{"id":365080,"date":"2025-10-29T12:00:43","date_gmt":"2025-10-29T06:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=365080"},"modified":"2025-11-04T09:35:11","modified_gmt":"2025-11-04T04:05:11","slug":"del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/","title":{"rendered":"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an ‘Award’: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In petitions filed under Section 14<\/a> and 15<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (‘the Act’), seeking substitution or appointment of an arbitrator and\/ or to pass an order enabling the arbitrator to continue proceedings, the Single Judge Bench of Jasmeet Arora, J<\/span>, allowed the petitions.<\/p>\n

The Court further held that an order passed under Section 25(a)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> would not qualify as an ‘arbitral award’ and therefore the parties would not be required to challenge the same under Section 34<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The respondent company had been awarded the tender for projects relating to erection, testing, commissioning and handover of steam turbine and generator auxiliaries for various thermal power projects. Subsequently, the respondent subcontracted the work of erection and commissioning of mechanical and erection packages of the projects to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Due to delays in completion of the work, the respondent had issued a notice of termination. The petitioner had filed petitions under Section 9<\/a> of the Act<\/a> and the Court, vide order dated 8-1-2024, had appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.<\/p>\n

Vide order dated 18-11-2024 (‘impugned order’), the arbitrator closed the arbitration proceedings since the petitioner had not filed his statement of claims and not paid a portion of the arbitral fee under Section 25(a)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The respondent had contended that the impugned order was an arbitral award and therefore the only remedy available to the petitioner would be to challenge the same under Section 34<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court observed that in the case of PCL Suncon<\/span> v. National Highway Authority of India<\/span>, (2021) SCC OnLine Del 313<\/a>, the Court had referred to the case of Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Ltd.<\/span> v. Bhadra Products<\/span>, (2018) 2 SCC 534<\/a> wherein the Supreme Court had held that an arbitral award must finally decide an issue or a point at which the parties are in issue in the arbitration. Relying on this, the Court in PCL Suncon (supra)<\/span> had held that holding that an order terminating the arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> was an award was contrary to several decisions of the Court.<\/p>\n

Thus, the court opined that an order of the arbitrator could be considered an award only when it adjudicates upon the rights of the parties. An order terminating the proceedings for non-filing of a statement of claim could not be considered an arbitral award.<\/p>\n

The Court also referred to the case of Gangotri Enterprises Ltd.<\/span> v. NTPC Tamil Nadu Energy Company Ltd.<\/span>, (2017) SCC OnLine Del 6560<\/a>, wherein the Court had examined the scope of Section 25(a)<\/a> of the Act<\/a> and stated that once the arbitral proceedings were terminated and the arbitrator’s mandate was terminated, it could be challenged under Section 14<\/a> of the Act<\/a> but not Section 34<\/a> of the Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court, therefore, held that an order under Section 25(a) could not amount to an arbitral award since it did not deal with the rights of parties before the arbitrator. For an order to qualify as an award, it must decide, either finally or on an interim, an issue forming part of the dispute referred to arbitration. An order under Section 25(a)<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, being procedural in nature and not addressing the substantive lis<\/span> between the parties, lacks the essential attributes of an arbitral award.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court allowed the instant petitions and directed that the arbitration shall continue before the arbitrator appointed by the Court vide order dated 8-1-2024.<\/p>\n

[Mecwel Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. G.E. Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd., 2025 SCC OnLine Del 7138<\/a>, decided on 14-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Dr. Amit George, Shashwat Kabi, Ibansara Syiemlieh, Adhishwar Suri, Vaibhav Gandhi, Kartikay Puneesh, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Akshay Sapre, Abhijeet Swaroop, Vinam Gupta, Shivani Karmakar, Advocates<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Such an order merely terminates the arbitral proceedings on account of the claimant’s default in filing the statement of claim and does not involve any adjudication or determination of the rights or obligations of the parties.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":365086,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2633,91585,40741,2543,69917,91586],"class_list":["post-365080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral_award","tag-arbitral-fee","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-jasmeet-singh","tag-section-25a-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC: Order passed u\/S. 25(a) of A&C Act not an 'Award' | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not an arbitral 'award'.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an 'Award': Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not an arbitral 'award'.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-29T06:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-04T04:05:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an 'Award': Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC: Order passed u\/S. 25(a) of A&C Act not an 'Award' | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-29T06:30:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-04T04:05:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not an arbitral 'award'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Order under Section 25(a) of A&C Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an ‘Award’: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC: Order passed u\/S. 25(a) of A&C Act not an 'Award' | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not an arbitral 'award'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an 'Award': Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not an arbitral 'award'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-29T06:30:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-04T04:05:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an 'Award': Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/","name":"Del HC: Order passed u\/S. 25(a) of A&C Act not an 'Award' | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-29T06:30:43+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-04T04:05:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not an arbitral 'award'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Order under Section 25(a) of A&C Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/del-hc-order-passed-u-s-25a-of-ac-act-not-award\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 25 (a) of the Arbitration Act is not an ‘Award’: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Order-under-Section-25a-of-AC-Act.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/delhi-high-court-amendment-application-being-rejected-as-belated-does-not-constitute-interim-award-susceptible-to-challenge-under-s-34-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":365080,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court: Amendment application being rejected as ‘belated’ does not constitute interim award susceptible to challenge under S 34 Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (\u2018A&C Act') challenging an order passed wherein the arbitrator rejected an application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the statement of claim, Prateek Jalan, J. dismissed the petition as non-maintainable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/16\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-arbitral-award-by-arbitrator-de-jure-inability-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":365080,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside arbitral award passed by Arbitrator having de jure inability to pass the award","author":"Arunima","date":"June 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ineligibility of an Arbitrator goes to the root of his jurisdiction and the Arbitral Award cannot be considered as valid.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/06\/delhi-court-sets-aside-90-lakh-arbitral-award-bmw-india-financial-services\/","url_meta":{"origin":365080,"position":2},"title":"Delhi Court sets aside ₹90 lakh award granted in favour of BMW India Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.","author":"Editor","date":"June 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Unilateral Appointment of the Sole Arbitrator vitiates the proceedings of Arbitration.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patiala House Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/the-wide-scope-of-section-9-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":365080,"position":3},"title":"The Wide Scope of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ayushi Raghuwanshi\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-489-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-489-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-489-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-489-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-489-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/section-34-of-arbitration-act-a-well-reasoned-arbitral-award-cannot-be-interfered-with-delhi-high-court-on-limited-scope-of-interference-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":365080,"position":4},"title":"[Section 34 of Arbitration Act] A well-reasoned arbitral award cannot be interfered with: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Arbitral Tribunal is a creature of Contract, and the Contract is the only basis on which the Learned Tribunal should adjudicate, apart from the general provisions of law and jurisprudence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/amazon-in-dispute-with-future-retail\/","url_meta":{"origin":365080,"position":5},"title":"Emergency arbitrator’s award is referable to S. 17(1) of Indian Arbitration Act; enforceable under S. 17(2): Scopious analysis of landmark SC ruling in favour of Amazon in dispute with Future Retail","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0Supreme Court: Holding that an award passed by Emergency Arbitrator is enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a Division Bench of R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ. has ruled in favour of Amazon in the infamous Future-Amazon dispute. It has been held that the interim award in favour\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=365080"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/365080\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/365086"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=365080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=365080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=365080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}