{"id":366417,"date":"2025-11-12T12:30:08","date_gmt":"2025-11-12T07:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=366417"},"modified":"2025-11-18T09:55:38","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T04:25:38","slug":"del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as &#8216;dhoka&#8217;; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an application filed by Dabur under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523435\" target=\"_blank\">39, Rules 1<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523437\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a>, seeking a permanent and mandatory injunction against Patanjali for denigration, disparagement and defamation through their advertisement for chyawanprash, the Single Judge Bench of Tejas Karia, J, held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">calling other chyawanprash as &#8216;dhoka&#8217; or deceit constituted disparagement of chyawanprash as a class and was not permissible<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court restrained Patanjali from broadcasting the advertisement disparaging the class of chyawanprash and also directed the defendants to block the same from all internet and social media websites.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff company, Dabur, founded in 1884, specializes in production of ayurvedic medicines and marketing a diverse range of wellness and healthcare products including chyawanprash.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Dabur submitted that its chyawanprash is manufactured as per the formulae prescribed in the &#8216;Rasa Tantra Saar Va Siddha Prayog Sangraha&#8217;. Dabur&#8217;s product is a market leader in the chyawanprash category and enjoys an enviable reputation and goodwill all over India. Dabur had further contended that the very mention of chyawanprash is primarily associated with their product in the minds of the consumers and with decades of history, they have earned widespread recognition for its health benefits, particularly for boosting immunity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Defendant 1, Patanjali, was founded by Baba Ramdev and specializes in manufacture of various cosmetics, ayurvedic medicines, personal care and food products. Baba Ramdev is the brand ambassador of Patanjali and claims to be an expert in Yoga, Veda and Ayurveda in India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Dabur submitted that in October, 2025, it had become aware of an advertisement aired by Patanjali on national television channel, Star Plus (&#8216;impugned advertisement&#8217;) wherein Patanjali referred to all chyawanprash as &#8216;dhoka&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Dabur contended that the manner and storyline of the impugned advertisement conveyed the overall message that Dabur&#8217;s as well as the entire class of chyawanprash available in the market are fake inferior products which have no medicinal benefits. Dabur further contended that the impugned advertisement is disparaging Dabur as well as other chyawanprash in order to promote Patanjali&#8217;s product and must therefore be taken down.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that though the impugned advertisement did not directly refer to Dabur&#8217;s chyawanprash, generic disparagement of all competing products by Patanjali was likely to cause harm to Dabur since Dabur was the market leader in chyawanprash.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that while comparative advertising is permissible, it cannot extend to disparaging a competitor&#8217;s product. It is open to an advertiser to highlight that a particular aspect or quality of its product is superior to that of a rival, provided that the overall message of the advertisement is not misleading.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also stated that any factual claim or representation made in an advertisement must be not only accurate, but also free from the potential to mislead. If an advertisement crosses the permissible limits and becomes false, misleading, unfair, or deceptive, it ceases to enjoy the protection afforded by Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)(a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The test of an advertisement constituting disparagement has to be seen from the point of view of an ordinary reasonable man, i.e., what would be the impact \/ impression of the advertisement on said reasonable and ordinary person of average intelligence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in the instant case, the impugned advertisement sought to convey the message that only Patanjali&#8217;s product is genuine and all other products in the market are deceptive. This is incorrect and disparages the entire class of chyawanprash in general. The Court opined that as long as the manufacturers of chyawanprash, including Dabur, had a drug license and manufactured as per the Ayurveda books as detailed in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002852199\" target=\"_blank\">Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940<\/a>, they could not be said to be deceiving the public. Such a statement would be false representation and not merely puffery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court stated that since the average consumer considers Baba Ramdev a well-known yogi and an authority or ayurvedic practices, his assertion on the quality of other chyawanprash would have a lasting effect on the minds of the public. It would lead the viewers to accept Baba Ramdev&#8217;s statement as true and disregard other brands of chyawanprash.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that a prima facie case had been made out in favour of Dabur. The balance of convenience was also in Dabur&#8217;s favour and an irreparable injury would be caused to Dabur if the ad-interim injunction was not granted.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the Court, till the next date of hearing,<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-roman;\">\n<li>\n<p>Restrained Patanjali and all entities acting through it from issuing, broadcasting or disseminating the impugned advertisement or any other advertisement that refers to chyawanprash from other brands as &#8216;dhoka&#8217;; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Directed the defendants to take down, block or disable the impugned advertisement from all print mediums and electronic mediums including youtube and Instagram.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter was further listed for 6-2-2026<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dabur India Ltd. v. Patanjali Ayurved Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/A2qp6NKI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 8347<\/a>, decided on 6-11-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, R. Jawahar Lal, Anirudh Bakhru, Meghna Kumar, Krisna Gambhir, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Defendant:<\/span> Rajiv Nayar, Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocates, Rahul Sahay, Rishabh Pant, Neha Gupta, Abhijeet Kr. Pandey, Osheen Verna, Pratham Arora, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;While it is open to exaggerate the claims relating to the goods or services and embellish their virtues or benefits, it is not open to denigrate or disparage the goods of the others as a class in its entirety.