{"id":365598,"date":"2025-11-03T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2025-11-03T06:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=365598"},"modified":"2025-11-03T12:00:36","modified_gmt":"2025-11-03T06:30:36","slug":"tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In October 2025, several significant developments unfolded across Tribunals and Commissions. From CCPA&#8217;s order imposing Rs 5 Lakh penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading advertisement, CCI&#8217;S dismissal of abuse of dominance case against ICICI Securities NSE and BSE, NHRC cognizance on fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur and reported abduction and murder of differently abled RTI activist in Gujarat, CESTAT&#8217;s order on old\/used lead-acid batteries recovered from ship, this quick legal roundup presents the month&#8217;s most significant stories acrossRegulatory Bodies, Tribunals, and Commissions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (GST)<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemical&#8217;s shares<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">In an appeal filed by Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemicals Ltd. (GNFC) against the ruling of the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) denying input tax credit (ITC) on expenses incurred for buyback of shares, the Two-Member Bench of Rajeev Topno, Member (SGST)* and Sunil Kumar Mall, Member (CGST)* rejected the appeal, holding that since buyback of shares constitutes a transaction in securities, which is neither a supply of goods nor of services under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (CGST Act), no ITC can be availed on such expenditure and reversal of common input credit is mandatory under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534751\" target=\"_blank\">17(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a>. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">Central Consumer Protection Authority<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">Inside CCPA order imposing Rs 5 Lakh penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad on selection of 216+ candidates in UPSC CSE 2022<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">While considering this suo motu matter revolving around an advertisement by Drishti IAS (VDK Eduventures Pvt. Ltd.), concerning selection of 216+ candidates in UPSC CSE 2022; the Bench of Nidhi Khare (Chief Commissioner) and Anupam Mishra (Commissioner), found the claim made in the impugned advertisement to be misleading and directed Drishti IAS to pay penalty of Rs 5 Lakhs for publishing the misleading advertisement. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/ccpa-imposes-5lakh-penalty-on-drishti-ias-over-misleading-ad\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">Competition Commission of India<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">&#8216;Several key players act as competitive constraint&#8217;; CCI dismisses anti-competitive, abuse of dominance allegations against ICICI Securities, NSE &amp; BSE<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">A complaint was filed by the Informant under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001531240\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)(a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002783336\" target=\"_blank\">Competition Act, 2002<\/a> (&#8216;Act&#8217;), alleging violations of Sections 3 and 4 of the Act by ICICI Securities Limited (&#8216;ICICI&#8217;), in alleged collusion with the National Stock Exchange (&#8216;NSE&#8217;) and the Bombay Stock Exchange (&#8216;BSE&#8217;). The four-member Bench comprising Ravneet Kaur (Chairperson), Anil Agrawal (Member), Sweta Kakkad (Member), and Deepak Anurag (Member) examined whether the standardisation of the Authorised Person (&#8216;AP&#8217;) Agreement and ICICI&#8217;s termination practices contravened Sections 3(3), 3(4), and 4 of the Act. The Competition Commission of India (&#8216;CCI&#8217;) observed that the agreement format stemmed from Securities and Exchange Board of India (&#8216;SEBI&#8217;) regulatory framework aimed at investor protection and operational consistency. Therefore, it held that the enforcement of uniform AP Agreements by NSE and BSE did not constitute a concerted practice under Section 3(3) of the Act. The CCI noted that the securities broking industry in India was competitive and include several large players, and that ICICI did not hold a dominant position in the market. The CCI found no evidence of ICICI exercising significant market power or engaging in anti-competitive vertical restraints. The CCI thus held that there was no prima facie case of contravention of Sections 3(4) and 4 of the Act.<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/08\/cci-on-abuse-of-dominance-by-icici-securities-nse-bse\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">Customs, Excise &amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">Old\/Used Lead Acid Batteries recovered from ship not exigible to central excise duty: CESTAT<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">In an appeal filed against order of confirmation of the demand of central excise duty by Commissioner (Appeals), the two-member Bench of Satendra Vikram Singh (Technical Member) and Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha (Judicial Member) allowed the appeal and held that old Lead Acid Batteries recovered from ship breaking were not excisable under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002913364\" target=\"_blank\">Central Excise Act, 1944<\/a> (Central Excise Act) as it did not amount to manufacture.<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/04\/old-lead-acid-batteries-from-ship-breaking-not-excisable-cestat\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">Transferring tenancy and occupancy rights in immovable property not service under S. 65-B(44) of Finance Act; not liable to service tax: CESTAT, Ahmedabad<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">In an appeal filed against order of confirmation of the demand of service tax by Commissioner (Appeals), the two-member Bench of Satendra Vikram Singh (Technical Member) and Somesh Arora (Judicial Member) allowed the appeal and stated that the activity of transfer of tenancy and occupancy rights in respect of immovable property did not come under the definition of service under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550201\" target=\"_blank\">65-B(44)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000065759\" target=\"_blank\">Finance Act, 1994<\/a> (&#8216;Finance Act&#8217;). Hence, the amount received from the owner for surrendering and relinquishing tenancy and occupancy rights was not taxable. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/transferring-tenancy-rights-not-liable-to-service-tax-cestat\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">Online shopping platforms should develop a system of photographing\/video recording of receiving &amp; opening of packages by delivery persons: DCDRC, East Delhi<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">While considering this consumer dispute wherein the complainant had alleged that he was sold a different laptop instead of the one he had ordered from Amazon Retail; the Bench of S.S. Malhotra (President) and Ravi Kumar (Member)*, found both Amazon and Appario Retail (OP-2) liable for deficiency of service. The DCDRC however opined that there should be a system in place by online sellers\/platforms whereby photographs or videos of receiving and opening of the packet is taken by their representative\/ rider \/delivery person, to keep record of what is being delivered. The Commission opined that this approach would avoid many complaints in future. