{"id":366490,"date":"2025-11-13T09:30:41","date_gmt":"2025-11-13T04:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=366490"},"modified":"2025-11-18T10:12:49","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T04:42:49","slug":"father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father&#8217;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#8217;s maintenance: Kerala HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In the present petition, the point for consideration was whether retirement benefits such as pension and gratuity were liable to attachment under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523430\" target=\"_blank\">XXXVIII Rule 5<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;) in a claim for maintenance and educational expenses made by a minor daughter against her father. The Family Court had dismissed the petition for attachment before judgment citing the exemption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>. The Division Bench of Devan Ramachandran and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M.B. Snehalatha*<\/span>, JJ., set aside that order, holding that the exemption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> cannot be invoked to defeat a statutory and moral obligation to maintain one&#8217;s minor child.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner, a minor daughter represented by her mother, filed a claim before the Family Court seeking maintenance and educational expenses from her father, who had retired on 31-05-2025, as a LD Clerk in the Panchayat Department. It was alleged that though he had sufficient means and income, the father failed to provide any maintenance and educational expenses. She is a Plus Two student and has already incurred an expense of Rs 2,74,900 towards tuition and hostel fees. She further requires Rs 3 lakh for further studies and Rs 10,000 per month for hostel expenses, along with Rs 20,000 per month for maintenance over the next three years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The daughter alleged that her father earned more than Rs 55,000 per month and was expected to receive approximately Rs 55 lakh as retirement benefits, pay revision arrears, DA arrears, etc. She sought attachment of these benefits before judgment, alleging that he was taking hasty steps to withdraw and divert the funds to defeat any decree passed against him. She claimed Rs 39.94 lakh towards past and future maintenance and educational expenses and sought attachment before judgment of the retirement benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">She had also filed a petition for attachment before judgment which was dismissed by the Family Court, while relying on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Radhey Shyam Gupta<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Punjab National Bank<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/09epTRAK\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(2009) 1 SCC 376<\/span><\/a>, on the ground that retirement benefits were not attachable in view of the exemption under proviso to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The father contended that he was suffering from various illnesses and was on leave for a long period because of which he would receive a nominal amount as retirement benefits. He stated that he had no house or landed property and also had to care for his aged parents. He submitted that his last drawn salary was only Rs 16,000, and it was impossible for him to pay Rs 20,000 per month for maintenance.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court acknowledged that maintenance of Rs 2000 per month had been ordered earlier by the Judicial Magistrate First-Class, but the father had defaulted in paying that paltry amount. The Court emphasized that the obligation to maintain one&#8217;s minor children is a fundamental, legal, and constitutional duty, and that the right of a wife or a minor child to maintenance supersedes the employee&#8217;s right to claim exemption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramesh Chander Kaushal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Veena Kaushal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/P59CLDb1\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #467886; color: #467886;\">(1978) 4 SCC 70<\/span><\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that an order directing payment of maintenance is a measure of social justice and specially enacted to protect women and children, and it falls within the sweep of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574882\" target=\"_blank\">15 (3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> and reinforced by Article 39.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court clarified that the exemption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> is intended to protect employees after retirement and ensures their sustenance when their earning capacity comes to an end. However, this protection cannot be used as a shield to avoid fulfilling statutory and moral obligations towards dependents. The Court opined that the object behind Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> is to protect the said amount for utilizing the same for the benefits of the employee and family and to prevent vagrancy and destitution of the family members of the employee.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court distinguished <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Radhey Shyam Gupta<\/span> (supra), noting that it involved a bank&#8217;s execution proceedings against a retiree, whereas the present case involved a claim by his own daughter seeking maintenance and educational expenses. The Court rejected the father&#8217;s argument that the retirement benefits were not attachable towards the daughter&#8217;s maintenance plea according to the exemption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523806\" target=\"_blank\">60(1)(g)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> and observed that the daughter could not be equated with a creditor who was attaching the retirement benefits of an employee for a debt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court, while allowing the petition, set aside the Family Court&#8217;s order denying the attachment before judgment of the father&#8217;s retirement benefits and directed it to reconsider the plea afresh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rifa Fathima v. Salim, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wmhOT1QV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 12114<\/a>, decided on 07-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice M.B. Snehalatha<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> P. Rahul, Rajesh V. Prasad, Abhina L., Namitha Neethu Balachandran, Shyama S, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> B. Mohanlal, P.S. Preetha, Motty Jiby Vasudevan, Abijith M., Avani Nair, Jayaprabha Arjun, Praveena T., Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The object behind Section 60(1)(g) CPC is to protect the said amount for utilizing the same for the benefits of the employee and family and to prevent vagrancy and destitution of the family members of the employee.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":366498,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[61876,54756,91540,2523,2863,52205,5271,7021,91488],"class_list":["post-366490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-attachment-before-judgment","tag-justice-devan-ramachandran","tag-justice-m-b-snehalatha","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-maintenance","tag-order-xxxviii-rule-5-cpc","tag-pension","tag-retirement-benefits","tag-section-601g-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Father&#039;s retirement benefits can be attached for child&#039;s maintenance: Kerala HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court holds that exemption under Section 60(1)(g) is inapplicable where father&#039;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#039;s maintenance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father&#039;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#039;s maintenance: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court holds that exemption under Section 60(1)(g) is inapplicable where father&#039;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#039;s maintenance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-13T04:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-18T04:42:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father&#039;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#039;s maintenance: Kerala HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Father's retirement benefits can be attached for child's maintenance: Kerala HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-13T04:00:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-18T04:42:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court holds that exemption under Section 60(1)(g) is inapplicable where father's retirement benefits are to be attached for child's maintenance.