{"id":364479,"date":"2025-10-22T17:00:42","date_gmt":"2025-10-22T11:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=364479"},"modified":"2025-10-28T15:55:12","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T10:25:12","slug":"notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/","title":{"rendered":"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In a special leave petition filed against the judgment and order passed by Calcutta High Court, the division bench of Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. stayed the effect and operation of the following:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Order dated 21-08-2025<\/span>: Passed by the Calcutta High Court, which held that notice to UBS Switzerland AG, a foreign entity, via diplomatic channels under Section 105<\/a> of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) in a Criminal Revision Petition is not mandatory.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Revision Petition Judgment dated 24-09-2025<\/span>: Passed by the Sessions Court, Alipore, proceeding to adjudicate the said Revision Petition ex parte against a foreign entity, despite a substantive challenge pending through an SLP filed before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Calcutta High Court, through its order had held that serving notice to UBS Switzerland AG via diplomatic channels under Section 105<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> was not mandatory in a criminal revision petition. Following this, the Alipore Sessions Court proceeded to adjudicate the matter ex parte against the foreign entity, despite the pendency of a substantive challenge before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

    The Court issued notice in the matter.<\/p>\n

    The Court took note of these developments and stayed the effect and operation of both orders. The bench observed that, until the SLP is finally decided, no further proceedings shall continue based on the impugned orders.<\/p>\n

    Furthermore, the Court recorded that the counsel appearing through caveat on behalf of respondent 6 accepted and waived formal notice. The Court granted four weeks’ time for the respondent to file a counter-affidavit, with the petitioner being allowed two weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter will be listed after the completion of the pleadings. Additionally, the Court directed that notices be sent to the unrepresented respondents.<\/p>\n

    [UBS Switzerland v. State of West Bengal, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2274<\/a>, decided on 17-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Sidhartha Aggarwal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Adv., Mr. Ankoosh Mehta, Adv., Ms. Aishwarya Gupta, Adv., Mr. Gunav Gujral, Adv., Mr. Karan Dhalla, Adv., Mr. Advait Shukla, Adv., Mr. Srinivas Chatti, Adv., Mr. Aakash Agarwal, Adv., M\/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, AOR<\/p>\n