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":366420,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49709,2543,48570,87202,42631,92452],"class_list":["post-366417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-dabur","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-disparagement","tag-justice-tejas-karia","tag-patanjali","tag-patanjali-chyawanprash"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC restrains Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash &#039;dhoka&#039; | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Dabur, restraining Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash brands a &#039;dhoka&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as &#039;dhoka&#039;; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Dabur, restraining Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash brands a &#039;dhoka&#039;.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-12T07:00:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-18T04:25:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as &#039;dhoka&#039;; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC restrains Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash 'dhoka' | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-12T07:00:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-18T04:25:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Dabur, restraining Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash brands a 'dhoka'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Patanjali chyawanprash 'dhoka' advertisement\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as &#8216;dhoka&#8217;; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC restrains Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash 'dhoka' | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Dabur, restraining Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash brands a 'dhoka'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as 'dhoka'; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Dabur, restraining Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash brands a 'dhoka'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-12T07:00:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-18T04:25:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as 'dhoka'; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/","name":"Del HC restrains Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash 'dhoka' | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-12T07:00:08+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-18T04:25:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted interim injunction in favour of Dabur, restraining Patanjali from calling other chyawanprash brands a 'dhoka'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Patanjali chyawanprash 'dhoka' advertisement"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/del-hc-grants-interim-relief-in-dabur-patanjali-chyawanprash-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patanjali restrained from calling other chyawaprash brands as &#8216;dhoka&#8217;; Delhi High Court grants interim relief to Dabur"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Patanjali-chyawanprash-dhoka-advertisement.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":352788,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/dhc-restrains-patanjali-from-airing-ads-disparaging-dabur\/","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Patanjali from airing advertisements disparaging Dabur Chyawanprash","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While Patanjali could state that its product, \u2018Patanjali Special Chyawanprash\u2019, was the best, it could not state that the other chyawanprash manufactures lacked the necessary knowledge and technical know-how to prepare the same as per ayurvedic texts, since that statement is both untrue and misleading to the public at large.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patanjali disparaging ads Dabur","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Patanjali-disparaging-ads-Dabur.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Patanjali-disparaging-ads-Dabur.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Patanjali-disparaging-ads-Dabur.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Patanjali-disparaging-ads-Dabur.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/09\/cal-hc-disparagement-or-mere-puffery-court-decides-in-matter-of-offending-misleading-advertisements-dabur-india-v-baidyanath-ayurved\/","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | Disparagement or mere puffery? Court decides in matter of offending\/misleading\u00a0advertisements [Dabur India v. Baidyanath Ayurved]","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Shekhar B. Saraf, J. decided on a petition which was filed seeking remedy against impugned advertisements disparaging the goodwill and reputation of the petitioner and its product. Facts: The plaintiff\/petitioner had filed the present suit against an advertising campaign containing five impugned advertisements issued by the defendant\/respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/04\/legal-roundup-ipr-november-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":2},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025: Key IPR rulings of the Month","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Compiling key judgments from High Courts across India, this roundup presents November\u2019s significant developments in copyright, trade mark, trade dress, and personality rights, reflecting evolving trends in IP protection and enforcement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200173,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/16\/slanderous-defamatory-videos-against-patanjali-ayurved-to-be-pulled-out-from-social-media-platforms\/","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":3},"title":"Slanderous &#038; Defamatory videos against Patanjali Ayurved to be pulled out from Social Media platforms","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of J.R. Midha, J., in an order directed Facebook Inc., Google LLC, YouTube LLC to remove the content as mentioned by the plaintiffs (Patanjali Ayurved Ltd.) to defame them from their respective portals. The plaintiffs stated that videos containing slanderous, defamatory and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/30\/advertisement-to-misleading-advertisement-horlicks-ltd-v-zydus-wellness-products\/","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":4},"title":"Advertisement to Misleading Advertisement | Horlicks Ltd. v. Zydus Wellness Products","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ankoosh Mehta*, Maitrayi Jain** and Anushka Shah***","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270248,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/16\/delhi-high-court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-dabur-india-for-openly-disparaging-nihar-naturals-shanti-amla-oil-by-whatsapp-message\/","url_meta":{"origin":366417,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad interim injunction against Dabur India for openly disparaging Nihar Naturals Shanti Amla Oil by WhatsApp message","author":"Editor","date":"July 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J. passed an ad-interim injunction in favour of Marico Pvt. Ltd (\u2018plaintiff') and found that the advertisement by Dabur India Ltd (\u2018defendant') was disparaging their goods by mentioning them as \u2018sasta amla' and hinting that use of such oil will be detrimental to the customer,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366417\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/366420"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}