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"retirement benefits attached for child's maintenance\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father&#8217;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#8217;s maintenance: Kerala HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Father's retirement benefits can be attached for child's maintenance: Kerala HC | SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court holds that exemption under Section 60(1)(g) is inapplicable where father's retirement benefits are to be attached for child's maintenance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father's retirement benefits are to be attached for child's maintenance: Kerala HC","og_description":"Kerala High Court holds that exemption under Section 60(1)(g) is inapplicable where father's retirement benefits are to be attached for child's maintenance.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-13T04:00:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-18T04:42:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father's retirement benefits are to be attached for child's maintenance: Kerala HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/","name":"Father's retirement benefits can be attached for child's maintenance: Kerala HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-13T04:00:41+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-18T04:42:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kerala High Court holds that exemption under Section 60(1)(g) is inapplicable where father's retirement benefits are to be attached for child's maintenance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"retirement benefits attached for child's maintenance"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/13\/father-retirement-benefits-can-be-attached-for-child-maintenance-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. 60(1)(g) exemption inapplicable where father&#8217;s retirement benefits are to be attached for child&#8217;s maintenance: Kerala HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/retirement-benefits-attached-for-childs-maintenance.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/what-does-the-term-competence-under-section-24-of-cpc-refer-to-kerala-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":366490,"position":0},"title":"What does the term \u2018competence\u2019 under Section 24 of CPC refer to? Kerala HC explains","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Section 24 (1) of the Code, the High Court or District Court may at any stage withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any court subordinate to it; and transfer the same for trial or disposal to any court subordinate to it and competent to try or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/23\/determination-of-attachment-and-sale-of-life-insurance-policy-for-execution-of-decree-against-judgment-debtor\/","url_meta":{"origin":366490,"position":1},"title":"Determination of Attachment and Sale of Life Insurance Policy for Execution of Decree against Judgment-Debtor","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Love Kumar Gupta*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307374,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/17\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-order-directing-furnish-bank-guarantee-violation-order38-rule5-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":366490,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside direction furnishing bank guarantee being violative of principles underlying Order 38 Rule 5 CPC","author":"Arunima","date":"November 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Whilst the court is not unduly bound by the texts or Order XXXVIII Rule 1 and 2 or Order XXXVIII Rule (5) or any other provisions of CPC, the substantial principles for grant of such interim measures cannot be disregarded.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/return-of-mahar-can-be-shown-by-parties-statements-not-just-khula-nama-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":366490,"position":3},"title":"Return of Mahar can be shown by parties&#8217; statements and not merely through Khula Nama: Kerala High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the factum of an attempt of reconciliation and the absence of Mahar with the wife being prima facie established, there was no reason to doubt, or to find error in the views and holdings of the Family Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Return of Mahar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Return-of-Mahar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Return-of-Mahar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Return-of-Mahar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Return-of-Mahar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365157,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/kerala-hc-cruelty-monitoring-movements-forcing-wife-to-resign-is-cruelty-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":366490,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;Serious mental cruelty&#8217;; Kerala HC grants divorce to wife subjected to constant unfounded suspicion, monitoring, and forced job resignation","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe continued mistrust of the husband creates an atmosphere of humiliation, fear and emotional suffering and such conduct makes it unreasonable to expect the wife to continue living with him and the wife is entitled to live with dignity and freedom through the remedy of divorce.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"monitoring movements forcing wife to resign is cruelty","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/monitoring-movements-forcing-wife-to-resign-is-cruelty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/monitoring-movements-forcing-wife-to-resign-is-cruelty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/monitoring-movements-forcing-wife-to-resign-is-cruelty.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/monitoring-movements-forcing-wife-to-resign-is-cruelty.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/30\/patiala-house-court-orders-stay-on-attachment-of-bikaner-house\/","url_meta":{"origin":366490,"position":5},"title":"Delhi Court orders conditional stay on attachment of Bikaner House; Directs payment of decretal amount in terms of Arbitral Award","author":"Editor","date":"November 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court had ordered the attachment of the Bikaner House to enforce payment since neither did the Nagar Palika of the State of Rajasthan comply with the court order to file an affidavit of assets nor did it pay the petitioner per the arbitral award.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bikaner House attachment stayed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attachment-stayed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attachment-stayed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attachment-stayed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attachment-stayed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366490"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366490\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/366498"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}