{"id":366570,"date":"2025-11-13T14:00:13","date_gmt":"2025-11-13T08:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=366570"},"modified":"2025-11-14T15:58:39","modified_gmt":"2025-11-14T10:28:39","slug":"jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/","title":{"rendered":"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Jharkhand High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by some members of the Medical Cadre, seeking directions to revise and refix their benefits under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (&#8216;DACP scheme&#8217;) in line with the 5th and 6th Pay Revisions, along with release of arrears and consequential entitlements, after the State shifted the cut-off date and withdrew earlier benefits, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ananda Sen<\/span>, J., held that all similarly situated persons falling within the same class must be given the same benefits, irrespective of whether they filed litigation or not. The Court emphasised that the date which was fixed earlier was the only crucial date for the purpose of grant of DACP benefits, and there cannot be any other second date.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case arose from the implementation of the DACP scheme for Medical Cadre employees. While the scheme was initially designed to extend career progression benefits in line with the 5th and 6th Pay Revisions, subsequent government actions altered its scope. The original cut-off date of 05-04-2002 and the grant of benefits from 29-10-2008 were later disturbed when the State, by Resolution dated 11-09-2013, shifted the cut-off date to 01-09-2008 and through Notification dated 15-01-2014, the DACP scheme benefits earlier granted were withdrawn.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved employees challenged this withdrawal, but their writ petitions were dismissed. On appeal, the Division Bench, by judgment dated 02-08-2023, held that the shifting of the cut-off date was not proper and allowed the matter. The State carried the issue to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court dismissed the petition on 19-02-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the petitioners, who did not earlier approach the Court sought to claim the same benefits as those already granted before.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that the date of DACP scheme was changed by the State by virtue of a Resolution which was ultimately set aside by the Division Bench of the Court in Shyam <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sundar Singh v. State of Jharkhand<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/C100Za5J\" target=\"_blank\">2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 768<\/a>. It was noted that the effect of the order was that the date which was fixed earlier was the only crucial date for the purpose of grant of DACP scheme and there cannot be any other second date. The Court highlighted that once a particular date has been fixed, all the persons who come within the zone of consideration must get the same benefit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in the judgment of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shyam Sundar Singh<\/span> (supra) which declared that the cut-off date was bad, it was not in personam and rather it was in rem. It was further noted that it was the policy decision of the State which was struck down which automatically revived the earlier policy. It was emphasised by the Court that when the particular policy was revived, all the persons, who were within the zone were entitled to get the benefit of the policy, no matter whether they approached the Court or not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ganesh Chandra Sinha v. State of Jharkhand<\/span><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Ganesh Chandra Sinha v. State of Jharkhand, Nutral Citation No.- 2025:JHHC:24327\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>, wherein it was held that when in principle an entitlement of a group of persons has already been decided, it is immaterial as to who are the person who were appearing before the Court in the litigation. Benefits of the policy decision should be granted to all even if they are not a party to the litigation. The Court highlighted that denying benefits to similarly situated persons, who even if have not appeared before the Court, were entitled for same service benefits and the State could not deny the same, as they were not a separate category.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court allowed the petition while directing the respondents to grant similar benefits to the petitioners and other similarly situated persons in terms of the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shyam Sundar Singh<\/span> (supra) judgment, which already held that shifting of the cut-off date was not proper.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, thus, ordered that consequential benefits be released within eight weeks from receipt of the order. It was further emphasised that since the Division Bench judgment of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shyam Sundar Singh<\/span> (supra) was confirmed by the Supreme Court, all similarly situated persons falling within the same class must be given the same benefits, irrespective of whether they filed litigation or not. Accordingly, the petition stood allowed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ram Prasad Singh v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/n5Bw4kY1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Jhar 3587<\/a>, decided on 06-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Vinay Kr. Tiwary, Advocate, Vishwanath Moon, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Rahul Kamlesh, AC<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Ganesh Chandra Sinha v. State of Jharkhand, Nutral Citation No.- 2025:JHHC:24327<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;When the particular policy has been revived, all the persons, who are within the zone are entitled to get the benefit of the policy, no matter whether they have approached the Court or not.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":366579,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[92564,92563,5791,71279,92565,32088],"class_list":["post-366570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-career-progression-benefits","tag-dynamic-assured-career-progression-scheme-benefits","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-justice-ananda-sen","tag-medical-officers-benefits","tag-pay-revisions"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers: JhaHC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court ruled that DACP benefits cannot be restricted to litigants, holding that all similarly placed medical cadre officers are entitled to equal benefits.