{"id":363797,"date":"2025-10-15T09:30:48","date_gmt":"2025-10-15T04:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=363797"},"modified":"2025-10-20T09:39:29","modified_gmt":"2025-10-20T04:09:29","slug":"legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property&#8217;s mutation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> The present petition was filed by the petitioner seeking mutation of his allotted share in the property, based on a registered partition deed executed among the parties, as the Tehsildar had refused to grant the request stating one of the legal heirs (&#8216;excluded sharer&#8217;) was absent from the partition deed. A Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">C. Jayachandran<\/span>, J., while allowing the petition, directed the Tehsildar to effect mutation in respect of the property allotted to the petitioner&#8217;s share, holding that the absence of one legal heir from the partition deed was not a valid ground for refusing mutation.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A partition deed was signed among the parties, on the strength of which, the petitioner sought the mutation of the property allotted to his share. The Tehsildar refused the request stating that one among the legal heirs was left out in the partition deed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner&#8217;s counsel submitted that the excluded sharer was estranged from the family, and he did not join the partition deed, yet a property was earmarked to his share via the same deed. He contended that the non-joining of one of the parties could not be a matter which could be taken stock of by the Tehsildar to refuse the mutation, especially when a property was already earmarked to the excluded sharer. He submitted that refusing mutation was not the remedy, and if the excluded sharer was aggrieved by his exclusion in the execution of the partition deed, he could take appropriate action as per law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the respondents&#8217; counsel submitted that although the excluded sharer had filed an objection to the mutation sought by the petitioner, he did not turn up before the Tehsildar, despite issuance of notice on three occasions. He further submitted that it was based on the complaint preferred by the excluded sharer that the mutation was refused.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the excluded sharer did not make a representation before the Court even after being impleaded as an additional respondent. The Court opined that if the excluded sharer had any grievance, it was for him to take appropriate actions which included either to get the partition deed set aside or to seek such other remedies. If no such action was taken, it was not for the mutating authority to safeguard the interests of the excluded sharer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner sought mutation only in respect of his allotted share and that a share was earmarked to the excluded sharer as well, even though the same might not preclude the rights of the excluded sharer to challenge the partnership deed. The Court observed that mutation could not be refused merely on the ground that one among the parties had not joined the partition deed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court allowed the petition and directed the Tehsildar to expeditiously effect the mutation in respect of the petitioner&#8217;s share in the property within a period of one month.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rajendran Ashari R. v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3RXqWVoZ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Ker 10189<\/a>, decided on 07-10-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Raj Carolin V., Advocate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Deepa Narayanan, Sr. Government Pleader.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;A share was earmarked to the excluded sharer as well, even though the same might not preclude the rights of the excluded sharer to challenge the partnership deed.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":363806,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[90865,90864,90861,2523,32017,62049,90863,90862],"class_list":["post-363797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-absence-of-legal-heir","tag-excluded-sharer","tag-justice-c-jayachandran","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-mutation","tag-mutation-of-property","tag-non-joining-of-parties","tag-registered-partition-deed"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Legal heir&#039;s absence no ground to refuse mutation of property: Ker HC|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court stated that legal heir&#039;s absence is no ground to refuse mutation of property and directed Tehsildar to effect mutation of petitioner&#039;s property.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property&#039;s mutation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court stated that legal heir&#039;s absence is no ground to refuse mutation of property and directed Tehsildar to effect mutation of petitioner&#039;s property.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-15T04:00:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-20T04:09:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property&#039;s mutation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property: Ker HC|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-15T04:00:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-20T04:09:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court stated that legal heir's absence is no ground to refuse mutation of property and directed Tehsildar to effect mutation of petitioner's property.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property&#8217;s mutation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property: Ker HC|SCC Times","description":"Kerala High Court stated that legal heir's absence is no ground to refuse mutation of property and directed Tehsildar to effect mutation of petitioner's property.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property's mutation","og_description":"Kerala High Court stated that legal heir's absence is no ground to refuse mutation of property and directed Tehsildar to effect mutation of petitioner's property.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-10-15T04:00:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-20T04:09:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property's mutation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","name":"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property: Ker HC|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp","datePublished":"2025-10-15T04:00:48+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-20T04:09:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Kerala High Court stated that legal heir's absence is no ground to refuse mutation of property and directed Tehsildar to effect mutation of petitioner's property.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property&#8217;s mutation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213466,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":363797,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J. Facts of the case were such that petitioners are daughters of respondent who had sold his property to other respondents. After the sale was concluded one of the respondent to whom the property was sold\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/25\/ker-hc-tahsildar-as-the-mutation-granting-authority-has-no-power-to-examine-vexed-issues-of-title\/","url_meta":{"origin":363797,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Tahsildar, as the mutation granting authority, has no power to examine vexed issues of title","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of Alexander Thomas, J. set aside an order passed by Tahsildar vide which petitioners\u2019 request for transfer of registry and mutation was rejected, holding the same to be ultra vires and illegal. Petitioners\u2019 herein were the donee of gift deeds executed by their respective mothers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/validity-of-registered-sale-deed-to-be-decided-only-by-civil-court-manipur-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":363797,"position":2},"title":"Validity of Registered Sale Deed to be decided only by Civil Court and not Revenue Court: Manipur HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"At the time of mutation proceedings, the competent authority must examine the manner of acquisition of the title.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"manipur high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/02\/partition-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":363797,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Daughters filed partition suit while disowning their registered release deed. As per S. 92 of Evidence Act, burden to adduce evidence sufficient to exclude written evidence will be on the daughters? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G. Jayachandran, J., the instant suit was filed with regard to the relief of partition and permanent injunction from alienating or encumbering the suit property. Instant suit was filed for partition by daughters of Late Palanisamy Gounder against his sons was dismissed by the trial court while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206368,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":363797,"position":4},"title":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of G. Narendar, J. hearing a civil writ petition set aside the order of revenue authority passed after 30 years, ruling that the said power was exercised after a lapse of a long time and hence was unreasonable. The present matter pertained\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":341840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/19\/tehsildar-cant-decide-mutation-applications-based-on-disputed-testamentary-documents-particularly-a-will-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":363797,"position":5},"title":"Tehsildar can\u2019t decide mutation applications based on disputed testamentary documents, particularly a Will: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRevenue Officers, including the Tehsildar, do not have judicial authority to resolve disputes related to wills or non-testamentary documents. These matters must be decided by the Civil Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=363797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363797\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/363806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=363797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=363797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=363797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}