{"id":364899,"date":"2025-10-28T09:00:18","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T03:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=364899"},"modified":"2025-10-28T09:42:16","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T04:12:16","slug":"gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/","title":{"rendered":"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &#038; Chemical&#8217;s shares"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (GST)<\/span>: In an appeal filed by Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemicals Ltd. (GNFC) against the ruling of the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) denying input tax credit (ITC) on expenses incurred for buyback of shares, the Two-Member Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Rajeev Topno, Member (SGST)<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">*<\/span><\/span> and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sunil Kumar Mall, Member (CGST)<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">*<\/span><\/span> rejected the appeal, holding that since buyback of shares constitutes a transaction in securities, which is neither a supply of goods nor of services under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (CGST Act), no ITC can be availed on such expenditure and reversal of common input credit is mandatory under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534751\" target=\"_blank\">17(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">GNFC, a Public Limited Company and State Public Sector Undertaking engaged in the manufacture of fertilizers and chemicals, initiated a share buyback programme in December 2023 pursuant to a Government of Gujarat Resolution dated 24-04-2023. During the course of the buyback, the company incurred various expenses and claimed that it was entitled to avail ITC on such expenditure, contending that the buyback activity was undertaken in the course or furtherance of business, being integral to its financial stability and long-term business objectives. The company contended that such indirect expenses, though not directly resulting in taxable outward supplies, nonetheless qualify as business-related and hence eligible for ITC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The GAAR, after admitting the application and granting a personal hearing, passed its advance ruling, holding that the applicant was not eligible to avail ITC on the expenditure incurred for buyback of shares and was also required to reverse ITC on common inputs and input services used for the said purpose. Aggrieved by this ruling, GNFC filed an appeal before the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (Appellate Authority) under Section 100 of the CGST Act and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000520296\" target=\"_blank\">Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (GGST Act).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the present appeal.<\/p>\n<h3>Issues and Analysis<\/h3>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Whether the expenditure incurred by the appellant, a listed entity, for the buyback of its own shares in the course or furtherance of business is eligible for ITC under the Goods and Service Tax (GST) regime?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Appellate Authority observed that shares are &#8220;securities&#8221; as defined in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558063\" target=\"_blank\">2(h)(i)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002768479\" target=\"_blank\">Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956<\/a>, and are therefore neither goods nor services under the CGST Act. Consequently, a transaction in securities does not amount to a supply under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534814\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a> and falls outside the scope of GST.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Referring to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534740\" target=\"_blank\">16(1)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a>, the Appellate Authority noted that ITC is admissible only on goods or services or both that are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business, subject to the restrictions laid down in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a>. It emphasized that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534751\" target=\"_blank\">17(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a> restricts ITC to taxable supplies and disallows credit on goods or services used for effecting exempt supplies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since transactions in securities are not supplies under GST, any tax paid on goods or services used for such transactions is not eligible for ITC. Further, Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534751\" target=\"_blank\">17(3)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a> includes transactions in securities in the value of exempt supplies, indicating a clear legislative intent to deny credit for expenses incurred in relation to such activities. The Appellate Authority also noted that the argument that all costs incurred in the furtherance of business are eligible for ITC is irrelevant when the activity itself is a non-taxable transaction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Appellate Authority held that the appellant was not entitled to ITC on expenditure incurred for buyback of shares.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Whether ITC reversal is required on common inputs and input services used in relation to buyback of shares.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Appellate Authority examined Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534751\" target=\"_blank\">17(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a> along with the Explanation at the end of Chapter V of the CGST Rules, which provides that for determining the value of exempt supply, the value of security shall be taken as one per cent of the sale value of such security.