    For Respondent(s):<\/span> Dr. Purvish Malkan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, AOR, Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Adv., Mrs. Susmita Mahala, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The Supreme Court’s direction ensures that UBS Switzerland AG will be protected from ex parte adjudication in Indian criminal proceedings. This safeguard will remain in place until the Court examines the issue of serving notice through diplomatic channels.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":364488,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[87767,29620,91233,91236,91232,45891,91235,87765,91234],"class_list":["post-364479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-calcutta-hc-order","tag-criminal-revision-petition","tag-diplomatic-channels","tag-foreign-entity-in-indian-law","tag-notice-to-foreign-entity","tag-section-105-crpc","tag-sessions-court-ex-parte-order","tag-supreme-court-stay","tag-ubs-switzerland-ag"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court Orders Against UBS Switzerland AG Regarding Notice via Diplomatic Channels | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court stayed Calcutta High Court and Sessions Court orders in case involving UBS Switzerland AG, ensuring no ex parte adjudication until diplomatic service issue is resolved under Section 105 CrPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court stayed Calcutta High Court and Sessions Court orders in case involving UBS Switzerland AG, ensuring no ex parte adjudication until diplomatic service issue is resolved under Section 105 CrPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-22T11:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-28T10:25:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court Orders Against UBS Switzerland AG Regarding Notice via Diplomatic Channels | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-22T11:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-28T10:25:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court stayed Calcutta High Court and Sessions Court orders in case involving UBS Switzerland AG, ensuring no ex parte adjudication until diplomatic service issue is resolved under Section 105 CrPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"UBS Switzerland AG\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court Orders Against UBS Switzerland AG Regarding Notice via Diplomatic Channels | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court stayed Calcutta High Court and Sessions Court orders in case involving UBS Switzerland AG, ensuring no ex parte adjudication until diplomatic service issue is resolved under Section 105 CrPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG","og_description":"Supreme Court stayed Calcutta High Court and Sessions Court orders in case involving UBS Switzerland AG, ensuring no ex parte adjudication until diplomatic service issue is resolved under Section 105 CrPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-22T11:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-28T10:25:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/","name":"Supreme Court Stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court Orders Against UBS Switzerland AG Regarding Notice via Diplomatic Channels | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-22T11:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-28T10:25:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Supreme Court stayed Calcutta High Court and Sessions Court orders in case involving UBS Switzerland AG, ensuring no ex parte adjudication until diplomatic service issue is resolved under Section 105 CrPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"UBS Switzerland AG"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/notice-foreign-entity-diplomatic-channels-s-105-crpc-supreme-court-stays-orders-ubs-switzerland-ag\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Notice to foreign entity via diplomatic channels under S. 105 CrPC| Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC and Sessions Court orders against UBS Switzerland AG"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/UBS-Switzerland-AG.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/wife-infertility-husband-mutual-divorce-fir-cruelty-calcutta-high-court-revision-petition-quash-fir-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":364479,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Infertility cannot be a ground for divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the revision petition filed for quashing of FIR and criminal proceeding against the petitioner\/husband, the Court held that prima facie case of a cognizable offence of cruelty can be make out against the petitioner\/husband therefore inherit power of High Court under S. 482 CrPC cannot be exercised.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-revision-seeking-cancellation-of-bail-in-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":364479,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision seeking cancellation of bail in assault case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticized the trial court for solely relying on party's submissions and not calling for injury report.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/07\/tri-hc-second-revision-petition-not-competent-in-view-of-s-3973-crpc-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":364479,"position":2},"title":"Tri HC | Second revision petition not competent in view of S. 397(3) CrPC, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0S. Talapatra, J., relying on the Supreme Court decision in\u00a0Azghar Khan v. State of U.P.,\u00a01981 Supp SCC 78, dismissed a criminal revision petition filed against the order of Additional Sessions Judge. Genesis of the grievance was noted in a complaint filed by\u00a0petitioner alleging that respondent\u00a0stole the cheque in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":296459,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/wb-teacher-recruitment-scam-sc-refuses-interfere-calcutta-hc-order-abhishek-banerjee\/","url_meta":{"origin":364479,"position":3},"title":"WB Teacher Recruitment Scam: SC refuses to interfere with Calcutta HC order allowing CBI and ED to interrogate TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"On April 28, the Supreme Court sat to pass a stay order on Calcutta High Court's Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay's order directing SC's Secretary General to produce the transcript of his \u201ccontroversial\u201d interview, wherein he had made remarks against Abhishek Banerjee in relation to the Teachers Recruitment Scam case, which was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"abhishek banerjee","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/abhishek-banerjee.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/abhishek-banerjee.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/abhishek-banerjee.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/abhishek-banerjee.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224799,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/31\/del-hc-ss-143-147-ni-act-lay-down-special-code-for-trial-recourse-to-s-482-crpc-as-a-substitute-for-initiating-second-revision-petition-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":364479,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Ss. 143-147 NI Act lay down Special Code for trial, recourse to S. 482 CrPC as a substitute for initiating second revision petition denied","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., dismissed a petition filed against the order of the Sessions Court whereby it had dismissed the review petition filed by the petitioners against the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate taking cognizance of offences under Section 138 and Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":312019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/23\/no-conviction-solely-based-on-accuseds-statements-under-section-313-of-crpc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":364479,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No conviction solely based on accused\u2019s statements under Section 313 of CrPC\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the impugned notice has not been produced before the Court, thus not proved, the case's foundation is wrong and thus not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=364479"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364479\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/364488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=364479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=364479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=364479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}