the import of the newly added safeguard under Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a> has laid down the following procedure to be followed by Magistrates dealing with private criminal complaints being filed under Chapter XVI of the new Code:<\/p>\n

10<\/span>. Therefore, the procedural drill would be this way:<\/p>\n

A complaint is presented before the Magistrate under Section 223<\/a> BNSS<\/a>; on presentation of the complaint, it would be the duty of the Magistrate\/Court concerned to examine the complainant on oath, which would be his sworn statement and examine the witnesses present if any, and the substance of such examination should be reduced into writing. The question of taking of cognizance would not arise at this juncture. The Magistrate has to, in terms of the proviso, issue a notice to the accused who is given an opportunity of being heard. Therefore, notice shall be issued to the accused at that stage and after hearing the accused, take cognizance and regulate its procedure thereafter.<\/p>\n

The same view has been reiterated by the Allahabad High Court in Rakesh Kumar Chaturvedi<\/span> v. State of U.P.<\/span><\/a>12<\/sup><\/a> wherein it was held:<\/p>\n

11<\/span>. Adverting to the facts of the present case, it is apparent that notices have been issued to the applicant without recording the statements of the complainant and witnesses, which is against the prescribed procedure under the BNSS, therefore, this Court is of the view that the impugned order is not sustainable in the eyes of law. It is also noticed that the notice issued to the applicant, contained as Annexure 1 is a blank notice without filling the blanks and mentioning the name of the applicant only, whereas notice should have been issued properly after filling all the relevant blanks and the Court concerned shall ensure that such notice is not issued in future.<\/p>\n

The aforementioned views have further been fortified by the Kerala High Court in Suby Antony<\/span> v. Susha<\/span><\/a>13<\/sup><\/a> wherein the High Court has clearly outlined the procedure to be followed for complaints filed under Chapter XVI of the new Code as under:<\/p>\n

7.<\/span> … Being guided by the precedents on Sections 200 and 202 Code and the plain language of the proviso to Section 223(1)<\/a> BNSS<\/a>, this Court is of the opinion that, after the complaint is filed, the Magistrate should first examine the complainant and witnesses on oath and thereafter, if the Magistrate proceeds to take cognizance of the offence\/s, opportunity of hearing should be afforded to the accused.<\/p>\n

However, it would be apposite to also mention a divergent view taken by the Calcutta High Court in Kaberi Dey<\/span> v. Sourav Bhattacharjee<\/span><\/a>14<\/sup><\/a><\/span> wherein the Court has outlined a procedure wherein there is no requirement of the Magistracy to examine the complainant and other witnesses before issuing the statutory notice to the proposed accused as mandated by the proviso of Section 223 of the new Code. The relevant observations are as follows:<\/p>\n

18<\/span>. From a comparative study of the relevant provisions of the CrPC<\/a> and the BNSS it would be evident that the provisions of pre cognizance hearing has been introduced by the legislature by insertion of the proviso to Section 223(1)<\/a> BNSS<\/a>. However, the other portions of the relevant provisions have been kept intact. Since the other provisions remains unaltered therefore, there can hardly any scope of departure from the interpretation as made by the Supreme Court in various judgments including the judgments quoted above in R.R. Chari case<\/span><\/a>15<\/sup><\/a>, Tula Ram case<\/span><\/a>16<\/sup><\/a> and Manharibhai Muljibhai case<\/span><\/a>17<\/sup><\/a> as the cognizance is known to be the initial stage of taking judicial notice of the allegations in the complaint for proceeding further in terms of the other provisions of the CrPC.<\/a> Therefore, there can be no occasion for a Magistrate to examine the complainant prior to taking cognizance.<\/p>\n

An etymological and assiduous analysis of the aforementioned postulations would invariably establish that any variance from the procedure as laid down by the statutory mandate of the proviso of Section 223(1) of the new Code would at best be an irregularity under Section 506 the new Code (corresponding to Section 460<\/a>, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a>) which can be rectified by the High Court while exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 and remand back the case for compliance with the statutory mandate. The same has been done by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Gulshan Rai<\/span> v. Charanjit Singh<\/span><\/a>18<\/sup><\/a> wherein the impugned summoning order was set aside and the learned trial court was directed to pass a fresh order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the proposed accused.<\/p>\n