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On a conjoint reading of these provisions, the Appellate Authority held that the appellant&#8217;s claim that there was no requirement to reverse ITC on tax paid on common inputs and input services related to the buyback was not legally tenable, as the deeming fiction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002534751\" target=\"_blank\">17(3)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002896482\" target=\"_blank\">CGST Act<\/a> mandates inclusion of transactions in securities in the value of exempt supplies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Appellate Authority upheld the ruling of the GAAR and held that the appellant was not eligible to avail ITC involved in the expenditure incurred for buyback of shares and was required to reverse ITC on common inputs and input services used in relation thereto.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Appellate Authority rejected the present appeal.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner, State Tax, Gujarat, Advance Ruling (Appeal) No. GUJ\/GAAAR\/APPEAL\/2025\/17, decided on 22-09-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the appellant:<\/span> CA Rutvij Modi and CA Jenee Bhavsar<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the department:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Reaffirming the principle that transactions in securities fall outside the ambit of GST, the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that ITC on share buyback expenses is inadmissible and must be reversed under Section 17(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67535,"featured_media":364909,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[91489,30102,91496,91494,91490,45195,35487,6241,47253,91497,26374,91498,91491,91495,50301,91492,91493],"class_list":["post-364899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-appellate-authority-for-advance-ruling","tag-cgst-act","tag-common-input-services","tag-eligibility-of-itc","tag-gaaar-gujarat","tag-gaar","tag-goods-and-services-tax","tag-gst","tag-gujarat-authority-for-advance-ruling","tag-gujarat-narmada-valley-fertilizers-chemicals-ltd","tag-input-tax-credit","tag-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses","tag-itc-denial","tag-itc-reversal","tag-non-taxable-supply","tag-share-buyback","tag-transaction-in-securities"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Gujarat Appellate AAR on ITC claim on share buyback expenses | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld GAAR&#039;s decision denying Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemicals&#039; ITC claim on share buyback expenses.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemical&#039;s shares\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld GAAR&#039;s decision denying Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemicals&#039; ITC claim on share buyback expenses.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-28T03:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-28T04:12:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Adyasha Mohanty\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &amp; Chemical&#039;s shares\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Adyasha Mohanty\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/\",\"name\":\"Gujarat Appellate AAR on ITC claim on share buyback expenses | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-28T03:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-28T04:12:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78c465cbeb48da1692e320122fae5166\"},\"description\":\"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld GAAR's decision denying Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals' ITC claim on share buyback expenses.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"ITC claim on share buyback expenses\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &#038; Chemical&#8217;s shares\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78c465cbeb48da1692e320122fae5166\",\"name\":\"Adyasha Mohanty\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2241c0ff179c6c25f2248d1ed6adcf2f0bbf5b0b50a0bbd0023918bd41238326?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2241c0ff179c6c25f2248d1ed6adcf2f0bbf5b0b50a0bbd0023918bd41238326?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Adyasha Mohanty\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/adyasha\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gujarat Appellate AAR on ITC claim on share buyback expenses | SCC Times","description":"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld GAAR's decision denying Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals' ITC claim on share buyback expenses.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemical's shares","og_description":"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld GAAR's decision denying Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals' ITC claim on share buyback expenses.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-28T03:30:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-28T04:12:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Adyasha Mohanty","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemical's shares","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Adyasha Mohanty","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/","name":"Gujarat Appellate AAR on ITC claim on share buyback expenses | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-28T03:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-28T04:12:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78c465cbeb48da1692e320122fae5166"},"description":"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld GAAR's decision denying Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals' ITC claim on share buyback expenses.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"ITC claim on share buyback expenses"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/28\/gujarat-appellate-aar-on-itc-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Inside Gujarat Appellate AAR order refusing Input Tax Credit claim on buyback expenditure of Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers &#038; Chemical&#8217;s shares"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/78c465cbeb48da1692e320122fae5166","name":"Adyasha Mohanty","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2241c0ff179c6c25f2248d1ed6adcf2f0bbf5b0b50a0bbd0023918bd41238326?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2241c0ff179c6c25f2248d1ed6adcf2f0bbf5b0b50a0bbd0023918bd41238326?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Adyasha Mohanty"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/adyasha\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ITC-claim-on-share-buyback-expenses.