{"id":364446,"date":"2025-10-22T13:00:47","date_gmt":"2025-10-22T07:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=364446"},"modified":"2025-10-27T15:16:13","modified_gmt":"2025-10-27T09:46:13","slug":"orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Orissa High Court:<\/span> In the present revision petition, the petitioner challenged an order passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sonepur, which had dropped the execution proceedings arising from a money decree due to procedural defects in the execution application. The petitioner argued that the Trial Court failed to provide him an opportunity to rectify those technical shortcomings and, therefore, sought to have the order set aside.<\/p>\n

A Single Judge Bench of Ananda Chandra Behera, J.<\/span>, observed that the doctrine of res judicata was not applicable to execution proceedings. Thus, the Court while allowing the petition and setting aside the order, held that the Trial Court had passed the order without giving the petitioner an opportunity to supply the required particulars of the properties indicated in the execution application, in compliance with the provisions of Order 21, Rule 11(2)<\/a> and Appendix (E) No. 6 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’). In view of this procedural lapse, the Court held that the order could not be sustained in law.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

The case arose from execution proceedings that were initiated pursuant to a decree passed in a money suit. The petitioner, acting as the Decree Holder, filed a civil revision under Section 115 CPC, challenging the order dated 27-09-2024 issued by the Civil Judge (Senior Division). By the said order, the Trial Court dropped the execution proceedings on the ground that the execution petition was not executable.<\/p>\n

The petitioner failed to specify the exact amount to be recovered from the Judgment Debtors, did not furnish valuation details of two Government vehicles, and omitted the valuation of immovable properties listed in the schedule. These deficiencies, coupled with other technical shortcomings, formed the basis for the Trial Court’s decision to terminate the execution process.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n

The Court observed that it was a fundamental principle in civil law that the doctrine of res judicata was not applicable to execution proceedings. The Court emphasised that when an order was passed to drop execution proceedings on technical grounds, the Judgment Debtor was not precluded under law from filing a fresh application for execution, provided correct particulars were furnished to make the execution petition executable.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that execution proceedings were governed by Order 21 CPC, which contained 106 rules and constituted a self-contained and independent framework. Therefore, the Decree Holder was not debarred from obtaining the fruits of the decree merely due to technical defects in the execution application, such as non-furnishing of particulars of movable and immovable properties. As per law, the Court was required to provide an opportunity to the Decree Holder to supply the necessary particulars in order to rectify such defects.<\/p>\n

Importantly, the Court noted that the Trial Court passed the order without providing any opportunity to the petitioner to supply the required particulars of the properties indicated in the execution application, in compliance with the provisions of Order 21, Rule 11(2) and Appendix (E) No. 6 CPC. In view of the procedural lapse, the Court held that the order could not be sustained in law. Consequently, the Court found no justification under law to disallow the revision filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court, therefore, allowed the revision petition and set aside the order dated 27-09-2024. The Execution Case was remitted back to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), with a direction to provide the petitioner an opportunity to furnish the correct particulars relating to the mode of execution in accordance with the provisions of Order 21 Rule 11(2) and Appendix E No.6 CPC.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the Court directed both parties to appear before the Trial Court on 22-10-2025 to receive further directions regarding the continuation of the execution proceedings.<\/p>\n