An important issue that remains in ambiguity which would require judicial interpretation is whether the proposed accused appearing upon the notice issued under the proviso of Section 223(1) of the new Code would be able to rely on documents\/averments\/submissions outside of the complaint and the documents annexed therein in the reply filed by him\/her\/them and whether the proposed accused upon notice would be permitted to cross-examine the complainant and other witnesses who have deposed in pre-summoning evidence.<\/p>\n

Submissions to this regard were made by learned Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju during the hearing of the case of Kushal Kumar Aggarwal<\/span><\/a>. Firstly, that the hearing given to the accused in terms of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 223 will be confined to the question whether a case is made out to proceed on the basis of the complaint and hence, only the complaint and the documents produced along with the complaint can be considered at the time of hearing. His second submission was that it is well-settled that cognizance is taken by the criminal court of the offence and not the offender. Therefore, after taking cognizance after following the procedure prescribed by the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 223, if cognizance is taken, there will be no occasion to again take cognizance of the same offence when supplementary or further complaints are filed.<\/span><\/p>\n

In my humble opinion the intent of the legislature was to protect citizens from being mechanically summoned in private criminal complaints being filed on the strength of subterfuges and incongruity in the allegations therein, by providing the proposed accused an opportunity of being heard before issuance of process. The legislative intent would be defeated in case the proposed accused is restricted and limited to respond to the averments\/allegations\/documents of the complaint as the same could also suffer from concealments and misstatements just to mislead the learned Magistracy to issue process.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Author can be reached at: adhirajsingh984@gmail.com<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> SLP (Crl.) No. 12055 of 2025.<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 13193<\/a>.<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1221<\/a>.<\/p>\n

4.<\/a> (2024) 8 SCC 465 : (2024) 3 SCC (Cri) 731<\/a>.<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> (2024)7 SCC 61 : (2024) 3 SCC (Cri) 39<\/a>.<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine Del 8285<\/a>.<\/p>\n

7.<\/a> 2025 SCC Online Cal 5294<\/a>.<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> 2025 SCC Online J&K 394<\/a>.<\/p>\n

9.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine Kar 490<\/a>.<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine Kar 20292<\/a>.<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> 2024 SCC Online Kar 96<\/a>.<\/p>\n

12.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine All 4884<\/a>.<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine Ker 532<\/a>.<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine Cal 5928<\/a>.<\/p>\n

15.<\/a> R.R. Chari<\/span> v. State of U.P.<\/span>, 1951 SCC 250 : 1951 SCC OnLine SC 22<\/a>.<\/p>\n

16.<\/a> Tula Ram<\/span> v. Kishore Singh<\/span>, (1977) 4 SCC 459 : 1977 SCC (Cri) 621 : 1977 SCC OnLine SC 275<\/a>.<\/p>\n

17.<\/a> Manharibhai Muljibhai Kakadia<\/span> v. Shaileshbhai Mohanbhai Patel<\/span>, (2012) 10 SCC 517 : (2013) 1 SCC (Cri) 218<\/a>.<\/p>\n