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/16\/dcdrc-suggestion-to-reduce-wrong-product-delivery-by-online-shopping-platforms\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">Income Tax Appellate Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">&#8216;Escaped income is below Rs 50 lakhs&#8217;; ITAT quashes reassessment notice under S. 148 Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation of 3 years<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">In the present case, an appeal was filed by the appellant-assessee against the impugned order dated 16-6-2025, passed by the NFAC, Delhi relating to assessment year (&#8216;A.Y.&#8217;) 2017-18, whereby NFAC confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer (&#8216;AO&#8217;) in upholding the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559391\" target=\"_blank\">147<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559392\" target=\"_blank\">148<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (&#8216;Act&#8217;), although the reopening was barred by limitation as escaped income was less than Rs 50 lakhs and did not fall under the extended time limitation under Section 149(1)(b). Mahavir Singh (Vice President), observed that the escaped income in the present case was below Rs 50 lakhs and as per Section 149(1)(a), the notice under Section 148 could be issued only within 3 years from the end of relevant assessment year, i.e., upto 31-03-2021, whereas in the present case, the notice was issued on 09-02-2024. Thus, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and held that the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the permissible period of limitation under Section 149(1)(a), therefore, the reassessment was void ab initio. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/21\/itat-quashes-reassessment-notice-barred-by-limitation-s-148\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">Resolution Professional to be appointed as liquidator unless replaced by Adjudicating Authority on grounds provided in Section 34 IBC: NCLAT<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">The present company appeal was filed by the Resolution professional (&#8216;appellant&#8217;) of Rajesh Landmark Projects (P) Ltd. (&#8216;Corporate Debtor&#8217;), challenging the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Court V, Mumbai Bench (&#8216;Adjudicating Authority&#8217;), which had allowed an interim application filed by the appellant seeking liquidation of the corporate debtor. However, instead of appointing the appellant as liquidator, it appointed Respondent 2, relying on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (&#8216;IBBI&#8217;) circular dated 18-7-2023 (&#8216;Circular&#8217;). The Bench of Ashok Bhushan, J. (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Technical Member), stated that the legislative scheme of Section 34(1) of the IBC clearly intended the Resolution professional to be appointed as liquidator, with replacement being a discretionary act of the adjudicating authority based on the grounds specified in Section 34(4) of the IBC. Thus, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the impugned order insofar as it appointed Respondent 2 as liquidator could not be sustained. Since there were no grounds available under Section 34(4) of the IBC for replacing the appellant, the appellant was required to be appointed as liquidator. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/01\/nclat-rp-to-be-liquidator-unless-replaced-unless-s-34-ibc\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline; text-underline-style: solid; text-underline-mode: continuous; text-underline-color: #171617; color: #171617;\">National Human Rights Commission<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">On 14-10-2025, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) took suo motu cognizance of a media report that eight patients died and three others were critically injured in a fire at the trauma centre ICU of the Government run Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Hospital in Jaipur, Rajasthan on 06-10-2025. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/nhrc-suo-motu-cognizance-of-sms-hospital-fire-jaipur\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/nhrc-suo-motu-cognizance-of-sms-hospital-fire-jaipur\/\" target=\"_blank\"><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of reported abduction and murder of differently abled RTI activist in Gujarat<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">On 22-10-2025, the National Human Rights Commission (&#8216;NHRC&#8217;) took suo motu cognizance of a media report regarding the death of a differently abled RTI activist in Tharad district, Gujarat. The victim was reportedly abducted by unidentified persons from an area near his residence on 12-10-2025, and his dead body was subsequently found in a canal on 14-10-2025. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span> <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/nhrc-suo-motu-cognizance-of-differently-abled-rti-activist-murder-gujarat\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #171617;\">NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of reported attacks on three journalists in Kerala, Manipur, and Tripura<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #171617;\">On 22-10-2025, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) took suo motu cognizance of the reported attacks on three journalists in Kerala and Manipur on 31-08-2025, and Tripura on 21-09-2025. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/24\/nhrc-suo-motu-cognizance-of-reported-attacks-on-three-journalists\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Explore the key legal developments of October 2025, featuring the CCPA&#8217;s order imposing Rs 5 Lakh penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad, CCI&#8217;s abuse of dominance case against ICICI Securities NSE and BSE, NHRC on fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur and reported abduction and murder of differently abled RTI activist in Gujarat.