{"id":364429,"date":"2025-10-22T10:00:22","date_gmt":"2025-10-22T04:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=364429"},"modified":"2025-10-27T15:21:18","modified_gmt":"2025-10-27T09:51:18","slug":"civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the petitioner to recall respondent for cross-examination by challenging the order passed by the Trial Court, whereby his application under Order 13 Rule 17 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;) in the suit for recovery of loan amount, was dismissed, a Single Judge Bench of Girish Kathpalia, J., held that it was high time that paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled that civil suits can be allowed to run for decades. Accordingly, the Court upheld the impugned order and dismissed the petitioner&#8217;s application.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the petitioner&#8217;s counsel had repeatedly sought adjournment on various grounds. In November 2024, he sought so that he had met with an accident which was allowed by the Trial court. Further, in February 2025, he again quested for the same citing that the lawyers were on strike, so he did not appear, and the matter thus got adjourned. On the next date in June 2025, he requested a proxy counsel to seek pass over. However, the Trial Court closed the cross-examination of the respondent and posted the matter on a further date. He again did not appear on the date concerned, so the right to lead his evidence was closed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner&#8217;s counsel contended that in June 2025, a proxy counsel appeared on his behalf to seek pass-over which was denied and requested that he had a good case on merits, so another opportunity should be granted to him. Per contra, the respondent strongly objected to it and argued that eleven adjournments were taken with the sole aim of delaying the suit proceedings.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it was repeatedly held by the Supreme Court as well as all High Courts across the country that strike by lawyers was not a justified ground for defaults as the Courts were never on strike. Further, the Court emphasized that the judicial record is sacrosanct, and it clearly stated that nobody appeared as proxy of petitioner&#8217;s counsel in June 2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court specified that if proceedings were not correctly recorded in the order sheet, the party concerned should immediately move the same Court for rectification, failing which the party concerned could not be allowed later to challenge correctness of its contents. The Court, thus, stated that the petitioner never approached the Trial court, seeking rectification of order passed in June 2025 to the effect that a proxy counsel on behalf of petitioner had appeared and had requested for passover, which was declined. Further, upon pursuing the said records, the Court noted that in June 2025, the default was not just for appearance on behalf of the petitioner but also with regards to the failure to pay cost for which there was no explanation given. The Court further highlighted that in September 2025, the petitioner&#8217;s counsel sought adjournment on the ground of illness. Thus, the matter was listed for final hearing in October 2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the above showed blatant and deliberate design on the part of petitioner to continue to protract the Trial Court proceedings, which was with the obvious aim to frustrate the respondent into giving up the litigation. Further, the Court opined that where a party not just defaults in appearing but also contumaciously defies clearing the cost, consequences stipulated under Section 35-B of the CPC, the defaulting party must be stopped from participating further in the proceedings, as settled by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that it was time that paradigms be changed by Courts, and an impression across the society be dispelled that civil suits can be allowed to run for decades. Therefore, the Court dismissed the application by upholding the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sohn Singh v. Dildar Singh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ptcnIKRZ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 6490<\/a>, decided on 15-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Amrik Singh, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Deepak Mittal, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It shows blatant and deliberate design on the part of petitioner to continue to protract the trial court proceedings, which is with the obvious aim to frustrate the respondent into giving up the lis.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":364432,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[91198,2543,56088,69313,50450,91199],"class_list":["post-364429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cpc-1908","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-finality-of-litigation","tag-justice-girish-kathpalia","tag-prolonged-litigation","tag-section-35b-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Civil suits cannot run for decades: Del HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that civil suits cannot run for decades, and it was high time that this paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that civil suits cannot run for decades, and it was high time that this paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-22T04:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-27T09:51:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Civil suits cannot run for decades: Del HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-22T04:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-27T09:51:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that civil suits cannot run for decades, and it was high time that this paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"civil suits cannot run for decades\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Civil suits cannot run for decades: Del HC | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that civil suits cannot run for decades, and it was high time that this paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that civil suits cannot run for decades, and it was high time that this paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-22T04:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-27T09:51:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/","name":"Civil suits cannot run for decades: Del HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-22T04:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-27T09:51:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that civil suits cannot run for decades, and it was high time that this paradigm be changed by Courts and an impression across the society be dispelled.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"civil suits cannot run for decades"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/22\/civil-suits-not-to-run-for-decades-del-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High time to shift paradigm that civil suits can run for decades: Delhi High Court upholds dismissal of civil suit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/civil-suits-cannot-run-for-decades.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/delhi-hc-power-transfer-proceedings-between-high-courts-is-exclusively-vested-in-the-sc-u-s25-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":364429,"position":0},"title":"Power to transfer proceedings between High Courts u\/s 25 of CPC is exclusively vested in Supreme Court: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Delhi High Court cannot exercise power to transfer proceedings between two separate High Courts as the said power of transfer between two High Courts, can be exercised in terms of Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, by only the Supreme Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":99321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/04\/court-clarifies-order-xiii-a-of-code-of-civil-procedure-1908\/","url_meta":{"origin":364429,"position":1},"title":"Court clarifies Order XIII-A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908","author":"Saba","date":"February 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Divisional Bench of Badar Durez and Ashutosh Kumar, JJ. while disposing of an appeal gave relief to party whose suit was dismissed at the admission stage \u00a0by invoking the provisions of Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It was held by the Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":296879,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":364429,"position":2},"title":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"If plaint filed in different courts are read juxtaposing each other it cannot be concluded that similar and identical issues are involved in both the cases.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/27\/application-for-discovery-of-documents-under-order-xi-rule-12-of-cpc-filed-after-the-stage-of-settlement-of-issues-is-non-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":364429,"position":3},"title":"Application for discovery of documents under Order XI Rule 12 of CPC filed after the stage of settlement of issues is non-maintainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of Chandrashekhar, J. dismissed a civil writ petition filed against the order of trial court dismissing petitioner\u2019s application for discovery of documents. In the present case, the petitioner was the defendant in suit in trial court; where he had filed an application\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/28\/parties-to-a-suit-must-stand-on-their-own-legs-and-it-is-the-primary-responsibility-of-the-party-taking-a-specific-stand-to-prove-his-stand-by-leading-evidence-oral-as-well-as-documentary\/","url_meta":{"origin":364429,"position":4},"title":"Parties to a suit must stand on their own legs and prove their specific stand","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application for a direction upon the respondent to produce a copy of the letter dated 04-07-2009 has been rejected. The main issue that arose\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299744,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/delhi-hc-directs-family-court-judges-to-judiciously-use-legal-provisions-expeditious-disposal-petitions\/","url_meta":{"origin":364429,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Family Court Judges to judiciously use the legal provisions for expeditious disposal of petitions","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cScrupulous adherence to Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 can curtail litigation like the present one, which aside from clogging the litigation also keeps the parties embroiled in litigation with a false hope of some relief.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=364429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/364429\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/364432"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=364429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=364429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=364429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}