{"id":364595,"date":"2025-10-23T18:00:22","date_gmt":"2025-10-23T12:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=364595"},"modified":"2025-10-31T10:54:20","modified_gmt":"2025-10-31T05:24:20","slug":"delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an appeal challenging dismissal of application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC in a suit for specific performance of an unregistered agreement to sell in which one of the clauses stipulated a refund of double the earnest money, Girish Kathpalia<\/span>, J., directed the respondents to not create third party interest in the subject property as till decision of the appeal, the subject property needs to be preserved.<\/p>\n

The present appeal arose out of a property dispute concerning the basement portion of property in Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi. The property was originally purchased by Dr. Nagrath and his wife, late Ms. Nagrath in 1968 and later redeveloped under a 2010 collaboration agreement, by which the owners were allotted the basement, ground floor, first floor, third floor with terrace, and part of the stilt area.<\/p>\n

After Ms. Nagrath’s death in 2012, her interest devolved upon Dr. Nagrath by virtue of a will. On 09-05-2023, Dr. Nagrath entered into an Agreement to Sell with the appellant for the sale of the entire basement (“suit property”) for a total consideration of ₹57,10,00-. An amount of ₹5,00,000 was paid as earnest money, and the sale deed was to be executed on or before 30-11-2023.<\/p>\n

The agreement contained two critical clauses: Clause 8, which permitted the buyer to either seek refund of double earnest money or to “get the sale affected in his\/her name through court of law” in case of seller’s default; and Clause 11, which bound the “legal heirs of both parties” to the terms of the contract.<\/p>\n

Before the sale could be executed, Dr. Nagrath passed away on 20-12-2023. His family advocate was informed on 23-12-2023 by a relative that an agreement to sell had been entered into between the deceased and a Chandigarh-based purchaser. Thereafter, the appellant remained in contact with the legal heirs, and at the request of respondent no. 1 (one of the heirs), his company prepared a valuation report dated 18-06-2024 for the property.<\/p>\n

However, without the appellant’s knowledge, respondent 1 alone executed another Agreement to Sell on 24-06-2024 in favour of respondent 4, covering both the basement and ground floor. Notably, that later agreement itself referred to the earlier 09-05-2023 agreement with Dr. Nagrath and shifted the risk of litigation and previous payments onto the new vendee.<\/p>\n

When the appellant discovered this, he issued a legal notice on 18-06-2025 to the legal heirs, calling upon them to honour the earlier agreement. Respondent 1 replied through counsel on 11-07-2025 denying the claim, while respondents 2 and 3, in their reply dated 05-07-2025, disclosed that they had not consented to the 24-06-2024 transaction and that disputes existed between the heirs.<\/p>\n

On 04-09-2025, the appellant filed a civil suit before the District Judge (South), Saket, seeking specific and mandatory injunctions to enforce the 09-05-2023 agreement, to restrain alienation, and to declare the 24-06-2024 agreement void.<\/p>\n

An application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC was filed for an ex parte ad-interim injunction to prevent third-party transfers. However, by order dated 06-09-2025, the trial court dismissed the injunction application, holding that an agreement to sell does not create any title or interest in the property and that since Clause 8 provided for refund of double earnest money, there was no irreparable loss. The Trial Court held that legal heirs of the deceased vendor were “third parties” vis-à-vis the agreement.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved, the appellant preferred first appeal before the Delhi High Court on grounds that Clause 11 expressly bound the heirs; that they had actual notice of the agreement; and that respondent 1’s conduct of obtaining a valuation and executing a subsequent sale acknowledging the earlier one was evidence of collusion. The appellant further submitted that the Trial Court failed to apply for the settled “triple test” for injunction as laid down in Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh<\/span>, (1992) 1 SCC 719<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It was argued that the Trial Court erred in treating monetary compensation as adequate relief because the property’s alienation would irreversibly frustrate the appellant’s right to specific performance. The appeal also highlighted that respondent 1 had not obtained probate of Dr. Nagrath’s will and, hence, had no authority to unilaterally sell the property.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, counsel for respondents 2 and 3 supported the appeal to the extent that respondent 1 had indeed acted unilaterally, entering multiple agreements without probate, and agreed that the subject property required protection.<\/p>\n

The Court held that by order dated 15-10-2025, issued notice in the appeal and granted interim protection to preserve the property.<\/p>\n

Taking note of the submissions that respondent no.1 was executing multiple sale agreements without probate, and that the 24-06-2024 agreement itself acknowledged the earlier contract with the appellant, the Court found a prima facie case for protection of the subject matter.<\/p>\n

The Court directed that:<\/p>\n

“Till the next date of hearing, the respondents shall not create any third-party interest in the subject property.”<\/p>\n