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court ruled that DACP benefits cannot be restricted to litigants, holding that all similarly placed medical cadre officers are entitled to equal benefits.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-13T08:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-14T10:28:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/\",\"name\":\"DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers: JhaHC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-13T08:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-14T10:28:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court ruled that DACP benefits cannot be restricted to litigants, holding that all similarly placed medical cadre officers are entitled to equal benefits.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"DACP benefits\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers: JhaHC | SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court ruled that DACP benefits cannot be restricted to litigants, holding that all similarly placed medical cadre officers are entitled to equal benefits.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court ruled that DACP benefits cannot be restricted to litigants, holding that all similarly placed medical cadre officers are entitled to equal benefits.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-13T08:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-14T10:28:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/","name":"DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers: JhaHC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-13T08:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-14T10:28:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court ruled that DACP benefits cannot be restricted to litigants, holding that all similarly placed medical cadre officers are entitled to equal benefits.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"DACP benefits"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/jhar-hc-dacp-benefits-extend-to-all-similarly-situated-medical-cadre-officers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jharkhand HC: DACP benefits extend to all similarly situated medical cadre officers, not just litigants"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/DACP-benefits-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319012,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/01\/employees-have-legitimate-expectation-to-receive-same-benefits-as-offered-to-similarly-situated-employees-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":366570,"position":0},"title":"Employees have legitimate expectation to receive same benefits as offered to similarly situated employees: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that the respondent has no authority to make a discrimination among the similarly situated employees for no good reason.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/29\/jharkhand-highcourt-roadconstructiondepartment-benefits-assuredcareerprogression-acp-employment-superannuation-legalnews-legal-research-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":366570,"position":1},"title":"Jharkhand High Court | Post Retiral Benefits will also be granted if found entitled to any benefit under Assured Career Progression Scheme","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J., while disposing of the instant petition filed against the order passed by the State and the Road Construction Department cancelling the benefits granted under Assured Career Progression (\u2018ACP') held that if the petitioner is found entitled to any benefit under ACP,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244565,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/27\/aft-reluctance-to-undergo-criteria-course-cannot-create-a-bar-for-benefit-of-modified-assured-career-progression-scheme\/","url_meta":{"origin":366570,"position":2},"title":"AFT | Reluctance to undergo criteria course cannot create a bar for benefit of Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava (Chairperson) and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve (Member) A, granted benefits of Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) to the applicant along with subsequent increments and pensionary benefits. The applicant was enrolled in Army as Havildar on 17-12-1994\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310408,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/30\/cal-hc-upholds-rectification-of-initial-pay-fixation-error-under-the-assured-career-progression-scheme-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":366570,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rectification of initial pay fixation error under the Assured Career Progression Scheme","author":"Ritu","date":"December 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ACP Scheme mandates upgradation to the next higher grade in the existing hierarchy and the petitioner, being a Constable, was entitled to the 1st ACP upgradation in the existing hierarchical pay scale.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/24\/jhar-hc-sap-personnel-not-entitled-to-superannuation-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":366570,"position":4},"title":"Jharkhand HC: Special Auxiliary Police personnel are contractual appointees with a maximum tenure of 7 years, not entitled to superannuation benefit","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf any age of superannuation was to be included or read into the scheme, the same could only be done by a proper amendment and not by any recommendatory letter.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SAP personnel not entitled to superannuation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/SAP-personnel-not-entitled-to-superannuation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/SAP-personnel-not-entitled-to-superannuation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/SAP-personnel-not-entitled-to-superannuation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/SAP-personnel-not-entitled-to-superannuation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/30\/jhar-hc-a-person-not-vigilant-of-his-rights-and-who-acquiesces-with-situation-cannot-claim-relief-that-is-otherwise-available-to-vigilant-man\/","url_meta":{"origin":366570,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | A person not vigilant of his rights and who acquiesces with situation cannot claim relief that is otherwise available to vigilant man","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Aniruddha Bose, C.J. and B.B. Mangalmurti, J. dismissed a petition claiming arrears of pension, post retrial benefits with statutory and penal interest. In the present case the appellant was appointed as Chairman and later was appointed as Junior Account Clerk in Rural Works Department.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366570\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/366579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}