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":365598,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/tribunal-and-commissions-october-2025-roundup-rti-activist-murder-case-drishti-iasmisleading-ad-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":364899,"position":0},"title":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup October 2025| Murder of differently abled RTI activist; Jaipur Hospital Fire; Penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad &amp; More","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the key legal developments of October 2025, featuring the CCPA\u2019s order imposing Rs 5 Lakh penalty on Drishti IAS over misleading ad, CCI\u2019s abuse of dominance case against ICICI Securities NSE and BSE, NHRC on fire in Trauma centre ICU at SMS Hospital Jaipur and reported abduction and murder\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tribunals and Commissions October 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Tribunals-and-Commissions-October-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/12\/gujarat-appellate-for-advance-ruling-harmonised-system-of-nomenclature-gst-agricultural-machinery-customs-tariff-act-1975-farm-type-machinery-hsn-8436-tax-mechanical-equipment-legal-re\/","url_meta":{"origin":364899,"position":1},"title":"Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld the decision of AAR; classified agricultural hand operated drum under HSN 8436, liable to GST at 12% rate","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (Gujarat): In an appeal for determining the Harmonised System of Nomenclature code (HSN) and applicable tax on the appellant's product, the two-member bench of Milind Torawane and Vivek Ranjan upheld the decision of the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling that the appellant's product\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advance Rulings&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (Gujarat)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/21\/tamil-nadu-aar-rejects-auto-color-paints-itc-refund-adjustment-request\/","url_meta":{"origin":364899,"position":2},"title":"Read why AAR Tamil Nadu refused to admit Auto Color Paints\u2019 application for refund and Input Tax Credit adjustment over erroneous GST reporting","author":"Editor","date":"October 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, Auto Color Paints mistakenly reported purchase invoices as sales in GSTR-1 from 2017\u201418 to 2022\u201423, resulting in a loss of Input Tax Credit amounting to \u20b918.53 lakh. After the supplier refused adjustment, the applicant approached AAR, Tamil Nadu, seeking relief under Section 97 of the CGST\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advance Rulings&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Auto Color Paints&#8217; ITC refund","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Auto-Color-Paints8217-ITC-refund.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Auto-Color-Paints8217-ITC-refund.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Auto-Color-Paints8217-ITC-refund.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Auto-Color-Paints8217-ITC-refund.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275648,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/15\/gujarat-authority-for-advance-ruling-combined-wire-rope-goods-and-services-tax-central-tax-rate-income-tax-rate-fishing-vessel-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":364899,"position":3},"title":"Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling| \u2018Combined Wire Rope\u2019 not a part of the fishing vessel, thus, not eligible for GST at 5 percent","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling: In an application sought for advance ruling on the question that whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate of 5 percent under entry No. 252 of Schedule 1 of Notification No. 1\/2017 of Central Tax Rate and a corresponding notification issued by Gujarat\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advance Rulings&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/28\/composition-dealer-purchases-scrap-used-vehicles-from-centre-state-ut-or-local-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":364899,"position":4},"title":"If Composition Dealer purchases Scrap\/Used Vehicles from Centre, State, UT or Local authority, will dealer be liable to pay GST on RCM basis? Guj AAR explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling, GST: Addressing the matter with regard to purchase of scrap\/used vehicles by composition dealer from unregistered dealer, Division Bench of Sanjay Saxena and Arun Richard (Members) held that, in the said circumstance, no Reverse Charge Mechanism liability will be there. Applicant sought Advance Ruling on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advance Rulings&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/12\/gujarat-authority-for-advance-ruling-kirloskar-power-sprayer-harmonized-system-of-nomenclature-gst-central-board-of-indirect-taxes-and-customs-mechanical-sprayer-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":364899,"position":5},"title":"What is the HSN code and GST rate for a Mechanical Sprayer? Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling answers","author":"Editor","date":"October 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling: In an application sought for advance ruling on the question that, what is the Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) and Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate of Kirloskar power sprayer, the two-member bench Milind Kavatkar and Amit Kumar Mishra has ruled that the 8-digit HSN\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Advance Rulings&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Advance Rulings","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/aar\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67535"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=364899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364899\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/364909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=364899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=364899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=364899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}