[Rajnish Bhardwaj v Renu Woodbridge, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6546<\/a>, decided on 15-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Ms. Amrita Sarkar, Advocate for appellant<\/p>\n

Mr. Swarnendu Chatterjee, Advocate for R2&3<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court noted that the subject property deserves preservation till the appeal is decided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":364596,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[91321,90855,91324,91117,72373,91319,81560,2943,91318,91322,91317,75635,75341,91323,91316,91320],"class_list":["post-364595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adinteriminjunction","tag-civilprocedurecode","tag-civilremedy","tag-contractlaw","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-immovableproperty","tag-indiancontractact","tag-injunction","tag-legalheirs","tag-lispendens","tag-order39","tag-propertydispute","tag-propertylaw","tag-realestatelitigation","tag-specificperformance","tag-thirdpartyrights"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC restrains third-party rights in property dispute| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court bars creation of third-party rights over disputed property, holding that the subject matter must be preserved pending adjudication.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court bars creation of third-party rights over disputed property, holding that the subject matter must be preserved pending adjudication.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-23T12:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-31T05:24:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC restrains third-party rights in property dispute| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-23T12:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-31T05:24:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court bars creation of third-party rights over disputed property, holding that the subject matter must be preserved pending adjudication.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"third-party rights in property dispute\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC restrains third-party rights in property dispute| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court bars creation of third-party rights over disputed property, holding that the subject matter must be preserved pending adjudication.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication","og_description":"Delhi High Court bars creation of third-party rights over disputed property, holding that the subject matter must be preserved pending adjudication.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-23T12:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-31T05:24:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/","name":"Delhi HC restrains third-party rights in property dispute| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-23T12:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-31T05:24:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court bars creation of third-party rights over disputed property, holding that the subject matter must be preserved pending adjudication.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"third-party rights in property dispute"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/23\/delhi-hc-third-party-rights-property-injunction-2025\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court restrains creation of third-party rights in property dispute; holds that subject property must be preserved pending adjudication"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/third-party-rights-in-property-dispute.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":263438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/issue-of-accommodation-in-a-domestic-violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":364595,"position":0},"title":"Issue of accommodation in a Domestic Violence dispute between husband and wife shall not affect landlord’s right to get possession of his property: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Refusing to interfere with the Delhi High Court verdict, the bench of MR Shah and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that in a dispute between the husband and wife under the Domestic Violence Act, the landlord, who otherwise is entitled to the decree of eviction should not be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":47531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/17\/appeal-against-decree-in-partition-suit-languishing-for-30-years-heard-by-75-judges-termed-unfortunate\/","url_meta":{"origin":364595,"position":1},"title":"Appeal against decree in partition suit languishing for 30 years, heard by 75 Judges, termed unfortunate","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0 Disposing of an appeal filed in 1985 against a judgment and decree in a partition suit, the Court observed that, \u201cIt is really very unfortunate that this appeal has remained pending on the Board of this Court for almost 30 years and has to pass through hands\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6411,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/18\/property-details-investments-and-assets-can-be-accessed-by-one-s-spouse-under-rti\/","url_meta":{"origin":364595,"position":2},"title":"Property details, investments and assets can be accessed by one\u2019s spouse under RTI","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 18, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC):\u00a0\u201cThough certain documents like annual returns of assets, investments, IT returns etc were earlier declared as private\/ personal or third party information, as far as spouses are concerned they are not private or personal or third party information between them, in the context of marital disputes especially\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290977,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/29\/delhi-high-court-doctrine-of-lis-pendens-a-discretionary-remedy-not-applicable-in-service-contracts-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":364595,"position":3},"title":"Whether Doctrine of lis pendens applicable on in-service contracts? Delhi High Court answers","author":"Aastha","date":"April 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act is an expression of the principle \u201cpending a litigation nothing new should be introduced\u201d. It provides that pendente lite, neither party to the litigation, in which any right to immovable property is in question, can alienate or otherwise deal with such property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":364595,"position":4},"title":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: B.M. Shyam Prasad, J., held that there cannot be a complete adjudication of the petitioner\u2019s rights unless the third parties are also heard. In the present matter, the petitioner was a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 and first respondent was a company registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357903,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/26\/no-right-to-residence-after-divorce-section-17-dv-act-matrimonial-home-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":364595,"position":5},"title":"Right to Residence under Domestic Violence Act ends upon divorce, unless a contrary statutory right persists : Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA plain reading of Section 17 DV Act confers upon every woman in a domestic relationship the right to reside in the shared household, irrespective of whether she has any right, title or beneficial interest in the same. However, it does not create a proprietary interest in the property and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Right to residence after divorce","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-to-residence-after-divorce.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-to-residence-after-divorce.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-to-residence-after-divorce.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Right-to-residence-after-divorce.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=364595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364595\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/364596"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=364595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=364595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=364595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}