18.<\/a> 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 13194<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Adhiraj Singh*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":366890,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[92803,92801,92802,92800,92796,92795,92799,92798,92794,92797],"class_list":["post-366889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-criminal-justice-reforms-india","tag-fir-electronic-registration","tag-forensic-investigation-reforms","tag-magisterial-powers","tag-new-criminal-procedure-code","tag-nss-2023-analysis","tag-nss-vs-crpc","tag-private-complaint-procedure","tag-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita","tag-section-223-proviso"],"yoast_head":"\nComprehensive Analysis of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"An in-depth examination of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, explaining procedural changes and their impact on private complaints and magisterial processes.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"An in-depth examination of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, explaining procedural changes and their impact on private complaints and magisterial processes.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-17T03:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-17T03:55:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/\",\"name\":\"Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-17T03:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-17T03:55:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"An in-depth examination of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, explaining procedural changes and their impact on private complaints and magisterial processes.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Section 223 NSS\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023","description":"An in-depth examination of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, explaining procedural changes and their impact on private complaints and magisterial processes.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023","og_description":"An in-depth examination of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, explaining procedural changes and their impact on private complaints and magisterial processes.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-17T03:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-17T03:55:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/","name":"Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-17T03:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-17T03:55:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"An in-depth examination of Section 223 of the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, explaining procedural changes and their impact on private complaints and magisterial processes.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Section 223 NSS"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/17\/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-section-223-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 223, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-223-NSS.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/22\/parliament-passes-new-criminal-law-bills-to-replace-colonial-era-ipc-crpc-evidence-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":366889,"position":0},"title":"Parliament passes new Criminal Law Bills to replace colonial-era IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act; Read key highlights","author":"Editor","date":"December 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Indian Criminal Justice system is all set to be revamped with the passing of the Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill, 2023, Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita 2023, and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita 2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Criminal Law Bills","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Criminal-Law-Bills.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Criminal-Law-Bills.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Criminal-Law-Bills.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Criminal-Law-Bills.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304232,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/10\/dhc-suggests-to-replace-shall-with-may-in-section483-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":366889,"position":1},"title":"[Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023] Delhi HC suggests Select Committee to replace \u201cshall\u201d with \u201cmay\u201d and \u201cbail or bail bond\u201d with \u201cpersonal bond with or without surety\u201d","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is observed that in Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the word \u201cshall\u201d means \u201cit is mandatory for the accused to furnish bail bond with surety\u201d.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/three-new-bills-to-overhaul-indian-criminal-justice-system-withdrawn-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":366889,"position":2},"title":"Centre\u2019s new Bills to overhaul Indian Criminal Justice system withdrawn; To be reintroduced after incorporating suggestions of Committee","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The decision came in light of the Parliamentary Committee\u2019s recommendations to amend the bills with some major changes relating to adultery, Section 377, etc.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"New criminal law bills","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/New-criminal-law-bills.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/New-criminal-law-bills.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/New-criminal-law-bills.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/New-criminal-law-bills.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326136,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/09\/calcutta-high-court-directs-enhancement-forensic-capabilities-bnss-enforcement-nibmg-national-institute-of-biomedical-generics-government-foresic-laboratory-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":366889,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court directs Enhancement of Forensic Capabilities due to BNSS Enforcement, recognizing NIBMG as Government Forensic Laboratory","author":"Arunima","date":"July 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"By directing the recognition of NIBMG as a CFSL and its scientists as government experts, the Court aims to alleviate the pressure on existing forensic laboratories and ensure timely and accurate forensic analysis, thereby strengthening the overall criminal justice system.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324976,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/24\/icps-hosts-second-training-programme-on-newly-enacted-criminal-laws-for-government-officers-and-officials\/","url_meta":{"origin":366889,"position":4},"title":"ICPS Hosts Second Training Programme on Newly Enacted Criminal Laws for Government Officers and Officials","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies (ICPS) has successfully conducted its second training programme on newly enacted criminal laws on 20th and 21st June, 2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Events\/Webinars"","block_context":{"text":"Events\/Webinars","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/events-and-webinars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ICPS Hosts Second Training Programme","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ICPS-Hosts-Second-Training-Programme.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ICPS-Hosts-Second-Training-Programme.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ICPS-Hosts-Second-Training-Programme.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ICPS-Hosts-Second-Training-Programme.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373326,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/21\/del-hc-amends-rules-parties-include-complainant-and-victim\/","url_meta":{"origin":366889,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC amends rules to include ‘complainant’ and ‘victim’ within the term “parties” in criminal cases","author":"Ritu","date":"January 21, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis amendment shall come into force from the date of its publication in the gazette.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"parties include complainant and victim","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/parties-include-complainant-and-victim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/parties-include-complainant-and-victim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/parties-include-complainant-and-victim.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/parties-include-complainant-and-victim.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366889\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/366890"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}