[Santosh Patra v. State of Orissa, 2025 SCC OnLine Ori 3769<\/a>, decided on 09-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Budhiram Das, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Opposite Parties:<\/span> G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In case of passing an order to drop the execution proceedings on the ground of any technicality, the Judgment Debtor is not precluded under law to file a fresh application for execution providing correct particulars for making the execution petition executable.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":364449,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[91205,91206,78825,91204,91208,40963,37146,44097,5353,91209,91207,34292],"class_list":["post-364446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-execution-decree-defect","tag-execution-stay","tag-fair-opportunity","tag-justice-ananda-chandra-behera","tag-mode-of-execution","tag-order-21-cpc","tag-orissa-high-court","tag-procedural-lapse","tag-res-judicata","tag-res-judicata-not-applicable-to-order-21cpc","tag-rule-112-cpc","tag-technical-defect"],"yoast_head":"\nOrissa HC: Res Judicata not applicable to Order 21CPC|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Orissa High Court held that technical defects in an execution petition cannot defeat a decree, reaffirming that Res Judicata is not applicable to Order 21CPC as it is a self-contained code.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court held that technical defects in an execution petition cannot defeat a decree, reaffirming that Res Judicata is not applicable to Order 21CPC as it is a self-contained code.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-22T07:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-27T09:46:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/\",\"name\":\"Orissa HC: Res Judicata not applicable to Order 21CPC|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-22T07:30:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-27T09:46:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Orissa High Court held that technical defects in an execution petition cannot defeat a decree, reaffirming that Res Judicata is not applicable to Order 21CPC as it is a self-contained code.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Res Judicata not applicable to Order 21CPC\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Orissa HC: Res Judicata not applicable to Order 21CPC|SCC Times","description":"Orissa High Court held that technical defects in an execution petition cannot defeat a decree, reaffirming that Res Judicata is not applicable to Order 21CPC as it is a self-contained code.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle","og_description":"Orissa High Court held that technical defects in an execution petition cannot defeat a decree, reaffirming that Res Judicata is not applicable to Order 21CPC as it is a self-contained code.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-22T07:30:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-27T09:46:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/","name":"Orissa HC: Res Judicata not applicable to Order 21CPC|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-22T07:30:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-27T09:46:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Orissa High Court held that technical defects in an execution petition cannot defeat a decree, reaffirming that Res Judicata is not applicable to Order 21CPC as it is a self-contained code.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Res Judicata not applicable to Order 21CPC"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/orissa-hc-res-judicata-not-appliable-to-order-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Orissa HC: Technical defects cannot defeat decree execution; Order 21 CPC excludes Res Judicata principle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Res-Judicata-not-applicable-to-Order-21CPC.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/half-a-century-old-litigation-we-wish-it-is-the-knock-out-round-sc-holds-objections-cant-be-raised-in-instalments-res-judicata-applicable-on-execution-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":364446,"position":0},"title":"‘Half a century old litigation, we wish it is the knock out round!’ SC holds objections can\u2019t be raised in instalments; Res judicata applicable on execution proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"...the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/ori-hc-order-21-rule-29-cpc-cannot-come-to-the-rescue-unless-sufficient-cause-is-shown-to-stay-the-execution-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":364446,"position":1},"title":"Ori HC | Order 21 Rule 29 CPC cannot come to the rescue unless sufficient cause is shown to stay the execution case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the petition filed against the order which rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 29 CPC to stay the further proceeding in an execution case till the disposal of another civil suit.\u00a0 The facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":290829,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/28\/explained-supreme-court-verdict-on-application-of-principle-of-res-judicata-and-other-cpc-provisions-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":364446,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court judgment on application of principle of Res Judicata and other CPC provisions","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that before examining the defendants\u2019 ground of res judicata to oppose the eviction petition, several aspects may have to be looked into, like whether such an issue was substantively at issue in the previous suit and similar such other questions may crop up.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"latest judgement of supreme court on res judicata","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/10\/conundrum-of-res-judicata-and-rejection-of-plaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":364446,"position":3},"title":"Conundrum of res judicata and rejection of plaint: SC summarises guiding principles for deciding an application under Or. 7 R. 11(d) CPC\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. upheld the order of the Karnataka High Court whereby an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC (Rejection of plaint) filed by the appellant was dismissed.\u00a0 While deciding the appeal, the Supreme Court summarised the guiding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/28\/calcutta-high-court-affirms-dismissal-of-order-7-rule-11-application-on-non-demonstration-of-grounds-of-rejection-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":364446,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Incidental or non-essential observations do not constitute res judicata\u2019; Calcutta High Court affirms dismissal of Order 7 Rule 11 application","author":"Ritu","date":"December 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the mere dismissal of the first suit does not automatically render the second suit barred by res judicata.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/05\/exercise-of-power-involving-application-under-or-1-r-10-of-cpc-is-completely-different-from-exercise-of-power-under-or-21-rules-97-99-101-of-cpc-orissa-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":364446,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Exercise of power involving Application under Or. 1 R. 10 of CPC is completely different from Exercise of Power under Or. 21 Rules 97, 99 & 101 of CPC; Scope of latter is much wider","author":"Editor","date":"May 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Biswanath Rath, J., rejected the application being devoid of merits. The instant C.M.P. involves allowing an Application being moved by a third party in an Execution Proceeding taking resort to the provision under Order 21 Rules 97, 99 & 101 of Civil procedure code i.e. CPC after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=364446"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364446\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/364449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=364446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=364446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=364446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}