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":365601,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,46957],"tags":[91872,91875,91873,91881,91878,91879,91876,91874,91877,91880],"class_list":["post-365598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup","tag-drishtiias","tag-gujaratrtiactivistmurder","tag-icicisecurities","tag-legalmonthlyroundup","tag-occupancyrights","tag-octoberlegalroundup","tag-onlineshopping","tag-smshospitalfire","tag-tenancyrights","tag-tribunalcommisionmonthlyroundup"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tribunals &amp; Commissions October 2025 Roundup | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025: Differently abled RTI activist murder case; Fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur; abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities NSE and BSE; Drishti IAS&#039;s misleading ad case &amp; more\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025: Differently abled RTI activist murder case; Fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur; abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities NSE and BSE; Drishti IAS&#039;s misleading ad case &amp; more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-03T06:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunals & Commissions October 2025 Roundup | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-03T06:30:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025: Differently abled RTI activist murder case; Fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur; abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities NSE and BSE; Drishti IAS's misleading ad case & more\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunals & Commissions October 2025 Roundup | SCC Times","description":"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025: Differently abled RTI activist murder case; Fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur; abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities NSE and BSE; Drishti IAS's misleading ad case & more","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad & More","og_description":"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025: Differently abled RTI activist murder case; Fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur; abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities NSE and BSE; Drishti IAS's misleading ad case & more","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-11-03T06:30:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/","name":"Tribunals & Commissions October 2025 Roundup | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp","datePublished":"2025-11-03T06:30:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025: Differently abled RTI activist murder case; Fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur; abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities NSE and BSE; Drishti IAS's misleading ad case & more","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":364559,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/nhrc-suo-motu-cognizance-of-differently-abled-rti-activist-murder-gujarat\/","url_meta":{"origin":365598,"position":0},"title":"NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of reported abduction and murder of differently abled RTI activist in Gujarat","author":"Editor","date":"October 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The NHRC issued notice to the State DGP, calling for a detailed report on the matter within two weeks.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Differently abled RTI activist","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Differently-abled-RTI-activist.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Differently-abled-RTI-activist.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Differently-abled-RTI-activist.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Differently-abled-RTI-activist.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362765,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/ccpa-imposes-5lakh-penalty-on-drishti-ias-over-misleading-ad\/","url_meta":{"origin":365598,"position":1},"title":"Inside CCPA order imposing Rs 5 Lakh penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad on selection of 216+ candidates in UPSC CSE 2022","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In a preliminary inquiry, it was prima facie observed that Drishti IAS had allegedly published the claim\/advertisement and simultaneously advertised various types of courses provided by them on its official website while concealing important information. Therefore DG (Investigation) was requested to look into the matter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Drishti IAS","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Drishti-IAS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Drishti-IAS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Drishti-IAS.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Drishti-IAS.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/31\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":365598,"position":2},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | July 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of July, 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity \u00a0 Solar Project Whether there was bona fide delay in commissioning the solar power project? \u201c\u2026allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/05\/treating-rbi-governor-as-deemed-cpio-cic-issues-show-cause-notice-for-non-disclosure-of-wilful-defaulters-of-bad-loans\/","url_meta":{"origin":365598,"position":3},"title":"Treating RBI Governor as deemed CPIO, CIC issues show cause notice for non-disclosure of &#8220;wilful defaulters of bad loans&#8221;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhy is RBI fighting tooth and nail to defend defaulters?\u201d Central Information Commission (CIC): A Bench comprising of Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu issued a show-cause notice to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Urjit Patel holding him as deemed Public Information Officer (PIO) responsible for non-disclosure of a list of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6517,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/11\/ministry-of-environment-and-forests-rebuked-for-providing-false-information-to-rti-applicant\/","url_meta":{"origin":365598,"position":4},"title":"Ministry of Environment and Forests rebuked for providing false information to RTI applicant","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 11, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC): While coming down heavily upon Ministry of Environment and Forests for rendering \u201cfalse and misleading\u201d information in response to an RTI application seeking information on the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation emitted by cellphone towers on human beings, CIC issued a show cause to the Ministry\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/02\/30-reports-to-read-from-tribunals-and-commissions-legal-roundup-law-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":365598,"position":5},"title":"30 Reports to Read from Tribunals and Commissions | April and May RoundUp 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC) Framework of RTI Act restricts jurisdiction of CIC to provide a ruling on issues pertaining to access\/right to information, not venture into merits of case Neeraj Kumar Gupta (Information Commissioner), decides whether Commission can provide a ruling regarding the merits of a case or redressal of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=365598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365598\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/365601"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=365598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=365598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=365598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}